<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 - Discussions by LightRider</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:02:26 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:02:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>0</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>0</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>0</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Vista &amp;quot;upgrade&amp;quot; drops compliance checking, requires old OS to install</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I suppose that it was wrong of me to say what I did. I have been increasingly angry and frustrated about the majority of the news concerning Vista lately. I have been very optimistic and enthusiastic about the OS and related technologies, but to hear negative
 thing after negative thing about it, I let it out inappropriately. I don't mean to rag on you guys who make the great software, but the people who make the business and marketing choices. I will try to express my frustration in a different way from now on.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/a35aeb2603c74cfa929b9dec0050785a#a35aeb2603c74cfa929b9dec0050785a</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:10:54 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/a35aeb2603c74cfa929b9dec0050785a#a35aeb2603c74cfa929b9dec0050785a</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Vista &amp;quot;upgrade&amp;quot; drops compliance checking, requires old OS to install</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I suppose he might have offered information about the subject of the thread, had he not proffered indifference in responding to the concerns raised by dismissing them outright and then claiming that he will &quot;quit the thread&quot; after doing so. Although, I
 will say that he at least opened his mouth to confront an obviously unpopular corporate decision. I don't see any other 'Softies sharing their opinions or trying to defend the decision, short of swiping at my comment.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/d4d0e3bb75a14b388a979dec00507806#d4d0e3bb75a14b388a979dec00507806</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:31:57 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/d4d0e3bb75a14b388a979dec00507806#d4d0e3bb75a14b388a979dec00507806</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Vista &amp;quot;upgrade&amp;quot; drops compliance checking, requires old OS to install</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>LightRider wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;...but <b>his posts</b> in this thread...</div>
</blockquote></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/30ae10ed58014403b5d39dec005077b2#30ae10ed58014403b5d39dec005077b2</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/30ae10ed58014403b5d39dec005077b2#30ae10ed58014403b5d39dec005077b2</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Vista &amp;quot;upgrade&amp;quot; drops compliance checking, requires old OS to install</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was not attacking you, I was expressing incredulity of the content of your posts, which I tend to hold to a higher standard when there's a Windows emblem next to the name.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/e806063b0da945d098779dec00507736#e806063b0da945d098779dec00507736</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:22:01 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/e806063b0da945d098779dec00507736#e806063b0da945d098779dec00507736</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Vista &amp;quot;upgrade&amp;quot; drops compliance checking, requires old OS to install</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't know much about this PetKnep guy, but his posts in this thread are incredibly worthless, and very lacking for an MS guy.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/3d4029a93fed4cab96309dec00507691#3d4029a93fed4cab96309dec00507691</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/251788-Vista-quotupgradequot-drops-compliance-checking-requires-old-OS-to-install/3d4029a93fed4cab96309dec00507691#3d4029a93fed4cab96309dec00507691</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - No Upgrading?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response, I appreciate it.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/f716bbec5d1349fdbf1e9dec001ef599#f716bbec5d1349fdbf1e9dec001ef599</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:10:08 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/f716bbec5d1349fdbf1e9dec001ef599#f716bbec5d1349fdbf1e9dec001ef599</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - No Upgrading?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Will I be forced to buy a new vista license if I want to upgrade my machine more than once? What if I have to change devices due to hardware failure more than once?<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/926d53c76e9447a59f6e9dec001ef4db#926d53c76e9447a59f6e9dec001ef4db</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:23:30 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/926d53c76e9447a59f6e9dec001ef4db#926d53c76e9447a59f6e9dec001ef4db</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - No Upgrading?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This doesn't address my upgrading question.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/43ea6218b59e420aaf849dec001ef44f#43ea6218b59e420aaf849dec001ef44f</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/43ea6218b59e420aaf849dec001ef44f#43ea6218b59e420aaf849dec001ef44f</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - No Upgrading?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So the MS guys have nothing to say?<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/07eea68041a74abfbb939dec001ef364#07eea68041a74abfbb939dec001ef364</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/07eea68041a74abfbb939dec001ef364#07eea68041a74abfbb939dec001ef364</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - No Upgrading?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is this true? Are we enthusiasts unable to upgrade our systems without ponying up more dough for you guys? This is almost as bad as the WinFS news... Why are you trying to hurt your fans?<br>
<br>
Referring to <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/10/12/2240214.shtml">http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/10/12/2240214.shtml</a><br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/239400#239400</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:43:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/239400-No-Upgrading/239400#239400</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - WinFS no longer a product</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is the saddest news I've heard from MS lately. This will be even worse for my friend to hear because he is a big DB guy. I was so looking forward to that UX that allowed me to surf my sea of data in such a natural way...oh well...still a dream.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/203237-WinFS-no-longer-a-product/3fbb572d0f484cfe96fd9deb017a0033#3fbb572d0f484cfe96fd9deb017a0033</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:49:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/203237-WinFS-no-longer-a-product/3fbb572d0f484cfe96fd9deb017a0033#3fbb572d0f484cfe96fd9deb017a0033</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Alex St. John - Surviving Vista</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That's why I have a throw-away hotmail account. Access to interesting content without the fears of registration consequences.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/190067-Alex-St-John-Surviving-Vista/84e7b714ee734bf6b6959deb01635dc6#84e7b714ee734bf6b6959deb01635dc6</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 04:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/190067-Alex-St-John-Surviving-Vista/84e7b714ee734bf6b6959deb01635dc6#84e7b714ee734bf6b6959deb01635dc6</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Alex St. John - Surviving Vista</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An interesting and informative presentation about casual content development for the new OS given by Alex St. John and Mike Sandige. Check out
<a href="http://www.gdctv.net">www.gdctv.net</a> for the video. I like where he razzes the MS guys for not giving the presentation themselves.<br>
<br>
I liked Alex back when he wrote for Maximum PC magazine back in the day. Glad to see that he's been doing well. Don't like that WildTangent has spyware aspects to it, but I think it's been a positive development for the net in general.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/190067-Alex-St-John-Surviving-Vista/190067#190067</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 02:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/190067-Alex-St-John-Surviving-Vista/190067#190067</guid>
		<dc:creator>LightRider</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LightRider/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>