<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for LostInTangent</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/LostInTangent/Comments/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description></description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:03:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: OData Roadmap: Exposing Any Data Source as an OData service</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <p>@CmdrTallen</p><p>Did you set a page size for the entity set you want to page? Without doing that, SkipCount and TopCount won't be enabled. It's a bug that needs to be fixed.</p><p>As far as the v3 part, that is because I was using the CTP version of WCF Data Services in the demo, while the toolkit code on Codeplex isn't.</p><p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/MIX/MIX11/FRM16#c634415138150000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 18:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/MIX/MIX11/FRM16#c634415138150000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: OData Roadmap: Exposing Any Data Source as an OData service</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ <p>@Michael</p><p>Sorry to hear you're having some issues. First off: the toolkit assemblies that are publically available are built against .NET 4. They can be used with the new CTP (as I did at MIX), but you'd have to download the source from Codeplex and rebuild them against those assemblies. I didn't actually use any OData v3 features in the session, so my use of the CTP was pretty superflous.</p><p>The 500 error you're getting is a generic WCF error and could be from anything, and it's vague nature isn't because of the toolkit, that's a behavior of WCF. If you add the following attribute to your service, you should see a better error message:</p><p>[ServiceBehavior(IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults=true)]</p><p>Feel free to ping me if you continue having issues.</p><p>/JC</p><p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/MIX/MIX11/FRM16#c634404980940000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:34:54 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/MIX/MIX11/FRM16#c634404980940000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Web Camps TV #2 - OData Overview with Jonathan Carter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>There definitely will shaggygi. When James asked me to do an episode for the show, I intended on showing a lot more, but I ended up gabbing on forever and he cut me off at 20 minutes or so <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> Stay tuned for future episodes on producing and consuming OData
 services.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In the meantime, if you want to chat about how you could get started, feel free to ping me at the e-mail I mentioned above.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Web+Camps+TV/Web-Camps-TV-2-OData-Overview-with-Jonathan-Carter#c634189963180000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:51:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Web+Camps+TV/Web-Camps-TV-2-OData-Overview-with-Jonathan-Carter#c634189963180000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Web Camps TV #2 - OData Overview with Jonathan Carter</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>@Exoteric</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Yep I do have a W3C Linked Data sticker on my laptop <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> We're all fans of RDF and what the W3C have done to move the industry towards a Web of data. As you said, the original Astoria prototype did have RDF support. The only reason it was removed, in favor
 of AtomPub (as the default format), was because of customer feedback.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The idea of supporting RDF is certainly still active, we just want to make sure not to randomize people without having a really good reason for it. If RDF support would be useful for you, I'd love to know. Make sure to shoot any general OData feedback you
 may have our way as well (joncart at microsoft dot com), as that's always useful.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>/JC</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Web+Camps+TV/Web-Camps-TV-2-OData-Overview-with-Jonathan-Carter#c634189834410000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:17:21 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Web+Camps+TV/Web-Camps-TV-2-OData-Overview-with-Jonathan-Carter#c634189834410000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 37: Leveraging Model Metadata and Validation with ASP.NET MVC2</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>The client-side validation that MVC uses is fully extensible, and it's pretty simple to wire-up a custom implementation. Out of the box, the validation uses MS AJAX, and if you want to use jQuery validation, there is an implementation of that in the MVC
 futures project (<a href="http://aspnet.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=37423">here</a>). If you have any troubles getting it to work, feel free to e-mail me (joncart at microsoft dot com).</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-37-Leveraging-Model-Metadata-and-Validation-with-ASPNET-MVC2#c633988577620000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:49:22 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-37-Leveraging-Model-Metadata-and-Validation-with-ASPNET-MVC2#c633988577620000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 37: Leveraging Model Metadata and Validation with ASP.NET MVC2</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Great question, and fortunately the answer is yes <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> I tried to keep the video short, so I couldn't go into every scenario, but all of the validation messages can be customized, as well as localized by using resource files. In the video I just simply used
 the default messages for example.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-37-Leveraging-Model-Metadata-and-Validation-with-ASPNET-MVC2#c633985859610000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:19:21 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-37-Leveraging-Model-Metadata-and-Validation-with-ASPNET-MVC2#c633985859610000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 22: Simplifying Data-Driven Web Applications</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>This experience will get much better <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /></p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-22-Simplifying-Data-Driven-Web-Applications#c633825883390000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:32:19 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-22-Simplifying-Data-Driven-Web-Applications#c633825883390000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 22: Simplifying Data-Driven Web Applications</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>They make us all cry. It is a &quot;solution&quot; for a problem that is a &quot;solution&quot; for another problem <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> Getting away from generated code is the best answer.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-22-Simplifying-Data-Driven-Web-Applications#c633825882930000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:31:33 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-22-Simplifying-Data-Driven-Web-Applications#c633825882930000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 22: Simplifying Data-Driven Web Applications</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>A good portion of what I did is indeed available in .NET 3.5 SP1 (mainly the data annotations). Basically my main focus of this episode was to highlight the new &quot;single line of code&quot; approach, and then scope it with the context for those that aren't familiar
 with Dynamic Data at all.</p>
<p>Good news for you: the data annotations are localizable, and you can specify the order in which columns appear without having to worry about the physical order of the properties in the entity classes. Email me (joncart at microsoft dot com) and I'll get
 you some samples of this.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-22-Simplifying-Data-Driven-Web-Applications#c633825881000000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:28:20 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-22-Simplifying-Data-Driven-Web-Applications#c633825881000000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 11: Bi-Directional Routing with ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Great to hear!</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-11-Bi-Directional-Routing-with-ASPNET-WebForms-40#c633825874020000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:16:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-11-Bi-Directional-Routing-with-ASPNET-WebForms-40#c633825874020000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 8: Pure Client-Side Development with ASP.NET AJAX 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Yep, exactly. Unfortunately, because we're trying to be cutting edge with this show, stuff WILL change between an episode being published and new versions of the bits coming out <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /></p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633825873670000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:16:07 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633825873670000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 8: Pure Client-Side Development with ASP.NET AJAX 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Yep, you'll need to include the JavaScript files. Just keep in mind that the ScriptManager control in ASP.NET WebForms was the one that was including the ASP.NET AJAX libraries for you, so once you aren't using it, you'll have to include the scripts manually.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633825873130000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:15:13 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633825873130000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 8: Pure Client-Side Development with ASP.NET AJAX 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>AjaxRes.js is actually an artifact of the internal builds that I was using for the video <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> If you grab the latest bits off of Codeplex, you won't need it.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633825872320000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633825872320000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 15: Model-First Development with the Entity Framework 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Sounds like what you want it to use Dynamics as your data store/platform, and then place the Entity Framework over it so that you can program against its dynamic entities. If so, the guys over at ADX Studio (<a href="http://www.adxstudio.com/">http://www.adxstudio.com/</a>)
 are working on something that handles this very nicely.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-15-Model-First-Development-with-the-Entity-Framework-40#c633825868700000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-15-Model-First-Development-with-the-Entity-Framework-40#c633825868700000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 15: Model-First Development with the Entity Framework 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>I'll definitely be digging into the code much more moving forward. This episode was just an initial introduction to the high level changes coming. I'll make sure to provide plenty of good detail/usage examples <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /></p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-15-Model-First-Development-with-the-Entity-Framework-40#c633825866180000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-15-Model-First-Development-with-the-Entity-Framework-40#c633825866180000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 15: Model-First Development with the Entity Framework 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for the heads up bertnz. The ORM space certainly has lots of great options.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-15-Model-First-Development-with-the-Entity-Framework-40#c633825864790000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-15-Model-First-Development-with-the-Entity-Framework-40#c633825864790000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 15: Model-First Development with the Entity Framework 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>LINQ To SQL is getting quit a few improvements in the .NET 4 timeframe. You can see a pretty comprehensive list here:
<a href="http://damieng.com/blog/2009/06/01/linq-to-sql-changes-in-net-40">http://damieng.com/blog/2009/06/01/linq-to-sql-changes-in-net-40</a></p>
<p>As far as the Entity Framework being the preferred option for data access moving forward, yes, that is the case.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-15-Model-First-Development-with-the-Entity-Framework-40#c633825864340000000</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:00:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-15-Model-First-Development-with-the-Entity-Framework-40#c633825864340000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 14: Sentient DSLs</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[haha very well played <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-14-Sentient-DSLs#c633742298890000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-14-Sentient-DSLs#c633742298890000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 11: Bi-Directional Routing with ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I would go with the unique string approach. Since part of the whole objective is to provide more meaningful URLs to end users, integer/guid identifiers don't really provide them any value. That doesn't mean that you won't still need to do something along
 the lines of &quot;Products/1&quot; in situations were that makes sense. You might have resources that don't legitimately have a unique value other than an ID. For SEO purposes having a descriptive value in the URL certainly helps as well. &quot;Products/Cups&quot; is capable
 of being spidered as a resource on &quot;cups&quot; whereas &quot;Products/45&quot; isn't. Will that make a huge difference? Maybe not, but every little bit helps <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br>
<br>
There is no need to get religious on either approach, it all just comes down to which approach serves the needs of your application the best. Since routing is so extensible, you should have fun building the sitemap you want. There is soooo much more to it then
 what I showed in this demo since this episode was meant only to show how routing and webforms can work together. General purpose routing has plenty of awesome little features.<br>
<br>
I doubt there will be a 10-4 episode on ASP.NET Routing specifically since it isn't a feature in .NET Framework 4.0, but I could throw together some ad-hoc screencasts and plop them on my blog (<a href="http://www.lostintangent.com">http&#58;&#47;&#47;www.lostintangent.com</a>) or C9.<br>
<br>
Keep these great questions coming guys, I seriously love the 10-4 community <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-11-Bi-Directional-Routing-with-ASPNET-WebForms-40#c633718993180000000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-11-Bi-Directional-Routing-with-ASPNET-WebForms-40#c633718993180000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 11: Bi-Directional Routing with ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[That is one of the first questions that always comes up after seeing ASP.NET Routing <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /> As of right now the only way to configure your routes is through code. That said, I'm a firm believer that a good API is the perfect foundation for layering additional
 forms of expression (i.e. loading routes from a config file or DB). There are a couple prototypes floating around that pull your route definitions from config that I'd be more than happy to share with you.<br>
<br>
As far as new rendering of controls, I'll deifnitely try to fit this in later episodes. Funny enough I actually showed off a very subtle change to the ListView control in this episode but I didn't call it out. You no longer have to have a PlaceHolderTemplate
 if your ItemTemplate's contents are truly seperate markup (i.e. not &lt;li&gt;'s within a &lt;ul&gt; for instance).
<br>
<br>
Feel free to email me (joncart at microsoft dot com) and I can share some additional info in the meantine.
<br>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-11-Bi-Directional-Routing-with-ASPNET-WebForms-40#c633718855760000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:32:56 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-11-Bi-Directional-Routing-with-ASPNET-WebForms-40#c633718855760000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 8: Pure Client-Side Development with ASP.NET AJAX 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>That's a good question. Firstly, it's important to point out that almost that entire demo could have been done imperatively, without adding anything to the HTML unneccesarily. The declarative command bubbling (sys:command) is a feature I can choose to use,
 but I can achieve the exact same thing strictly in JavaScript. The same goes for the conditional attributes I used (class:odd).<br>
<br>
While ASP.NET AJAX provides a lot of functionality in terms of working with it declaratively (as some folks like), it was developed with the mindset of using it completely unobtrusively. That said, the data templates are somewhat of&nbsp;a gray area. Defining the
 template is arguably much easier (for some)&nbsp;to do in HTML as opposed to within JavaScript (as other libraries do). That said, it does impose a foreign component to the HTML that isn't actually valid content (i.e. the binding expressions).<br>
<br>
If you don't like the approach of defining your templates and bindings within the markup, you can still do that in JavaScript as well. The creation of the DataView class simply requires an element that it can bind to and repeat, so there is no reason why that
 element couldn't be constructed using DOM methods imperatively, as opposed to retreiving it from the actual DOM as I did in the demo.<br>
<br>
I'll put together a demo that does this and post it later.</p>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633700784980000000</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633700784980000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: 10-4 Episode 8: Pure Client-Side Development with ASP.NET AJAX 4.0</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[To clarify one thing about the demo I showed off in the video...the DataView control, bindings, command bubbling, and ADO.NET Data Services integration are currently available on Codeplex, but the change tracking functionality and the ability to save changes
 back to the service aren't. That behavior will be included in the next Codeplex preview, along with much more.<br>
<p>posted by LostInTangent</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633699863960000000</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-8-ASPNET-AJAX-40#c633699863960000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>LostInTangent</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>