<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for Knute</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/knute/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by Knute</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/knute/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:16:01 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:16:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3170.1238, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>British Military Bans iPods [British Military Bans iPods]</title><description>&lt;strong&gt;
				Interesting article:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/07/13/britain.mod.reut/index.html"&gt;
				&lt;strong&gt;
						http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/07/13/britain.mod.reut/index.html
				&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;strong&gt;
				Looks like iPods pose a security threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute
		&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/12815-British-Military-Bans-iPods/'&gt;British Military Bans iPods&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/12815/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/12815-British-Military-Bans-iPods/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/12815-British-Military-Bans-iPods/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:16:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/12815-British-Military-Bans-iPods/</guid><evnet:views>12205</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/12815/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;strong&gt;
				Interesting article:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/07/13/britain.mod.reut/index.html"&gt;
				&lt;strong&gt;
						http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/07/13/britain.mod.reut/index.html
				&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;strong&gt;
				Looks like iPods pose a security threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute
		&lt;/strong&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/12815-British-Military-Bans-iPods/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/12815/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Uh oh, IE it's time to wake up and smell the... [Uh oh, IE it's time to wake up and smell the...]</title><description>&lt;strong&gt;
				Now the feds are saying DON'T use IE. That should be a wake up call to the IE team. Hello are you guys going to come up with a more secure, better browser before the next decade???&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;a href="http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B7D91FC13-9FA9-4703-B000-10000DAA78DD%7D&amp;amp;siteid=google&amp;amp;dist=google"&gt;
				&lt;strong&gt;
						http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B7D91FC13-9FA9-4703-B000-10000DAA78DD%7D&amp;amp;siteid=google&amp;amp;dist=google
				&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;strong&gt;
				~ Knute
		&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/11297-Uh-oh-IE-its-time-to-wake-up-and-smell-the/'&gt;Uh oh, IE it's time to wake up and smell the...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/11297/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/11297-Uh-oh-IE-its-time-to-wake-up-and-smell-the/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/11297-Uh-oh-IE-its-time-to-wake-up-and-smell-the/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:54:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/11297-Uh-oh-IE-its-time-to-wake-up-and-smell-the/</guid><evnet:views>5577</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/11297/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;strong&gt;
				Now the feds are saying DON'T use IE. That should be a wake up call to the IE team. Hello are you guys going to come up with a more secure, better browser before the next decade???&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;a href="http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B7D91FC13-9FA9-4703-B000-10000DAA78DD%7D&amp;amp;siteid=google&amp;amp;dist=google"&gt;
				&lt;strong&gt;
						http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B7D91FC13-9FA9-4703-B000-10000DAA78DD%7D&amp;amp;siteid=google&amp;amp;dist=google
				&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;strong&gt;
				~ Knute
		&lt;/strong&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/11297-Uh-oh-IE-its-time-to-wake-up-and-smell-the/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/11297/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Is this the future of Authentication??? [Is this the future of Authentication???]</title><description>
				&lt;strong&gt;I am interested if you would do this to authenticate your computer, etc.&lt;/strong&gt;
		
		&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/09/spain.club/index.html"&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
				
						&lt;strong&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/09/spain.club/index.html&lt;/strong&gt;
				
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		
				&lt;strong&gt;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9294-Is-this-the-future-of-Authentication/'&gt;Is this the future of Authentication???&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/9294/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9294-Is-this-the-future-of-Authentication/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9294-Is-this-the-future-of-Authentication/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 23:13:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9294-Is-this-the-future-of-Authentication/</guid><evnet:views>7664</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/9294/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;strong&gt;I am interested if you would do this to authenticate your computer, etc.&lt;/strong&gt;
		
		&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/09/spain.club/index.html"&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
				
						&lt;strong&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/09/spain.club/index.html&lt;/strong&gt;
				
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		
				&lt;strong&gt;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9294-Is-this-the-future-of-Authentication/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/9294/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Gmail in trouble in California [Gmail in trouble in California]</title><description>
				&lt;strong&gt;Looks like Gmail is already in trouble in the sunshine state. Lawmakers are passing legislation to help protect consumers privacy. It's about time...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
		
		&lt;a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/8781969.htm"&gt;
				
						&lt;strong&gt;http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/8781969.htm&lt;/strong&gt;
				
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		
				&lt;strong&gt;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8322-Gmail-in-trouble-in-California/'&gt;Gmail in trouble in California&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/8322/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8322-Gmail-in-trouble-in-California/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8322-Gmail-in-trouble-in-California/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 21:58:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8322-Gmail-in-trouble-in-California/</guid><evnet:views>2562</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/8322/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;strong&gt;Looks like Gmail is already in trouble in the sunshine state. Lawmakers are passing legislation to help protect consumers privacy. It's about time...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
		
		&lt;a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/8781969.htm"&gt;
				
						&lt;strong&gt;http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/8781969.htm&lt;/strong&gt;
				
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		
				&lt;strong&gt;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/8322-Gmail-in-trouble-in-California/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/8322/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Whats up with MSDN Search???? [Whats up with MSDN Search????]</title><description>&lt;strong&gt;
				I did a search for "data grid" on MSDN and this is what I got:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;a href="http://www.hestness.com/nettest/dg.jpg"&gt;
				&lt;strong&gt;
						http://www.hestness.com/nettest/dg.jpg
				&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;strong&gt;
				
						&lt;br /&gt;
						&lt;br /&gt;What is up with that? I find the quickest way to search MSDN is to go to google and put in my query and it will search MSDN, the MSDN search tool is pathetic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute
		&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5907-Whats-up-with-MSDN-Search/'&gt;Whats up with MSDN Search????&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/5907/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5907-Whats-up-with-MSDN-Search/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5907-Whats-up-with-MSDN-Search/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 20:21:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5907-Whats-up-with-MSDN-Search/</guid><evnet:views>5798</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/5907/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;strong&gt;
				I did a search for "data grid" on MSDN and this is what I got:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;a href="http://www.hestness.com/nettest/dg.jpg"&gt;
				&lt;strong&gt;
						http://www.hestness.com/nettest/dg.jpg
				&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;strong&gt;
				
						&lt;br /&gt;
						&lt;br /&gt;What is up with that? I find the quickest way to search MSDN is to go to google and put in my query and it will search MSDN, the MSDN search tool is pathetic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute
		&lt;/strong&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5907-Whats-up-with-MSDN-Search/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/5907/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>&amp;quot;RedHat Rolls out Linux Desktop Software&amp;quot; Huh??? [&amp;quot;RedHat Rolls out Linux Desktop Software&amp;quot; Huh???]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
				
						
								&lt;strong&gt;This article claims that Red Hat has "Rolled Out" desktop software,doesn't that mean that you can go out and buy a copy? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's not rolled out until it's in cellophane and on store shelves,which will be????&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
						
						&lt;a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-05/05/content_1453964.htm"&gt;
								
										&lt;strong&gt;http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-05/05/content_1453964.htm&lt;/strong&gt;
								
						&lt;/a&gt;
						&lt;br /&gt;
						&lt;br /&gt;
						
								&lt;strong&gt;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;
						
						&lt;br /&gt;
				
		&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5801-quotRedHat-Rolls-out-Linux-Desktop-Softwarequot-Huh/'&gt;&amp;quot;RedHat Rolls out Linux Desktop Software&amp;quot; Huh???&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/5801/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5801-quotRedHat-Rolls-out-Linux-Desktop-Softwarequot-Huh/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5801-quotRedHat-Rolls-out-Linux-Desktop-Softwarequot-Huh/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 22:50:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5801-quotRedHat-Rolls-out-Linux-Desktop-Softwarequot-Huh/</guid><evnet:views>2127</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/5801/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;
				
						
								&lt;strong&gt;This article claims that Red Hat has "Rolled Out" desktop software,doesn't that mean that you can go out and buy a copy? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's not rolled out until it's in cellophane and on store shelves,which will be????&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
						
						&lt;a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-05/05/content_1453964.htm"&gt;
								
										&lt;strong&gt;http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-05/05/content_1453964.htm&lt;/strong&gt;
								
						&lt;/a&gt;
						&lt;br /&gt;
						&lt;br /&gt;
						
								&lt;strong&gt;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;
						
						&lt;br /&gt;
				
		&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5801-quotRedHat-Rolls-out-Linux-Desktop-Softwarequot-Huh/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/5801/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Binding &amp;amp; Editing XML to a DataGrid in ASP.Net [Binding &amp;amp; Editing XML to a DataGrid in ASP.Net]</title><description>
				&lt;strong&gt;Does anyone here know of a good example of Binding an XML document, not an XML resultset from SQL, to a DataGrid in ASP.net, in C#?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have seen some stuff in VB, but not complete examples. The examples I have seen have all been Xml as a result of a SQL query, not dealing with pure XML documents. I want to deal only with XML...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5298-Binding-amp-Editing-XML-to-a-DataGrid-in-ASPNet/'&gt;Binding &amp;amp; Editing XML to a DataGrid in ASP.Net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/5298/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5298-Binding-amp-Editing-XML-to-a-DataGrid-in-ASPNet/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5298-Binding-amp-Editing-XML-to-a-DataGrid-in-ASPNet/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:55:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5298-Binding-amp-Editing-XML-to-a-DataGrid-in-ASPNet/</guid><evnet:views>2830</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/5298/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;strong&gt;Does anyone here know of a good example of Binding an XML document, not an XML resultset from SQL, to a DataGrid in ASP.net, in C#?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have seen some stuff in VB, but not complete examples. The examples I have seen have all been Xml as a result of a SQL query, not dealing with pure XML documents. I want to deal only with XML...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5298-Binding-amp-Editing-XML-to-a-DataGrid-in-ASPNet/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/5298/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Best Way to avoid SPAM? [Best Way to avoid SPAM?]</title><description>
				&lt;strong&gt;what is the best way, to avoid spam when using forums? I never got any&amp;nbsp;Spam at this email until I signed up here. I guess it's because of the email in my profile&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4055-Best-Way-to-avoid-SPAM/'&gt;Best Way to avoid SPAM?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/4055/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4055-Best-Way-to-avoid-SPAM/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4055-Best-Way-to-avoid-SPAM/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 01:50:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4055-Best-Way-to-avoid-SPAM/</guid><evnet:views>2842</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/4055/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;strong&gt;what is the best way, to avoid spam when using forums? I never got any&amp;nbsp;Spam at this email until I signed up here. I guess it's because of the email in my profile&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;~ Knute&lt;/strong&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4055-Best-Way-to-avoid-SPAM/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/4055/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Interesting Article for the Penguin's [Interesting Article for the Penguin's]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
				This article in Information Week talks about Linux's Achilles heel, interesting:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18901660"&gt;http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18901660&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute
		&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4017-Interesting-Article-for-the-Penguins/'&gt;Interesting Article for the Penguin's&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/4017/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4017-Interesting-Article-for-the-Penguins/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4017-Interesting-Article-for-the-Penguins/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:35:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4017-Interesting-Article-for-the-Penguins/</guid><evnet:views>4046</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/4017/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;
				This article in Information Week talks about Linux's Achilles heel, interesting:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18901660"&gt;http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18901660&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute
		&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4017-Interesting-Article-for-the-Penguins/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/4017/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Why do VB code snippets come before C# in MSDN? [Why do VB code snippets come before C# in MSDN?]</title><description>
				
						&lt;strong&gt;Hey MSDN team, why do the VB code snippets come before the C# and C++ samples? Is it something like this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Easy - VB&lt;br /&gt;2. Difficult - C#&lt;br /&gt;3. Expert - C++&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just curious...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
						&lt;br /&gt;
						ps - I can see the flames already, look at that fire burn!!!
				
		&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3727-Why-do-VB-code-snippets-come-before-C-in-MSDN/'&gt;Why do VB code snippets come before C# in MSDN?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/3727/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3727-Why-do-VB-code-snippets-come-before-C-in-MSDN/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3727-Why-do-VB-code-snippets-come-before-C-in-MSDN/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:11:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3727-Why-do-VB-code-snippets-come-before-C-in-MSDN/</guid><evnet:views>2962</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/3727/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;strong&gt;Hey MSDN team, why do the VB code snippets come before the C# and C++ samples? Is it something like this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Easy - VB&lt;br /&gt;2. Difficult - C#&lt;br /&gt;3. Expert - C++&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just curious...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
						&lt;br /&gt;
						ps - I can see the flames already, look at that fire burn!!!</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3727-Why-do-VB-code-snippets-come-before-C-in-MSDN/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/3727/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>MSDN Feature Request [MSDN Feature Request]</title><description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
				&lt;span&gt;
						I find the MSDN documentation to be marginally helpful when developing my projects. I usually go to MSDN to find out what the methods and properties of an object are, then I go out on the web and search for "Scenarios" where I would use them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It would be nice if there were more scenario's in MSDN. What I mean is something like this. Say you are developing an application that accesses an Xml Document. You need to be able to iterate through all the nodes and if you find and attribute with the name of productID add a value.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am not really look for a sample, because I get really tired of samples against the NW DB.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What would be nice is if I clicked on XmlDataDocument in MSDN in addition to all the properties and methods there would also be some common scenarios like the one above. Then there would be a short list of the items necessary to make that happen, i.e. XmlDataDocument, XmlNode, Xpath, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don't know if I am making sense here but I just think the documentation could be a little richer.
				&lt;/span&gt;
		&lt;/p&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		What are your thoughts?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3092-MSDN-Feature-Request/'&gt;MSDN Feature Request&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/3092/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3092-MSDN-Feature-Request/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3092-MSDN-Feature-Request/</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:01:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3092-MSDN-Feature-Request/</guid><evnet:views>816</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/3092/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I find the MSDN documentation to be marginally helpful when developing my projects. I usually go to MSDN to find out what the methods and properties of an object are, then I go out on the web and search for "Scenarios" where I would use them.It would be nice if there were more scenario's in MSDN. What I mean is something like this. Say you are developing an application that accesses an Xml Document. You need to be able to iterate through all the nodes and if you find and attribute with the name of productID add a value.I am not really look for a sample, because I get really tired of samples…</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3092-MSDN-Feature-Request/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/3092/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>No Passport Login? [No Passport Login?]</title><description>It would have been nice if there was integrated Passport login. Was this avoided for some reason? I have noticed on sites like gotdotnet that they chose the Passport route.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Other than that small gripe this site is great! Well maybe some emoticons in messages would be fun too, but hey I can live without them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/646-No-Passport-Login/'&gt;No Passport Login?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/646/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/646-No-Passport-Login/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/646-No-Passport-Login/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:50:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/646-No-Passport-Login/</guid><evnet:views>3750</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/646/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>It would have been nice if there was integrated Passport login. Was this avoided for some reason? I have noticed on sites like gotdotnet that they chose the Passport route.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Other than that small gripe this site is great! Well maybe some emoticons in messages would be fun too, but hey I can live without them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ Knute</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Knute</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/646-No-Passport-Login/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/646/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>