Loading User Information from Channel 9

Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9

Latest Achievement:

Loading User Information from MSDN

Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN

Visual Studio Achievements

Latest Achievement:

Loading Visual Studio Achievements

Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements


Craig Matthews Craig_​Matthews Good News, Everyone!

    "It's not pro- or anti-JavaScript; the language's flaws are discussed frankly, but its ultimate impact on the industry is tremendously positive."

    One of JavaScript's impacts on the industry is the hundreds of thousands of man hours wasted by technicians who don't know any better troubleshooting "Java" installations when users get "JavaScript" errors.


  • What Windows needs

    , bondsbw wrote


    The desktop in Windows 8 didn't change a whole lot since 7.  It even got a few lauded improvements, like the much improved file copy dialog and speed enhancements.

    Not that that matters, your argument is bogus anyway.  Windows has steadily been going toward a more useful desktop use case since Windows 8.  8.1 got the Start button, 8.1 update 1 got the taskbar and title bar everywhere (when using a mouse) and the taskbar shows Metro apps.  Windows Threshold should be bringing non-touch users an experience that is fully immersed within the desktop, including start menu and windowed Metro apps.

    It is undeniable that Microsoft has been going toward the desktop for every version after Windows 8.

    "Going toward the desktop." That's just the thing. They were already there. Windows 7's desktop is near perfect. Now if people want to say "Well, 8 was really a tablet OS", that's fine. But it was called Windows 8 and it was shipped on desktops. 

    Big deal, 8.1 got the "start button" -- when everyone knew full well and were flat out ignoring the fact that no one was asking for the stupid bitmap of the button to be put back. They wanted the Start Menu and its features. Yeah, that's "coming" in Windows 9. I bet $25, though, that all of my desktop apps will still be covered up by a full screen search result pane when I try to search for something off that start menu while I'm needing my context to reference.

    Taskbar and titlebars while in "metro" apps? Big deal. Those aren't improvements to the desktop, they are stupid things that don't belong on a touch interface. They don't help my desktop use because my desktop use does not entail running a full screen Facebook app on my 27" desktop display.

    There are things that Microsoft could have done to improve the desktop which they've needed to do for quite a long time. Mostly things that are broken.

    Libraries? Great. Oh, but I can't use them in an Enterprise really because they don't support DFS paths. Why don't they? Because Windows Search has a silly inability to understand DFS redirects, even though they've been part of Windows for 15 years. Hell, the "Windows Search" component on Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition flat out says in the description that it's "not for enterprise use"

    How about event viewer "more information" links that lead to 404's, wasting the time of my technicians? Or Excel files getting locked on the server preventing people from opening them in write mode because someone who doesn't even have the file open happens to have the file selected in Explorer

    The file copy dialog is great. That's really the only improvement I saw to the desktop when, in all honesty it should have been done around XP time. Maybe in Windows 9, they'll figure out how to get Event Viewer to populate a list in less than 45 seconds when it would have taken XP five. They've been too busy putting a tablet interface on my servers and LOB workstations.

    , BitFlipper wrote

    Why was it necessary to castrate the desktop in the way they did, and in the process possibly alienating their large and previously non-complaining user base? 

    When Windows 8 came out, if you only went by this place and the Building Windows 8 blog, you would swear people were rioting in the streets and ringing Ballmer's phone off the hook demanding the removal of the "close button" and "window chrome." All of a sudden, the desktop was this evil "legacy" thing (who needs to look at more than one application at once????), that people wanted to get rid of.

    No, I'm not fracking exaggerating.


  • Waiting for Windows 9 :-)

    , giovanni wrote

    ... (and a modern cmd box with better resizing and cut and paste!).

    FYI - https://code.google.com/p/conemu-maximus5/ is pretty nice, I use it all the time now.

  • What the hell is Microsoft doing to Skype?

    Appears functional on my Wifi only iPhone. Does that count?

  • KDE Plasma 5.0 released

    While I agree that Windows 8's biggest problem was marketing, there's a tablet UI on my server. Just sayin'.

  • Bill Gates’ energy views are a turn-off

    Stopped reading at 'left-wing'.

  • Do you use Linux?

    , Bass wrote

    I know this is a Microsoft forum, but I'm curious. Do you use Linux?

    • Professionally?
    • As a hobby?
    • Dual boot? Main OS?
    • What distro(s)?
    • What are your specific interests in Linux?

    Professionally: In the past, I've admin'd SUSE Enterprise Server and Redhat Enterprise for mapping/GIS services (ESRI ArcGIS products) - before Google Maps and when Google Earth was known as "Keyhole." Also CentOS for infrastructure (DNS, sendmail, squid).

    Professionally nowadays, I work in a Windows shop and the only Linux we have is the console instance in our VMware infrastructure which is all Windows servers/Windows VDI. We're moving to Hyper-V so that Linux console will be going away.

    Hobby: Not as such. More half hobby/half infrastructure at my house. I have three CentOS virtual machines, one is my Plex media server/DLNA server, one is a Nagios Core box for host & service monitoring/alerts, and one is a tinker box which, to be quite honest, I use mainly to do 'whois' or 'dig' queries. 

    Dual Boot/Main OS: Since the advent of virtualization on x86/x64 platforms, I've never seen a good reason to dual boot. All of my Linux machines are the main OS in the VMs I have set up. All my physical machines are Windows.

    Distros: SUSE, RHEL, and CentOS in the past professionally, the console in VMware at work, and CentOS at home. My virtual router is the Vyatta distribution. I have a couple Roku boxes, a WD Live, and an STB  from Verizon -- they might be running Linux for all I know, but I couldn't care less, so I'm not sure. I do believe, however, that the WD Live runs Linux --- I can tell because it pukes and acts stupid if any DFS paths are involved with the media sources. I've owned a couple Android phones in the past. I tried ChromeOS on one of my netbooks, but I couldn't really figure out what the point of this distribution was, unless I was in the business of selling notebooks with no capabilities.

    Specific Interests in Linux: I have none. It, like Windows, is a means to an end. My media server is Linux because I don't want to allocate all of the RAM and license money necessary for a Windows server to do this one thing. I run my network monitoring on Linux because I'm familiar with Nagios.

  • triple your battery life with sand

    If we were to go by all of the new stuff being posted about for the last few years, we should, by now, have 6 separate cures for cancer, warp drive, have eliminated Alzheimer's, and batteries with endless power. Can't wait for the next breakthrough.

  • Win Phone 8.1 beef.

    , kettch wrote

    @Craig_Matthews: I understand not wanting to lock the OS into supporting those features. There were some problems when Twitter or Facebook changed the API, and they had to roll out an OS update. However, they should have come up with some kind of plug-in model that would have provided the same functionality.

    That's exactly what they need. I certainly get maybe not tying the phone's OS to specific named services (e.g. Facebook, Twitter), but a plug-in model that you suggest would solve the problem nicely and obviously open it up to more than Twitter and Facebook.

    The integration of everything from different places into hubs is most of the reason I bought this awesome monstrosity of a phablet and it's an example of where, IMO, devices should be going in the future. Having to go into the Facebook app when I want to bring up the photos from a friend's trip is going to definitely feel like a step backward into the "iPhone way" of doing things.

    IMO, Windows Phone 8 is pretty much what Android wishes it was, and makes the iPhone look like a feature phone because WP8 is all about bringing all your stuff into your device in a consistent and useable manner. Now it seems they want to go in the iPhone direction unfortunately. That's a real shame because this phone, as it is, kills.



  • Metro IE - back or forward behavior

    This irritates the ever living crap out of me, especially on mobile OSs like on an iPhone or Android. Especially if I'm reading a bunch of different articles and going back to the index frequently. I'll by 3/4s of the way through a list of articles .. and I will see one I want to read, and I will intentionally open it in a new tab because I don't want my position in the index to be disrupted. Once I go back -- something that requires me to only close the new tab I have open, the first tab reloads when it's put back on the screen. Now I have to 1) wait for the page to reload, then 2) find where I was again.

    Pages reloading because they just happen to be brought back from the background makes me want to throw the device against a wall.