<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 - Discussions by larsw</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/larsw/Discussions/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/larsw/Discussions</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:37:47 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:37:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>0</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>0</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>0</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Using shared DataContract between client and Service</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you're building &quot;both sides of the gap&quot; / or if you are building a reference implementation, I can't see why it would harm if&nbsp;you to reuse your business entities in both the server and client.</p>
<p>I know it's against &quot;the 4 tenets&quot; to do so, but hey! He asked how he could do it...</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Lars Wilhelmsen</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/253716-Using-shared-DataContract-between-client-and-Service/721b682aa8184c0796199dea0155c613#721b682aa8184c0796199dea0155c613</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 22:14:17 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/253716-Using-shared-DataContract-between-client-and-Service/721b682aa8184c0796199dea0155c613#721b682aa8184c0796199dea0155c613</guid>
		<dc:creator>larsw</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/larsw/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Using shared DataContract between client and Service</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sumit,<br>
<br>
&nbsp;In order to fix your problem, you'll have to use the command line tool, svcutil.exe to generate the proxy code.<br>
<br>
With the /reference (or /r for short) switch, you can specify assemblies that contains shared types.<br>
<br>
(You will probably use the /target:code (or /t) switch - to generate<br>
&nbsp;your proxy class).<br>
<br>
&nbsp;Run svcutil.exe without any arguments to view the help - or look it up in the MSDN documentation.<br>
<br>
&nbsp;<img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /><br>
<br>
&nbsp;Regards,<br>
<br>
&nbsp;Lars Wilhelmsen<br>
&nbsp;Senior Software Engineer<br>
&nbsp;Norway</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/253716-Using-shared-DataContract-between-client-and-Service/0d527515f2ab4e61af129dea0155c5c5#0d527515f2ab4e61af129dea0155c5c5</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:45:11 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/253716-Using-shared-DataContract-between-client-and-Service/0d527515f2ab4e61af129dea0155c5c5#0d527515f2ab4e61af129dea0155c5c5</guid>
		<dc:creator>larsw</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/larsw/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Best Practices for Common Operations ( BPFCOP? :-) )</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi robert,<br>
<br>
I actually read that article a week ago - quite interesting...<br>
<br>
&nbsp;--larsw</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/6220-Best-Practices-for-Common-Operations--BPFCOP---/f9e5adf2bd3241d5966b9dea01199f43#f9e5adf2bd3241d5966b9dea01199f43</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 11:05:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/6220-Best-Practices-for-Common-Operations--BPFCOP---/f9e5adf2bd3241d5966b9dea01199f43#f9e5adf2bd3241d5966b9dea01199f43</guid>
		<dc:creator>larsw</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/larsw/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Best Practices for Common Operations ( BPFCOP? :-) )</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,<br>
<br>
Yesterday, I started to work on a small library to parse ID3v2 tags (For those of you that don't know what it is; it's the information embedded in mp3 files, that tells you about the artist/title/recorded year/genre/bpm etc). I normally throw up some mock-up
 code, and refine it afterwards. Since this is a operation&nbsp;that&nbsp;I would possibly run on *a lot* of files, I want this&nbsp;operation to be fast.&nbsp;So I allready thought about rewriting it with /unsafe, and use pointer arithmetics to parse the tags).<br>
<br>
As&nbsp;I&nbsp;started to hack on the library,&nbsp;and tried to comprehend the specification (found at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.id3.org/">http://www.id3.org/</a>) -&nbsp;I&nbsp;came across &quot;problems&quot; - something that we programmers normally does when we do this kind of development, like
 &quot;what is the best way to check a 3 byte large array if it contains &quot;ID3&quot; and other minor things. Should we just run throught them with nested if-statements, to check each element&nbsp;- and bail out, if it doesn't&nbsp;match. Or should we create an array containing
 the match criteria - and check the arrays against each other.<br>
<br>
There really should be a wiki that could be used to discuss these small day-to-day problems - that we all run accross.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
&nbsp;--larsw - http://<a href="http://www.sral.org">www.sral.org</a>/</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/6220-Best-Practices-for-Common-Operations--BPFCOP---/6220#6220</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 09:53:21 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/6220-Best-Practices-for-Common-Operations--BPFCOP---/6220#6220</guid>
		<dc:creator>larsw</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/larsw/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>