Entries:
Comments:
Posts:

Loading User Information from Channel 9

Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9

Latest Achievement:

Loading User Information from MSDN

Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN

Visual Studio Achievements

Latest Achievement:

Loading Visual Studio Achievements

Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements

Discussions

FluffyDevilBunny FluffyDevil​Bunny GO GO GADGET COMPILER!
  • Mixed mode managed c

    I have my answer. I will post it so that it is in the archives incase anyone else needs it.

    System::String^ CString2DotNetOut()
    {

              char* cString = "20 chars for testing";
              System::String^ sString = System::Runtime::InteropServices::Marshal::PtrToStringAnsi(System::IntPtr(cString));
              return sString;
    }

    void DotNetString2CStringOut(System::String^ sString)
    {

              char* cString = (char*)System::Runtime::InteropServices::Marshal::StringToHGlobalAnsi(sString).ToPointer();
              cout << cString;
    }

    FDB

  • Mixed mode managed c

    Hi all,

    We have a mixed mode managed c dll here and I need help.

    The internals of the dll are using native c and the interface is exposing managed c so that c# can call it. We are passing a System.String into the dll and need to convert it to char*.

    Currently the developer is looping for each character in the string and placing the value into the char. There has got to be a better way.

    Anyone?

    Thanks

    FDB

  • What the background?

    Yea! That is the one, but it's not on the machine this time. The images in the directory are not the same... I swear I have not been drinking!

    That's my favorite one though!

    FDB

  • What the background?

    Ok, I am confused. I installed Vista RTM and noticed that the background wallpaper I had used throught the RC series was missing and some new ones were there. This was a new install not an upgrade BTW.

    So I found this one that I really liked with has the evening scene of the pier on the ocean. The one with the lights.

    Last night I had an issue when I installed the new ATI drivers, which resulted in me cussing a lot and reinstalling all over again due to the whole OS dying.

    Now on this new install the wallpaper items are the ones I saw in the RC edition and the other ones I saw, including my new favorite are gone!!! I looked on the CD and can't find any cabs or installation directories (like i386).

    So what the background folks??? Does Vista randomly decide which set of photos you are getting and how can I get the one I liked back?

    FDB

  • Will Vista Volume License by on MSDN

    I hope soon cause it's where certified partners get thier VL media from Tongue Out

    FDB

  • Vista RTM Now on MSDN Downloads

    Thanks, I'll check it out

  • Vista RTM Now on MSDN Downloads

    amd_duron wrote:
    One comment about outlook 2007, what is the issue here?

    I have it since the 12th:


    Programs Included

    • Microsoft Office Access 2007
    • Microsoft Office Excel 2007
    • Microsoft Office Outlook 2007
    • Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2007
    • Microsoft Office Publisher 2007
    • Microsoft Office Word 2007
    • Microsoft Office Communicator 2007
    • Microsoft Office InfoPath 2007
    • Microsoft Office Outlook 2007
    • Integrated Enterprise Content Management
    • Electronic Forms
    • Advanced Information Rights Management and Policy Capabilities



    I only see Pro up there Outlook isn't listed in the description.

  • Vista RTM Now on MSDN Downloads

    Too bad I can't install until there is an Outlook 2007 released. Sad

    FDB

  • Vista RTM

    It's the Utlimate version for Corporations. It's only available through VLM.

  • IPv6 and Vista

    I thought the tunneling only applied to XP. The way I understood it was that IPV6 in XP was a tunnel protocol that went through IPV4 and in Vista it became a stack instead of a tunnel. So Vista either connects direct IPV6 to IPV6 or IPV4 to IPV4 and without a supporting router the transit is lost if a downgrade to IPV4 can't be performed. Is this wrong?

    FDB