Discussions

Bas said:

CreamFilling512 said:

*snip*

Wolfram|Alpha isn't sure what to do with your input

That's pretty much all I get from it. When I asked a question about CAT5e, it asked me if I wanted to know something about cats. Can't say I'm too impressed so far...

For people saying that it's not providing the answers for your questions, like about CAT5e, seriously you have to understand what is going on.  The data has to be curated.  If you can find a database on cable specifications and get it curated, or do it yourself (eventually you will be able to do so according to Wolfram), then you will be able to query it.  You can't query data that doesn't exist in a queryable form.  Google doesn't query data on CAT5e either.  It just returns documents linking to the word CAT5e. 

You have to be realistic.  The first step is understanding what the engine is doing.  The second step is patience for the day of actual release (it's only in beta!), the third step will be to add data to it.

I was so irritated by the misspelling and your reposting of the misspelling - I was going to say something nasty - but then I figured it out.  :*)

andy_hanger18 wrote:



Richard.Hein wrote: "I'm surprised that you do not understand ... I'd expect a developer to know what unit tests are and to have done this for all your code in the past".

That statement is simply rubbish. Most developers know what unit tests are but not everyone unit tests their code.  I'd just say that the guy has a bee in his bonnet about unit testing. He thinks its the best thing since sliced bread and everyone should do it.

Unit testing is still fairly new in my opinion. More and more people are taking it up but its not as popular as this guy seems to think. No doubt some people have been doing it for years but I'd say more just don't.

Another case of a little knowledge can be dangerous I think.

Personally, unless your company procedures call for including unit testing when you write code then I wouldn't worry about it.

Nobody mentioned unit tests, and nothing in the processes documentation mentioned it (I am a contractor); it was brought up just before deployment after 4 months of coding.  Of course, I believe that testing should happen as soon as possible for each bit, but they want "sign off" on ALL the test cases "before QA is involved".

ScanIAm wrote:

It's highly likely that the QA guy is looking for you to do his job.  He's read a few articles in the various trade mags about unit tests, and like others have pointed out, he's trying to make you look bad.

I wouldn't mess with him, head on, but instead, I'd document 20 or so unit tests and send them to him.  And by document, I mean press "///" and let .NET do the documentation for you.  Fill it out in intricate detail with only the most obvious of comments.  Things like:

i++;   // Add 1 to i

etc.

Be sure to send them back, (cc your PM) and ask him if that is the level and kind of documentation he is looking for.

Then, sleep with his wife.

I was thinking about that (the part about writing 20 or so unit tests and sending the .NET documentation ), but that would involve getting IT requests for intalling NUnit or some other harness, etc....  AFter I talk to my PM I'll see if they want real unit tests or not.

Dr Herbie wrote:


Sounds like a bumptious prat. CCing your PM was a ridiculous thing to do. He's probably a failed developer.  Have you talked to your PM about this?

What do your company processes say anout Unit Tests?

Herbie

Thanks for the feedback.  I've also worked on software for clinical trials and much more stringent testing and QA processes and in fact I am the guy that brought unit testing in-house at my last employer.  Anyways, the company processes don't say squat about unit tests.  They sent me a template, but it had nothing filled in, so I asked for clarification on the level of detail, and content.  I searched for other examples across all the documentation currently available, and there's nothing except a "summary" document from another dev who wrote each .dll name and stored proc, with "As Designed" next to Result of test, and the fact that he tested it.  I wasn't sure if that's what they wanted, and for the life of me can't imagine what use the doc is but to waste a developers time.

I haven't talked to my PM but did CC him my reply, which stated, "Your definition of unit tests is completely different ... I've done plenty of unit testing but have never had to document them ..." and attached a link to Wikipedia on unit testing.

Has anyone here been asked to write documentation describing all the unit tests they have done on their code, for QA to review, with pass/fail signoffs on everything?

The reason I ask is because I've never been asked to do this kind of documentation, and it's not even "unit tests" they are asking about, what they really mean is some functional testing done on a web application that covers the use cases, but "not in as much detail" as the QA teams test cases.  I sent QA a draft of what I think they wanted, and asked for feedback "because I've never had to write this kind of documentation and I'm not sure if this is what you want", and got back a reply, "I'm surprised that you do not understand ... I'd expect a developer to know what unit tests are and to have done this for all your code in the past" with a CC to my project manager, which was basically trying to make me look bad, and that basic kind of attitude.  I replied that our definitions of "unit test" were completely different....  Wondering if there's any opinion, because I am really pissed off right now.

lcriscola wrote:



Be# wrote: - Does "Microsoft Viusal Studio Team System 2008 Team Suite" comprise all the features of the "Architecture Edition", "Development Edition", "Database Edition" and "Test Edition" -- or is it yet another addition?

It comprise all the features.

Just to be clear, Team Suite includes each of the editions, but Team Suite is not an "edition" in itself.

littleguru wrote:



W3bbo wrote: Anyone wanna bet he's a 13 yearold who knows a bit of VB after playing around with Dreamweaver then took-on an overly ambitious project on GetAFreelancer.com?

From his question I don't understand if he wants only to compare blobs or check for stuff in the images... that's why I asked - his question doesn't make that 100% clear to me.

This part makes elevates the difficulty from a binary comparison to extremely advanced AI programming, or stuff you'd find in PhotoSynth ... "like fingerprint matching/Comparing ..... ".

I tried it and get the same problem.