<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for BryanF</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/bryanf/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by BryanF</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/bryanf/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:06:11 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:06:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Apple, EMI offering DRM-clean music [Apple, EMI offering DRM-clean music]</title><description>&lt;A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17911460/"&gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17911460/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;[removed]&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253684-Apple-EMI-offering-DRM-clean-music/'&gt;Apple, EMI offering DRM-clean music&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/253684/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253684-Apple-EMI-offering-DRM-clean-music/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253684-Apple-EMI-offering-DRM-clean-music/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:28:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253684-Apple-EMI-offering-DRM-clean-music/</guid><evnet:views>5302</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/253684/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17911460/"&gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17911460/&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;I'm surprised there wasn't already a discussion when I got here. This is certainly a step in the right direction. &lt;strike&gt;I would have preferred MP3 to AAC, but I guess that's just nitpicking.&lt;/strike&gt; [EDIT: Some day I will take the time to learn to read...]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So... when can we expect Zune / everyone else&amp;nbsp;to follow? &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-4.gif' alt='Tongue Out' /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>BryanF</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253684-Apple-EMI-offering-DRM-clean-music/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/253684/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Gartner: Antitrust changes in Vista to take years [Gartner: Antitrust changes in Vista to take years]</title><description>Via &lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-6128157.html?part=rss&amp;amp;tag=6128157&amp;amp;subj=news"&gt;CNet&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I know the whole PatchGuard thing has probably been done to death here, but there's a passage in the article outrageous enough that it seemed reviving the topic:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div class="quoteAuthor"&gt;The Article wrote:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="quoteBody"&gt;"Our goal is to provide an initial set of documented, supported kernel interfaces in the Windows Vista SP1 (Service Pack 1) timeframe, recognizing that this will require collaboration from our industry partners," Ben Fathi, the outgoing corporate vice president of Microsoft’s Security Technology Unit said in a statement late Thursday.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Gartner expects SP1 to be released in early 2008 and predicts that more programming interfaces related to the kernel will be delivered with SP2 or later. All these changes could have a negative effect on Vista, MacDonald wrote.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"Any kernel changes may have a 'ripple effect' up the software stack and will require retesting of all of Windows Vista applications," he wrote.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;The last paragraph is the punchline.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I can't understand why anyone gives analysts money... :|&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/242444-Gartner-Antitrust-changes-in-Vista-to-take-years/'&gt;Gartner: Antitrust changes in Vista to take years&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/242444/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/242444-Gartner-Antitrust-changes-in-Vista-to-take-years/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/242444-Gartner-Antitrust-changes-in-Vista-to-take-years/</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:29:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/242444-Gartner-Antitrust-changes-in-Vista-to-take-years/</guid><evnet:views>2728</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/242444/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Via CNet.I know the whole PatchGuard thing has probably been done to death here, but there's a passage in the article outrageous enough that it seemed reviving the topic:The Article wrote:"Our goal is to provide an initial set of documented, supported kernel interfaces in the Windows Vista SP1 (Service Pack 1) timeframe, recognizing that this will require collaboration from our industry partners," Ben Fathi, the outgoing corporate vice president of Microsoft’s Security Technology Unit said in a statement late Thursday.Gartner expects SP1 to be released in early 2008 and predicts that more&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>BryanF</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/242444-Gartner-Antitrust-changes-in-Vista-to-take-years/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/242444/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>XNA Studio Express / Build Games for 360! [XNA Studio Express / Build Games for 360!]</title><description>Details &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/aug06/08-13XNAGameStudioPR.mspx"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Looking forward to the beta. I'm interested to see what the development platform looks like.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/220213-XNA-Studio-Express--Build-Games-for-360/'&gt;XNA Studio Express / Build Games for 360!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/220213/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/220213-XNA-Studio-Express--Build-Games-for-360/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/220213-XNA-Studio-Express--Build-Games-for-360/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:37:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/220213-XNA-Studio-Express--Build-Games-for-360/</guid><evnet:views>21706</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/220213/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Details &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/aug06/08-13XNAGameStudioPR.mspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Woohoo! &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-2.gif' alt='Big Smile' /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Looking forward to the beta. I'm interested to see what the development platform looks like.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>BryanF</dc:creator><slash:comments>34</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/220213-XNA-Studio-Express--Build-Games-for-360/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/220213/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>(Nevermind) [(Nevermind)]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;EDIT: Ignore this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212594-Nevermind/'&gt;(Nevermind)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/212594/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212594-Nevermind/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212594-Nevermind/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:03:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212594-Nevermind/</guid><evnet:views>3100</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/212594/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;EDIT: Ignore this.&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>BryanF</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212594-Nevermind/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/212594/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Live Clipboard [Live Clipboard]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;[Link to Ray Ozzie's blog on Live Clipboard now dead.]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/165114-Live-Clipboard/'&gt;Live Clipboard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/165114/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/165114-Live-Clipboard/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/165114-Live-Clipboard/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:21:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/165114-Live-Clipboard/</guid><evnet:views>7630</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/165114/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Read &lt;a href="http://spaces.msn.com/rayozzie/blog/cns!FB3017FBB9B2E142!285.entry"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With all the activity here today, I'm surprised nobody's mentioned this. For those of you that don't like to read, here's the summary: Today Ray Ozzie announced a new format and UI&amp;nbsp;convention for enabling structured content to be copied and pasted seemless amongst website and even desktop applications. The new format, LiveContacts, will be released under the same terms as the list extensions (i.e., Creative Commons -&amp;nbsp;ShareAlike).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>BryanF</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/165114-Live-Clipboard/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/165114/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Microsoft finally beats Google [Microsoft finally beats Google]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;[removed]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/161335-Microsoft-finally-beats-Google/'&gt;Microsoft finally beats Google&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/161335/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/161335-Microsoft-finally-beats-Google/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/161335-Microsoft-finally-beats-Google/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:55:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/161335-Microsoft-finally-beats-Google/</guid><evnet:views>10442</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/161335/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>...at least in terms of minimalism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was going to try a query on MSN Search and must of crossed a few neurons because instead I ended up typing this into the address bar:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://search.live.com"&gt;http://search.live.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Serendipity!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I guess this is the begining of Windows Live Search. Pretty nice interface--even back and forward working--but nothing special at this point. It'll be interesting to see where this goes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>BryanF</dc:creator><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/161335-Microsoft-finally-beats-Google/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/161335/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Holographic Storage [Holographic Storage]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/80850/holographic-discs-set-for-retail-next-year.html"&gt;http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/80850/holographic-discs-set-for-retail-next-year.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;This probably isn't news to many of you. What I'm interested in is what are your thoughts about this development with respect to the BluRay vs. HD-DVD p*ssing contest? Of course this article leaves a lot of questions unanswered, but supposedly this technology has a better GB/$ value than current optical disk technologies, so it's not too big of a stretch to assume that prices for drives and discs could be driven down to within the reach of non-commercial customers within a reasonable time frame--assuming a high enough volume. Is it even worth bothering with these "next-generation" DVD formats, or would it be better to simply endure the current technology until holographic storage starts to see momentum?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;(PS: Can anyone think of a better term for non-commercial customers than "consumers"? I hate that word...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137208-Holographic-Storage/'&gt;Holographic Storage&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/137208/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137208-Holographic-Storage/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137208-Holographic-Storage/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:01:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137208-Holographic-Storage/</guid><evnet:views>4315</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/137208/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/80850/holographic-discs-set-for-retail-next-year.htmlThis probably isn't news to many of you. What I'm interested in is what are your thoughts about this development with respect to the BluRay vs. HD-DVD p*ssing contest? Of course this article leaves a lot of questions unanswered, but supposedly this technology has a better GB/$ value than current optical disk technologies, so it's not too big of a stretch to assume that prices for drives and discs could be driven down to within the reach of non-commercial customers within a reasonable time frame--assuming a high&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>BryanF</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137208-Holographic-Storage/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/137208/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>