<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for lars</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/lars/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by lars</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/lars/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:25:06 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:25:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3192.39714, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>C9 Email form broken? [C9 Email form broken?]</title><description>Does the C9 email form work? I don't seem to get any mail when I test sending email to myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(The address is correct and it works from Outlook).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87731-C9-Email-form-broken/'&gt;C9 Email form broken?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/87731/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87731-C9-Email-form-broken/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87731-C9-Email-form-broken/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:25:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87731-C9-Email-form-broken/</guid><evnet:views>18862</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/87731/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Does the C9 email form work? I don't seem to get any mail when I test sending email to myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(The address is correct and it works from Outlook).&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>13</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87731-C9-Email-form-broken/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/87731/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Software activation and product end of life [Software activation and product end of life]</title><description>Software like Window XP and Office requires activation after being
installed. How will this be handled after Microsoft announces that
those products have reached their "end of life"? Will Microsoft
continue to run activation servers "forever", or will people be forced
to upgrade when they fail to activate after a reinstall?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/65234-Software-activation-and-product-end-of-life/'&gt;Software activation and product end of life&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/65234/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/65234-Software-activation-and-product-end-of-life/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/65234-Software-activation-and-product-end-of-life/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 01:00:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/65234-Software-activation-and-product-end-of-life/</guid><evnet:views>9601</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/65234/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Software like Window XP and Office requires activation after being
installed. How will this be handled after Microsoft announces that
those products have reached their "end of life"? Will Microsoft
continue to run activation servers "forever", or will people be forced
to upgrade when they fail to activate after a reinstall?&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/65234-Software-activation-and-product-end-of-life/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/65234/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Free upgrade to XP64 [Free upgrade to XP64]</title><description>Looks like people with x64 hardware running Windows XP gets to upgrade
to Windows XP 64-bit free of charge. How cool is that? Rock'n'roll!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60463-Free-upgrade-to-XP64/'&gt;Free upgrade to XP64&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/60463/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60463-Free-upgrade-to-XP64/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60463-Free-upgrade-to-XP64/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:04:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60463-Free-upgrade-to-XP64/</guid><evnet:views>29672</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/60463/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Looks like people with x64 hardware running Windows XP gets to upgrade
to Windows XP 64-bit free of charge. How cool is that? Rock'n'roll!&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>16</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60463-Free-upgrade-to-XP64/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/60463/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>How &amp;quot;open&amp;quot; are YOU? [How &amp;quot;open&amp;quot; are YOU?]</title><description>So, we know that Microsoft is trying to be open and transparent and communicate on all levels, with blogs, chats etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How transparent is the average 9er? What kind of communication do you
permit, and why (not)? Do you put your phone number on the homepage?
Your MSN Messenger address? Skype? ICQ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(I've still not figured out my own take on this one yet.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60066-How-quotopenquot-are-YOU/'&gt;How &amp;quot;open&amp;quot; are YOU?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/60066/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60066-How-quotopenquot-are-YOU/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60066-How-quotopenquot-are-YOU/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:45:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60066-How-quotopenquot-are-YOU/</guid><evnet:views>32356</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/60066/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>So, we know that Microsoft is trying to be open and transparent and communicate on all levels, with blogs, chats etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How transparent is the average 9er? What kind of communication do you
permit, and why (not)? Do you put your phone number on the homepage?
Your MSN Messenger address? Skype? ICQ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(I've still not figured out my own take on this one yet.)&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>27</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/60066-How-quotopenquot-are-YOU/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/60066/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Penguins at airport security [Penguins at airport security]</title><description>&lt;img src="http://images.ibsys.com/2005/0421/4402061.jpg" id="image4402061" border="0" height="240" width="320" /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"&lt;span class="medium"&gt;The first penguin seems to be wondering why this is necessary.  "It's not like I planned to hijack the plane to Antarctica."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Denver Channel: &lt;a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/slideshow/4402056/detail.html?qs=;s=1;w=320"&gt;Penguin at airport security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Via: &lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/"&gt;Bruce Schneier's blog&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/59978-Penguins-at-airport-security/'&gt;Penguins at airport security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/59978/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/59978-Penguins-at-airport-security/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/59978-Penguins-at-airport-security/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 01:07:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/59978-Penguins-at-airport-security/</guid><evnet:views>10218</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/59978/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;img src="http://images.ibsys.com/2005/0421/4402061.jpg" id="image4402061" border="0" height="240" width="320" /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"&lt;span class="medium"&gt;The first penguin seems to be wondering why this is necessary.  "It's not like I planned to hijack the plane to Antarctica."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Denver Channel: &lt;a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/slideshow/4402056/detail.html?qs=;s=1;w=320"&gt;Penguin at airport security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Via: &lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/"&gt;Bruce Schneier's blog&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/59978-Penguins-at-airport-security/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/59978/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: End of an Era, Proof [Re: End of an Era, Proof]</title><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
				&lt;div class="quoteAuthor"&gt;shooby wrote:&lt;/div&gt;
				&lt;div class="quoteBody"&gt;I'd be your salvation, if you listen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
		&lt;/blockquote&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I knew it! It's another one of those "how to get into heaven" type of threads isn't it? :p&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href=''&gt;Re: End of an Era, Proof&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/342683/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments></comments><link></link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:41:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false"></guid><evnet:views>2</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/342683/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>	shooby wrote:
				I'd be your salvation, if you listen.

		
		

I knew it! It's another one of those "how to get into heaven" type of threads isn't it? :pin reply to Re: End of an Era, Proof</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/342683/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: The End of an Era [Re: The End of an Era]</title><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
				&lt;div&gt;billh wrote:&lt;/div&gt;
				&lt;div&gt;Bad karma, away! Shoo! Perhaps Charles should
perform some GUI&amp;nbsp;Feng Shui on this site by rearranging the
forums.&lt;/div&gt;
		&lt;/blockquote&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/342662/'&gt;Re: The End of an Era&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/342662/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:45:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/342662/</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/342662/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>	billh wrote:
				Bad karma, away! Shoo! Perhaps Charles should
perform some GUI&amp;nbsp;Feng Shui on this site by rearranging the
forums.
		
		

:Din reply to Re: The End of an Era</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/342662/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>MSN Messenger encryption [MSN Messenger encryption]</title><description>I'm looking for something that will encrypt/decrypt my MSN Messenger
traffic on the fly. It doesn't have to be amazingly secure, I'm just
trying to stop the casual snooper watching my traffic on the wire.
Since it would have to be installed on the recipients machine as well
it should be as cheap as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any ideas?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/55278-MSN-Messenger-encryption/'&gt;MSN Messenger encryption&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/55278/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/55278-MSN-Messenger-encryption/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/55278-MSN-Messenger-encryption/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:25:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/55278-MSN-Messenger-encryption/</guid><evnet:views>9530</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/55278/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I'm looking for something that will encrypt/decrypt my MSN Messenger
traffic on the fly. It doesn't have to be amazingly secure, I'm just
trying to stop the casual snooper watching my traffic on the wire.
Since it would have to be installed on the recipients machine as well
it should be as cheap as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any ideas?&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/55278-MSN-Messenger-encryption/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/55278/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: The End of an Era [Re: The End of an Era]</title><description>And all along I though toast was a Mac thingie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.wurst-wasser.net/Projects/Pictures/FlyingToasters2.jpg" height="143" width="223" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/342629/'&gt;Re: The End of an Era&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/342629/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:10:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/342629/</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/342629/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>And all along I though toast was a Mac thingie.

in reply to Re: The End of an Era</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/342629/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Google: That's my layout, now hand over your domain Mister! [Google: That's my layout, now hand over your domain Mister!]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
				&lt;i&gt;"The takedown notice was rather curious in its use of American law,
given that the site is at a Belgian web address, but it appears as
though the server itself is hosted in Houston, Texas. [...] They insist not only that the parody stop, but that
the domain be transferred to Google. See, it's all fun and games until
you make a parody of a Google site. &lt;/i&gt;
		&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;If Microsoft did this, half of the planet would explode. Don't be evil, mm'kay!"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/news/posts/20040904-4158.html"&gt;Google puts the hammer down on Google parodies&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/20519-Google-Thats-my-layout-now-hand-over-your-domain-Mister/'&gt;Google: That's my layout, now hand over your domain Mister!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/20519/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/20519-Google-Thats-my-layout-now-hand-over-your-domain-Mister/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/20519-Google-Thats-my-layout-now-hand-over-your-domain-Mister/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:35:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/20519-Google-Thats-my-layout-now-hand-over-your-domain-Mister/</guid><evnet:views>25399</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/20519/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;
				&lt;i&gt;"The takedown notice was rather curious in its use of American law,
given that the site is at a Belgian web address, but it appears as
though the server itself is hosted in Houston, Texas. [...] They insist not only that the parody stop, but that
the domain be transferred to Google. See, it's all fun and games until
you make a parody of a Google site. &lt;/i&gt;
		&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;If Microsoft did this, half of the planet would explode. Don't be evil, mm'kay!"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/news/posts/20040904-4158.html"&gt;Google puts the hammer down on Google parodies&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>28</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/20519-Google-Thats-my-layout-now-hand-over-your-domain-Mister/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/20519/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>MS Office: The Next Generation? [MS Office: The Next Generation?]</title><description>How is the next generation of Microsoft Office coming along? Maybe you
could do some interviews with the Office dev team? That would be
interesting!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15444-MS-Office-The-Next-Generation/'&gt;MS Office: The Next Generation?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/15444/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15444-MS-Office-The-Next-Generation/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15444-MS-Office-The-Next-Generation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 23:26:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15444-MS-Office-The-Next-Generation/</guid><evnet:views>15549</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/15444/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>How is the next generation of Microsoft Office coming along? Maybe you
could do some interviews with the Office dev team? That would be
interesting!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>23</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/15444-MS-Office-The-Next-Generation/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/15444/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Fun with IE: Crash IE with 11 bytes [Fun with IE: Crash IE with 11 bytes]</title><description>&lt;i&gt;"IE seems to have problems handling Cascading Style Sheet (CSS)
elements and therefore an attacker can easily crash IE by using the
following, imho, weird combinations of CSS elements:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;STYLE&amp;gt;@;/*&lt;br /&gt;
There you go, 11 bytes is all it takes to crash IE. Having &amp;lt;STYLE&amp;gt;@;/*&lt;br /&gt;
alone is enough, other HTML tags are not necessary."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
		&lt;a href="http://www.ecqurity.com/adv/IEstyle.html"&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ecqurity.com/adv/IEstyle.html&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;i&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14184-Fun-with-IE-Crash-IE-with-11-bytes/'&gt;Fun with IE: Crash IE with 11 bytes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/14184/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14184-Fun-with-IE-Crash-IE-with-11-bytes/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14184-Fun-with-IE-Crash-IE-with-11-bytes/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:37:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14184-Fun-with-IE-Crash-IE-with-11-bytes/</guid><evnet:views>8017</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/14184/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;i&gt;"IE seems to have problems handling Cascading Style Sheet (CSS)
elements and therefore an attacker can easily crash IE by using the
following, imho, weird combinations of CSS elements:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;STYLE&amp;gt;@;/*&lt;br /&gt;
There you go, 11 bytes is all it takes to crash IE. Having &amp;lt;STYLE&amp;gt;@;/*&lt;br /&gt;
alone is enough, other HTML tags are not necessary."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
		&lt;a href="http://www.ecqurity.com/adv/IEstyle.html"&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ecqurity.com/adv/IEstyle.html&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;i&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/14184-Fun-with-IE-Crash-IE-with-11-bytes/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/14184/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Informant in `Sasser' worm case under investigation [Informant in `Sasser' worm case under investigation]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
				&lt;em&gt;"The informant who tipped Microsoft Corp. to the identity of the "Sasser" computer worm's creator last month is among five people under investigation as possible accomplices, prosecutors said Wednesday."&lt;/em&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/news/8917"&gt;Informant in `Sasser' worm case under investigation, German prosecutors say&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Greed and stupidity in perfect harmony. LOL!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9689-Informant-in-Sasser-worm-case-under-investigation/'&gt;Informant in `Sasser' worm case under investigation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/9689/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9689-Informant-in-Sasser-worm-case-under-investigation/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9689-Informant-in-Sasser-worm-case-under-investigation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 18:29:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9689-Informant-in-Sasser-worm-case-under-investigation/</guid><evnet:views>1363</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/9689/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;
				&lt;em&gt;"The informant who tipped Microsoft Corp. to the identity of the "Sasser" computer worm's creator last month is among five people under investigation as possible accomplices, prosecutors said Wednesday."&lt;/em&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/news/8917"&gt;Informant in `Sasser' worm case under investigation, German prosecutors say&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Greed and stupidity in perfect harmony. LOL!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9689-Informant-in-Sasser-worm-case-under-investigation/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/9689/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Microsoft antivirus [Microsoft antivirus]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
				&lt;em&gt;Mike Nash, chief of Microsoft's security business unit, told reporters that Microsoft is developing software to protect personal computers running Windows against malicious software, the worms and viruses that have plagued users with data loss, shutdowns and disruptions in Web traffic in recent years. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;"We're still planning to offer our own AV (anti-virus) product," Nash said&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?storyID=5429092"&gt;Reuters: Microsoft on Track to Offer Anti-Virus Software&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is going to be interesting. If Microsoft starts selling an anti-virus solution, they are in a sense charging for their own faults. No security holes - no anti-virus program needed. So in order för the Anti-virus division to show a profit, windows needs more security problems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If Microsoft integrates it into the OS, or gives the product away for free - we're right back the situation where MSIE was offered free and Netscape cost money. Lawsuits, Lawsuits, Lawsuits.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only way to win is to make it so &lt;strong&gt;GOOD&lt;/strong&gt; that it puts an end to the whole virus plague. That is one challenging task.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9673-Microsoft-antivirus/'&gt;Microsoft antivirus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/9673/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9673-Microsoft-antivirus/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9673-Microsoft-antivirus/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:43:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9673-Microsoft-antivirus/</guid><evnet:views>14419</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/9673/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;
				&lt;em&gt;Mike Nash, chief of Microsoft's security business unit, told reporters that Microsoft is developing software to protect personal computers running Windows against malicious software, the worms and viruses that have plagued users with data loss, shutdowns and disruptions in Web traffic in recent years. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;"We're still planning to offer our own AV (anti-virus) product," Nash said&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?storyID=5429092"&gt;Reuters: Microsoft on Track to Offer Anti-Virus Software&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>26</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9673-Microsoft-antivirus/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/9673/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>What is...? [What is...?]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Okey so, I'm abit bored today. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edit: just to clairfy: These are results returned when searching on &lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com"&gt;www.solvalou.com&lt;/a&gt;. Follow the links.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com/misc_whatis.php?search=linux"&gt;Linux is ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Linux is for Bitches.&lt;br /&gt;Linux is Right For You.&lt;br /&gt;Linux is not open source.&lt;br /&gt;Linux is more secure than any other operating system&lt;br /&gt;Linux is obsolete.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com/misc_whatis.php?search=Windows"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windows is ...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Windows is a Security Nightmare.&lt;br /&gt;Windows is cheaper than Linux&lt;br /&gt;Windows is free and offers a one-click.&lt;br /&gt;Windows is here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com/misc_whatis.php?search=microsoft"&gt;Microsoft is ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft is Building a Global Monopoly.&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft is not making money on its browsers.&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft is making lemonade.&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft is not an innovator.&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft is right.&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft is Plain Crazy.&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft is everywhere.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com/misc_whatis.php?search=Scoble"&gt;Scoble is...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scoble is a Worm.&lt;br /&gt;Scoble is still looking over his shoulder.&lt;br /&gt;Scoble is a good guy.&lt;br /&gt;Scoble is just plain scary.&lt;br /&gt;Scoble is wrapping.&lt;br /&gt;Scoble is losing it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com/misc_whatis.php?search=Lars"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lars is...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lars is Online&lt;br /&gt;Lars is approximately £1.&lt;br /&gt;Lars is Torture&lt;br /&gt;Lars is most professional.&lt;br /&gt;Lars is a little BUTT KISS *.&lt;br /&gt;Lars is a young strong Judo exerciser from Jutland.&lt;br /&gt;Lars is scheduled for decommissioning early this summer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com/misc_whatis.php?search=channel+9"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;channel 9 is ...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Channel 9 is Alive.&lt;br /&gt;Channel 9 is all about the conversation.&lt;br /&gt;Channel 9 is either the next big thing in corporate communications&lt;br /&gt;Channel 9 is available at http.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just for fun. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9644-What-is/'&gt;What is...?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/9644/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9644-What-is/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9644-What-is/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:48:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9644-What-is/</guid><evnet:views>23511</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/9644/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;Okey so, I'm abit bored today. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edit: just to clairfy: These are results returned when searching on &lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com"&gt;www.solvalou.com&lt;/a&gt;. Follow the links.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com/misc_whatis.php?search=linux"&gt;Linux is ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Linux is for Bitches.&lt;br /&gt;Linux is Right For You.&lt;br /&gt;Linux is not open source.&lt;br /&gt;Linux is more secure than any other operating system&lt;br /&gt;Linux is obsolete.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.solvalou.com/misc_whatis.php?search=Windows"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windows is ...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Windows is a Security Nightmare.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>33</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9644-What-is/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/9644/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Moblog dead in the water? [Moblog dead in the water?]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Dudes - Get those cameras a'snappin' again!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9614-Moblog-dead-in-the-water/'&gt;Moblog dead in the water?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/9614/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9614-Moblog-dead-in-the-water/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9614-Moblog-dead-in-the-water/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:35:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9614-Moblog-dead-in-the-water/</guid><evnet:views>2919</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/9614/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;Dudes - Get those cameras a'snappin' again!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/9614-Moblog-dead-in-the-water/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/9614/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>HoTMaiL vs GMail - bring it on! [HoTMaiL vs GMail - bring it on!]</title><description>&lt;span class="headline"&gt;Extremetech.com has a &lt;a href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1586090,00.asp"&gt;Preview of&amp;nbsp;Google's Gmail Beta&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
		&lt;a href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1586090,00.asp"&gt; &lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;The part I find most interesting is&amp;nbsp;that the amount of ad space&amp;nbsp;so far looks&amp;nbsp;pretty okey.&amp;nbsp;Maybe they'll crank it up a bit when it goes public.&amp;nbsp;But&amp;nbsp;it looks pretty slick&amp;nbsp;compared to MSN /&amp;nbsp;Hotmail.&amp;nbsp;I wouldn't use Hotmail at all if it didn't integrate with Outlook. Those flashy ads are just horrible.&amp;nbsp;And it's only 20 (?) Mb of space? Maybe GMail isn't so bad. Wonder what MSNs&amp;nbsp;move will be?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Image from&amp;nbsp;Extremetech for those that&amp;nbsp;think the article is a bit on the long side.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img height="700" src="http://common.ziffdavisinternet.com/util_get_image/6/0,1311,sz=1&amp;amp;i=68598,00.jpg" width="699" /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/6217-HoTMaiL-vs-GMail-bring-it-on/'&gt;HoTMaiL vs GMail - bring it on!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/6217/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/6217-HoTMaiL-vs-GMail-bring-it-on/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/6217-HoTMaiL-vs-GMail-bring-it-on/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 08:50:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/6217-HoTMaiL-vs-GMail-bring-it-on/</guid><evnet:views>20538</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/6217/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Extremetech.com has a Preview of&amp;nbsp;Google's Gmail Beta The part I find most interesting is&amp;nbsp;that the amount of ad space&amp;nbsp;so far looks&amp;nbsp;pretty okey.&amp;nbsp;Maybe they'll crank it up a bit when it goes public.&amp;nbsp;But&amp;nbsp;it looks pretty slick&amp;nbsp;compared to MSN /&amp;nbsp;Hotmail.&amp;nbsp;I wouldn't use Hotmail at all if it didn't integrate with Outlook. Those flashy ads are just horrible.&amp;nbsp;And it's only 20 (?) Mb of space? Maybe GMail isn't so bad. Wonder what MSNs&amp;nbsp;move will be?(Image from&amp;nbsp;Extremetech for those that&amp;nbsp;think the article is a bit on the long side.)&amp;nbsp;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>30</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/6217-HoTMaiL-vs-GMail-bring-it-on/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/6217/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>A bug that just might kill you [A bug that just might kill you]</title><description>Independent&amp;nbsp;published an article today about how the Sasser Worm &lt;a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=518242"&gt;crashed UK Coastguard computers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It
makes one think. It's easy to slip up and leave something vulnerable.
But in todays world it may actually end up killing someone.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5810-A-bug-that-just-might-kill-you/'&gt;A bug that just might kill you&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/5810/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5810-A-bug-that-just-might-kill-you/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5810-A-bug-that-just-might-kill-you/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 23:26:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5810-A-bug-that-just-might-kill-you/</guid><evnet:views>3817</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/5810/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Independent&amp;nbsp;published an article today about how the Sasser Worm &lt;a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=518242"&gt;crashed UK Coastguard computers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It
makes one think. It's easy to slip up and leave something vulnerable.
But in todays world it may actually end up killing someone.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>21</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/5810-A-bug-that-just-might-kill-you/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/5810/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Longhorn back to basics: Error messages that makes sense! [Longhorn back to basics: Error messages that makes sense!]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a suggestion for an improvement that I think is long over due. And this is going to be a real rant, so hold on to your hats.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Short version:&lt;/strong&gt; Something should be made to make system errors more understandable to the end user.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rant:&lt;/strong&gt; Right now there are two levels of errors.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;The ones you get in windows that is pointless because&lt;br /&gt;they don't give enough information - like &lt;em&gt;"Unable to print"&lt;/em&gt;, and then you know that the Wizard is just going to ask you if the cable is plugged in and then give up. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And then there is the other kind, the kind that is horribly undecipherable. The information you get when Windows blue screens is practicly useless for the average joe. And for most computer professionals outside Microsoft aswell. When my computer reboots and I find an entry in the event log that says &lt;em&gt;"event ID 1003, category 202, source: unknown, System Error". &lt;/em&gt;What am I supposed to do with that information? First stop is the Knowledgebase. And I'm grateful for that. But if that turns up a blank? Call Microsoft Technical Support and start handing over money? And to make it even more useless, it's even translated. Probably by someone who didn't know what it ment either...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's like being right back in the good old days when&lt;br /&gt;the Amiga coughed up a [guru meditation] with some strange number you could look up to find out what subsystem that crashed. Atleast that was cute. Now it's &lt;strong&gt;20 years&lt;/strong&gt; later. And I still have to go to &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.softwaretipsandtricks.com"&gt;www.softwaretipsandtricks.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://www.eventid.net"&gt;www.eventid.net&lt;/a&gt; or some other strange website. And if I'm lucky, and that's a big &lt;strong&gt;IF&lt;/strong&gt;, they have a listing relevant to my case. Is it so hard to put something understandable in the event log? Or is it obscure by design to generate support call revenue? Talk to me.&lt;br /&gt;But don't tell me to analyze the crash dump. Normal end users don't do that. And I shouldn't have to do it either. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Get some guys over from the Longhorn translucent spinning 3D prettywindows team and put them to work writing real error messages, and get the basics right first.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5763-Longhorn-back-to-basics-Error-messages-that-makes-sense/'&gt;Longhorn back to basics: Error messages that makes sense!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/5763/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5763-Longhorn-back-to-basics-Error-messages-that-makes-sense/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5763-Longhorn-back-to-basics-Error-messages-that-makes-sense/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 20:09:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5763-Longhorn-back-to-basics-Error-messages-that-makes-sense/</guid><evnet:views>3793</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/5763/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;I have a suggestion for an improvement that I think is long over due. And this is going to be a real rant, so hold on to your hats.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Short version:&lt;/strong&gt; Something should be made to make system errors more understandable to the end user.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rant:&lt;/strong&gt; Right now there are two levels of errors.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;The ones you get in windows that is pointless because&lt;br /&gt;they don't give enough information - like &lt;em&gt;"Unable to print"&lt;/em&gt;, and then you know that the Wizard is just going to ask you if the cable is plugged in and then give up. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>18</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5763-Longhorn-back-to-basics-Error-messages-that-makes-sense/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/5763/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>C# v2.0 Specification [C# v2.0 Specification]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Does the &lt;a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/1/6/81682478-4018-48fe-9e5e-f87a44af3db9/SpecificationVer2.doc"&gt;C# 2.0 Specification&lt;/a&gt; (July 2003)&amp;nbsp;available&amp;nbsp;at &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/team/language/default.aspx"&gt;C# Language Corner&lt;/a&gt; describe the way C# will be&amp;nbsp;implemented in Whidbey? If not, where can I obtain the most recent draft? And when will the final standard be ready?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5408-C-v20-Specification/'&gt;C# v2.0 Specification&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/5408/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5408-C-v20-Specification/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5408-C-v20-Specification/</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2004 15:30:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5408-C-v20-Specification/</guid><evnet:views>2648</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/5408/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;Does the &lt;a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/1/6/81682478-4018-48fe-9e5e-f87a44af3db9/SpecificationVer2.doc"&gt;C# 2.0 Specification&lt;/a&gt; (July 2003)&amp;nbsp;available&amp;nbsp;at &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/team/language/default.aspx"&gt;C# Language Corner&lt;/a&gt; describe the way C# will be&amp;nbsp;implemented in Whidbey? If not, where can I obtain the most recent draft? And when will the final standard be ready?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/5408-C-v20-Specification/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/5408/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Integrate ebooks with Visual Studio [Integrate ebooks with Visual Studio]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
				Alot of books these days come with an ebook version on CD. Many of them are in Compiled HTML (CHM) format. Atleast the books from Microsoft Press. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wouldn't it be great to be able to integrate the books you buy with Visual Studio? Drop the CHM file in a special directory and get it searched right alongside MSDN (and Codewize). I think that would be great. Right now I have to first find the file, open it and then search. Never happens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Btw; what is the best tool to handle your CHM collection? Is there a tool that let you index and keep a searchable library?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4892-Integrate-ebooks-with-Visual-Studio/'&gt;Integrate ebooks with Visual Studio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/4892/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4892-Integrate-ebooks-with-Visual-Studio/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4892-Integrate-ebooks-with-Visual-Studio/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:20:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4892-Integrate-ebooks-with-Visual-Studio/</guid><evnet:views>12737</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/4892/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;
				Alot of books these days come with an ebook version on CD. Many of them are in Compiled HTML (CHM) format. Atleast the books from Microsoft Press. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wouldn't it be great to be able to integrate the books you buy with Visual Studio? Drop the CHM file in a special directory and get it searched right alongside MSDN (and Codewize). I think that would be great. Right now I have to first find the file, open it and then search. Never happens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Btw; what is the best tool to handle your CHM collection? Is there a tool that let you index and keep a searchable library?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/4892-Integrate-ebooks-with-Visual-Studio/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/4892/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Come on Microsoft people. Let's see your bookshelves! [Come on Microsoft people. Let's see your bookshelves!]</title><description>Created a new thread for this question that came up in the thread &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=4024"&gt;"Good books for learning to program".&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;table class="quoteTable"&gt;

&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif" /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td class="txt3"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jaz wrote:&lt;/strong&gt; 
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Just wondering.&amp;nbsp; What do the MS guys have on their bookshelves, programming related and well maybe some fiction?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Excellent question! Come on MS people. Let's see your bookshelves! Why not post a picture of it so we can see which O'reilly books you're secretly reading.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How is Microsoft related to Microsoft Press? Does every employee get a set of books - do you just request them?&amp;nbsp;Or do you have to open your wallet like the rest of us?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3969-Come-on-Microsoft-people-Lets-see-your-bookshelves/'&gt;Come on Microsoft people. Let's see your bookshelves!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/3969/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3969-Come-on-Microsoft-people-Lets-see-your-bookshelves/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3969-Come-on-Microsoft-people-Lets-see-your-bookshelves/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:48:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3969-Come-on-Microsoft-people-Lets-see-your-bookshelves/</guid><evnet:views>4086</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/3969/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Created a new thread for this question that came up in the thread "Good books for learning to program".





Jaz wrote: 

Just wondering.&amp;nbsp; What do the MS guys have on their bookshelves, programming related and well maybe some fiction?Excellent question! Come on MS people. Let's see your bookshelves! Why not post a picture of it so we can see which O'reilly books you're secretly reading.How is Microsoft related to Microsoft Press? Does every employee get a set of books - do you just request them?&amp;nbsp;Or do you have to open your wallet like the rest of us?/Lars.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3969-Come-on-Microsoft-people-Lets-see-your-bookshelves/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/3969/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Outlook for the whole family. [Outlook for the whole family.]</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;I've been using Outlook for a few years, and now I've managed to convince my wife to give up Eudora and run Outlook too. So now I'm trying to share my calendar and contacts with her. Sound simple enough. Atleast I thought so.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only way I've found so far is to share a .pst file, but there is no multiuser support for doing that. It seems like the &lt;span class="neWord"&gt;kosher way to go is to run Exchange. But Exchange is not free. Nor is the server OS it requires. And so on. So it suddenly becomes &lt;strong&gt;very&lt;/strong&gt; expensive. And complicated!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have Microsoft got a strategy for dealing with using Outlook within a family (home use)? I've read that there used to be something called Web folders" in earlier versions but that they are gone in 2003.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3486-Outlook-for-the-whole-family/'&gt;Outlook for the whole family.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/3486/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3486-Outlook-for-the-whole-family/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3486-Outlook-for-the-whole-family/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:07:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3486-Outlook-for-the-whole-family/</guid><evnet:views>20129</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/3486/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;br /&gt;I've been using Outlook for a few years, and now I've managed to convince my wife to give up Eudora and run Outlook too. So now I'm trying to share my calendar and contacts with her. Sound simple enough. Atleast I thought so.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only way I've found so far is to share a .pst file, but there is no multiuser support for doing that. It seems like the &lt;span class="neWord"&gt;kosher way to go is to run Exchange. But Exchange is not free. Nor is the server OS it requires. And so on. So it suddenly becomes &lt;strong&gt;very&lt;/strong&gt; expensive. And complicated!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>31</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3486-Outlook-for-the-whole-family/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/3486/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Give me your best Windows diagnostics tips! [Give me your best Windows diagnostics tips!]</title><description>The scenario:&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;You're a happy windows user that run Windows 2000 or XP. Got a few applications installed from major vendors like Micrsoft, Adobe, Macromedia and Symantec. Not too many freeware quick hacks. The basic setup. And so one day out of the blue, it happens. You're working as usual and the computer freezes up. So you do the monkey manouver and bring up the Task Manager.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There you find 99% idle time, no hung apps. No unusual memory usage. Not too much kernel time. No disk activity. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So you kill explorer.exe and restarts it. And maybe that does the trick. Or you have to reboot. And the computer runs again. And suddenly, the problem is back.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At this point, the regular user reinstalls windows.&lt;br /&gt;I think most of us have experienced this at some point or another. But how can it really be solved?&lt;br /&gt;How do you really find out WHAT is wrong, and WHY the computer just hangs there idle? How do you find out what explorer.exe (or other application)&amp;nbsp;is waiting for?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Maybe the smart thing is to reinstall. But I hate to lose. I know about regmon, filemon and the performance monitor. But how do I look "under the hood" of a production system and find out what component, driver, &amp;lt; insert here &amp;gt; that causes the problem when it doesn't result in any load? When it just goes into wait without generating any special activity?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know this may not be the best forum to ask this question. But I've asked alot of my developer buddies and they all go I don't know.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So how would YOU go about trying to diagnose such a system? What are your best tips?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3479-Give-me-your-best-Windows-diagnostics-tips/'&gt;Give me your best Windows diagnostics tips!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/3479/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3479-Give-me-your-best-Windows-diagnostics-tips/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3479-Give-me-your-best-Windows-diagnostics-tips/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:48:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3479-Give-me-your-best-Windows-diagnostics-tips/</guid><evnet:views>9271</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/3479/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>The scenario:&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;You're a happy windows user that run Windows 2000 or XP. Got a few applications installed from major vendors like Micrsoft, Adobe, Macromedia and Symantec. Not too many freeware quick hacks. The basic setup. And so one day out of the blue, it happens. You're working as usual and the computer freezes up. So you do the monkey manouver and bring up the Task Manager.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There you find 99% idle time, no hung apps. No unusual memory usage. Not too much kernel time. No disk activity. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>20</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/3479-Give-me-your-best-Windows-diagnostics-tips/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/3479/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Significance of 1033 [Significance of 1033]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems the&amp;nbsp;documentation is always contained in a folder named as a number. I don't know if it's always been "1033", but I've seen that one for ages with the MSDN Library.&amp;nbsp;What is the significance&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;of "1033"? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/2935-Significance-of-1033/'&gt;Significance of 1033&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/2935/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/2935-Significance-of-1033/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/2935-Significance-of-1033/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:24:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/2935-Significance-of-1033/</guid><evnet:views>2739</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/2935/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;p&gt;It seems the&amp;nbsp;documentation is always contained in a folder named as a number. I don't know if it's always been "1033", but I've seen that one for ages with the MSDN Library.&amp;nbsp;What is the significance&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;of "1033"? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;/Lars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>lars</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/2935-Significance-of-1033/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/2935/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>