Discussions

So, how do we get this to work with .NET 2.0?

Regards,
Frank

the admin password turned out to be password

At least I got Vista up and running now.

I feel so cool.

I got it while I was on the Microsoft campus last week.  So, as far as I know, it doesn't get any more legit than that.

I did leave the machine to install overnight at the office.

Worse comes to worse, I can get the DVD image from MSDN.

Regards,
Frank

I left my computer to install Vista overnight and was delighted to see that it was finished in the morning.

However, it created a few user accounts that I don't have the password for.

I have Toby the User and Abby the Admin.

I tried the usual suspects -- P@ssw0rd and a few other ones.

Any idea what it could be or how I can install Vista without creating the accounts automatically?

Regards,
Frank

It seems to work fine when the User Control is in the root directory of the web project.

If you have a tendency to put user controls into their own sub folder (like most dev's do), you have no way to access a reference to the control or the type.

I came across this via Google, but I'm not totally sold on the idea.

http://west-wind.com/weblog/posts/3016.aspx 

Regards,
Frank

So, if there's a user control that I would need to cast an object to, then that should go inside the app_code folder, too?

I blogged about this before and, maybe I didn't clearly explain the problem.

Take a look at the following code screen shots from two different .NET 2.0 projects:

Windows Forms:

ASP.NET Web Page:

Notice anything different?  You'll see that both class files have their usual “using” statements, both use partial classes, but the ASP.NET page is without a namespace declaration by default.

If you have VS2005 and would like to play along at home, then create a new solution, add a Windows Forms project and an ASP.NET web site.  You'll get the same results.

In fact, you'll get namespaces everywhere there's code, except for web sites and web service projects.

This can't be a bug and I'm giving the ASP.NET team the benefit of a doubt and I'm assuming that this is done by design.

I just can't figure out why they would make it this way. 

My best theory is that the ASP.NET team wanted C# to behave in a manner consistent to VB.NET, but once again, I can't explain why anyone would want that.

Can somebody explain the Case of the Missing Namespace?

Thanks in Advance,
Frank

I really like the Gateway Tablet PC.  It has a widescreen and a good feel in your hands.

My work laptop is a Toshiba Portege M200, which is a pretty solid laptop.

Sounds like you're looking for a slate tablet and not a convertible.

Any reason why?

Karim wrote:

Based on this, it sounds like someone should create a 24-hour cable TV news channel that shows nothing but disaster footage and rumors about pop stars.

It's actually very funny.


Read this post:

http://neopoleon.com/blog/posts/16678.aspx


then scroll all the way to the bottom of this post

http://neopoleon.com/blog/posts/16711.aspx

or go to:

http://www.4guysfromviewpoint.com/?p=106