<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for Tom Kirby-Green</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/dot_tom/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by Tom Kirby-Green</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dot_tom/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:50:30 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:50:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Is F# really &amp;quot;C# Advanced&amp;quot;? [Is F# really &amp;quot;C# Advanced&amp;quot;?]</title><description>So back in the day we had Mort (VB), Elvis (C# with a web bias) and Einstein (C++). With F# becoming an 'official' language sponsored by the C# team what persona should we &lt;STRIKE&gt;encumber&lt;/STRIKE&gt; tag F# with?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Joking aside I find the intersection of C# 3.0, F# and ParallelFX with their common Functional meta-theme an interesting mix, esp. with the apparent degree of involved shared people resources within Microsoft. Is F# destined to become "C# Advanced"? Or will C#'s eventual replacement be Elvis-orientated version of F#? What do folks think?&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258602-Is-F-really-quotC-Advancedquot/'&gt;Is F# really &amp;quot;C# Advanced&amp;quot;?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/258602/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258602-Is-F-really-quotC-Advancedquot/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258602-Is-F-really-quotC-Advancedquot/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:50:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258602-Is-F-really-quotC-Advancedquot/</guid><evnet:views>3804</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/258602/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>So back in the day we had Mort (VB), Elvis (C# with a web bias) and Einstein (C++). With F# becoming an 'official' language sponsored by the C# team what persona should we &lt;STRIKE&gt;encumber&lt;/STRIKE&gt; tag F# with?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Joking aside I find the intersection of C# 3.0, F# and ParallelFX with their common Functional meta-theme an interesting mix, esp. with the apparent degree of involved shared people resources within Microsoft. Is F# destined to become "C# Advanced"? Or will C#'s eventual replacement be Elvis-orientated version of F#? What do folks think?</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Tom Kirby-Green</dc:creator><slash:comments>14</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258602-Is-F-really-quotC-Advancedquot/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/258602/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Any word on the Dec Orcas (ISO) CTP? [Any word on the Dec Orcas (ISO) CTP?]</title><description>Any word on the December 2006 Visual Studio Orcas CTP? I understand this is the one that will have a .ISO distribution (yay!) so we can install it alongside Whidbey on Vista without recorse to Virtual PC (whoot).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;This week? Next? In the new year?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250715-Any-word-on-the-Dec-Orcas-ISO-CTP/'&gt;Any word on the Dec Orcas (ISO) CTP?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/250715/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250715-Any-word-on-the-Dec-Orcas-ISO-CTP/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250715-Any-word-on-the-Dec-Orcas-ISO-CTP/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:04:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250715-Any-word-on-the-Dec-Orcas-ISO-CTP/</guid><evnet:views>1708</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/250715/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Any word on the December 2006 Visual Studio Orcas CTP? I understand this is the one that will have a .ISO distribution (yay!) so we can install it alongside Whidbey on Vista without recorse to Virtual PC (whoot).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;This week? Next? In the new year?&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Tom Kirby-Green</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250715-Any-word-on-the-Dec-Orcas-ISO-CTP/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/250715/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>The best way to effect &amp;quot;net use&amp;quot; from C#? [The best way to effect &amp;quot;net use&amp;quot; from C#?]</title><description>What's the best way to effect a "net use" from C#? I need to be able to establish named drives, passing the user name and password. AndAlso of course remove said mappings. In other words I'd like to be able to carry out variations on a theme of:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; net use q: &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.comfile://\\SomeServer\SomeShare&gt;\\SomeServer\SomeShare&lt;/a&gt; foo /user:bar&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;and&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; net use /d q:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;One way of doing this might be to use System.Diagnostics.Process and redirect the stdout and stderr so I can parse any output to delivery decent structured error messages that my code can act upon. However that seems a little clunky. I'd really rather PInvoke a set of APIs than "shell out". Anyone got any thoughts?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Cheers - tom.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/242590-The-best-way-to-effect-quotnet-usequot-from-C/'&gt;The best way to effect &amp;quot;net use&amp;quot; from C#?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/242590/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/242590-The-best-way-to-effect-quotnet-usequot-from-C/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/242590-The-best-way-to-effect-quotnet-usequot-from-C/</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:14:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/242590-The-best-way-to-effect-quotnet-usequot-from-C/</guid><evnet:views>8802</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/242590/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>What's the best way to effect a "net use" from C#? I need to be able to establish named drives, passing the user name and password. AndAlso of course remove said mappings. In other words I'd like to be able to carry out variations on a theme of:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; net use q: \\SomeServer\SomeShare foo /user:barand&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; net use /d q:One way of doing this might be to use System.Diagnostics.Process and redirect the stdout and stderr so I can parse any output to delivery decent structured error messages that my code can act upon. However that seems a little clunky. I'd really rather PInvoke a set&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Tom Kirby-Green</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/242590-The-best-way-to-effect-quotnet-usequot-from-C/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/242590/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>