<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for gdesroches</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/gdesroches/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by gdesroches</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/gdesroches/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:54:18 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:54:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>NLA missing from Remote Desktop Client 6.0 for Windows XP? [NLA missing from Remote Desktop Client 6.0 for Windows XP?]</title><description>I successfully downloaded and installed Remote Desktop Client 6.0 for Windows XP today. I found it on this page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925876&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The page says it supports Network Level Authentication. Unfortunately, when I try to connect to a Windows Vista machine with NLA enabled, I get a dialog stating, "The remote computer requires Network Level Authentication, which your computer does not support. For assistance, contact your system administrator or technical support."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this supposed to work, or does it only support Vista clients? If the latter is the answer, then why would they even mention NLA on the RDP 6.0 client for XP?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250447-NLA-missing-from-Remote-Desktop-Client-60-for-Windows-XP/'&gt;NLA missing from Remote Desktop Client 6.0 for Windows XP?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/250447/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250447-NLA-missing-from-Remote-Desktop-Client-60-for-Windows-XP/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250447-NLA-missing-from-Remote-Desktop-Client-60-for-Windows-XP/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:54:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250447-NLA-missing-from-Remote-Desktop-Client-60-for-Windows-XP/</guid><evnet:views>15591</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/250447/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I successfully downloaded and installed Remote Desktop Client 6.0 for Windows XP today. I found it on this page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925876&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The page says it supports Network Level Authentication. Unfortunately, when I try to connect to a Windows Vista machine with NLA enabled, I get a dialog stating, "The remote computer requires Network Level Authentication, which your computer does not support. For assistance, contact your system administrator or technical support."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gdesroches</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250447-NLA-missing-from-Remote-Desktop-Client-60-for-Windows-XP/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/250447/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Problem installing the Windows SDK 6.0.6000.0 [Problem installing the Windows SDK 6.0.6000.0]</title><description>&lt;span&gt;I posted this in the MSDN forums, but nobody has replied yet, so I thought I'd post it here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have Windows XP Professional x64 Edition. I have a system partition 
which is 8GB (D:). I have a separate partition for programs and documents (E:). 
I also have a big scratch partition (F:). My temporary directory is on the F: 
drive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Currently, the D: drive has about 100MB of free disk space. Since 
only system components are installed here and my swap file is on a separate 
partition, this is enough space. The E: drive has about 25GB free. The F: drive 
has about 30GB free.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I run the Windows Vista / .NET Framework 3.0 
SDK setup, it asks me for two folder locations. One for the SDK files and 
another for SDK samples. I set both to directories on the E: drive. When I go to 
the next step, it says I need 600MB+ on my D: drive in order to continue. I went 
back and made sure both of my selected directory locations were on E:. 
Unfortunately, the SDK still demands 600MB+ of my system drive. I have gone 
through my D: drive to find stuff I can delete and I still am not even close to 
having enough room. Why is the installer demanding space from the system 
drive? Is there a way I can work around this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/249883-Problem-installing-the-Windows-SDK-6060000/'&gt;Problem installing the Windows SDK 6.0.6000.0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/249883/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/249883-Problem-installing-the-Windows-SDK-6060000/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/249883-Problem-installing-the-Windows-SDK-6060000/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:14:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/249883-Problem-installing-the-Windows-SDK-6060000/</guid><evnet:views>1969</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/249883/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;span&gt;I posted this in the MSDN forums, but nobody has replied yet, so I thought I'd post it here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have Windows XP Professional x64 Edition. I have a system partition 
which is 8GB (D:). I have a separate partition for programs and documents (E:). 
I also have a big scratch partition (F:). My temporary directory is on the F: 
drive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Currently, the D: drive has about 100MB of free disk space. Since 
only system components are installed here and my swap file is on a separate 
partition, this is enough space. The E: drive has about 25GB free. The F: drive 
has about 30GB free.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gdesroches</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/249883-Problem-installing-the-Windows-SDK-6060000/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/249883/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Channel 9: The Videos RSS Feed Question [Channel 9: The Videos RSS Feed Question]</title><description>One of the many RSS feeds I subscribe to is the Channel 9 videos feed. The problem is, I don't get the same list I would get if I went to the actual Videos aspx page. Whenever someone replies to a video, it gets bumped to the top of the RSS feed. I don't remember all of the video titles, so sometimes I'll think there is a new video, but be disappointed when I visit the page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the all-powerful Channel 9 Overlords would change this behaviour or add an option for it, I would be greatful. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and keep up the good work! :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/249818-Channel-9-The-Videos-RSS-Feed-Question/'&gt;Channel 9: The Videos RSS Feed Question&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/249818/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/249818-Channel-9-The-Videos-RSS-Feed-Question/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/249818-Channel-9-The-Videos-RSS-Feed-Question/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:41:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/249818-Channel-9-The-Videos-RSS-Feed-Question/</guid><evnet:views>1180</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/249818/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>One of the many RSS feeds I subscribe to is the Channel 9 videos feed. The problem is, I don't get the same list I would get if I went to the actual Videos aspx page. Whenever someone replies to a video, it gets bumped to the top of the RSS feed. I don't remember all of the video titles, so sometimes I'll think there is a new video, but be disappointed when I visit the page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the all-powerful Channel 9 Overlords would change this behaviour or add an option for it, I would be greatful. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and keep up the good work! &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-2.gif' alt='Big Smile' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gdesroches</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/249818-Channel-9-The-Videos-RSS-Feed-Question/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/249818/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>PowerShell: Running an executable with a long filename and using a variable as a command line parame [PowerShell: Running an executable with a long filename and using a variable as a command line parame]</title><description>I started a little project today, and I figured I could bang it out in PowerShell. I want to take all .img (DVD image) files and mount them as virtual drives with a program called "DAEMON Tools". I thought this would be easy to figure out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here was my first step. I came up with the following code within seconds. I can now iterate through all .img files in a directory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[code]&lt;br&gt;$files = get-childitem -filter *.img&lt;br&gt;foreach ($file in $files)&lt;br&gt;{&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; echo $file.FullName&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;[/code]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, to call the DAEMON Tools executable and pass the file name as a command line argument. The following line works in cmd.exe. I have to use quotes, because the path has a space.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"C:\Program Files\DAEMON Tools\daemon.exe" -mount 0,myimage.img&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
However, this does not work in PowerShell. It took me a quite a while to figure out how to run an exe with a long filename, but I finally found it on some random blog post. So, this is what I have now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[code]&lt;br&gt;$files = get-childitem -filter *.img&lt;br&gt;
foreach ($file in $files)&lt;br&gt;
{&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;'C:\Program Files\DAEMON Tools\daemon.exe' -mount 0`,`"myimage.img`"&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;[/code]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I need to know how to use the $file variable as a command line argument for the executable. I couldn't find anything related to this stuff in the documentation, in the wiki, or through the other various links google gave me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why is this information so difficult to find? All the web sites I've seen contain the same basic MONAD tutorials. There is no mention of how to run a plain executable other than stating "Just type it in."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry about the rant. I'm just frustrated. This stuff should have taken a few minutes to figure out. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can anyone help me out here?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/231329-PowerShell-Running-an-executable-with-a-long-filename-and-using-a-variable-as-a-command-line-p/'&gt;PowerShell: Running an executable with a long filename and using a variable as a command line parame&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/231329/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/231329-PowerShell-Running-an-executable-with-a-long-filename-and-using-a-variable-as-a-command-line-p/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/231329-PowerShell-Running-an-executable-with-a-long-filename-and-using-a-variable-as-a-command-line-p/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:39:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/231329-PowerShell-Running-an-executable-with-a-long-filename-and-using-a-variable-as-a-command-line-p/</guid><evnet:views>5766</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/231329/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I started a little project today, and I figured I could bang it out in PowerShell. I want to take all .img (DVD image) files and mount them as virtual drives with a program called "DAEMON Tools". I thought this would be easy to figure out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here was my first step. I came up with the following code within seconds. I can now iterate through all .img files in a directory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[code]&lt;br&gt;$files = get-childitem -filter *.img&lt;br&gt;foreach ($file in $files)&lt;br&gt;{&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; echo $file.FullName&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;[/code]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gdesroches</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/231329-PowerShell-Running-an-executable-with-a-long-filename-and-using-a-variable-as-a-command-line-p/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/231329/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>What happened to .NET 3.0 in Longhorn? [What happened to .NET 3.0 in Longhorn?]</title><description>I recall hearing (from the .NET show I believe) about .NET 3.0 being built into Longhorn. Now I'm hearing it will ship with 2.0. Was 3.0 suppose to be 2.0 with WPF, WCF, and WinFS, or was there going to be more until they scaled back?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/111030-What-happened-to-NET-30-in-Longhorn/'&gt;What happened to .NET 3.0 in Longhorn?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/111030/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/111030-What-happened-to-NET-30-in-Longhorn/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/111030-What-happened-to-NET-30-in-Longhorn/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:00:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/111030-What-happened-to-NET-30-in-Longhorn/</guid><evnet:views>7642</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/111030/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I recall hearing (from the .NET show I believe) about .NET 3.0 being built into Longhorn. Now I'm hearing it will ship with 2.0. Was 3.0 suppose to be 2.0 with WPF, WCF, and WinFS, or was there going to be more until they scaled back?&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gdesroches</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/111030-What-happened-to-NET-30-in-Longhorn/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/111030/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>