Discussions

4 hours ago, Minh wrote

@SteveRichter, he said "technically uneducated". Big difference

That would matter if you were to take his assertion for "technologically sophisticated" californian. And that's a generalization that I simply can't accept.

@Bass:

32 minutes ago, Bass wrote

stuff

++

1 day ago, GoddersUK wrote

You're suggesting that Microsoft will patch flash independently of Adobe?

Yes.

Surely that creates a whole host of problems in itself as the MS Flash and Adobe Flash begin to diverge?

Why? It's not like the format spec has changed significantly in the last three years...

http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/Leapmotion-Kinect-20/LastRead?lastReadTime=05%2F22%2F2012%2015%3A57%3A24%20%2B00%3A00 

On the other hand, I'd rather have "Microsoft's Flash" rather than "Adobe's Flash". In the former case, the code goes thru the SDL and is subject to regular patches and security reviews. I'd rather have that

My impression is that "Microsoft is" is more of a north american thing, while "Microsoft are" is more commonly used in the UK.

I use "<company> are" here just to annoy people

Works in Renton, WA

Ah Chris, Chris... will you ever learn?

Awww... butthurt much?