<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 - Discussions by MikeGalos</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MikeGalos/Discussions/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MikeGalos/Discussions</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:29:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>0</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>0</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>0</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - vacation (updated).. Montreal / Nova Scotia / NYC</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you want speed to get there quickly, take the NY Thruway (I 90). If you want scenic, take NY Route 17.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/257521-vacation-updated-Montreal--Nova-Scotia--NYC/a3942da709c24a098cfd9deb00151783#a3942da709c24a098cfd9deb00151783</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/257521-vacation-updated-Montreal--Nova-Scotia--NYC/a3942da709c24a098cfd9deb00151783#a3942da709c24a098cfd9deb00151783</guid>
		<dc:creator>MikeGalos</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MikeGalos/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Summer of War?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Syria wants Lebanon back. Quoting (indirectly) the Lebanese daily newspaper
<i>Al Mustaqbal</i> ...<br>
<br>
<em>Syrian troops on Thursday reportedly have penetrated three kilometers into Lebanese territories, taking up positions in the mountains near Yanta in east Lebanon's Bekaa Valley.</em>
<br>
<br>
More on this at <a href="http://www.michaeltotten.com/archives/001483.html">Michael J. Totten's Blog</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/256115-Summer-of-War/f85cef0ef5ad4d05a2979dec00910ed2#f85cef0ef5ad4d05a2979dec00910ed2</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/256115-Summer-of-War/f85cef0ef5ad4d05a2979dec00910ed2#f85cef0ef5ad4d05a2979dec00910ed2</guid>
		<dc:creator>MikeGalos</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MikeGalos/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question for the &amp;quot;program managers&amp;quot;  types</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As an FYI: I absolutely agree with Bruce's 3Bs description. Nicely summarized.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250285-Question-for-the-quotprogram-managersquot-types/bc80871c631649239ec69dec0039cd20#bc80871c631649239ec69dec0039cd20</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250285-Question-for-the-quotprogram-managersquot-types/bc80871c631649239ec69dec0039cd20#bc80871c631649239ec69dec0039cd20</guid>
		<dc:creator>MikeGalos</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MikeGalos/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question for the &amp;quot;program managers&amp;quot;  types</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>Minh wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td><strong>MikeGalos wrote:</strong> <i>&#65279;All the responsibility with none of the authority is
<em>not</em> a joke. It's the key to successfully being a Program Manager as Microsoft has traditionally defined it rather than a generic project manager.
<br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thanks for the insights, Mike. I found this to be fascinating. So MS has baked this into how it runs projects. Do you find this to be a hinderance when it comes to Agile methods (w/ all the SCRUM talks during Vista development)? Or are you guys moving towards
 Agile at all?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
It varies with how the team implements an Agile methodology and how religious they are to it. My current group is Very dedicated to Agile and while some of what PMs do changes (as do ALL disciplines) the need for PMs doing PM things absolutely remains critical.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250285-Question-for-the-quotprogram-managersquot-types/f9388822efec4b8bbe2d9dec0039ccf7#f9388822efec4b8bbe2d9dec0039ccf7</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:30:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250285-Question-for-the-quotprogram-managersquot-types/f9388822efec4b8bbe2d9dec0039ccf7#f9388822efec4b8bbe2d9dec0039ccf7</guid>
		<dc:creator>MikeGalos</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MikeGalos/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question for the &amp;quot;program managers&amp;quot;  types</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote>
<div>Minh wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;
<blockquote>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td>
<td><strong>MikeGalos wrote:</strong> <i><br>
The groups that do worst split design and schedule and that means that when trade offs inevitably occur, the choice that is made isn't based on all the factors but is, instead, a personality and power fight between the person who owns the design and the person
 who owns the schedule and often (usually?) the end result is precisely the wrong choice.<br>
</i></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
Interesting. I assume this means that the PM would solely takes care of the scheduling (business goals) bits, since there is usally already a technical (design goals) guy in the group.<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
The whole point of a true Program Manager is that they MUST own both scheduling and technical design. If there is a dedicated schedule owner or a dedicated feature owner then you're in that miserable state of politics rather than function. If there is already
 a design goals guy in the group and they don't own the schedule then the PM isn't doing the real PM job.<br>
<br>
Yes, there are some groups inside and outside of Microsoft that have &quot;non-technical PMs&quot; but they're not following the real methodology. They've been coopted either by management who don't understand the role and want a traditional Project Manager or they haven't
 been able to find people with the mix of skills needed to really do the PM job.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250285-Question-for-the-quotprogram-managersquot-types/d03495ab960f42929d2a9dec0039ccca#d03495ab960f42929d2a9dec0039ccca</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250285-Question-for-the-quotprogram-managersquot-types/d03495ab960f42929d2a9dec0039ccca#d03495ab960f42929d2a9dec0039ccca</guid>
		<dc:creator>MikeGalos</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MikeGalos/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Question for the &amp;quot;program managers&amp;quot;  types</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All the responsibility with none of the authority is <em>not</em> a joke. It's the key to successfully being a Program Manager as Microsoft has traditionally defined it rather than a generic project manager.
<br>
<br>
You see, if the person who has the responsibility has the authority then they can get things done by saying &quot;do it or else&quot; rather than &quot;do it because it's right and here's why it's right...&quot;<br>
<br>
If a Microsoft PM can't explain to his team why something is the right thing to do then it's time for him to rethink his plans and assumptions.<br>
<br>
The groups that do best understand that ownership of the design and the schedule must be in the same person and that person needs to understand both the business and technical issues in order to make the proper trade offs. That person is a good PM. Yes, they're
 rare but it's worth finding them.<br>
<br>
The groups that do worst split design and schedule and that means that when trade offs inevitably occur, the choice that is made isn't based on all the factors but is, instead, a personality and power fight between the person who owns the design and the person
 who owns the schedule and often (usually?) the end result is precisely the wrong choice.<br>
<br>
Mike<br>
Formerly: 13 years as a Microsoft employee - 10 as a PM<br>
Currently: 2&nbsp;years consulting to Microsoft as a PM<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250285-Question-for-the-quotprogram-managersquot-types/0a2fab002395437d908a9dec0039cb50#0a2fab002395437d908a9dec0039cb50</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 08:47:09 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/250285-Question-for-the-quotprogram-managersquot-types/0a2fab002395437d908a9dec0039cb50#0a2fab002395437d908a9dec0039cb50</guid>
		<dc:creator>MikeGalos</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MikeGalos/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Microsoft is, Microsoft are?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the differences between British English and US English<br>
<br>
US English treats a corporation or company or group as the singular entity itself so in the US we'd say:<br>
<br>
<strong>Microsoft is releasing ...<br>
</strong><br>
UK English treats a corporation or company or group as a plural collection so in the UK they'd say:<br>
<br>
<strong>Microsoft are releasing ...<br>
</strong><br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/201084-Microsoft-is-Microsoft-are/b8918e221ea84563aee69deb01778699#b8918e221ea84563aee69deb01778699</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:35:51 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/201084-Microsoft-is-Microsoft-are/b8918e221ea84563aee69deb01778699#b8918e221ea84563aee69deb01778699</guid>
		<dc:creator>MikeGalos</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/MikeGalos/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>