<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for evildictaitor</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/evildictaitor/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by evildictaitor</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/evildictaitor/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:19:18 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:19:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Inappropriate content on Channel 9 [Inappropriate content on Channel 9]</title><description>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"&gt;&lt;span id="ctl00_MainPlaceHolder_EntryList_ctl14_EntryTemplate_UsernameLabel"&gt;&lt;a id="ctl00_MainPlaceHolder_EntryList_ctl14_EntryTemplate_UsernameLink" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/Dr.%20Cameron/" class="shrunk"&gt;Dr. Cameron&lt;/a&gt;'s postings range from the innane flame-baiting (and has had threads locked because of it) to the frankly bizzare, his/her profile caption is inappropriate for Channel 9, and thus the user account should be removed.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"&gt;Given that on other posts the account seems to show some basic understanding of computing, my guess is that it's someone with a long standing grudge against Channel 9 who's come back to haunt us.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/465900-Inappropriate-content-on-Channel-9/'&gt;Inappropriate content on Channel 9&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/465900/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/465900-Inappropriate-content-on-Channel-9/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/465900-Inappropriate-content-on-Channel-9/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:19:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/465900-Inappropriate-content-on-Channel-9/</guid><evnet:views>630</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/465900/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Dr. Cameron's postings range from the innane flame-baiting (and has had threads locked because of it) to the frankly bizzare, his/her profile caption is inappropriate for Channel 9, and thus the user account should be removed.Given that on other posts the account seems to show some basic&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/465900-Inappropriate-content-on-Channel-9/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/465900/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Bring back the SPAM button [Bring back the SPAM button]</title><description>Alright, the SPAM button was abused by some people before, but can't we have a system where clicking the SPAM button sends the C9 team a warning and a link, because the amount of spam on this forum is huge, and it's not being properly sorted out by the C9 team.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The sheer volume of spam means there NEEDS to be a centralized way of reporting it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/457577-Bring-back-the-SPAM-button/'&gt;Bring back the SPAM button&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/457577/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/457577-Bring-back-the-SPAM-button/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/457577-Bring-back-the-SPAM-button/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:35:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/457577-Bring-back-the-SPAM-button/</guid><evnet:views>426</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/457577/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Alright, the SPAM button was abused by some people before, but can't we have a system where clicking the SPAM button sends the C9 team a warning and a link, because the amount of spam on this forum is huge, and it's not being properly sorted out by the C9 team.The sheer volume of spam means there&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/457577-Bring-back-the-SPAM-button/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/457577/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>blog spam [blog spam]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;Here:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/255685-BitmapMakeTransparent/?CommentID=455383#ReplyTo=455383"&gt;http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/255685-BitmapMakeTransparent/?CommentID=455383#ReplyTo=455383&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/455562-blog-spam/'&gt;blog spam&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/455562/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/455562-blog-spam/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/455562-blog-spam/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:48:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/455562-blog-spam/</guid><evnet:views>454</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/455562/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Here:http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/255685-BitmapMakeTransparent/?CommentID=455383#ReplyTo=455383in reply to blog spam</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/455562-blog-spam/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/455562/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>For heaven's sake, can you PLEASE test C9 in browsers other than IE before going live [For heaven's sake, can you PLEASE test C9 in browsers other than IE before going live]</title><description>The C9 frontpage is going completely AWOL on Google Chrome AND Firefox 3.0.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Seriously, go back to using tables for layout if you can't use CSS properly. It's more important that is works in all browsers than that it does fancy stuff. You still haven't fixed the editor bug in Chrome that means you can't use formatting either for that matter, or the bug that means that when you login sometimes everytime you click Reply it goes through passport login only to redirect you to the front page of that thread, ad infinitum.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; Really, Microsoft of all companies ought to be able to get such simple things right, particularly in a site dedicated to developers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/441730-For-heavens-sake-can-you-PLEASE-test-C9-in-browsers-other-than-IE-before-going-live/'&gt;For heaven's sake, can you PLEASE test C9 in browsers other than IE before going live&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/441730/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/441730-For-heavens-sake-can-you-PLEASE-test-C9-in-browsers-other-than-IE-before-going-live/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/441730-For-heavens-sake-can-you-PLEASE-test-C9-in-browsers-other-than-IE-before-going-live/</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:01:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/441730-For-heavens-sake-can-you-PLEASE-test-C9-in-browsers-other-than-IE-before-going-live/</guid><evnet:views>891</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/441730/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>The C9 frontpage is going completely AWOL on Google Chrome AND Firefox 3.0.Seriously, go back to using tables for layout if you can't use CSS properly. It's more important that is works in all browsers than that it does fancy stuff. You still haven't fixed the editor bug in Chrome that means you&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/441730-For-heavens-sake-can-you-PLEASE-test-C9-in-browsers-other-than-IE-before-going-live/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/441730/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Yahoo approaches Microsoft - begs to be bought [Yahoo approaches Microsoft - begs to be bought]</title><description>Despite the furore around Microsoft trying to buy out Yahoo at the beginning of the year, and the dodgy tactics used by Jerry Yang to avoid the takeover bid, Google today has pulled out of its advertising deal with Yahoo and Mr Yang has said  "To this day the best thing for Microsoft to do is buy Yahoo"&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;More (&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7712298.stm"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7712298.stm&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/441324-Yahoo-approaches-Microsoft-begs-to-be-bought/'&gt;Yahoo approaches Microsoft - begs to be bought&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/441324/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/441324-Yahoo-approaches-Microsoft-begs-to-be-bought/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/441324-Yahoo-approaches-Microsoft-begs-to-be-bought/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:53:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/441324-Yahoo-approaches-Microsoft-begs-to-be-bought/</guid><evnet:views>998</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/441324/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Despite the furore around Microsoft trying to buy out Yahoo at the beginning of the year, and the dodgy tactics used by Jerry Yang to avoid the takeover bid, Google today has pulled out of its advertising deal with Yahoo and Mr Yang has said  "To this day the best thing for Microsoft to do is buy&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>11</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/441324-Yahoo-approaches-Microsoft-begs-to-be-bought/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/441324/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Oh have a bit more spam, why don't you? [Oh have a bit more spam, why don't you?]</title><description>&lt;div&gt;Because someone, somewhere, loves you so much that they can't help but give you spam. The spam is at the bottom of the link.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250193-Run-an-application-elevated-without-using-quotRun-as-Administratorquot/"&gt;http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250193-Run-an-application-elevated-without-using-quotRun-as-Administratorquot/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/434145-Oh-have-a-bit-more-spam-why-dont-you/'&gt;Oh have a bit more spam, why don't you?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/434145/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/434145-Oh-have-a-bit-more-spam-why-dont-you/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/434145-Oh-have-a-bit-more-spam-why-dont-you/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:30:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/434145-Oh-have-a-bit-more-spam-why-dont-you/</guid><evnet:views>471</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/434145/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Because someone, somewhere, loves you so much that they can't help but give you spam. The spam is at the bottom of the link.http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250193-Run-an-application-elevated-without-using-quotRun-as-Administratorquot/in reply to Oh have a bit more spam, why don't you?</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/434145-Oh-have-a-bit-more-spam-why-dont-you/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/434145/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Suggestion to avoid necro-bumping [Suggestion to avoid necro-bumping]</title><description>Would it be possible for a BIG warning sign to be displayed when you try to reply to any thread for which the last reply was over a year ago, and another warning sign if you're trying to reply to root or a comment that is over a year old? It's not an immediate problem, but I've noticed that every now and then someone new will try and post a helpful comment to someone who went away in 2005/6/7 and then there's a sudden influx of help from various niners who fail to see that the post's "owner" is no longer here...&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Sound like a good idea to you?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433824-Suggestion-to-avoid-necro-bumping/'&gt;Suggestion to avoid necro-bumping&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/433824/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433824-Suggestion-to-avoid-necro-bumping/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433824-Suggestion-to-avoid-necro-bumping/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:18:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433824-Suggestion-to-avoid-necro-bumping/</guid><evnet:views>451</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/433824/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Would it be possible for a BIG warning sign to be displayed when you try to reply to any thread for which the last reply was over a year ago, and another warning sign if you're trying to reply to root or a comment that is over a year old? It's not an immediate problem, but I've noticed that every&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433824-Suggestion-to-avoid-necro-bumping/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/433824/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Raymond [Raymond]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/433571-Obamas-Outrageous-October-Socialist-Sweet-Surprise-How-Sweet-It-Is/"&gt;http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/433571-Obamas-Outrageous-October-Socialist-Sweet-Surprise-How-Sweet-It-Is/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Typically full of useful and well thought out ideas, raymond has now decided that Obama's campaign to attract young women to the democrats is working only because (and I quote) "Women like chocolate" and posts videos about a "Chocolate man".&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;At what point does C9 decide that enough rascism is enough?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433714-Raymond/'&gt;Raymond&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/433714/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433714-Raymond/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433714-Raymond/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:18:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433714-Raymond/</guid><evnet:views>473</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/433714/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/433571-Obamas-Outrageous-October-Socialist-Sweet-Surprise-How-Sweet-It-Is/Typically full of useful and well thought out ideas, raymond has now decided that Obama's campaign to attract young women to the democrats is working only because (and I quote)&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/433714-Raymond/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/433714/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>spam [spam]</title><description>Heads up: More spam in the tech-off forum.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/429069-spam/'&gt;spam&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/429069/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/429069-spam/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/429069-spam/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:35:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/429069-spam/</guid><evnet:views>431</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/429069/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Heads up: More spam in the tech-off forum.in reply to spam</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/429069-spam/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/429069/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>The Poll [The Poll]</title><description>Why does the poll not have a "I'd rather that C9 worked on my PC rather than on my phone" option?&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Seriously, fix C9 for browsers such as Chrome and Safari before you start making it work on phones, because more people access C9 through Chrome and Safari than access it through phones.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Priorities, people!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/426334-The-Poll/'&gt;The Poll&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/426334/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/426334-The-Poll/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/426334-The-Poll/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:43:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/426334-The-Poll/</guid><evnet:views>425</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/426334/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Why does the poll not have a "I'd rather that C9 worked on my PC rather than on my phone" option?Seriously, fix C9 for browsers such as Chrome and Safari before you start making it work on phones, because more people access C9 through Chrome and Safari than access it through phones.Priorities, people!in reply to The Poll</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/426334-The-Poll/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/426334/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Playing videos hampered by overuse of javascript [Playing videos hampered by overuse of javascript]</title><description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have a big TV at home which is much better for watching videos on (e.g. C9 videos) but I've got a problem playing them through my PS3 due to a rather small but fantastically irritating issue with the video threads:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On every video thread (except for the "headline" thread), so for example &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/funkyonex/The-P-Invoke-Interop-Assistant/"&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;, there's a little box that contains the different links for downloading (WMV, MP3 etc). This swaps with the Del.icio.us, Digg etc. links when the mouse hovers over links that are immediately above them. When you first go to the page, javascript turns on the first "tab" which yields the links for download.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The problem is thus: If you were to use a non-firefox/IE based browser (say one on the PS3 for instance), these links &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; appear. never. not ever. This means that when using the PS3 browser, I can't download the WMVs of the shows, which means watching the shows on my TV means faffing about with my laptop and memory sticks, and due to there being no subtitles on the shows, I can't watch them at work &lt;i&gt;either.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The offending code is here:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;pre id="line204"&gt;&amp;lt;div id="ctl00_MainPlaceHolder_Starter_Info_DownloadsList" class="downloads" style="&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;display:none;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.mp4" title="iPod Format Video (MPEG 4)" class="linkImage iPod"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.mp4" class="link" title="iPod Format Video (MPEG 4)"&amp;gt;iPod (MP4)&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.mp3" title="MP3 Audio" class="linkImage mp3"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.mp3" class="link" title="MP3 Audio"&amp;gt;MP3&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.mp4" title="PSP Format Video (MPEG 4)" class="linkImage psp"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.mp4" class="link" title="PSP Format Video (MPEG 4)"&amp;gt;PSP (MP4)&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.wma" title="Windows Media Audio" class="linkImage wma"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.wma" class="link" title="Windows Media Audio"&amp;gt;WMA&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.wmv" title="Windows Media Video" class="linkImage wmv"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_ch9.wmv" class="link" title="Windows Media Video"&amp;gt;WMV&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_2MB_ch9.wmv" title="Windows Media Video (High Quality)" class="linkImage wmvh"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_2MB_ch9.wmv" class="link" title="Windows Media Video (High Quality)"&amp;gt;WMV (High)&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_Zune_ch9.wmv" title="Zune" class="linkImage zune"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/ch9/7/3/8/8/1/4/ThisWeekC9Aug1_Zune_ch9.wmv" class="link" title="Zune"&amp;gt;Zune&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/pre&gt; &lt;pre id="line211"&gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;pre id="line211"&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;pre id="line211"&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
Note that removing the style="display:none" is sufficient on the second element to solve the problem. It'll also save you 22 bytes of HTTP transfer, although I might dwarf that with my video downloading, but you can tell your boss it's an optimisation :P&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/419666-Playing-videos-hampered-by-overuse-of-javascript/'&gt;Playing videos hampered by overuse of javascript&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/419666/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/419666-Playing-videos-hampered-by-overuse-of-javascript/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/419666-Playing-videos-hampered-by-overuse-of-javascript/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:08:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/419666-Playing-videos-hampered-by-overuse-of-javascript/</guid><evnet:views>826</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/419666/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Hi,

I have a big TV at home which is much better for watching videos on (e.g. C9 videos) but I've got a problem playing them through my PS3 due to a rather small but fantastically irritating issue with the video threads:

On every video thread (except for the "headline" thread), so for example this&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/419666-Playing-videos-hampered-by-overuse-of-javascript/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/419666/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Fix for FF3/Channel9 crash bug [Fix for FF3/Channel9 crash bug]</title><description>1. Go to Add/Remove Programs&lt;br&gt;2. Select Microsoft Silverlight&lt;br&gt;3. Click Uninstall (requires admin permission)&lt;br&gt;4. Restart any browsers you have running (even non-FF3 ones)&lt;br&gt;5. Open Firefox3 to the channel9 home page. It should now say there is no Silverlight, click to install&lt;br&gt;6. Click to install&lt;br&gt;7. Restart browser&lt;br&gt;8. Open Channel9 in FF3 and enjoy the lack of crashing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/412081-Fix-for-FF3Channel9-crash-bug/'&gt;Fix for FF3/Channel9 crash bug&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/412081/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/412081-Fix-for-FF3Channel9-crash-bug/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/412081-Fix-for-FF3Channel9-crash-bug/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:33:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/412081-Fix-for-FF3Channel9-crash-bug/</guid><evnet:views>1139</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/412081/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>1. Go to Add/Remove Programs2. Select Microsoft Silverlight3. Click Uninstall (requires admin permission)4. Restart any browsers you have running (even non-FF3 ones)5. Open Firefox3 to the channel9 home page. It should now say there is no Silverlight, click to install6. Click to install7. Restart&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/412081-Fix-for-FF3Channel9-crash-bug/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/412081/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>China overtakes US in carbon emissions [China overtakes US in carbon emissions]</title><description>Just saw this on &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7347638.stm"&gt;BBC News&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although it has now overtaken the US in total emissions China refuses to put a cap on emissions because it's emission &lt;i&gt;per person &lt;/i&gt;is about one third as much carbon as the US &lt;i&gt;per person&lt;/i&gt;. Thoughts?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262241-China-overtakes-US-in-carbon-emissions/'&gt;China overtakes US in carbon emissions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/262241/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262241-China-overtakes-US-in-carbon-emissions/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262241-China-overtakes-US-in-carbon-emissions/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:15:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262241-China-overtakes-US-in-carbon-emissions/</guid><evnet:views>1308</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/262241/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Just saw this on &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7347638.stm"&gt;BBC News&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although it has now overtaken the US in total emissions China refuses to put a cap on emissions because it's emission &lt;i&gt;per person &lt;/i&gt;is about one third as much carbon as the US &lt;i&gt;per person&lt;/i&gt;. Thoughts?&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>13</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262241-China-overtakes-US-in-carbon-emissions/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/262241/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Silverlight rehab on Channel 10 [Silverlight rehab on Channel 10]</title><description>From the wonder that is Channel 10.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://on10.net/blogs/tina/Silverlight-Rehab/"&gt;http://on10.net/blogs/tina/Silverlight-Rehab/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thought I'd share it, given its brilliance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261973-Silverlight-rehab-on-Channel-10/'&gt;Silverlight rehab on Channel 10&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/261973/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261973-Silverlight-rehab-on-Channel-10/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261973-Silverlight-rehab-on-Channel-10/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:14:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261973-Silverlight-rehab-on-Channel-10/</guid><evnet:views>943</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/261973/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>From the wonder that is Channel 10.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://on10.net/blogs/tina/Silverlight-Rehab/"&gt;http://on10.net/blogs/tina/Silverlight-Rehab/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thought I'd share it, given its brilliance.&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261973-Silverlight-rehab-on-Channel-10/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/261973/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Where do you post serious faults in IE? [Where do you post serious faults in IE?]</title><description>Because they seriously need to get a public feedback bug-center up and running soon. IE8 has loads of bugs which I'm sure would be easier to solve if they didn't have to trawl through zillions of pages to find them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261496-Where-do-you-post-serious-faults-in-IE/'&gt;Where do you post serious faults in IE?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/261496/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261496-Where-do-you-post-serious-faults-in-IE/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261496-Where-do-you-post-serious-faults-in-IE/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:03:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261496-Where-do-you-post-serious-faults-in-IE/</guid><evnet:views>979</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/261496/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Because they seriously need to get a public feedback bug-center up and running soon. IE8 has loads of bugs which I'm sure would be easier to solve if they didn't have to trawl through zillions of pages to find them.&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261496-Where-do-you-post-serious-faults-in-IE/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/261496/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>What the hell? [What the hell?]</title><description>Why does C9's main page have two locked threads, four threads called "spam" and one of a!'s link-spam threads?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And more importantly, why isn't anyone doing something about it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261235-What-the-hell/'&gt;What the hell?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/261235/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261235-What-the-hell/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261235-What-the-hell/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:28:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261235-What-the-hell/</guid><evnet:views>1433</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/261235/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Why does C9's main page have two locked threads, four threads called "spam" and one of a!'s link-spam threads?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And more importantly, why isn't anyone doing something about it?&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261235-What-the-hell/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/261235/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>New Video: Joe Duffy, Huseyin Yildiz, Daan Leijen, Stephen Toub: Inside the Task Parallel Library [New Video: Joe Duffy, Huseyin Yildiz, Daan Leijen, Stephen Toub: Inside the Task Parallel Library]</title><description>Just for you guys who never leave the coffeehouse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if you're &lt;i&gt;really &lt;/i&gt;lazy, here's a &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=384229&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261071-New-Video-Joe-Duffy-Huseyin-Yildiz-Daan-Leijen-Stephen-Toub-Inside-the-Task-Parallel-Library/'&gt;New Video: Joe Duffy, Huseyin Yildiz, Daan Leijen, Stephen Toub: Inside the Task Parallel Library&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/261071/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261071-New-Video-Joe-Duffy-Huseyin-Yildiz-Daan-Leijen-Stephen-Toub-Inside-the-Task-Parallel-Library/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261071-New-Video-Joe-Duffy-Huseyin-Yildiz-Daan-Leijen-Stephen-Toub-Inside-the-Task-Parallel-Library/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:05:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261071-New-Video-Joe-Duffy-Huseyin-Yildiz-Daan-Leijen-Stephen-Toub-Inside-the-Task-Parallel-Library/</guid><evnet:views>1048</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/261071/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Just for you guys who never leave the coffeehouse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if you're &lt;i&gt;really &lt;/i&gt;lazy, here's a &lt;a href="/showpost.aspx?postid=384229"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/261071-New-Video-Joe-Duffy-Huseyin-Yildiz-Daan-Leijen-Stephen-Toub-Inside-the-Task-Parallel-Library/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/261071/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Vista SP1 Distribution [Vista SP1 Distribution]</title><description>Is the Vista SP1 going to be shipped out via Windows Update, and if so, what sort of timescale are we talking about? Also will new Vista sales come with SP1 preinstalled (I'm thinking shrinkwrapped Vistas here)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260785-Vista-SP1-Distribution/'&gt;Vista SP1 Distribution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260785/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260785-Vista-SP1-Distribution/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260785-Vista-SP1-Distribution/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 03:03:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260785-Vista-SP1-Distribution/</guid><evnet:views>3673</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260785/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Is the Vista SP1 going to be shipped out via Windows Update, and if so, what sort of timescale are we talking about? Also will new Vista sales come with SP1 preinstalled (I'm thinking shrinkwrapped Vistas here)?&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260785-Vista-SP1-Distribution/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260785/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Why doesn't someone build a C++ obj VM? [Why doesn't someone build a C++ obj VM?]</title><description>So that I don't have to spend five minutes in every quarter hour compiling dammit. It should be like C# - JITed for all debug builds, and then properly compile on the final build. Is that so hard to ask?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260546-Why-doesnt-someone-build-a-C-obj-VM/'&gt;Why doesn't someone build a C++ obj VM?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260546/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260546-Why-doesnt-someone-build-a-C-obj-VM/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260546-Why-doesnt-someone-build-a-C-obj-VM/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:57:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260546-Why-doesnt-someone-build-a-C-obj-VM/</guid><evnet:views>1966</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260546/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>So that I don't have to spend five minutes in every quarter hour compiling dammit. It should be like C# - JITed for all debug builds, and then properly compile on the final build. Is that so hard to ask?&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260546-Why-doesnt-someone-build-a-C-obj-VM/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260546/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>C9 Admins [C9 Admins]</title><description>Hey, I was wondering if there was any "official" reason as to why threads which are clearly entirely spam are not deleted or blanked, but only locked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you only lock them, then they still work as advertising though Google and Windows Live searchbots.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you delete or blank them, they do &lt;i&gt;not &lt;/i&gt;piggyback their product to a high pagerank through abuse of the forums here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can we have some "official" response from the admins here?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260250-C9-Admins/'&gt;C9 Admins&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260250/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260250-C9-Admins/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260250-C9-Admins/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:45:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260250-C9-Admins/</guid><evnet:views>1999</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260250/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Hey, I was wondering if there was any "official" reason as to why threads which are clearly entirely spam are not deleted or blanked, but only locked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you only lock them, then they still work as advertising though Google and Windows Live searchbots.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you delete or blank them, they do &lt;i&gt;not &lt;/i&gt;piggyback their product to a high pagerank through abuse of the forums here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can we have some "official" response from the admins here?&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260250-C9-Admins/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260250/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Too much spam in the coffeehouse [Too much spam in the coffeehouse]</title><description>Can we get some administrator action here?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the front page of the coffeehouse, there are four threads (that's 28% of the non-stickies) which are pure spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.comShowPost.aspx?PostID=371736&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.comShowPost.aspx?PostID=371898&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.comShowPost.aspx?PostID=371881&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.comShowPost.aspx?PostID=371861&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we include this and &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=371891&gt;RoyalScrubber's post&lt;/a&gt; complaining about the amount of spam, we can see that 42% of the front page of the Coffeehouse is dedicated to spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Frankly the admins &lt;i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt; to get their act together on this one.&lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=371861&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260209-Too-much-spam-in-the-coffeehouse/'&gt;Too much spam in the coffeehouse&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260209/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260209-Too-much-spam-in-the-coffeehouse/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260209-Too-much-spam-in-the-coffeehouse/</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:32:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260209-Too-much-spam-in-the-coffeehouse/</guid><evnet:views>2725</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260209/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Can we get some administrator action here?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the front page of the coffeehouse, there are four threads (that's 28% of the non-stickies) which are pure spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we include this and &lt;a href="/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=371891"&gt;RoyalScrubber's post&lt;/a&gt; complaining about the amount of spam, we can see that 42% of the front page of the Coffeehouse is dedicated to spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260209-Too-much-spam-in-the-coffeehouse/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260209/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>How not to do Silverlight [How not to do Silverlight]</title><description>I just followed one of the links to the MIX University to have a look at the Silverlight Firestarter, and came across this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visitmix.com/University/silverlight/firestarter/"&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.visitmix.com/University/silverlight/firestarter/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take a particularly good look at the rollover on the right - I don't know what the hell it's doing, but they're obviously not doing it right. The rollover animation is sparodic and jumpy, and it wasn't even that great an idea to start off with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You'll also notice on the left panel that the overlay highlighting doesn't follow the Z-index of the pictures correctly or smoothly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A particularly bad example of Silverlight usage, and certainly not something that should be the frontpage advert for new Silverlight users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edit: It seems to work better in IE7 (but is still jumpy and ugly) - it's truly appalling in Firefox.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260057-How-not-to-do-Silverlight/'&gt;How not to do Silverlight&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260057/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260057-How-not-to-do-Silverlight/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260057-How-not-to-do-Silverlight/</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:48:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260057-How-not-to-do-Silverlight/</guid><evnet:views>2652</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260057/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I just followed one of the links to the MIX University to have a look at the Silverlight Firestarter, and came across this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visitmix.com/University/silverlight/firestarter/"&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.visitmix.com/University/silverlight/firestarter/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take a particularly good look at the rollover on the right - I don't know what the hell it's doing, but they're obviously not doing it right. The rollover animation is sparodic and jumpy, and it wasn't even that great an idea to start off with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/260057-How-not-to-do-Silverlight/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260057/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Drawing in title bar [Drawing in title bar]</title><description>How can you draw inside the Title bar of a windows form (thinking Vista here) and still keep the min/max/close buttons from C# / C++&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For overview, I'm thinking of drawing a custom app-icon style thing, simmilar to the Office2007 office-button-thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any "proofs of concept" would be appreciated :P&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259965-Drawing-in-title-bar/'&gt;Drawing in title bar&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/259965/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259965-Drawing-in-title-bar/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259965-Drawing-in-title-bar/</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:45:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259965-Drawing-in-title-bar/</guid><evnet:views>1898</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/259965/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>How can you draw inside the Title bar of a windows form (thinking Vista here) and still keep the min/max/close buttons from C# / C++&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For overview, I'm thinking of drawing a custom app-icon style thing, simmilar to the Office2007 office-button-thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any "proofs of concept" would be appreciated &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-4.gif' alt='Tongue Out' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259965-Drawing-in-title-bar/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/259965/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Quick == in VS [Quick == in VS]</title><description>Is there a way of asking Visual Studio to create an equivilence operator for structs and/or classes such that == is defined as all of it's elements being equivilent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have an example:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;class ComplexNumber {&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; private int re,im;&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and ask VS to derive the equivilence relation:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;public static bool operator== (ComplexNumber a, ComplexNumber b){&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; return a.re == b.re &amp;amp;&amp;amp; a.im == b.im;&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but for much larger numbers of fields (say 20+)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before anyone suggests it, I don't want to use reflection, and although I can type them in manually, it means that if fields are added to the class later then unless someone shrewdly adds said field into the == function, it might break the equivilence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259845-Quick--in-VS/'&gt;Quick == in VS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/259845/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259845-Quick--in-VS/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259845-Quick--in-VS/</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:49:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259845-Quick--in-VS/</guid><evnet:views>1079</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/259845/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Is there a way of asking Visual Studio to create an equivilence operator for structs and/or classes such that == is defined as all of it's elements being equivilent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have an example:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;class ComplexNumber {&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; private int re,im;&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and ask VS to derive the equivilence relation:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;public static bool operator== (ComplexNumber a, ComplexNumber b){&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; return a.re == b.re &amp;amp;&amp;amp; a.im == b.im;&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but for much larger numbers of fields (say 20+)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/259845-Quick--in-VS/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/259845/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Channel9 and spam [Channel9 and spam]</title><description>Channel9 is increasingly getting spam adverts in the Techoff forum. Can someone &lt;i&gt;please&lt;/i&gt; go on a deleting spree through them?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Channel9 is a big website and spam links are deliberately put here to boost Google ratings, and while the C9 admins do nothing to combat it, there will be no peace in the Techoff forum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the C9 admins feel that this would be too much, they could at the very least kill all of the links to their site in the Techoff to minimise the google/windowslive boosting that their spamming gets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259817-Channel9-and-spam/'&gt;Channel9 and spam&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/259817/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259817-Channel9-and-spam/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259817-Channel9-and-spam/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:48:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259817-Channel9-and-spam/</guid><evnet:views>1416</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/259817/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Channel9 is increasingly getting spam adverts in the Techoff forum. Can someone &lt;i&gt;please&lt;/i&gt; go on a deleting spree through them?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Channel9 is a big website and spam links are deliberately put here to boost Google ratings, and while the C9 admins do nothing to combat it, there will be no peace in the Techoff forum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the C9 admins feel that this would be too much, they could at the very least kill all of the links to their site in the Techoff to minimise the google/windowslive boosting that their spamming gets.&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>evildictaitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259817-Channel9-and-spam/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/259817/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>