Loading User Information from Channel 9

Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9

Latest Achievement:

Loading User Information from MSDN

Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN

Visual Studio Achievements

Latest Achievement:

Loading Visual Studio Achievements

Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements


PerfectPhase PerfectPhase "This is not war, this is pest control!" - Dalek to Cyberman
  • Windows. 10 bucks a month.

    Beer28 wrote:
    W3bbo wrote:
    Beer28 wrote: I don't want to pay for renting my game console.

    You're not renting your console, you're paying a subscription fee to access a service.

    Paying access to a service isn't the same thing as paying access to physical property. You pay internet access fees, how is that any different?

    People are hosting these games on xbox on their own network tab. So MS is going to make huge money off of keeping list servers with p2p ip's and handing them off to console connections like gamespy or other linux game servers do for free? And handle everybody's sensitive vital and financial info because they're microsoft.

    Not on my tab. It's p2p, and there's no need for a gateway other than to collect money.

    Thats fine for one on one ect, but xbox live is about more than that, it's more of a community, it allows you to keep your single identity across all the games you play, global leguae tables the stort of things you do not get from from lots of small systems.  Also alot of people that use the xbox just want the system to work and that is what xbox live gives them.  

    Take it or leave it it's up to you.


  • hard disk help

    As far as hard drives, have you thought about faster drives or using RAID-0 to increase the speed.  For the spec machine you list, a single 7200rpm drive is a bit of a wimp Smiley


  • Anonymous methods

    Sven Groot wrote:
    PerfectPhase wrote: One other thing is there a general perpose parameterless delegate in the framework?  I tend to use ThreadStart but it's a bit missleading when you read the code back


    Thanks, feel kind of silly now as thats in the help file.....

  • Anonymous methods

    Sampy wrote:

    Works fine on the latest VS in my private branch.

    What's the latest version of VS like, I can manage about 3-4 compile-run sequences with the Feb-CTP before VS's memory useage tops out at over 500Mb and the UI becomes too slow to use?


  • Anonymous methods

    That's a shame, using anonymous methods in control.invoke seem, well, natural.

    One other thing is there a general perpose parameterless delegate in the framework?  I tend to use ThreadStart but it's a bit missleading when you read the code back

    Thanks anyway,


  • Anonymous methods

    Oh, I have the Feb CTP and get

    Error 1 The best overloaded method match for 'System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(System.Delegate)' has some invalid arguments D:\devwork\VirtualBox\VirtualBox.Lines.Standard\Visualiser.cs 54 10 VirtualBox.Lines.Standard

    Error 2 Argument '1': cannot convert from 'anonymous method' to 'System.Delegate' D:\devwork\VirtualBox\VirtualBox.Lines.Standard\Visualiser.cs 54 24 VirtualBox.Lines.Standard


  • Anonymous methods

    I have a chunk of code that looks like this

    public delegate void MyDelegate();
    private void DataReceived (object sender, GenericEventArgs<byte[]> data)
    MyDelegate d = delegate


    Surely there must be a way to write it like this

    private void DataReceived (object sender, GenericEventArgs<byte[]> data)
    rtbLog.Invoke(delegate ()

    Just can't see how!


  • how original!

    harumscarum wrote:
    Was flipping through the channels and I saw this: http://www.nbc.com/nbc/The_Office/ . *sigh*

    Looks like thats another great show trashed



  • I Fully Support Mr. Grimes, .NET is NOT the right technology for US as a C++ programmer

    leighsword wrote:

    everything is OK before Longhorn is released.

    Not 100% sure on this but you should still be able to call into WinFx via COM Callable Wrappers from unmanaged code. 

    Any way all the existing API's should still work with longhorn, you just will not get seamless access to all the cool new toys Smiley

    And there will always be a need for unmanaged C++ for kernel/driver type work, right tool for the right job and all that.


  • Response.​Redirect?

    Rake wrote:
    it just says line error

    Server.URLEncode()-ing the Session("username")

    Please tell me you didn't actuall type the '()-ing the..' bit but instead typed

    Server.URLEncode (Session("username"))

    having first checked that Session("username") is not null?


    As for redirect