<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for Bogusrabin</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/bogusrabin/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by Bogusrabin</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/bogusrabin/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 18:46:06 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 18:46:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Console: Toshiba Demonstrates Cell Microprocessor [Console: Toshiba Demonstrates Cell Microprocessor]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20050425/104149/"&gt;Story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nice ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/62787-Console-Toshiba-Demonstrates-Cell-Microprocessor/'&gt;Console: Toshiba Demonstrates Cell Microprocessor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/62787/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/62787-Console-Toshiba-Demonstrates-Cell-Microprocessor/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/62787-Console-Toshiba-Demonstrates-Cell-Microprocessor/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 18:46:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/62787-Console-Toshiba-Demonstrates-Cell-Microprocessor/</guid><evnet:views>4552</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/62787/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20050425/104149/"&gt;Story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nice ...&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bogusrabin</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/62787-Console-Toshiba-Demonstrates-Cell-Microprocessor/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/62787/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>An early peek at Longhorn [An early peek at Longhorn]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/An+early+peek+at+Longhorn/2100-1016_3-5671586.html?tag=nefd.lede"&gt;Story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thoughts?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"Longhorn will come in 32-bit and 64-bit versions, Allchin said."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just wonder does it work on my Duron 1GHz ... It would be great if MS
would tell some more detailed info about required hardware specs :-|&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56751-An-early-peek-at-Longhorn/'&gt;An early peek at Longhorn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/56751/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56751-An-early-peek-at-Longhorn/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56751-An-early-peek-at-Longhorn/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:22:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56751-An-early-peek-at-Longhorn/</guid><evnet:views>24109</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/56751/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/An+early+peek+at+Longhorn/2100-1016_3-5671586.html?tag=nefd.lede"&gt;Story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thoughts?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"Longhorn will come in 32-bit and 64-bit versions, Allchin said."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just wonder does it work on my Duron 1GHz ... It would be great if MS
would tell some more detailed info about required hardware specs &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-8.gif' alt='Expressionless' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bogusrabin</dc:creator><slash:comments>32</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56751-An-early-peek-at-Longhorn/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/56751/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Microsoft, Europeans argue over ruling [Microsoft, Europeans argue over ruling]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft%2C+Europeans+argue+over+ruling/2100-1014_3-5670226.html?tag=nefd.top"&gt;Story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thoughts ... ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56337-Microsoft-Europeans-argue-over-ruling/'&gt;Microsoft, Europeans argue over ruling&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/56337/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56337-Microsoft-Europeans-argue-over-ruling/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56337-Microsoft-Europeans-argue-over-ruling/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:21:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56337-Microsoft-Europeans-argue-over-ruling/</guid><evnet:views>3734</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/56337/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft%2C+Europeans+argue+over+ruling/2100-1014_3-5670226.html?tag=nefd.top"&gt;Story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thoughts ... ?&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bogusrabin</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/56337-Microsoft-Europeans-argue-over-ruling/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/56337/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Yahoo! News - &amp;quot;Longhorn Delayed Again - Who Wins?&amp;quot; [Yahoo! News - &amp;quot;Longhorn Delayed Again - Who Wins?&amp;quot;]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nf/20050405/bs_nf/32091"&gt;Story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;thoughts?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/54714-Yahoo-News-quotLonghorn-Delayed-Again-Who-Winsquot/'&gt;Yahoo! News - &amp;quot;Longhorn Delayed Again - Who Wins?&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/54714/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/54714-Yahoo-News-quotLonghorn-Delayed-Again-Who-Winsquot/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/54714-Yahoo-News-quotLonghorn-Delayed-Again-Who-Winsquot/</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:34:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/54714-Yahoo-News-quotLonghorn-Delayed-Again-Who-Winsquot/</guid><evnet:views>2841</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/54714/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nf/20050405/bs_nf/32091"&gt;Story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;thoughts?&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bogusrabin</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/54714-Yahoo-News-quotLonghorn-Delayed-Again-Who-Winsquot/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/54714/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>MS Office for Mac vs iWork '05 [MS Office for Mac vs iWork '05]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0412expo3.html"&gt;&lt;span class="text"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pretty interesting news/rumour ...&lt;br&gt;
Hopefully it uses open fileformats.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0412expo3.html"&gt;&lt;span class="text"&gt;Apple will launch its new iWork '05 productivity suite at Macworld Expo ...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/33146-MS-Office-for-Mac-vs-iWork-05/'&gt;MS Office for Mac vs iWork '05&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/33146/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/33146-MS-Office-for-Mac-vs-iWork-05/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/33146-MS-Office-for-Mac-vs-iWork-05/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:10:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/33146-MS-Office-for-Mac-vs-iWork-05/</guid><evnet:views>6633</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/33146/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0412expo3.html"&gt;&lt;span class="text"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pretty interesting news/rumour ...&lt;br&gt;
Hopefully it uses open fileformats.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0412expo3.html"&gt;&lt;span class="text"&gt;Apple will launch its new iWork '05 productivity suite at Macworld Expo ...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bogusrabin</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/33146-MS-Office-for-Mac-vs-iWork-05/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/33146/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Patent Office Rejects Microsoft's FAT Patent [Patent Office Rejects Microsoft's FAT Patent]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://pubpat.org/Microsoft_517_Rejected.htm"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Patent Office Rejects Microsoft'&lt;/span&gt;s&lt;span&gt; FAT Patent&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/23130-Patent-Office-Rejects-Microsofts-FAT-Patent/'&gt;Patent Office Rejects Microsoft's FAT Patent&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/23130/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/23130-Patent-Office-Rejects-Microsofts-FAT-Patent/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/23130-Patent-Office-Rejects-Microsofts-FAT-Patent/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:52:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/23130-Patent-Office-Rejects-Microsofts-FAT-Patent/</guid><evnet:views>6515</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/23130/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://pubpat.org/Microsoft_517_Rejected.htm"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Patent Office Rejects Microsoft'&lt;/span&gt;s&lt;span&gt; FAT Patent&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bogusrabin</dc:creator><slash:comments>22</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/23130-Patent-Office-Rejects-Microsofts-FAT-Patent/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/23130/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Mozilla, Opera Join Forces For New W3C Proposal [Mozilla, Opera Join Forces For New W3C Proposal]</title><description>"Hickson
predicts that if a backwards-compatible open-standards alternative
isn't created first, then 10 years from now the de facto Web
application standard will be Microsoft's Avalon and the .NET framework."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
:-(&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3361141"&gt;http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3361141&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8472-Mozilla-Opera-Join-Forces-For-New-W3C-Proposal/'&gt;Mozilla, Opera Join Forces For New W3C Proposal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/8472/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8472-Mozilla-Opera-Join-Forces-For-New-W3C-Proposal/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8472-Mozilla-Opera-Join-Forces-For-New-W3C-Proposal/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:13:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8472-Mozilla-Opera-Join-Forces-For-New-W3C-Proposal/</guid><evnet:views>3491</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/8472/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>"Hickson
predicts that if a backwards-compatible open-standards alternative
isn't created first, then 10 years from now the de facto Web
application standard will be Microsoft's Avalon and the .NET framework."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-6.gif' alt='Sad' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3361141"&gt;http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3361141&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bogusrabin</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8472-Mozilla-Opera-Join-Forces-For-New-W3C-Proposal/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/8472/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>&amp;quot;Average&amp;quot; Longhorn PC [&amp;quot;Average&amp;quot; Longhorn PC]</title><description>What do you think about this ... ?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"Microsoft is expected to recommend that the "average" Longhorn PC
feature a dual-core CPU running at 4 to 6GHz; a minimum of 2 gigs of
RAM; up to a terabyte of storage; a 1 Gbit, built-in, Ethernet-wired
port and an 802.11g wireless link; and a graphics processor that runs
three times faster than those on the market today." 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1581842,00.asp"&gt;http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1581842,00.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5782-quotAveragequot-Longhorn-PC/'&gt;&amp;quot;Average&amp;quot; Longhorn PC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/5782/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5782-quotAveragequot-Longhorn-PC/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5782-quotAveragequot-Longhorn-PC/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 20:56:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5782-quotAveragequot-Longhorn-PC/</guid><evnet:views>4486</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/5782/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>What do you think about this ... ?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"Microsoft is expected to recommend that the "average" Longhorn PC
feature a dual-core CPU running at 4 to 6GHz; a minimum of 2 gigs of
RAM; up to a terabyte of storage; a 1 Gbit, built-in, Ethernet-wired
port and an 802.11g wireless link; and a graphics processor that runs
three times faster than those on the market today." 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1581842,00.asp"&gt;http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1581842,00.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bogusrabin</dc:creator><slash:comments>13</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5782-quotAveragequot-Longhorn-PC/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/5782/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>