<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 - Discussions by DigitalDud</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:28:19 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:28:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>0</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>0</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>0</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - what source control do you use mostly?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">SlackmasterK wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;Well, since the thread got&nbsp; bumped anyway...<br>
<br>
Since I'm the only developer on my project, I just make 3 backups:<br>
&nbsp;- Another folder<br>
&nbsp;- Dev server in another state<br>
&nbsp;- Home (shhhh)</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Eh it's still a good idea to use source control even if you're the only dev. <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-4.gif' alt='Tongue Out' /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/233128-what-source-control-do-you-use-mostly/8b5dcf2b25df488cb9fd9deb011da9b7#8b5dcf2b25df488cb9fd9deb011da9b7</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 23:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/233128-what-source-control-do-you-use-mostly/8b5dcf2b25df488cb9fd9deb011da9b7#8b5dcf2b25df488cb9fd9deb011da9b7</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - what source control do you use mostly?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I mostly use a derivative of Perforce.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/233128-what-source-control-do-you-use-mostly/c6c7f254a2754c2489649deb011da960#c6c7f254a2754c2489649deb011da960</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 23:35:54 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/233128-what-source-control-do-you-use-mostly/c6c7f254a2754c2489649deb011da960#c6c7f254a2754c2489649deb011da960</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - who is reading what book?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm on my annual read of the Dune chronicles (not including the stupid prequels).&nbsp; I actually hate the books because they killed all scifi for me, everything else pales in comparison.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/245653-who-is-reading-what-book/555433bd5f7f4c6493ae9dec0029bb91#555433bd5f7f4c6493ae9dec0029bb91</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:02:15 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/245653-who-is-reading-what-book/555433bd5f7f4c6493ae9dec0029bb91#555433bd5f7f4c6493ae9dec0029bb91</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - so..uh... Nikon wins.. hands down.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">jamie wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;well ya you can.. its just the focus<br>
<br>
basically all small cameras take pics of things ...flat<br>
<br>
SLR just means... depth /&nbsp; burred BG but focus on object...<br>
<br>
* sometimes you wish you could get flat on them though<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I don't think you need an SLR for aperture priority, I've seen several point-and-shoot cameras that do that.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/258054-souh-Nikon-wins-hands-down/2ffcf33ca2e34c2f83979deb001cc81b#2ffcf33ca2e34c2f83979deb001cc81b</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:19:09 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/258054-souh-Nikon-wins-hands-down/2ffcf33ca2e34c2f83979deb001cc81b#2ffcf33ca2e34c2f83979deb001cc81b</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - so..uh... Nikon wins.. hands down.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I think its hard to find a camera that takes bad pictures, you don't need an expensive SLR, I've seen brillant night shots even from point-and-shoot cameras.<br>
<br>
Here's some cool pics I took during my Ireland trip a couple weeks ago on a point-and-shoot Canon.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/7366949@N06/sets/72157604324814573/"><br>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7366949@N06/sets/72157604324814573/</a><br>
<br>
Although its near impossible to mess up shots like these.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/258054-souh-Nikon-wins-hands-down/fec793c85d4a4cf5bcda9deb001cc4fc#fec793c85d4a4cf5bcda9deb001cc4fc</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:42:32 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/258054-souh-Nikon-wins-hands-down/fec793c85d4a4cf5bcda9deb001cc4fc#fec793c85d4a4cf5bcda9deb001cc4fc</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - PaaaaaaooooooollllooooooM ... Whyyyyyyyy???</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">corona_coder wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279;You can kill tracker in Ubuntu and it not bring down the system.&nbsp; Thats called superior design<br></div></blockquote><br><br>And in Vista running a file&nbsp;indexer doesn't hurt&nbsp;disk performance because of actual support for I/O prioritization.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260460-PaaaaaaooooooollllooooooM--Whyyyyyyyy/877b63c8e43946cab6619e31009e9366#877b63c8e43946cab6619e31009e9366</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:22:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260460-PaaaaaaooooooollllooooooM--Whyyyyyyyy/877b63c8e43946cab6619e31009e9366#877b63c8e43946cab6619e31009e9366</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - I have been converted</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Got a Win Mobile phone recently too, they rock cause of the huge software library.&nbsp; But can anyone recommend an instant messaging program that doesn't use SMS?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260463-I-have-been-converted/1465aabcbf0e4595b47e9e31009e9f71#1465aabcbf0e4595b47e9e31009e9f71</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:16:31 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260463-I-have-been-converted/1465aabcbf0e4595b47e9e31009e9f71#1465aabcbf0e4595b47e9e31009e9f71</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Infoworld launches &#39;Save XP&#39; website</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Vista machines have much less of a tendancy to become spyware-ridden pieces of crap like XP machines do, so I recommend it for family members and such.&nbsp; <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260418-Infoworld-launches-Save-XP-website/5a1533f081ff4269a9ee9e31009d5982#5a1533f081ff4269a9ee9e31009d5982</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:31:16 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260418-Infoworld-launches-Save-XP-website/5a1533f081ff4269a9ee9e31009d5982#5a1533f081ff4269a9ee9e31009d5982</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - First review of Windows 7 ??</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">Bas wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279;If there are no major architecture changes, but more fine-tuning of what we already have in Vista, then 2009 sound fine to me. Besides, three years between versions used to be just fine.</div></blockquote><br><br>I think it will depend on the sucess of Vista SP1, if there's still a lot of issues after the service pack it will obviously delay development quite a bit.&nbsp; The EU could also decide to be huge jerks (and probably will).</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260439-First-review-of-Windows-7-/eaac9a01142f49e18cbd9e31009decb4#eaac9a01142f49e18cbd9e31009decb4</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:28:20 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260439-First-review-of-Windows-7-/eaac9a01142f49e18cbd9e31009decb4#eaac9a01142f49e18cbd9e31009decb4</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - First review of Windows 7 ??</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>2009 makes sense, as long as they stick to features that don't require epic testing they should ship on time.&nbsp; Vista was slow-going because of lots of large internal changes like entirely new display/audio/network stacks.&nbsp; Probably necessary work from a long-term engineering standpoint, but hard to test, and sell.&nbsp; Win 7 will probably be pretty PM-driven like Office and be all UX and fit and finish stuff.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260439-First-review-of-Windows-7-/25133591a273439a90169e31009debe6#25133591a273439a90169e31009debe6</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260439-First-review-of-Windows-7-/25133591a273439a90169e31009debe6#25133591a273439a90169e31009debe6</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - KDE 4.1 Release Schedule</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The excuse was basically like, they wanted to create momentum or something at the expense of their users.&nbsp; Basically Zune 1.0 except with the risk of losing critical data.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260423-KDE-41-Release-Schedule/9eaa846c41f6484f9bf89e31009d9e7e#9eaa846c41f6484f9bf89e31009d9e7e</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260423-KDE-41-Release-Schedule/9eaa846c41f6484f9bf89e31009d9e7e#9eaa846c41f6484f9bf89e31009d9e7e</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - KDE 4.1 Release Schedule</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well that's nice considering 4.0 was basically released unfinished.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260423-KDE-41-Release-Schedule/604fbc9a60734d5abf919e31009d9d19#604fbc9a60734d5abf919e31009d9d19</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:22:17 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260423-KDE-41-Release-Schedule/604fbc9a60734d5abf919e31009d9d19#604fbc9a60734d5abf919e31009d9d19</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Windows Seven — A realistic forecast</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">nightski wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279; <p>I would love to see an unmanaged implementation of WPF, with the managed version transformed into a wrapper around this new foundation (similar to WinForms/Win32).&nbsp; This would not only potentially solve the perf problems, but also open up WPF to managed and native developers alike.&nbsp; In addition, they could then also potentially use WPF for core applications like explorer.</p><p>In fact I believe the work has already been started with Silverlight's implementation?</p></div></blockquote><br><br>There is an unmanaged implementation, well sort of.&nbsp; On Vista the visual tree created by WPF gets&nbsp;send to&nbsp;milcore.dll (unmanaged) which composites it with the rest of the desktop.&nbsp; It's why, for example, on Vista you get smooth resizing of WPF apps when you use the Windows magnifier.<br><br>Milcore is also what powers stuff like Flip3D.&nbsp; Hopefully they will publically expose it in future releases.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260396-Windows-Seven--A-realistic-forecast/ffd3a4bea8974c849d3c9e31009cb276#ffd3a4bea8974c849d3c9e31009cb276</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260396-Windows-Seven--A-realistic-forecast/ffd3a4bea8974c849d3c9e31009cb276#ffd3a4bea8974c849d3c9e31009cb276</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Windows Seven — A realistic forecast</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm predicting we'll see some Office 2007 UI in Windows 7.&nbsp; Mainly because historically new UI/controls and such were in Office first, then Windows at large.&nbsp; The Office UI was critically acclaimed, and it's silly not to incorporate it anywhere else.&nbsp; Vista added new common controls, it's likely Win 7 will continue the trend.&nbsp; Also, Sinsofsky is working on it apparently.<br><br>At the very least I think they'll update the common controls to render properly on the DWM frames (preserving alpha channels, etc).</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260396-Windows-Seven--A-realistic-forecast/484dbd45f60149dc883f9e31009cad83#484dbd45f60149dc883f9e31009cad83</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260396-Windows-Seven--A-realistic-forecast/484dbd45f60149dc883f9e31009cad83#484dbd45f60149dc883f9e31009cad83</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - PC with 4GB of ram: Vista x86 or x64?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">YearOfTheLinuxDesktop wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279;<br>I remember I've read it becomes 8KB if the ram is equal or more than 4GB (or something like that).<br></div></blockquote><br><br>No, I think you're thinking of IA-64 (Itanium),&nbsp;where Windows&nbsp;set the page size to 8 KB,&nbsp; x64 doesn't do&nbsp;that.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260393-PC-with-4GB-of-ram-Vista-x86-or-x64/37027d440fcf470c92779e31009c9c7e#37027d440fcf470c92779e31009c9c7e</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260393-PC-with-4GB-of-ram-Vista-x86-or-x64/37027d440fcf470c92779e31009c9c7e#37027d440fcf470c92779e31009c9c7e</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Another nail in the .NET coffin</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's nice to see the Linux guys catching up with what Windows and Mac development environments have had for 15 years.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260392-Another-nail-in-the-NET-coffin/7b448227b96c4caabaa69e31009c9125#7b448227b96c4caabaa69e31009c9125</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260392-Another-nail-in-the-NET-coffin/7b448227b96c4caabaa69e31009c9125#7b448227b96c4caabaa69e31009c9125</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - PC with 4GB of ram: Vista x86 or x64?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">YearOfTheLinuxDesktop wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279; <blockquote><table class="quoteTable"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td><td class="txt3"><strong>Dodo wrote:</strong><hr size="1"><i>&#65279;It depends on how many PCI cards you have in your system, aswell as your mainboard. Modern mainboards support to move the hardware address space even further than the end of 4GB.</i></td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote><br><br>I was meaning the additional overhead of windows. the size of memory page varies depending on the amount of ram installed and also 64bit vista uses more ram because 64bit and 32bit applications have different sets of 32 and 64bit libraries so the same library could be loaded twice.<br></div></blockquote><br><br>I'm pretty sure the size of the memory page is always 4 KB unless I'm misunderstanding you?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260393-PC-with-4GB-of-ram-Vista-x86-or-x64/4b961f57d46f4ea7a16a9e31009c9b01#4b961f57d46f4ea7a16a9e31009c9b01</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:54:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260393-PC-with-4GB-of-ram-Vista-x86-or-x64/4b961f57d46f4ea7a16a9e31009c9b01#4b961f57d46f4ea7a16a9e31009c9b01</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Top 50 Atheism Quotes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">ManipUni wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279;I believe this thread will end the entire Religion Vs. Non-Religion debate for good. <br><br></div></blockquote><br><br>It's more likely than ending this trolling.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260337-Top-50-Atheism-Quotes/5176a61f2e8b48f3a87e9e31009abfbb#5176a61f2e8b48f3a87e9e31009abfbb</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260337-Top-50-Atheism-Quotes/5176a61f2e8b48f3a87e9e31009abfbb#5176a61f2e8b48f3a87e9e31009abfbb</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Top 50 Atheism Quotes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What do atheists believe in? I don't get it.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260337-Top-50-Atheism-Quotes/eecd075885fd4d54978b9e31009abcdc#eecd075885fd4d54978b9e31009abcdc</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:30:10 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260337-Top-50-Atheism-Quotes/eecd075885fd4d54978b9e31009abcdc#eecd075885fd4d54978b9e31009abcdc</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Problems with Vista 32</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Load the crash dump into windbg and do an &quot;!analyze -v&quot;, just google for some detailed directions on how to analyze BSOD crash dumps.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260339-Problems-with-Vista-32/c4a88b3c609e4c0b94579e31009b0036#c4a88b3c609e4c0b94579e31009b0036</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:36:06 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260339-Problems-with-Vista-32/c4a88b3c609e4c0b94579e31009b0036#c4a88b3c609e4c0b94579e31009b0036</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - What would you like to do in Microsoft?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'd recommend going for an internship at MS, their internship program is the best.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259384-What-would-you-like-to-do-in-Microsoft/a99204f0bfea4d089fd09df90095ebd9#a99204f0bfea4d089fd09df90095ebd9</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:48:38 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259384-What-would-you-like-to-do-in-Microsoft/a99204f0bfea4d089fd09df90095ebd9#a99204f0bfea4d089fd09df90095ebd9</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - The Story of Stuff</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ugh way too many talking points, no context or background. And why does everyone always compare resource use to population?&nbsp; Why not compare resource use to production?&nbsp; US energy use is the highest compared to other countries (although China will beat
 us soon).&nbsp; Well, so is total production compared to other countries.&nbsp; We're not consuming more per person, we're producing more per resource.<br /><br />And how do people get the idea that corporations are more powerful than government?&nbsp; Can corporations fight wars? Can they make laws? Can they impose taxes?&nbsp; They only beat the government at efficiency.&nbsp; Corporations get so heavily regulated today, becoming
 the largest competitor in any market seems like political/legal suicide.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259612-The-Story-of-Stuff/00906698ec4741dd827a9df9009b6702#00906698ec4741dd827a9df9009b6702</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259612-The-Story-of-Stuff/00906698ec4741dd827a9df9009b6702#00906698ec4741dd827a9df9009b6702</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - What do you hate the most about software development?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Users</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259587-What-do-you-hate-the-most-about-software-development/8bf3fbf2e9eb4589a8c49df9009ac909#8bf3fbf2e9eb4589a8c49df9009ac909</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:10:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259587-What-do-you-hate-the-most-about-software-development/8bf3fbf2e9eb4589a8c49df9009ac909#8bf3fbf2e9eb4589a8c49df9009ac909</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Why doesn&#39;t Microsoft buy SCO?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The only good (beyond merely viable) *nix OS on the desktop today is OSX.&nbsp; This being the fact that its the only one not missing&nbsp;fundamental technical features like say, how about an actual I/O model?&nbsp; Plus its the only one that gets the &quot;it just works!&quot;
 factor to actually work, 99% of the time.&nbsp; OSX is the only *nix OS that is truly user friendly, by a long shot.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259543-Why-doesnt-Microsoft-buy-SCO/55fa010e66814140b47f9df90099b99a#55fa010e66814140b47f9df90099b99a</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259543-Why-doesnt-Microsoft-buy-SCO/55fa010e66814140b47f9df90099b99a#55fa010e66814140b47f9df90099b99a</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - American TV...</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You could also drop TV and just buy episodes one at a time from Amazon Unbox or something.&nbsp; Which totally works except for when it doesn't work.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259541-American-TV/183288656fd04f8daf559df90099ae22#183288656fd04f8daf559df90099ae22</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:34:44 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/259541-American-TV/183288656fd04f8daf559df90099ae22#183288656fd04f8daf559df90099ae22</guid>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/DigitalDud/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>