<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 - Discussions by nbb</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nbb/Discussions/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nbb/Discussions</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:41:11 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:41:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>0</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>0</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>0</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Why Windows 7 Take Up Maybe Slow but IT&#39;S Successor May Thrive</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteUser">sushovande said:</div><div class="quoteText">Its hard to take you seriously if you have style definitions in your post
<img src="http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-4.gif" alt="Tongue Out"></div></blockquote>I agree but you cannot see the stylesheet info until the article is posted as far as I'm aware.
<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/454203-Why-Windows-7-Take-Up-Maybe-Slow-but-ITS-Successor-May-Thrive/9cbe935aa9624468ab689deb00c6fd6c#9cbe935aa9624468ab689deb00c6fd6c</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/454203-Why-Windows-7-Take-Up-Maybe-Slow-but-ITS-Successor-May-Thrive/9cbe935aa9624468ab689deb00c6fd6c#9cbe935aa9624468ab689deb00c6fd6c</guid>
		<dc:creator>nbb</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nbb/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Why Windows 7 Take Up Maybe Slow but IT&#39;S Successor May Thrive</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK I'm sure that lots of you will disagree. However the basis of my argument is this:-<br>
<br>
1. You cannot upgrade directly from Windows XP to Windows 7 (unless I'm missing something here). To be honest, I've got enough to do in my life without having to reinstall ALL my software. Also why oh why, hasn’t Microsoft learnt from their experience with
 vista.<br>
<br>
2. Windows XP is supported until 2014<br>
<br>
3. Most users will replace their equipment within a 5 year timescale, so they will get a fresh copy of Windows 7 or the latest OS and will go through the pain barrier of reinstalling updated versions of their software (because we all love nice shiny new boxes
 don’t we!)<br>
<br>
Given the above, users may choose to stay with Win XP on the basis that it WORKS! And wait for Windows 8 or whatever mystical name is decided in the future. I suspect that future upgrades are more likely to be driven by new hardware and the requirement to have
 an OS that supports it than anything else.<br>
<div id="RadEditorStyleKeeper1">&nbsp;</div>
<div id="RadEditorStyleKeeper2">&nbsp;</div>
<div id="RadEditorStyleKeeper3">&nbsp;</div>
<div id="RadEditorStyleKeeper4">&nbsp;</div>
<style>
<!--
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin-top:0cm;
	margin-right:0cm;
	margin-bottom:10.0pt;
	margin-left:0cm;
	line-height:115%;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"}
.MsoChpDefault
	{}
.MsoPapDefault
	{margin-bottom:10.0pt;
	line-height:115%}
div.Section1
	{}
-->
</style>
<p class="MsoNormal">OK I'm sure that lots of you will disagree. However the basis of my argument is this:-<br>
<br>
1. You cannot upgrade directly from Windows XP to Windows 7 (unless I'm missing something here). To be honest, I've got enough to do in my life without having to reinstall ALL my software. Also why oh why, hasn’t Microsoft learnt from their experience with
 vista.<br>
<br>
2. Windows XP is supported until 2014</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">3. Most users will replace their equipment within a 5 year timescale, so they will get a fresh copy of Windows 7 or the latest OS and will go through the pain barrier of reinstalling updated versions of their software (because we all love
 nice shiny new boxes don’t we!)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Given the above, users may choose to stay with Win XP on the basis that it WORKS! And wait for Windows 8 or whatever mystical name is decided in the future. I suspect that future upgrades are more likely to be driven by new hardware and
 the requirement to have an OS that supports it than anything else.</p></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/454203-Why-Windows-7-Take-Up-Maybe-Slow-but-ITS-Successor-May-Thrive/454203#454203</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/454203-Why-Windows-7-Take-Up-Maybe-Slow-but-ITS-Successor-May-Thrive/454203#454203</guid>
		<dc:creator>nbb</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nbb/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>