C9 is still an unresponsive pig of a site for me.
For the most part, I've given up coming here, because it's just not worth the agonisingly long delays (and non-responses) to every click... it's easily the worst site I use.
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
exoteric said:vesuvius said:*snip*
That leaves anti-virus companies with a particularly unpleasant position: they must argue that Windows cannot be made more safe by default because the bundling of Security Essentials would significantly impact their market share. Their commercial interests are at odds with their own mission: they depend financially on new Windows machines being unprotected.
Another install ballot screen ??
exoteric said:W3bbo said:*snip*
One could persist the file system index on a system partition on a separate solid state disk to mitigate the issue. I imagine one could perhaps also use the cache of a hybrid disk to maintain the index.
The problem with organizing files and with tree-structured file systems is that often files do not naturally fall into a single category, so what is needed is a graph-structured layout. On the other hand, few people want to maintain a graph-structured layout manually. It's just too much work.
The new Semantic Engine that Microsoft presented at the last PDC looks like an attempt to solve this issue by having an engine that applies machine learning techniques to automatically index files - both textual and binary, such as images and audio. It'll be interesting to see how easily extensible it is. It could be one hell of a replacement for ifilters. There's so many interesting types of files that are not indexed currently.
I thought that WinFS was the attempt to manage this... essentially a relational view of the underlaying NTFS attributes.
mstefan said:elmer said:*snip*
I'm not sure about XP and earlier (don't recall offhand, and I'm too lazy to go boot XP), but Vista and Win7 will automagically run scheduled defrags in the background. IIRC, one caveat is that you can't defrag the MFT when the volume is in use, it has to be done at boot time (similar to a disk check/repair).
There are automated defrag utilities (diskeeper for example) that monitor the MFT and Pagefile to defrag them while the volume is in use.
rhm said:Sven Groot said:*snip*
NTFS uses b-trees for it's directory structure - you should be able to put millions of files in a single directory without the time to open a single named file increasing significantly. Of course Windows Explorer will become slow and use a lot of memory and don't even think about sharing that many files over SMB. But NTFS itself is fine with it.
Yes, because of the way the MFT works, max files per volume and max files per folder are the same thing, and how you organise them should make little or no difference to performance of NTFS.
To a file server handling requests, it's probably much of a muchness... but, of course, Windows Explorer viewing a folder with 2^32 files, might a different matter
Large volumes and/or folders can suffer from mft/folder/file fragmentation, and so I find that it's often good practice to archive rarely used files to separate volumes, rather than mixing rarely acessed files with frequently accessed files... unless you want to use an automated defrag ultility.
The 326dpi display is what made me proclaim out loud "wow", I didn't know that level of resolution was possible using IPS panels.
I will say that I'm not fond of the design of this unit: it looks too much like the handheld battery-powered Braun shavers of the 1970s and 80s that were black plastic with various metal bits sticking out, invariably becoming greasy and yucky over time. It wouldn't surprise me if this non-flush design went the same way.
I would be interested in buying this product to replace my PDA and mobile phone, and I was all set before Steve announced that 32GB is the capacity maximum for this generation. It's the first time they haven't announced a doubling of capacity. I guess I'll have to wait until next year for the 64GB version, but by then my music collection might be more than that (I've got 54GB right now).
it looks too much like the handheld battery-powered Braun shavers of the 1970s and 80s
Now, if it doubled as a shaver, I might be tempted... that'd be a feature I could actually use.
iShave... there's an app for that! - use the camera on those "difficult to see" places, as you mow them down... zoom right in on those pesky nostril hairs.
Sven Groot said:
Hmm, I'm not sure about the design. It feels very retro-80s to me. I think I prefer the rounded design of the current models.
Those screen specs are enough to make me salivate though. Not that I'll be getting one (or any new phone) in the forseeable future, but anyway.
They are apparently designed to accept a wrap-around edge protector (that comes in various colours) which then gives it the more rounded look of the current model.
I wouldn't buy one, mainly because it's massively excessive to my needs (I simply need a phone) and because I refuse to buy anything Apple... but it's interesting nonetheless.