<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 - Discussions by Dark_Halmut</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:39:18 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:39:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>0</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>0</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>0</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Dev Div changes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Gu simply gets things done right. I expect big things from that department now. I hope SL continues after the changes and doesn't disolve into the HTML5&#43;JS story.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Dev-Div-changes/8a15b88e755d45fb9d089efc00155fc6#8a15b88e755d45fb9d089efc00155fc6</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:17:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Dev-Div-changes/8a15b88e755d45fb9d089efc00155fc6#8a15b88e755d45fb9d089efc00155fc6</guid>
		<dc:creator>KeyboardG</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - .Net dll built for COM, target machine fails</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I had found some stuff online that also said don't put the assembly into the gac if you plan on using it for COM. The multiple ways is a bit cloudy/confusing.<br /><br />Unfornately the legacy app using the dll sits on a network share(file-server app) but the new C# dll will sit on each users WinDisk\Docs and Setting\All Users\App Data\App Folder\<br /><br /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260936-Net-dll-built-for-COM-target-machine-fails/21ade318ec0845e885ce9dfa00bf0025#21ade318ec0845e885ce9dfa00bf0025</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:41:22 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260936-Net-dll-built-for-COM-target-machine-fails/21ade318ec0845e885ce9dfa00bf0025#21ade318ec0845e885ce9dfa00bf0025</guid>
		<dc:creator>KeyboardG</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - .Net dll built for COM, target machine fails</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So I got it to work by cd'ing to the .net 2 directory and doing </p>
<p>regasm &quot;my full path to my dll\my.dll&quot; /codebase</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Is there a downside to this? There seems to be conflicting notation/articles out there on both of these methods.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260936-Net-dll-built-for-COM-target-machine-fails/9635ea54b17942ea848b9dfa00beff63#9635ea54b17942ea848b9dfa00beff63</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:24:01 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260936-Net-dll-built-for-COM-target-machine-fails/9635ea54b17942ea848b9dfa00beff63#9635ea54b17942ea848b9dfa00beff63</guid>
		<dc:creator>KeyboardG</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - .Net dll built for COM, target machine fails</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a C# dll built for COM and its all fine for my machine. I have a sample vm setup running just XP, .net 1.1 and 2.0 to serve as a test target machine.<br /><br />My legacy application is file-server(exe sits on network) and this cannot change. Doing things the right way I install my dll(and interop.xxx&nbsp;files) to C:\Docs and Settings\whatever\App Data\CompanyName\<br /><br />Now I know I need to get the class into the GAC so that my legacy app can see&nbsp;it over COM. I couldn't do this straight up as the gacutil isnt part of the .net runtime(so the target machine doesnt have it). I wrote a little installer/uninstaller exe which does
 this using System.EnterpriseServices.Internal.Publish.gacInstall(). <br /><br />I made sure my dll was strongly typed via the .net command prompt doing sn -k whatever.snk and adding that to the project as the key file.<br /><br />Ok, I can browse to C:\Windows\Assembly and see my class there but my legacy app still fails when creating the object on the target machine...<br /><br />What gives? <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-6.gif' alt='Sad' /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260936-Net-dll-built-for-COM-target-machine-fails/260936#260936</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:06:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260936-Net-dll-built-for-COM-target-machine-fails/260936#260936</guid>
		<dc:creator>KeyboardG</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Where is GACUTIL?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I&nbsp;was referring to this. Don't worry I wrote it myself last night.<br>
<br>
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">brockweaver wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;Just fyi, the only thing I could get to work in my situation (auto-install .NET 2.0 assemblies via an ActiveX control on a web page) was to write a little exe myself that calls into the System.EnterpriseServices.Internal.Publish object
 methods to install into the GAC and register it for interop.&nbsp; I could have used regasm to do the COM portion, but since some people do not have the 2.0 runtime in their path (and I didn't want to hard code it in the .inf file), I just did it through the exe.<br>
<br>
<br>
If anybody wants details, I'd be happy to post them.&nbsp; It took me a good 3 hours to get everything working as it should, and I see no reason for anyone to go through the same pains I did!<br>
</div>
</blockquote></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/205281-Where-is-GACUTIL/aee27aef4281407d8a309deb017c4c5f#aee27aef4281407d8a309deb017c4c5f</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/205281-Where-is-GACUTIL/aee27aef4281407d8a309deb017c4c5f#aee27aef4281407d8a309deb017c4c5f</guid>
		<dc:creator>KeyboardG</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Where is GACUTIL?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Information on this would be a great help.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/205281-Where-is-GACUTIL/63be64b8e75441209c129deb017c4bb2#63be64b8e75441209c129deb017c4bb2</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/205281-Where-is-GACUTIL/63be64b8e75441209c129deb017c4bb2#63be64b8e75441209c129deb017c4bb2</guid>
		<dc:creator>KeyboardG</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Linq is scary</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Its funny how whats old is new again.... As a foxpro developer I already have native SQL-like code and iterate over the selection(cursors) with scan statements. Just an observation, it seems with .net 3.0 a lot of the advantages of foxpro&nbsp;are being brought
 into&nbsp;the clr&nbsp;as foxpro sunsets.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250990-Linq-is-scary/d3d58c6aeebf499d94369dec0044d087#d3d58c6aeebf499d94369dec0044d087</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:23:43 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250990-Linq-is-scary/d3d58c6aeebf499d94369dec0044d087#d3d58c6aeebf499d94369dec0044d087</guid>
		<dc:creator>KeyboardG</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Thinking of picking up DS-Lite, Recommended Games?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mariokart DS is epic. Fully 3d, all the items and more, full fledged 4 cups with 4 or 5 races a piece, then 4 full cups from the previous Mariokarts (snes, gba, n64m gamecube). Online mode, DSvsDS, bots, battle modes. This game really blew me away. <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-7.gif' alt='Perplexed' /><br>
<br>
New MarioBros game is really well done too. Tetris has a ton of modes. Rocketslime is another really done game.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/245019-Thinking-of-picking-up-DS-Lite-Recommended-Games/c678659c7bd54566af649dec002816db#c678659c7bd54566af649dec002816db</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:34:07 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/245019-Thinking-of-picking-up-DS-Lite-Recommended-Games/c678659c7bd54566af649dec002816db#c678659c7bd54566af649dec002816db</guid>
		<dc:creator>KeyboardG</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dark_Halmut/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>