Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Windows Mobile 6.0 Things and Stuff
Apr 27, 2007 at 1:43 AMUK Community: DeveloperDeveloper Day
Dec 21, 2006 at 2:01 PMUK Community: DeveloperDeveloper Day
Dec 21, 2006 at 1:45 AMYup think I missed some of the good sessions - next time I'll try and get the inside word on which ones should be best!
London Niners: Tour, Drinks and Debate
Oct 03, 2006 at 2:52 AMFully intend to do DDD day 4. I did 3, but only managed to find W3bbo.
However, another weekend would be fun too, and I am free that weekend. I'd suggest York, but that is because I live there.
Rory Blyth: The Exit Interview
Sep 26, 2006 at 6:23 AMCongrats Rory. You go, girl!
Otto Berkes - Origami's Architect gives first look at Ultramobile PCs
Mar 10, 2006 at 4:01 AMI would define it, for a device like this, as a working day. 7-8 hours. 2-3 hours doesnt cut it.
Why a working day? Well, why 74 mins on a CD? Because its a target to aim for that makes sense - not an arbitrary number, a number with solid meaning to people who will actually use the damn thing.
Otto Berkes - Origami's Architect gives first look at Ultramobile PCs
Mar 09, 2006 at 4:41 AMI can see this having niche uses for workers out on the road (similar to what Sabot mentioned in previous threads) - but I cant see the man on the street going out and buying one of these. I look at the spec for this, and compare it to my WM5.0 pocket PC, and it just doesnt stack up:
Comparison PPC Origami
Connectivity Wifi, Bluetooth, GPRS Wifi, Bluetooth
Battery life ~7 hours with gprs on ~2 -3 hours
Cost Free with contract ~$1000
(<$50 month)
The origami site is selling it on connectivity - email and messaging everywhere. My PPC does that allready. I cant see why I need one of these....
Origami comes out better on resolution - so yeah for watching movies or whatever its going to come out well - but are they likely to have dvd drives built in? Yeah I can run my windows apps on it but most people dont run many windows apps other than office suite and then this doesnt have a keyboard. A cheap laptop would be better for things like that.
Its not going to run any decent games, so its not going to compete with the PSP. I can see their being games developed specifically to target it, but only if it sells well enough and again I cant see that.
Also, when it comes to form factor, I am severely disapointed. Its so 80's/90s. Apple has set a new standard in aesthetics with the iPod and spin-offs and frankly, this just sucks in comparison. People bought iPods partly because they look cool. These devices do not look cool.
I would have thought MS could have learned some lessons from how apple has gained over the last few years - but it seems not.
It needs to be somthing diferent. It needs to be somthing special and new that nothing else does. As it is it seems half-way to being a laptop, half-way to being a ppc, half-way to being a mobile media device, half-way to being a lot of things, and yet not good enough to take on any of the specialist devices in any area - and yet more than twice the cost of any of the specialist devices.
Somthign like the iPod - you could explain why you should buy one in less than ten words: All your music, everywhere you go. My challenge to the Origami team - do the same. Why should I have one of these, in less than ten words.
Jay Schmelzer - Working on the VB Core Team
Nov 03, 2005 at 2:51 AMI have a gazillion ideas for snippets I want to write - but the snippet editor home page on gotdotnet is down it seems
http://workspaces.gotdotnet.com/vbsnippeteditor
PDC Walkabout (Three clips)
Sep 21, 2005 at 3:50 AMAnders Hejlsberg - LINQ
Sep 14, 2005 at 5:51 AMThat was, having calmed down a bit, pretty much exactly what I was going to ask.
SQL Server has been developed over a long time and is very very good at doing things like getting the two records out of 100 million that you want very quickly. I hope DLinq takes advantage of this - I mean, does it as Minh asks do a full scan of the table or does it parse your DLinq query in to T-SQL?
See more comments…