<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for BorekB</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/borekb/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by BorekB</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/borekb/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:51:18 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:51:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Does Microsoft care about IE's market share these days? [Does Microsoft care about IE's market share these days?]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in the 90's I sort of understand why it was important to have a significant market share for your browser (OK, I don't fully get why it was THAT important but OK...) Now, in 2009, the question is why would Microsoft care about IE's market share? Is there any difference for MS in having 50% or 90%? What are the "threats" of losing a market share? Does Microsoft care about the market share at all these days or is IE being updated just for the sake of security and convenience of users?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494096-Does-Microsoft-care-about-IEs-market-share-these-days/'&gt;Does Microsoft care about IE's market share these days?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/494096/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494096-Does-Microsoft-care-about-IEs-market-share-these-days/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494096-Does-Microsoft-care-about-IEs-market-share-these-days/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:51:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494096-Does-Microsoft-care-about-IEs-market-share-these-days/</guid><evnet:views>658</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/494096/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Back in the 90's I sort of understand why it was important to have a significant market share for your browser (OK, I don't fully get why it was THAT important but OK...) Now, in 2009, the question is why would Microsoft care about IE's market share? Is there any difference for MS in having 50% or&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>BorekB</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494096-Does-Microsoft-care-about-IEs-market-share-these-days/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/494096/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>