@LarryLarsen: I think you misunderstood me. I didn't say you shouldn't have to uninstall apps. I understand the need for OEMs to install this crapware. However, I shouldn't have to be an expert and spend significant effort to uninstall the apps. Add/remove programs should "just work". Microsoft shouldn't provide the Windows logo for machines that install crapware that can't be easily removed this way.
I agree with this completely. I was thinking during the broadcast that there sure are important ways that Microsoft could improve Windows. The tip that people reboot after each app is removed could be negated if Windows could better deactivate running applications.
I don't follow how having a feature in C# where an event is signalled or a method is called when a property is changed would tie the language to the windows platform.
It would help me if the language had a "factory" facility. Where you have a hierarchical structure of abstract base classes and derived classes. I write a static method in each derived class that is used to determine if the derived class is the one to be newed up from the input. And then a 2nd static method that actually news up the object. The hassle comes in having to write the code that iterates thru the collection of classes, calling the static "Is this the class to new up" method. And then calling the static "create yourself" method. I use reflection for this. Which is OK. But a language feature would be nice.
I am so worried that azure is going to stifle innovation by Microsoft in the windows OS space. A network of PCs and servers should have more and more of a cloud like configuration and look and feel. Networks of PC should be able to connect to each other over the web with minimal setup effort. A windows PC should be able to connect to the network/cloud and, starting from a stub of an OS, load and access all the apps available from the cloud/network. SQL server databases should be easy to connect to in the network/cloud. There should be automatic replication of databases and file shares. I worry that Microsoft will not allow Windows to compete with Azure in its desire to maximize revenue from pay per use Azure.
I was not clear on my dependancy property question. I would find it useful if I could define a method be called whenever a property in an object is changed. Expanding that feature to its logical conclusion, signal an "event handler" whenever a method of an object is called.
In my case, DIR /AL /S did not show any junction points to the backup drive. But there were a ton of junctions points listed in a windows.old directory and in c:\users directories left over from when I moved the PC out of a domain and into a workgroup. I deleted all of these unnecessary directories and the backup completed successfully. What kind of code could I have written that would have analyzed the PC and listed the reasons my backup was failing?
Defrag: So You Just Got a New PC
Jan 05, 2012 at 1:46 PMI agree with this completely. I was thinking during the broadcast that there sure are important ways that Microsoft could improve Windows. The tip that people reboot after each app is removed could be negated if Windows could better deactivate running applications.
The Roslyn Project - Meet the Design Team
Nov 18, 2011 at 9:35 AMI am interested in hearing more about how the data structures Anders was describing work.
Channel Live at BUILD: Q&A with Anders Hejlsberg
Oct 04, 2011 at 4:11 PMI don't follow how having a feature in C# where an event is signalled or a method is called when a property is changed would tie the language to the windows platform.
Channel Live at BUILD: Q&A with Anders Hejlsberg
Oct 04, 2011 at 4:06 PMIt would help me if the language had a "factory" facility. Where you have a hierarchical structure of abstract base classes and derived classes. I write a static method in each derived class that is used to determine if the derived class is the one to be newed up from the input. And then a 2nd static method that actually news up the object. The hassle comes in having to write the code that iterates thru the collection of classes, calling the static "Is this the class to new up" method. And then calling the static "create yourself" method. I use reflection for this. Which is OK. But a language feature would be nice.
Silverlight TV 80: Reactive Extensions
Aug 06, 2011 at 8:14 AMWill we ever be able to do away with the UI thread? Or at least change C# to simplify the work of marshalling onto the UI thread.
Episode 53 - Scott Guthrie Discusses Windows Azure
Jul 29, 2011 at 3:08 PMI am so worried that azure is going to stifle innovation by Microsoft in the windows OS space. A network of PCs and servers should have more and more of a cloud like configuration and look and feel. Networks of PC should be able to connect to each other over the web with minimal setup effort. A windows PC should be able to connect to the network/cloud and, starting from a stub of an OS, load and access all the apps available from the cloud/network. SQL server databases should be easy to connect to in the network/cloud. There should be automatic replication of databases and file shares. I worry that Microsoft will not allow Windows to compete with Azure in its desire to maximize revenue from pay per use Azure.
Microsoft Board Member Charles H. Noski
Jul 14, 2011 at 9:11 AMI think the BOD should also be reponsible for reviewing why Microsoft has fallen so far behind Apple, Facebook and Google in the last 5 years.
Anders Hejlsberg: Questions and Answers
May 07, 2011 at 8:45 AMI was not clear on my dependancy property question. I would find it useful if I could define a method be called whenever a property in an object is changed. Expanding that feature to its logical conclusion, signal an "event handler" whenever a method of an object is called.
ECMAScript 5: The New Parts
Apr 26, 2011 at 12:14 PMsome things I don't understand about Javascript.
Why no interfaces? Why does WPF and sivlerlight not have javascript? Why is javascript not a .NET language?
Defrag 004 - Battery Life, Slow Wake, Library Problems
Apr 20, 2011 at 9:03 AMI had a windows7 backup failing on me and was told to look for junction points from the C: drive to the backup drive.
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-system/how-to-determine-why-windows-7-backup-failed/e553269c-776a-e011-8dfc-68b599b31bf5
What are junction points? Can I write code that will enumerate them? I would like to write an app that would evaluate a PC and list the reasons windows backup will not complete successfully.
In my case, DIR /AL /S did not show any junction points to the backup drive. But there were a ton of junctions points listed in a windows.old directory and in c:\users directories left over from when I moved the PC out of a domain and into a workgroup. I deleted all of these unnecessary directories and the backup completed successfully. What kind of code could I have written that would have analyzed the PC and listed the reasons my backup was failing?
See more comments…