<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for gkrishnaa</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/gkrishnaa/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by gkrishnaa</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/gkrishnaa/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:48:45 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:48:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Wat u say about FTM? [Wat u say about FTM?]</title><description>I know that the FileTransfer Manager is simple and good. But it would be better to expose some CommandLine Attributes for the FTM..like /startall.../resume../pause../stop.../exit. It ll be easy to schedule downloads with FTM thro the Windows Task Scheduler.&lt;br&gt;Wat u say?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--&lt;br&gt;G Krishnaa&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/233285-Wat-u-say-about-FTM/'&gt;Wat u say about FTM?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/233285/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/233285-Wat-u-say-about-FTM/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/233285-Wat-u-say-about-FTM/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:48:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/233285-Wat-u-say-about-FTM/</guid><evnet:views>747</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/233285/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I know that the FileTransfer Manager is simple and good. But it would be better to expose some CommandLine Attributes for the FTM..like /startall.../resume../pause../stop.../exit. It ll be easy to schedule downloads with FTM thro the Windows Task Scheduler.&lt;br&gt;Wat u say?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--&lt;br&gt;G Krishnaa&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gkrishnaa</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/233285-Wat-u-say-about-FTM/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/233285/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Will Microsoft Think of this?? [Will Microsoft Think of this??]</title><description>With new builds of Vista coming out every month with almost &amp;lt; 3.5 GB of file size..why cant microsoft jus release Updates or Service pack kind of Patches to the CTP and interim builds..&lt;br&gt;The problem is..When i jus ended up with the Activation Grace period of build 5456.5 am up with 5472 build to downlaod..which will again cost me some &amp;lt;3.5GB of download..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--&lt;br&gt;Krishnaa&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212852-Will-Microsoft-Think-of-this/'&gt;Will Microsoft Think of this??&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/212852/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212852-Will-Microsoft-Think-of-this/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212852-Will-Microsoft-Think-of-this/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:31:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212852-Will-Microsoft-Think-of-this/</guid><evnet:views>1242</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/212852/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>With new builds of Vista coming out every month with almost &amp;lt; 3.5 GB of file size..why cant microsoft jus release Updates or Service pack kind of Patches to the CTP and interim builds..&lt;br&gt;The problem is..When i jus ended up with the Activation Grace period of build 5456.5 am up with 5472 build to downlaod..which will again cost me some &amp;lt;3.5GB of download..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--&lt;br&gt;Krishnaa&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gkrishnaa</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/212852-Will-Microsoft-Think-of-this/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/212852/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>CTP Madness [CTP Madness]</title><description>Well i ave always been trying on the latest CTPs...&lt;br&gt;Its been great gettin to use new technology before its released. But CTPs make u mad sometimes..look at this scenario..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was having WinFX feb CTP..i decided to try out .NET 3.0 June..so i downloaded .net 3.0..and Orcas June CTP too..[H]&lt;br&gt;Obv u cant Install .net 3.0 with a previous CTP in place..so Uninstalled Feb WinFX CTP and Orcas....[H]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now Installed .Net 3.0 June and Orcas June CTPs...Then my Feb VSTO CTP failed to work since it needed Feb WinFX...:s&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So once then Downloaded VSTO june CTP..Then on Install the June CTP asks me to have Feb WinFX and it wont work on .net 3.0 June..[C]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gimme a solution to this..:(&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/207898-CTP-Madness/'&gt;CTP Madness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/207898/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/207898-CTP-Madness/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/207898-CTP-Madness/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:23:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/207898-CTP-Madness/</guid><evnet:views>797</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/207898/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Well i ave always been trying on the latest CTPs...&lt;br&gt;Its been great gettin to use new technology before its released. But CTPs make u mad sometimes..look at this scenario..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was having WinFX feb CTP..i decided to try out .NET 3.0 June..so i downloaded .net 3.0..and Orcas June CTP too..&lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-11.gif' alt='Cool' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obv u cant Install .net 3.0 with a previous CTP in place..so Uninstalled Feb WinFX CTP and Orcas....&lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-11.gif' alt='Cool' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now Installed .Net 3.0 June and Orcas June CTPs...Then my Feb VSTO CTP failed to work since it needed Feb WinFX...&lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-7.gif' alt='Perplexed' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gkrishnaa</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/207898-CTP-Madness/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/207898/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>MSN Groups..No Idea of Upgrading it??? [MSN Groups..No Idea of Upgrading it???]</title><description>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We ave a UG running on MSN Groups. Its been there since 4 years.&lt;br&gt;Since then MSN groups avent undergone a upgrade. &lt;br&gt;Wat i mean is MSN Spaces ,Hotmail have all undergone major version upgrades..But when is the time for MSN Groups..???Its still the same as it was 4 years back..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are some major porblems in MSN Groups..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--The Group mail doesnt go on time to all the Members..&lt;br&gt;--The group doesnt have a search for the posts that are Posted..&lt;br&gt;--the member search is so useless to search for pple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;there are more of problems that are faced in the MSN groups..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep adding wat ever problem you have..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will the MSN team Read this post??????&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--&lt;br&gt;G Krishnaa&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/205934-MSN-GroupsNo-Idea-of-Upgrading-it/'&gt;MSN Groups..No Idea of Upgrading it???&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/205934/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/205934-MSN-GroupsNo-Idea-of-Upgrading-it/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/205934-MSN-GroupsNo-Idea-of-Upgrading-it/</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 07:28:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/205934-MSN-GroupsNo-Idea-of-Upgrading-it/</guid><evnet:views>607</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/205934/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We ave a UG running on MSN Groups. Its been there since 4 years.&lt;br&gt;Since then MSN groups avent undergone a upgrade. &lt;br&gt;Wat i mean is MSN Spaces ,Hotmail have all undergone major version upgrades..But when is the time for MSN Groups..???Its still the same as it was 4 years back..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are some major porblems in MSN Groups..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--The Group mail doesnt go on time to all the Members..&lt;br&gt;--The group doesnt have a search for the posts that are Posted..&lt;br&gt;--the member search is so useless to search for pple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;there are more of problems that are faced in the MSN groups..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gkrishnaa</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/205934-MSN-GroupsNo-Idea-of-Upgrading-it/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/205934/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Why not a new Notepad to Vista? [Why not a new Notepad to Vista?]</title><description>With all menus replaced by Tabs in 2007 Office,the Windows Vista still has the same old Notepad which comes with Windows right from 2000.&lt;br&gt;Event the Solitaire in a new one. Wat the Vista guys could do is probably put a Tab concept in Notepad. Not telling to remove the Menus.But put the tabs as that in IE 7.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wat do u think abt it guys?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--&lt;br&gt;G Krishnaa&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/171542-Why-not-a-new-Notepad-to-Vista/'&gt;Why not a new Notepad to Vista?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/171542/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/171542-Why-not-a-new-Notepad-to-Vista/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/171542-Why-not-a-new-Notepad-to-Vista/</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:58:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/171542-Why-not-a-new-Notepad-to-Vista/</guid><evnet:views>8448</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/171542/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>With all menus replaced by Tabs in 2007 Office,the Windows Vista still has the same old Notepad which comes with Windows right from 2000.&lt;br&gt;Event the Solitaire in a new one. Wat the Vista guys could do is probably put a Tab concept in Notepad. Not telling to remove the Menus.But put the tabs as that in IE 7.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wat do u think abt it guys?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--&lt;br&gt;G Krishnaa&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>gkrishnaa</dc:creator><slash:comments>30</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/171542-Why-not-a-new-Notepad-to-Vista/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/171542/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>