Comment Feed for Haacked

Re: Progressively enable the mobile web with ASP.NET MVC 4, HTML5, and jQuery Mobile

Haacked — Mon, 19 Sep 2011 01:37:01 GMT

Whoops, forgot to login first. That last comment really was me.

posted by Haacked

Re: ASP.NET MVC 3 @:The Time is Now

Haacked — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:46:18 GMT

BTW, I wrote up some corrections to my talk in this blog post, A Look Back At Mix 11.

posted by Haacked

Re: NuGet In Depth: Empowering Open Source on the .NET Platform

Haacked — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:45:46 GMT

Hi folks, I made a couple of mistakes during the talk and wrote up some corrections in this blog post: A Look Back At Mix.

posted by Haacked

Re: ASP.NET MVC 3 @:The Time is Now

Haacked — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:52:21 GMT

@Romeo When I said "Your stuff is broken" I was speaking to the StackOverflow team who was in the audience. As NickCraver points out (he's on the StackOverflow team), it was an output cache issue that made their site look different when I brought it up in IE 9.

Interesting how easy it is to have loose fingers when accusing someone of having a loose mouth. I generally like to give people the benefit of the doubt first and understand the context before making accusations. But that's just me.

@Dan no idea. I'll ask around.

@NickCraver I think it's awesome that you guys fixed it before my talk was over.

posted by Haacked

Re: Hanselminutes on 9 - Debugging Crash Dumps with Tess Ferrandez and VS2010

Haacked — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:42:03 GMT

That is really cool! I can't wait to try it out on my slow apps.

posted by Haacked

Re: Hanselminutes on 9 - ASP.NET 4 and Phil Haack (and son!)

Haacked — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:43:17 GMT

Now I know what my boy was doing while I was talking! Eating that filthy plastic thing!

posted by Haacked

Re: This Week on C9: .NET Micro Framework, Azure, and PHP

Haacked — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:32:20 GMT

Thanks for the shout out fellas! Hi back atcha.

posted by Haacked

Re: Hanselminutes on 9 - ASP.NET MVC 2 Preview 1 with Phil Haack and Virtual Scott

Haacked — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:10:20 GMT

Thanks!

Good question. That was a bit of ignorance on my part. That attribute is System.ComponnentModel.DisplayNameAttribute which is part of System.dll. It is a pre-existing attribute that we just happen to support and it wasn't designed with the localization features that our newer data annotations are designed with. Unfortunately, with DisplayNameAttribute, the general idea is you have to subclass it to get localization. Yeah, that's annoying.

There are new attributes coming in ASP.NET 4 so I'll need to figure out what the suggested pattern will be.

All the validation components do allow setting resource keys such as ErrorMessageResourceType and ErrorMessageResourceKey.

posted by Haacked

Re: Hanselminutes on 9 - Inside Secret Microsoft Meeting Rooms - What Laptop do Alpha Geeks Use?

Haacked — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:01:53 GMT

What I said at the end was that because my laptop is so silent, "I'm creeping". Folks in L.A. know what I mean. Or anyone who watched the second? season of Weeds.

posted by Haacked

Re: ASP.NET MVC 1 with Phil Haack

Haacked — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:57:36 GMT

Stephen Walther posted some new videos on http://asp.net/mvc. Check em out. He'll be posting more as time permits.

posted by Haacked

Re: ASP.NET MVC: A New Framework for Building Web Applications

Haacked — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:51:37 GMT

Source will be posted here soon.

posted by Haacked

Re: ASP.NET MVC: A New Framework for Building Web Applications

Haacked — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:23:30 GMT

Don't forget to submit evals!!! And remember, higher numbers are better. To the person who gave me all 1s, I hope that was a voting error. Otherwise someone here really doesn't like me.

posted by Haacked

Re: ASP.NET MVC: A New Framework for Building Web Applications

Haacked — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:02:10 GMT

I disagree. Your negative experience with the Java MVC frameworks shouldn't be a condemnation of the MVC pattern. The pattern itself is valuable for web applications even in the "Real World". The popularity of Ruby on Rails and DJango is a testament to that.

ASP.NET MVC is intended to be a simple to use framework for developing web applications. It's not for everyone, for sure, but I think you'll find that it isn't overly complicated and is easy to learn.

posted by Haacked

Re: MVC Preview 4 with Phil Haack

Haacked — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:16:00 GMT

If it helps any, I can go on record here categorically stating that Microsoft and the ASP.NET team did not invent the Model View Controller pattern.

In terms of view engines, we do support multiple view engines. It'd be interesting to see if someone implements a ProMesh view engine for MVC. MVC is designed for extensibility, allowing the swapping out of any part you don't like. My IronRuby sample is an extreme demonstration of this.

posted by Haacked