Maximilian Haru Raditya
| Forum | Thread | Replies | Latest activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site Feedback | Migrate Account | 2 | Jun 07, 2011 at 9:53 PM |
| Site Feedback | Unable to resume download of videos | 5 | May 08, 2011 at 7:38 AM |
| Coffeehouse | Text rendering in IE9 preview? | 21 | Feb 12, 2011 at 12:47 AM |
TWC9: Next XBOX Announcement, AzureConf, Code Digger, Princess Leia and more
May 01, 2013 at 12:43 PMWell, I didn't know if it were something considered to be (very?) rude. It's just I used to had, and perhaps still have, not-so-good UX (User Experience) with it. As I live in a country with not-that-fast internet connection a.k.a. slow, moving between pages backward and forward causing page rendering issues in IE, as I experience it with IE9 and earlier versions, e.g.: the original page didn't come back well-formatted as I move backward and forward. In short, it's very annoying for me, and not a good UX to me. That's why I develop the habit of opening new links in a new tab, and not in current tab. I'm not sure how it could be something considered "rude".
Also, reading the arguments here: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/top-10-mistakes-web-design/, I become confused with the notation of "window" to be interchangeable with "tab". For me, a window is a window, and not a tab. And I understand this annoying behavior back then when I used IE6, as it had no notion of "tab". Thus, I'm not sure if it would be still an issue with tab as I consciously click the link, not something done unconsciously for me. Well, perhaps it's just applied to me...
Nevertheless, I respect your decision about it. It's just a suggestion after all, though it would be still (very) helpful to me.
Thanks.
TWC9: Next XBOX Announcement, AzureConf, Code Digger, Princess Leia and more
Apr 30, 2013 at 6:58 AMDude, I have suggestion. Could you make all links above to open in NEW tab by default, instead of in CURRENT tab, by using target="_blank" of the <a /> tag?
Thanks.
Preshow Day 1
Nov 01, 2012 at 9:05 PMExcellent!
Deep dive into the kernel of the .NET Framework
Sep 29, 2011 at 6:37 AMHQ WMV: http://video.ch9.ms/build/2011/wmv-hq/813-HD.wmv
A .NET developer's view of Windows 8 app development
Sep 27, 2011 at 4:45 PMYou're right. A lot of questions still remain...
Further, even the app that is used to develop Metro style apps and other apps a.k.a. VS11 is still written using C++ and .NET, and certainly not WinRT. I'm not even sure about Office.
Well, I wonder what MS is going to say about all of these. Metro is just for the consumer for now.
A .NET developer's view of Windows 8 app development
Sep 22, 2011 at 2:47 AMHQ WMV: http://video.ch9.ms/build/2011/wmv-hq/930-HD.wmv
Lap around the Windows Runtime
Sep 18, 2011 at 6:47 AMSo, are you saying that there would be a chance web app like ASP.NET to be built into WinRT itself in the future, by deprecating .NET?
Deep dive into the kernel of the .NET Framework
Sep 18, 2011 at 6:25 AMBut WinRT only for Metro and limited to Metro only. There are alot of application types other than Metro app. Web application using ASP.NET, for example. Where's the logic?
The Office Show: Office 365 - Part One
Jul 02, 2011 at 6:47 AMI'm guessing it's not degree, but day. So, 365 days in a year. Just a guess
Anders Hejlsberg: Questions and Answers
May 04, 2011 at 3:03 AMI agree with some posters above. The media file download should be resumeable just like C9 in the old days. I notice this change recently and it seems the files are now hosted in Windows Azure. It's not very convenient to download a non-resumeable file, especially using dial-up connection.
Here's the log I got using FDM (Free Download Manager):
----------------
GET /ch9/b0be/c77d5232-4d38-474d-80a5-9ed20166b0be/AnHourWithAndersHejlsberg_2MB_ch9.wmv HTTP/1.1
...
Host: media.ch9.ms
16:57:30 04/05/2011 HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 629089625
...
Server: Windows-Azure-Blob/1.0 Microsoft-HTTPAPI/2.0
...
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 09:57:35 GMT
...
Server does not support download resuming. Don't stop this download; otherwise you'll have to start it from the beginning.
----------------
See more comments…