<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for JChung2006</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/jchung2006/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by JChung2006</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/jchung2006/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:30:29 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:30:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3192.39714, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Seinfeld/Gates 2: "New Family" [Seinfeld/Gates 2: "New Family"]</title><description>&lt;object width="425" height="355"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBWPf1BWtkw&amp;hl=en"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBWPf1BWtkw&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/427197-SeinfeldGates-2-New-Family/'&gt;Seinfeld/Gates 2: "New Family"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/427197/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/427197-SeinfeldGates-2-New-Family/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/427197-SeinfeldGates-2-New-Family/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:30:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/427197-SeinfeldGates-2-New-Family/</guid><evnet:views>997</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/427197/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>in reply to Seinfeld/Gates 2: "New Family"</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>33</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/427197-SeinfeldGates-2-New-Family/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/427197/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>XRAY bookmarklet [XRAY bookmarklet]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Saw this on reddit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://westciv.com/xray/"&gt;http://westciv.com/xray/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A handy little bookmarklet that lets you inspect the DOM and CSS of any element on a page in IE, Firefox, and Safari.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/417074-XRAY-bookmarklet/'&gt;XRAY bookmarklet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/417074/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/417074-XRAY-bookmarklet/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/417074-XRAY-bookmarklet/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:15:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/417074-XRAY-bookmarklet/</guid><evnet:views>510</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/417074/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Saw this on reddit.
http://westciv.com/xray/
A handy little bookmarklet that lets you inspect the DOM and CSS of any element on a page in IE, Firefox, and Safari.in reply to XRAY bookmarklet</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/417074-XRAY-bookmarklet/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/417074/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Report Spam [Report Spam]</title><description>Looks like the spammers are back (YouTube copy and AAC DRM removal threads in Tech Off).  Do we need the Report Spam feature again?&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/414628-Report-Spam/'&gt;Report Spam&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/414628/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/414628-Report-Spam/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/414628-Report-Spam/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:58:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/414628-Report-Spam/</guid><evnet:views>408</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/414628/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Looks like the spammers are back (YouTube copy and AAC DRM removal threads in Tech Off).  Do we need the Report Spam feature again?in reply to Report Spam</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/414628-Report-Spam/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/414628/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Thumbs up! [Thumbs up!]</title><description>Thumbs up on the Thumbs Up/Thumbs Down feature! :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The call-to-action needs&amp;nbsp;to be highlighted more, at least during the initial roll-out (when people aren't aware of the feature).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The current faded white-on-gray icons don't grab your attention and are in an awkward position.&amp;nbsp; The adjustment could be as simple as moving the icons down by the other actions (Tags, Downloads, Share).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Love the tooltips (awesome vs. meh) :)&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/413951-Thumbs-up/'&gt;Thumbs up!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/413951/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/413951-Thumbs-up/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/413951-Thumbs-up/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:02:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/413951-Thumbs-up/</guid><evnet:views>419</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/413951/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Thumbs up on the Thumbs Up/Thumbs Down feature! :)The call-to-action needs&amp;nbsp;to be highlighted more, at least during the initial roll-out (when people aren't aware of the feature).The current faded white-on-gray icons don't grab your attention and are in an awkward position.&amp;nbsp; The adjustment&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/413951-Thumbs-up/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/413951/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>How to work around static methods in interfaces being disallowed [How to work around static methods in interfaces being disallowed]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's suppose that I design an interface:&lt;/p&gt;
		&lt;pre&gt;public interface IDoThis {
    void DoThis();
}&lt;/pre&gt;
		&lt;pre&gt;public class DoThis : IDoThis {
    void IDoThis.DoThis() {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }
}&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I want to be able to expose a static factory method for all classes that implement this interface.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;pre&gt;public interface IDoThis2 : IDoThis {
    &lt;span&gt;static IDoThis CreateInstance();&lt;/span&gt; // not allowed
}&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;pre&gt;public class DoThis2 : IDoThis2 {
    void IDoThis.DoThis() {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }
    static IDoThis CreateInstance() {
        return new DoThis2();
    }
}&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How would you work around this apparent C# limitation? Or is this a wrong way to think about this, and, if so, how would you approach the problem?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/407024-How-to-work-around-static-methods-in-interfaces-being-disallowed/'&gt;How to work around static methods in interfaces being disallowed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/407024/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/407024-How-to-work-around-static-methods-in-interfaces-being-disallowed/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/407024-How-to-work-around-static-methods-in-interfaces-being-disallowed/</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:30:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/407024-How-to-work-around-static-methods-in-interfaces-being-disallowed/</guid><evnet:views>903</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/407024/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Let's suppose that I design an interface:public interface IDoThis {
    void DoThis();
}public class DoThis : IDoThis {
    void IDoThis.DoThis() {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }
}
I want to be able to expose a static factory method for all classes that implement this interface.public interface IDoThis2 : IDoThis {
    static IDoThis CreateInstance(); // not allowed
}public class DoThis2 : IDoThis2 {
    void IDoThis.DoThis() {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }
    static IDoThis CreateInstance() {
        return new DoThis2();
    }
}
How…</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/407024-How-to-work-around-static-methods-in-interfaces-being-disallowed/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/407024/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Skyfire does Flash on Windows Mobile [Skyfire does Flash on Windows Mobile]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw this on Engadget via Digg:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/skyfire-browser-for-windows-mobile-is-game-changing-does-flash/"&gt;
Skyfire browser for Windows Mobile is game changing, does Flash&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when is Windows Mobile going to be able to do Silverlight too?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260614-Skyfire-does-Flash-on-Windows-Mobile/'&gt;Skyfire does Flash on Windows Mobile&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260614/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260614-Skyfire-does-Flash-on-Windows-Mobile/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260614-Skyfire-does-Flash-on-Windows-Mobile/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:02:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260614-Skyfire-does-Flash-on-Windows-Mobile/</guid><evnet:views>1283</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260614/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;I saw this on Engadget via Digg:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/skyfire-browser-for-windows-mobile-is-game-changing-does-flash/"&gt;
Skyfire browser for Windows Mobile is game changing, does Flash&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when is Windows Mobile going to be able to do Silverlight too?&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260614-Skyfire-does-Flash-on-Windows-Mobile/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260614/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>System.Guid not showing properly when debugging Visual Basic [System.Guid not showing properly when debugging Visual Basic]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Visual Basic variables of the System.Guid type show up as Guid.Empty instead of their actual values when displayed in the Visual Studio debugger windows (Locals, Watch, etc).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This bug affects both Visual Studio 2005 and 2008.&amp;nbsp; System.Guid variables show up fine in C#.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260579-SystemGuid-not-showing-properly-when-debugging-Visual-Basic/'&gt;System.Guid not showing properly when debugging Visual Basic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260579/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260579-SystemGuid-not-showing-properly-when-debugging-Visual-Basic/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260579-SystemGuid-not-showing-properly-when-debugging-Visual-Basic/</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:07:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260579-SystemGuid-not-showing-properly-when-debugging-Visual-Basic/</guid><evnet:views>1516</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260579/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;Visual Basic variables of the System.Guid type show up as Guid.Empty instead of their actual values when displayed in the Visual Studio debugger windows (Locals, Watch, etc).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This bug affects both Visual Studio 2005 and 2008.&amp;nbsp; System.Guid variables show up fine in C#.&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260579-SystemGuid-not-showing-properly-when-debugging-Visual-Basic/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260579/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>VR Head Tracking using the Wii remote [VR Head Tracking using the Wii remote]</title><description>A CMU grad student has devised a way to use the Wii remote to do &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw"&gt;virtual reality head tracking&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; He also seems to be doing neat HCI research like &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhSR_6-Y5Kg"&gt;foldable interactive displays&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; MSR needs to hire this guy or at least bring him in for an internship and get him working with your Surface guys on OLED-enabled technologies!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS.&amp;nbsp; The fact that he has the same initials as me has nothing to do with this recommendation. ;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260547-VR-Head-Tracking-using-the-Wii-remote/'&gt;VR Head Tracking using the Wii remote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260547/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260547-VR-Head-Tracking-using-the-Wii-remote/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260547-VR-Head-Tracking-using-the-Wii-remote/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:40:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260547-VR-Head-Tracking-using-the-Wii-remote/</guid><evnet:views>1571</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260547/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>A CMU grad student has devised a way to use the Wii remote to do &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw"&gt;virtual reality head tracking&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; He also seems to be doing neat HCI research like &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhSR_6-Y5Kg"&gt;foldable interactive displays&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; MSR needs to hire this guy or at least bring him in for an internship and get him working with your Surface guys on OLED-enabled technologies!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS.&amp;nbsp; The fact that he has the same initials as me has nothing to do with this recommendation. &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-5.gif' alt='Wink' /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260547-VR-Head-Tracking-using-the-Wii-remote/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260547/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Where to report Win32 errors [Where to report Win32 errors]</title><description>Where should I report errors I find in Win32, e.g., duplicate #defines in Win32Base.h, API's not properly guarded with #ifdef, etc.?  The MSDN Library wiki?&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258906-Where-to-report-Win32-errors/'&gt;Where to report Win32 errors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/258906/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258906-Where-to-report-Win32-errors/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258906-Where-to-report-Win32-errors/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:13:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258906-Where-to-report-Win32-errors/</guid><evnet:views>2445</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/258906/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Where should I report errors I find in Win32, e.g., duplicate #defines in Win32Base.h, API's not properly guarded with #ifdef, etc.?  The MSDN Library wiki?</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258906-Where-to-report-Win32-errors/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/258906/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>rainbow9.org [rainbow9.org]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I found this link on the &lt;a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/JavaScript"&gt;Mozilla Development Center&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rainbow9.org"&gt;http://www.rainbow9.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It also features a CSS, HTML, JavaScript, SVG, XML, and XAML editor all in&amp;nbsp;your browser.  Pretty slick!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258687-rainbow9org/'&gt;rainbow9.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/258687/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258687-rainbow9org/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258687-rainbow9org/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:20:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258687-rainbow9org/</guid><evnet:views>1127</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/258687/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;I found this link on the &lt;a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/JavaScript"&gt;Mozilla Development Center&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rainbow9.org"&gt;http://www.rainbow9.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It also features a CSS, HTML, JavaScript, SVG, XML, and XAML editor all in&amp;nbsp;your browser.  Pretty slick!&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258687-rainbow9org/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/258687/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>JavaScript behavior: odd or not? [JavaScript behavior: odd or not?]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;What would you expect this function to return?&lt;/p&gt;
		&lt;code&gt;function add(x, y, z) {&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; var x, y, z&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; return x&amp;nbsp;+ y + z&lt;br /&gt;}&lt;/code&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/258685-JavaScript-behavior-odd-or-not/'&gt;JavaScript behavior: odd or not?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/258685/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/258685-JavaScript-behavior-odd-or-not/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/258685-JavaScript-behavior-odd-or-not/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:34:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/258685-JavaScript-behavior-odd-or-not/</guid><evnet:views>2438</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/258685/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;What would you expect this function to return?&lt;/p&gt;
		&lt;code&gt;function add(x, y, z) {&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; var x, y, z&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; return x&amp;nbsp;+ y + z&lt;br /&gt;}&lt;/code&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/258685-JavaScript-behavior-odd-or-not/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/258685/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>ObjectDataSource data binding and field ordering for custom classes [ObjectDataSource data binding and field ordering for custom classes]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, hmm, I've been trying to answer lots of questions here so I thought I would go ahead and post a question of my own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's say that you have an entity class with a few fields defined:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;public class Customer&lt;br /&gt;{&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; public int Id { get; set; }&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; public string Name { get; set; }&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; public string Address { get; set; }&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; public string City { get; set; }&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; // ... more fields, etc.&lt;br /&gt;}&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I bind a collection of those to an ASP.NET control like a GridView or a DataList, the ASP.NET designer pulls the fields from the ObjectDataSource's SelectMethod just fine, but it generates them in a seemingly random order so my markup looks like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;asp:GridView runat="server" ... &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;Fields&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;asp:BoundField DataField="City" ... /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;asp:BoundField DataField="Name" ... /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;asp:BoundField DataField="Address" ... /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;asp:BoundField DataField="Id" ... /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;/Fields&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;/asp:GridView&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there an attribute I can set on these fields so that .NET will know which order I intend them to show up when I data bind them?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The weird thing about this is if I do it with reflection, I get them in the right order if I use Type.GetMembers and Predicate&amp;lt;T&amp;gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;Type type = typeof(Customer);&lt;br /&gt;List&amp;lt;MemberInfo&amp;gt; whatIGet = new List&amp;lt;MemberInfo&amp;gt;(type.GetMembers(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.DeclaredOnly));&lt;br /&gt;List&amp;lt;MemberInfo&amp;gt; whatIWanted = whatIGet.FindAll(delegate(MemberInfo m)&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; {&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; return m.MemberType != MemberTypes.Constructor &amp;amp;&amp;amp; m.MemberType != MemberTypes.Method;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; }&lt;br /&gt;); &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to avoid writing a Visual Studio 2005 macro to do this if possible.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256171-ObjectDataSource-data-binding-and-field-ordering-for-custom-classes/'&gt;ObjectDataSource data binding and field ordering for custom classes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/256171/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256171-ObjectDataSource-data-binding-and-field-ordering-for-custom-classes/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256171-ObjectDataSource-data-binding-and-field-ordering-for-custom-classes/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:26:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256171-ObjectDataSource-data-binding-and-field-ordering-for-custom-classes/</guid><evnet:views>3364</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/256171/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;Well, hmm, I've been trying to answer lots of questions here so I thought I would go ahead and post a question of my own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's say that you have an entity class with a few fields defined:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;public class Customer&lt;br /&gt;{&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; public int Id { get; set; }&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; public string Name { get; set; }&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; public string Address { get; set; }&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; public string City { get; set; }&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; // ... more fields, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256171-ObjectDataSource-data-binding-and-field-ordering-for-custom-classes/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/256171/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>2008: The Year of the Linux Desktop [2008: The Year of the Linux Desktop]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/2008_year_of_the_linux_desktop"&gt;http://www.maximumpc.com/article/2008_year_of_the_linux_desktop&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;Wait!&amp;nbsp; I thought this year was the year of the Linux desktop?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Like every year prior...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such a joke and what's sad is that they don't even realize it.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256050-2008-The-Year-of-the-Linux-Desktop/'&gt;2008: The Year of the Linux Desktop&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/256050/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256050-2008-The-Year-of-the-Linux-Desktop/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256050-2008-The-Year-of-the-Linux-Desktop/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:20:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256050-2008-The-Year-of-the-Linux-Desktop/</guid><evnet:views>6120</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/256050/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/2008_year_of_the_linux_desktop"&gt;http://www.maximumpc.com/article/2008_year_of_the_linux_desktop&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;Wait!&amp;nbsp; I thought this year was the year of the Linux desktop?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Like every year prior...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such a joke and what's sad is that they don't even realize it.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>14</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256050-2008-The-Year-of-the-Linux-Desktop/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/256050/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Call off the dogs, Microsoft [Call off the dogs, Microsoft]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/nunitaddin/archive/2007/05/30/microsoft-vs-testdriven-net-express.aspx"&gt;http://weblogs.asp.net/nunitaddin/archive/2007/05/30/microsoft-vs-testdriven-net-express.aspx&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;Threatening legal action against the developer who has made unit testing available to all Visual Studio SKU's is bad, 'mkay?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Especially so when Microsoft is planning to enable unit testing in the Visual Studio Professional SKU's in the next release.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Never mind that you can eschew the Express Editions and just use MSBuild and the command-compilers provided with the Microsoft Windows SDK and still be able to use third-party unit testing software.&amp;nbsp; Like you should be able to!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's an idea!&amp;nbsp; Make Visual Studio's unit testing support better than the third party tools that are already out there.&amp;nbsp; Currently, it's not as good, but that's OK; you've been at it for less time than the folks who've been doing it since before the .NET 2.0 release.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Actually compete instead of letting your lawyers "compete" for you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Shameful, Microsoft, absolutely shameful.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/255111-Call-off-the-dogs-Microsoft/'&gt;Call off the dogs, Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/255111/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/255111-Call-off-the-dogs-Microsoft/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/255111-Call-off-the-dogs-Microsoft/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:44:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/255111-Call-off-the-dogs-Microsoft/</guid><evnet:views>15634</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/255111/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>http://weblogs.asp.net/nunitaddin/archive/2007/05/30/microsoft-vs-testdriven-net-express.aspxThreatening legal action against the developer who has made unit testing available to all Visual Studio SKU's is bad, 'mkay?Especially so when Microsoft is planning to enable unit testing in the Visual Studio Professional SKU's in the next release.Never mind that you can eschew the Express Editions and just use MSBuild and the command-compilers provided with the Microsoft Windows SDK and still be able to use third-party unit testing software.&amp;nbsp; Like you should be able to!Here's an idea!&amp;nbsp; Make…</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>68</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/255111-Call-off-the-dogs-Microsoft/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/255111/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Emetic [Emetic]</title><description>Those of you who don't like C9 FSF trolls, look it up and have a chuckle.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254872-Emetic/'&gt;Emetic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/254872/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254872-Emetic/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254872-Emetic/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 02:12:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254872-Emetic/</guid><evnet:views>3148</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/254872/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Those of you who don't like C9 FSF trolls, look it up and have a chuckle.&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254872-Emetic/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/254872/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Where to report ASP.NET bugs? [Where to report ASP.NET bugs?]</title><description>I found one in ASP.NET with regards to localization and theming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Properties, stored in an ASP.NET theme's .skin file, with fractional values --&amp;nbsp;e.g., HorizontalPadding="0.25em" -- aren't treated as culture-invariant values.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When you use a culture with a different numeric format, e.g., commas instead of periods for the decimal separator, it uses culture-specific formatting when rendering the value, instead of culture-invariant formatting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I suspect that this would also hold for any other formats like for currency or dates and times, but I haven't verified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The workaround/hack is to create a culture-sensitive version of your .skin element with culture-specific properties -- e.g., HorizontalPadding="0,25em" -- and have your page change the SkinID of controls that use the skin when necessary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So my real question, since this particular issue is likely not pertinent to most of you, is where do I report these bugs?&amp;nbsp; I wouldn't be surprised if this bug lives in 3.0 and in the working version of 3.5, and I would like to see it eradicated before 3.5 goes live and fixed in 2.0 and 3.0.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253448-Where-to-report-ASPNET-bugs/'&gt;Where to report ASP.NET bugs?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/253448/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253448-Where-to-report-ASPNET-bugs/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253448-Where-to-report-ASPNET-bugs/</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:37:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253448-Where-to-report-ASPNET-bugs/</guid><evnet:views>2953</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/253448/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I found one in ASP.NET with regards to localization and theming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Properties, stored in an ASP.NET theme's .skin file, with fractional values --&amp;nbsp;e.g., HorizontalPadding="0.25em" -- aren't treated as culture-invariant values.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When you use a culture with a different numeric format, e.g., commas instead of periods for the decimal separator, it uses culture-specific formatting when rendering the value, instead of culture-invariant formatting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I suspect that this would also hold for any other formats like for currency or dates and times, but I haven't verified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/253448-Where-to-report-ASPNET-bugs/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/253448/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 Extensions for WCF and WPF [Visual Studio 2005 Extensions for WCF and WPF]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=F54F5537-CC86-4BF5-AE44-F5A1E805680D&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=F54F5537-CC86-4BF5-AE44-F5A1E805680D&amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;So when is this going to be done?&amp;nbsp; They haven't updated the CTP since November.&amp;nbsp; Is there not going to be an RTM version of this because of the impending release of Visual Studio 2007 aka Orcas?&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252428-Visual-Studio-2005-Extensions-for-WCF-and-WPF/'&gt;Visual Studio 2005 Extensions for WCF and WPF&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/252428/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252428-Visual-Studio-2005-Extensions-for-WCF-and-WPF/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252428-Visual-Studio-2005-Extensions-for-WCF-and-WPF/</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:43:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252428-Visual-Studio-2005-Extensions-for-WCF-and-WPF/</guid><evnet:views>21700</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/252428/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=F54F5537-CC86-4BF5-AE44-F5A1E805680D&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=F54F5537-CC86-4BF5-AE44-F5A1E805680D&amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;So when is this going to be done?&amp;nbsp; They haven't updated the CTP since November.&amp;nbsp; Is there not going to be an RTM version of this because of the impending release of Visual Studio 2007 aka Orcas?</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>18</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252428-Visual-Studio-2005-Extensions-for-WCF-and-WPF/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/252428/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Is backwards compatibility even important any more? [Is backwards compatibility even important any more?]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;If you can run an older version of Windows or DOS easily in a Virtual PC window, why bother maintaining backwards compatibility in newer versions of Windows?&amp;nbsp; The trick would be to make running a virtual Windows or DOS as seamless as possible -- just another window.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It isn't good enough if every time you start up a legacy application, it has to go through the "boot" process of loading the operating system and getting to a running state.&amp;nbsp; It has to be there loaded in the background already, ready to go, just waiting for you to start the application.&amp;nbsp; Like SuperFetch on steroids.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would no backwards compatibility free up significant enough development resources and open up previously blocked avenues towards compelling new functionality?&amp;nbsp; Is it even a worthwhile goal to drop backwards compatibility as a feature?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252253-Is-backwards-compatibility-even-important-any-more/'&gt;Is backwards compatibility even important any more?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/252253/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252253-Is-backwards-compatibility-even-important-any-more/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252253-Is-backwards-compatibility-even-important-any-more/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 05:16:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252253-Is-backwards-compatibility-even-important-any-more/</guid><evnet:views>6027</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/252253/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;If you can run an older version of Windows or DOS easily in a Virtual PC window, why bother maintaining backwards compatibility in newer versions of Windows?&amp;nbsp; The trick would be to make running a virtual Windows or DOS as seamless as possible -- just another window.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It isn't good enough if every time you start up a legacy application, it has to go through the "boot" process of loading the operating system and getting to a running state.&amp;nbsp; It has to be there loaded in the background already, ready to go, just waiting for you to start the application.&amp;nbsp; Like SuperFetch on steroids.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252253-Is-backwards-compatibility-even-important-any-more/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/252253/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Anyone tried Vista on VMware? [Anyone tried Vista on VMware?]</title><description>Or Virtual PC 2007 beta?&amp;nbsp; Or maybe Virtual PC 2004, though I seem to recall Vista not being supported on that.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251873-Anyone-tried-Vista-on-VMware/'&gt;Anyone tried Vista on VMware?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/251873/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251873-Anyone-tried-Vista-on-VMware/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251873-Anyone-tried-Vista-on-VMware/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:34:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251873-Anyone-tried-Vista-on-VMware/</guid><evnet:views>2951</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/251873/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Or Virtual PC 2007 beta?&amp;nbsp; Or maybe Virtual PC 2004, though I seem to recall Vista not being supported on that.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251873-Anyone-tried-Vista-on-VMware/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/251873/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 [Re: IE 7]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Eagerly awaiting the Ignore User feature in C9v4...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href=''&gt;Re: IE 7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/344504/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments></comments><link></link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:45:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false"></guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/344504/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Eagerly awaiting the Ignore User feature in C9v4...in reply to Re: IE 7</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/344504/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>WinFS [WinFS]</title><description>*knock knock*&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Anybody home?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now that Vista is almost out the door, is anybody else curious about what is going on with WinFS?&amp;nbsp; Or did that die when the reboot happened?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The WinFS team has been awfully quiet, or maybe I just haven't been looking for news&amp;nbsp;in the right places.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/245365-WinFS/'&gt;WinFS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/245365/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/245365-WinFS/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/245365-WinFS/</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:19:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/245365-WinFS/</guid><evnet:views>3396</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/245365/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>*knock knock*&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Anybody home?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now that Vista is almost out the door, is anybody else curious about what is going on with WinFS?&amp;nbsp; Or did that die when the reboot happened?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The WinFS team has been awfully quiet, or maybe I just haven't been looking for news&amp;nbsp;in the right places.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/245365-WinFS/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/245365/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Patent Infringment Lawsuit #765439765 Pending [Re: Patent Infringment Lawsuit #765439765 Pending]</title><description>shooby, why not quit wasting our time and wait until the lawsuit plays out before pronouncing Microsoft guilty of patent infringement?&amp;nbsp; The last time I checked, you were still innocent until proven guilty in this country's legal system.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href=''&gt;Re: Patent Infringment Lawsuit #765439765 Pending&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/343381/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments></comments><link></link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false"></guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/343381/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>shooby, why not quit wasting our time and wait until the lawsuit plays out before pronouncing Microsoft guilty of patent infringement?&amp;nbsp; The last time I checked, you were still innocent until proven guilty in this country's legal system.in reply to Re: Patent Infringment Lawsuit #765439765 Pending</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/343381/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>DirectX 10 not backwards compatible [DirectX 10 not backwards compatible]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/DirectX-10-and-so-it-ends-7762.shtml"&gt;http://news.softpedia.com/news/DirectX-10-and-so-it-ends-7762.shtml&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;Any DirectX software&amp;nbsp;developers out there happy with this decision?&amp;nbsp; It sounds like a really bad idea to me, but I'm no DirectX guru.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/138097-DirectX-10-not-backwards-compatible/'&gt;DirectX 10 not backwards compatible&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/138097/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/138097-DirectX-10-not-backwards-compatible/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/138097-DirectX-10-not-backwards-compatible/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 04:27:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/138097-DirectX-10-not-backwards-compatible/</guid><evnet:views>50436</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/138097/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/DirectX-10-and-so-it-ends-7762.shtml"&gt;http://news.softpedia.com/news/DirectX-10-and-so-it-ends-7762.shtml&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;Any DirectX software&amp;nbsp;developers out there happy with this decision?&amp;nbsp; It sounds like a really bad idea to me, but I'm no DirectX guru.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/138097-DirectX-10-not-backwards-compatible/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/138097/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Windows Vista Beta 2 canceled? [Windows Vista Beta 2 canceled?]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
				&lt;a href="http://www.windowsitpro.com/windowspaulthurrott/Article/ArticleID/48613/windowspaulthurrott_48613.html"&gt;Paul Thurrott: Microsoft Mulls Canceling Windows Vista Beta 2&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not that I consider Paul Thurrott a particularly credible source but what is Microsoft's official stance on the release of Windows Vista Beta 2?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Back when many people expressed their disappointment with Beta 1, one of the responses from Microsoft people about Beta 1 was that the "beef" was going to be in Beta 2. Beta 2 release dates in the meantime have been slipping further into the future, and now there's speculation that they're going to cancel Beta 2?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What gives, Microsoft?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137947-Windows-Vista-Beta-2-canceled/'&gt;Windows Vista Beta 2 canceled?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/137947/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137947-Windows-Vista-Beta-2-canceled/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137947-Windows-Vista-Beta-2-canceled/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:33:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137947-Windows-Vista-Beta-2-canceled/</guid><evnet:views>18105</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/137947/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Paul Thurrott: Microsoft Mulls Canceling Windows Vista Beta 2
Not that I consider Paul Thurrott a particularly credible source but what is Microsoft's official stance on the release of Windows Vista Beta 2?Back when many people expressed their disappointment with Beta 1, one of the responses from Microsoft people about Beta 1 was that the "beef" was going to be in Beta 2. Beta 2 release dates in the meantime have been slipping further into the future, and now there's speculation that they're going to cancel Beta 2?What gives, Microsoft?</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>20</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/137947-Windows-Vista-Beta-2-canceled/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/137947/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Microsoft feels your pain [Microsoft feels your pain]</title><description>Apologies to President Clinton for borrowing his phrase...&lt;a href="http://msexp.streamnavig.com/msexp/player.asp?e=E9999&amp;amp;s=9999_en_w&amp;amp;f=9999_en&amp;amp;uid=00011C7758813ADF&amp;amp;lng=en&amp;amp;cou=uk"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://msexp.streamnavig.com/msexp/player.asp?e=E9999&amp;amp;s=9999_en_w&amp;amp;f=9999_en&amp;amp;uid=00011C7758813ADF&amp;amp;lng=en&amp;amp;cou=uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Found at Marcus Perryman's blog&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/10/20/483067.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/10/20/483067.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/124940-Microsoft-feels-your-pain/'&gt;Microsoft feels your pain&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/124940/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/124940-Microsoft-feels-your-pain/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/124940-Microsoft-feels-your-pain/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:10:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/124940-Microsoft-feels-your-pain/</guid><evnet:views>8394</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/124940/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Apologies to President Clinton for borrowing his phrase...&lt;a href="http://msexp.streamnavig.com/msexp/player.asp?e=E9999&amp;amp;s=9999_en_w&amp;amp;f=9999_en&amp;amp;uid=00011C7758813ADF&amp;amp;lng=en&amp;amp;cou=uk"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://msexp.streamnavig.com/msexp/player.asp?e=E9999&amp;amp;s=9999_en_w&amp;amp;f=9999_en&amp;amp;uid=00011C7758813ADF&amp;amp;lng=en&amp;amp;cou=uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Found at Marcus Perryman's blog&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/10/20/483067.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/10/20/483067.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>JChung2006</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/124940-Microsoft-feels-your-pain/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/124940/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>