<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 - Discussions by The_Saint</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/The_Saint/Discussions/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/The_Saint/Discussions</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:17:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:17:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>0</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>0</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>0</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - I wonder where my hotel is, let me look it up on -Bing Maps-.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So,</p>
<p>'bing' it is then. I think the ad dept has produced a master stroke here. If we take the 'g' to mean 'you know who', then we are being told, in a subliminal manner, to 'bin-google'. Which is very cute.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subliminal_message">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subliminal_message</a></p>
<p>The 'decision engine' angle is very nice though, and the concept looks very promising...</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/470909-I-wonder-where-my-hotel-is-let-me-look-it-up-on-Bing-Maps-/4ea12433907c429b9cc09deb00dfc026#4ea12433907c429b9cc09deb00dfc026</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:41:29 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/470909-I-wonder-where-my-hotel-is-let-me-look-it-up-on-Bing-Maps-/4ea12433907c429b9cc09deb00dfc026#4ea12433907c429b9cc09deb00dfc026</guid>
		<dc:creator>The_Saint</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/The_Saint/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - And the EU strikes again...</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I think the important point to draw from this, is that 'choice' is important, and bully-boy underhand tactics will not win the day. If you want people to choose your products, provide a compelling case for them to 'choose' (your product). Be it, better performance,
 competitive cost, increased value, fantastic quality or superb experience.</p>
<p>Having a large market share I.e. &gt; 80%, is not a problem, as long as you aquired it in a fair and just manner. If that market share is being eroded by competitors, then don't * about it or use underhand tactics. Build better products!</p>
<p>Big corporations should learn from their mistakes; to be fined once is tough luck, to be fined twice or more is careless, and shareholders don't forget these things quickly as the fine always hits the bottom line. Yes, you're always going to have the small
 fishes gnawing away at your feet and complaining to the regulators, but the solution for them is the same. Build better products!</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/469084-And-the-EU-strikes-again/e407ea8a0aa849c686e39deb00dd4af4#e407ea8a0aa849c686e39deb00dd4af4</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:11:24 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/469084-And-the-EU-strikes-again/e407ea8a0aa849c686e39deb00dd4af4#e407ea8a0aa849c686e39deb00dd4af4</guid>
		<dc:creator>The_Saint</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/The_Saint/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Dream IT...</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I came across these short films today and thought other niners may enjoy them.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://dreams.honda.com/#/allstories">http://dreams.honda.com/#/allstories</a><br>
<br>
I don't work for Honda.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/461936-Dream-IT/461936#461936</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/461936-Dream-IT/461936#461936</guid>
		<dc:creator>The_Saint</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/The_Saint/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Operating Systems in 50 years.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Operating systems will just be taken for granted, just like electricity, the telephone, the railways and cars. They will be self-healing to a greater or lesser extent, with simple user interaction and interfaces. They may even be 'baked-in' to the hardware
 of the day, or 'embedded everything', if you will.</p>
<p>Remember as coders, you create other peoples' realities and experiences, what you decide an OS to be, then it will be so. I don't think the 'rise of the machines' will be anything to worry about. Just look at what they were predicting in the fifties, home
 cleaning robots, you know the sort of thing I mean.</p>
<p>I disagree with Charles on the 'intelligence' issue. Yes an OS could be classed as an intelligent implementation by the coding team, but it will not be intelligent per se. It will give users a perception of intelligence. It will not be able to make a meaningful
 relationship between ice cream and strawberries for example, because it will never have the 'experience' of ice cream and strawberries.</p>
<p>Yes, many-core and parallel computing may bring more 'grunt' to the show, but it will never become the compelling experience that is human interaction. But, bit by bit (excuse the pun!), day by day it will be improved.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/434673-Operating-Systems-in-50-years/af99a399bc3b4586b6be9dea0106c5eb#af99a399bc3b4586b6be9dea0106c5eb</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/434673-Operating-Systems-in-50-years/af99a399bc3b4586b6be9dea0106c5eb#af99a399bc3b4586b6be9dea0106c5eb</guid>
		<dc:creator>The_Saint</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/The_Saint/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>