<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 - Discussions by nightski</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:41:19 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:41:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>0</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>0</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>0</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Silverlight RTW is set for Oct 14 2008</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Anybody notice that Adobe managed to slip in a Flash 10 release pretty much at the exact same time?&nbsp; It has some pretty compelling features too like 3D and shader like effects.<br>
<br>
Don't get me wrong I am probably going to get into SL2 since I have been working in WPF quite a bit, but I just thought it was interesting.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/432777-Silverlight-RTW-is-set-for-Oct-14-2008/ecacbdba64984e9294e09dea01049e91#ecacbdba64984e9294e09dea01049e91</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:40:39 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/432777-Silverlight-RTW-is-set-for-Oct-14-2008/ecacbdba64984e9294e09dea01049e91#ecacbdba64984e9294e09dea01049e91</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - What would you say is Microsoft&#39;s coolest product?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteUser">Sven Groot said:</div><div class="quoteText">
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteUser">vesuvius said:</div>
<div class="quoteText">*snip*</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Maybe he was trying to prevent creating a temporary copy of Writer? <img src="http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-4.gif" alt="Tongue Out"><br>
<br>
And you're all wrong. The coolest product MS has made is in fact Flight Simulator X, especially when combined with the right add-ons.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.ookii.org/misc/fsx/egll3.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://www.ookii.org/misc/fsx/egll3.jpg"></a></div></blockquote>I was going to say .NET but then you mentioned FS.&nbsp; You are right, FS is definitely the coolest MS product in my opinion!&nbsp; For me
 at least that is the program that got me into programming in the first place.&nbsp; I have played it since the DOS days and it was my first computer game (ok so its more of a simulator than a game) <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' />&nbsp; Ever since then I fell in love with aviation.&nbsp; In fact, it
 drove me to solo an airplane on my 16th birthday and get a pilots license.<br>
<br>
Its amazing one program had such a large effect on my life.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/431996-What-would-you-say-is-Microsofts-coolest-product/f6cf819df8124b058e9f9dea0103f2df#f6cf819df8124b058e9f9dea0103f2df</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:21:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/431996-What-would-you-say-is-Microsofts-coolest-product/f6cf819df8124b058e9f9dea0103f2df#f6cf819df8124b058e9f9dea0103f2df</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - So, how are you implementing MDI in WPF?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I would take a look at the prism reference implementation by Microsoft.&nbsp; Our solution was before prism came out, but essentially our architecture is very similar.&nbsp; We utilize the MVP pattern and have the concept of a view host.&nbsp; Basically in XAML you can
 specify where content should go by placing viewhosts.&nbsp; Presenters can then inject a view into the view host dynamically.&nbsp; A view host can itself be an items control that can host multiple views.&nbsp; Also view hosts can be nested so that you can have a distinct
 presenter driving each particular view.<br /><br />When you utilize this type of architecture doing something like you mentioned is trivial.&nbsp; To open up a view all you do is instantiate a new copy of the presenter and specify the view host it should inject its view into.&nbsp; This could be a tab itemscontrol.&nbsp;
 Or it could be an itemscontrol that uses a custom template to give views a more MDI like feel within the container.<br /><br />It is completely customizable.&nbsp; Views are completely independent of Presenters and vice versa.&nbsp; The only contract is in the data binding.<br /><br />Lastly we have a separate service that takes care of navigation services.&nbsp; So when the presenter injects its view, it does so through the navigation service.&nbsp; This service takes care of remember history and so forth so that the user can go back &amp; forth among
 the views.<br /><br />The nice thing about this architecture is that the actual size of the supporting libraries are very minimal and very testable.&nbsp; This follows good agile principles.<br /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/420000-So-how-are-you-implementing-MDI-in-WPF/06429e5291284cb9bb979dfa00979581#06429e5291284cb9bb979dfa00979581</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/420000-So-how-are-you-implementing-MDI-in-WPF/06429e5291284cb9bb979dfa00979581#06429e5291284cb9bb979dfa00979581</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - WPF Buttons</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteUser">wkempf said:</div><div class="quoteText">
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteUser">jh71283 said:</div>
<div class="quoteText">*snip*</div>
</blockquote>
Then apply a style/template.&nbsp; Problem solved.</div></blockquote>Agreed, extremely easy to solve this problem.&nbsp; In fact, you don't even have to apply a style.&nbsp; If you just set the content of the button to a textblock with textwrap enabled it will wrap....<br>
<br>
Also the distinction should be made.&nbsp; Your issue is not with the Button control at all, it is with the default template.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/419755-WPF-Buttons/0a9838e183f2410997c09deb01337cc2#0a9838e183f2410997c09deb01337cc2</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:12:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/419755-WPF-Buttons/0a9838e183f2410997c09deb01337cc2#0a9838e183f2410997c09deb01337cc2</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - ASP.NET MVC is HTML&#39;s Last Gasp</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteUser">Maddus Mattus said:</div><div class="quoteText">
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteUser">Minh said:</div>
<div class="quoteText">*snip*</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't share your view and I'll explain why.<br>
<br>
For me the Apple platform has no appeal. It's market is too small and it has too many restrictions. So what we have is a few key players writing software for it and a whole lot of blank space wich nobody can fill.<br>
<br>
Enter Microsoft. Anyone can develop anything on Windows. There are plenty of websites with documentation, plenty of developers willing to share their experiences, some guidance for Microsoft and&nbsp;plenty of 3rd party tools to help you along the way. The best
 thing is;&nbsp;Microsoft is open for feedback. So when they start out to build something new, they release CTP's and betas. When they release a 1.0 into the community, they will gather the expierences from the field and point out a roadmap for 2.0.<br>
<br>
You call it mediocre stuff. I call it developing with partners. Apple just dumps their software and runs.</p>
</div></blockquote>I am a pretty hardcore .NET developer.&nbsp; I develop professionally with the platform and in my free time.&nbsp; Given that however, what you stated is pretty skewed.&nbsp; You can develop for the Mac natively using languages like python or ruby.&nbsp; Last time I checked,
 Python is higher on the TIOBE index than even our precious C# (<a href="http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html">http&#58;&#47;&#47;www.tiobe.com&#47;index.php&#47;content&#47;paperinfo&#47;tpci&#47;index.html</a>).&nbsp; It is very widely used and well known.&nbsp; I am not saying that it is better than C#, just that it is a very viable language.<br>
<br>
Learning to develop for the Mac is not difficult, at least not any more than .NET/Windows.<br>
<br>
ASP.NET MVC imo is very important.&nbsp; The OP had some things blatantly wrong about the framework, but I don't have time to get into them specifically.<br></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/415231-ASPNET-MVC-is-HTMLs-Last-Gasp/2fe8539f3cc041079d9a9deb012dbb17#2fe8539f3cc041079d9a9deb012dbb17</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:58:22 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/415231-ASPNET-MVC-is-HTMLs-Last-Gasp/2fe8539f3cc041079d9a9deb012dbb17#2fe8539f3cc041079d9a9deb012dbb17</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - detect fm signal in VB.NET</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From the looks of the documentation it adds an audio device to windows which you can read from (that part wouldn't be very hard).&nbsp; However their application allows you to change the freq also, meaning it is prob sending custom usb commands to the device.&nbsp;
 With some analyzing &amp; hacking one could possibly figure out how to reverse engineer this&nbsp;for your app, but I do not believe it would be trivial.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/261672-detect-fm-signal-in-VBNET/fd7050c8a0eb48e7a53b9dfa00c19681#fd7050c8a0eb48e7a53b9dfa00c19681</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:08:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/261672-detect-fm-signal-in-VBNET/fd7050c8a0eb48e7a53b9dfa00c19681#fd7050c8a0eb48e7a53b9dfa00c19681</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Good factory implementation ? (C++)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The point of&nbsp;the factory pattern&nbsp;is not to restrict access to creating the objects without the factory.&nbsp; It is simply to allow the creation of objects without specifying the class of the object you want to create.<br /><br />The implementation you provided was just fine.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/261677-Good-factory-implementation--C/5c68dcae02b747d8bb0d9dfa00c1a594#5c68dcae02b747d8bb0d9dfa00c1a594</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/261677-Good-factory-implementation--C/5c68dcae02b747d8bb0d9dfa00c1a594#5c68dcae02b747d8bb0d9dfa00c1a594</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Covariance/Contravariance in .NET Generics</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know of any official response from MS on why this feature wasn't supported in C#?&nbsp; The CLI itself supports it but for some reason it has been left out of C#.<br /><br />Thanks.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/261637-CovarianceContravariance-in-NET-Generics/261637#261637</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:36:54 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/261637-CovarianceContravariance-in-NET-Generics/261637#261637</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Optimization question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For a pixel shader - it wouldn't be too difficult.&nbsp; I would highly recommend using Nvidia's FX Composer 2&nbsp;- its a great IDE for shaders.&nbsp; Or if you want to use ATI stuff there is Rendermonkey.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/261573-Optimization-question/c901cc1d8cf5427088c59dfa00c1544a#c901cc1d8cf5427088c59dfa00c1544a</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:19:43 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/261573-Optimization-question/c901cc1d8cf5427088c59dfa00c1544a#c901cc1d8cf5427088c59dfa00c1544a</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Open new WPF Window / Multithreading</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="quoteAuthor">jh71283 wrote:</div>
<div class="quoteBody">&#65279;Object reference not set to an instance of an object.<b><br /><br />System.Windows.Application.Current</b> is nothing<br /><br />Bearing in mind that the application is winforms based, what is the winforms equivalent to
<b>System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher?</b></div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br />Below is a code example on how to do this.&nbsp; Basically you need to create the Window in a delegate that is passed to the Invoke method on any control in your Windows Forms solution.<br /><br />using System;<br />using System.Windows.Forms;<br />using System.Threading;
<p></p>
<p>namespace WPFHost<br />{<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; public partial class Form1 : Form<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; {<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; public Form1()<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; {<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; InitializeComponent();<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; {<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Thread thrd = new Thread(new ThreadStart(<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; delegate() {<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; this.Invoke(new MethodInvoker(CreateWindow));<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }));<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; thrd.Start();<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; public void CreateWindow()<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; {<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; System.Windows.Window wnd = new System.Windows.Window();<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; wnd.ShowDialog();<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }<br />}<br /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260825-Open-new-WPF-Window--Multithreading/a0c684c459ad44628b419dfa00be847b#a0c684c459ad44628b419dfa00be847b</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260825-Open-new-WPF-Window--Multithreading/a0c684c459ad44628b419dfa00be847b#a0c684c459ad44628b419dfa00be847b</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Open new WPF Window / Multithreading</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Try -<br /><br />System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher currentDispatcher = System.Windows.Application.Current.Dispatcher;<br /><br />currentDispatcher.Invoke(...);<br /><br />You must have a reference to the PresentationFramework.dll though, which I assume you already do.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260825-Open-new-WPF-Window--Multithreading/9f56455479744bf782499dfa00be83c1#9f56455479744bf782499dfa00be83c1</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 06:01:07 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260825-Open-new-WPF-Window--Multithreading/9f56455479744bf782499dfa00be83c1#9f56455479744bf782499dfa00be83c1</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - wpf grid syntax is badly designed</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you are editing by hand, yes it is tough.<br><br>But XAML was designed to be toolable.&nbsp; If you try doing this in Blend, my bets are that it can handle this automatically.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260539-wpf-grid-syntax-is-badly-designed/af6880a635d14b688f459dfa00bd3a0d#af6880a635d14b688f459dfa00bd3a0d</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260539-wpf-grid-syntax-is-badly-designed/af6880a635d14b688f459dfa00bd3a0d#af6880a635d14b688f459dfa00bd3a0d</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Roll my own podcast reader, where to start?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://joshsmithonwpf.wordpress.com/2008/01/06/introducing-podder-the-wpf-podcast-player/">http://joshsmithonwpf.wordpress.com/2008/01/06/introducing-podder-the-wpf-podcast-player/</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260497-Roll-my-own-podcast-reader-where-to-start/32ea13e1ef57427093479dfa00bd25eb#32ea13e1ef57427093479dfa00bd25eb</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260497-Roll-my-own-podcast-reader-where-to-start/32ea13e1ef57427093479dfa00bd25eb#32ea13e1ef57427093479dfa00bd25eb</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Yet another WPF binding question.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A type converter could possibly work if you use reflection and all sorts of unnatural ways to access the private variable <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' />&nbsp; But it is just a static class and won't have access to those private variables directly.<br><br>If you really want to bind to the array, in this case make it a property of the window.<br><br>public&nbsp;List&lt;int&gt; Integers<br>{<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;get { return integers; }<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;set { integers = value; }<br>}<br><br>then set x:Name=&quot;windowName&quot; on your Window declaration in XAML and use the following binding -<br><br>{Binding Path=Integers, ElementName=windowName}<br><br>But now&nbsp; you will have a new problem.&nbsp; The binding will not auto-update <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' />&nbsp; If you use an ObserveableCollection&lt;&gt; instead of List&lt;&gt; then you will get automatic updates (Because it implements the INotifyCollectionChanged interface.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260482-Yet-another-WPF-binding-question/f8a9ab302dcc44d1b87b9dfa00bd17d4#f8a9ab302dcc44d1b87b9dfa00bd17d4</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:37:14 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260482-Yet-another-WPF-binding-question/f8a9ab302dcc44d1b87b9dfa00bd17d4#f8a9ab302dcc44d1b87b9dfa00bd17d4</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tech Off - Yet another WPF binding question.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You can't bind to a private member from XAML unfortunately.</p><p>If you want to bind to it, either set the datacontext in code like you are doing, OR you have to declare the array in XAML as a resource.&nbsp; Then use {Binding Source={StaticResource integers}} to bind to the resource.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260482-Yet-another-WPF-binding-question/93ad9a0266b043eb8a4c9dfa00bd175b#93ad9a0266b043eb8a4c9dfa00bd175b</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/260482-Yet-another-WPF-binding-question/93ad9a0266b043eb8a4c9dfa00bd175b#93ad9a0266b043eb8a4c9dfa00bd175b</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Silverlight Tools for VS2008 Final not available?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">Harlequin wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279;Actually, I <strong>JUST</strong> found the projects. They are under the Windows projects, not Web (Visual C# &gt; Windows, or Visual Basic if you prefer). All the WPF projects are in there.</div></blockquote><br><br>WPF yes, but those are not silverlight.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260501-Silverlight-Tools-for-VS2008-Final-not-available/a06a45ad0f664d68bf299e31009f9bf7#a06a45ad0f664d68bf299e31009f9bf7</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260501-Silverlight-Tools-for-VS2008-Final-not-available/a06a45ad0f664d68bf299e31009f9bf7#a06a45ad0f664d68bf299e31009f9bf7</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Anybody running Vista on Leopard Macbook Pro?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">Mark Brown wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279;I thought I had heard/seen something about how Mac handles right mouse clicks in these situations. Can't remember what now though.</div></blockquote><br><br>You put two fingers on the touch pad and hit the button = right click</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260474-Anybody-running-Vista-on-Leopard-Macbook-Pro/a5d237ad32154e83aaf19e31009ee17c#a5d237ad32154e83aaf19e31009ee17c</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:53:46 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260474-Anybody-running-Vista-on-Leopard-Macbook-Pro/a5d237ad32154e83aaf19e31009ee17c#a5d237ad32154e83aaf19e31009ee17c</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Silverlight Tools for VS2008 Final not available?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Basically install the 1.1 tools for 2008 and follow these instructions -<br><br><a href="http://adamkinney.com/blog/262/default.aspx">http://adamkinney.com/blog/262/default.aspx</a><br><br>I shared your confusion a few weeks back and this did the trick <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260501-Silverlight-Tools-for-VS2008-Final-not-available/dadcc9264acb410aba029e31009f9b34#dadcc9264acb410aba029e31009f9b34</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:24:41 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260501-Silverlight-Tools-for-VS2008-Final-not-available/dadcc9264acb410aba029e31009f9b34#dadcc9264acb410aba029e31009f9b34</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - HD Rocks</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yea HD is amazing <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' />&nbsp; Only downfall is that HD != HD.&nbsp; HD Discovery always looks amazing.&nbsp; TBS HD and TNT HD aren't very good (artifacts, stretching).&nbsp; So it has the potential but some&nbsp;places don't broadcast very good stuff.<br><br>Even when talking about movies, some blu-ray movies are better than others.&nbsp; It all comes down to the compression/method and source material&nbsp;used&nbsp;for encoding.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260483-HD-Rocks/17733332394340c3bcbb9e31009f09e3#17733332394340c3bcbb9e31009f09e3</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:05:09 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260483-HD-Rocks/17733332394340c3bcbb9e31009f09e3#17733332394340c3bcbb9e31009f09e3</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Anybody running Vista on Leopard Macbook Pro?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The m1330 is a very nice laptop, and I am sure its m1530 cousin is also.&nbsp; I recommended one to my aunt for her job (sales), and so got&nbsp;to use it over the holidays.&nbsp; The only downfall is its screen - not nearly as nice as the Macbook pro's for some reason.&nbsp; But other than that a very solid, stylish machine.<br><br>Would be my 2nd choice.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260474-Anybody-running-Vista-on-Leopard-Macbook-Pro/5393667b7f874d2c9df49e31009edfff#5393667b7f874d2c9df49e31009edfff</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260474-Anybody-running-Vista-on-Leopard-Macbook-Pro/5393667b7f874d2c9df49e31009edfff#5393667b7f874d2c9df49e31009edfff</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Anybody running Vista on Leopard Macbook Pro?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">Mark Brown wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279;Hi everybody.<br><br>I'm in the market for a new laptop. I've always heard lots of good things from my designer friends and other fake turtle-neck wearing mac users about the Vista experience on their MacBooks. Many said its fantastic.<br><br>But I'd like to get some more data on this so I'd like to see what your experience has been&nbsp;with that setup and hear the good as well as the bad about how well it has worked for you.<br><br>Thanks.</div></blockquote><br><br>Macbook Pro runs Vista great (I am typing this message on one in Vista).&nbsp; It is my primary development machine with VS2008 and I wouldn't choose any other laptop.<br><br>Although, unless if you want it now it is rumored that soon the Macbook Pro's will receive a Penryn upgrade along with multi-touch touchpads.<br><br><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/01/21/next-macbooks-macbook-pros-to-receive-multi-touch-trackpad/">http://www.macrumors.com/2008/01/21/next-macbooks-macbook-pros-to-receive-multi-touch-trackpad/</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260474-Anybody-running-Vista-on-Leopard-Macbook-Pro/28c45a36eca34af785389e31009edb65#28c45a36eca34af785389e31009edb65</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260474-Anybody-running-Vista-on-Leopard-Macbook-Pro/28c45a36eca34af785389e31009edb65#28c45a36eca34af785389e31009edb65</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - goodbye BIOS: first EFI-enabled motherboard soon after Vista SP1</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">YearOfTheLinuxDesktop wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279; <blockquote><table class="quoteTable"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="10"><img src="/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif"></td><td class="txt3"><strong>Vasudev wrote:</strong><hr size="1"><i>&#65279; <p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/firmware/uefireg.mspx">UEFI Support and Requirements</a></p>Windows Server 2008 fully supports UEFI, and Windows Vista SP1 adds that UEFI support to the 64-bit version of Windows Vista.</i></td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote><br><br>no support for the 32bit version? nightski'd better add 2gb of ram to his macbook if he wants it to survive the 64bit upgrade.<br></div></blockquote><br><br>Yea I will have to go to 4gb.&nbsp; Its cheap.&nbsp; There are a few other issues though, like boot camp not supporting 64 bit.&nbsp; However, just today there was news of a 64bit version of boot camp coming with the leopard 10.5.2 update (possibly).<br><br>Hopefully that is true.&nbsp; If it all falls in place and I can use EFI &#43; 64 bit &#43; Vista SP1 I will be very happy <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' /></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260468-goodbye-BIOS-first-EFI-enabled-motherboard-soon-after-Vista-SP1/b62a875007bf4c9e8dcd9e31009ead1b#b62a875007bf4c9e8dcd9e31009ead1b</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:14:37 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260468-goodbye-BIOS-first-EFI-enabled-motherboard-soon-after-Vista-SP1/b62a875007bf4c9e8dcd9e31009ead1b#b62a875007bf4c9e8dcd9e31009ead1b</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - goodbye BIOS: first EFI-enabled motherboard soon after Vista SP1</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">YearOfTheLinuxDesktop wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279;<br><br>then your laptop is not a PC but a Mac<br><br></div></blockquote><br><br>Correct, but I primarily run Vista.&nbsp; This is really good news.&nbsp; Hopefully this means I can mess with my parititions without having to reformat every time&nbsp;due to the boot camp efi-&gt;bios hack.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260468-goodbye-BIOS-first-EFI-enabled-motherboard-soon-after-Vista-SP1/d5dbbd121b7e4c0ebd849e31009eab7b#d5dbbd121b7e4c0ebd849e31009eab7b</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260468-goodbye-BIOS-first-EFI-enabled-motherboard-soon-after-Vista-SP1/d5dbbd121b7e4c0ebd849e31009eab7b#d5dbbd121b7e4c0ebd849e31009eab7b</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - goodbye BIOS: first EFI-enabled motherboard soon after Vista SP1</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><blockquote><div class="quoteAuthor">YearOfTheLinuxDesktop wrote:</div><div class="quoteBody">&#65279; <p><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20080115221252_MSI_Plans_Transition_to_EFI_Intends_to_Drop_BIOS_Eventually.html">[xbit-labs] MicroStar International (MSI), one of the world’s largest makers of computer mainboards and other components, plans to start transition to Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI) in February of 2008. It is unclear how long the transition takes, but once it kicks off, there will hardly be a way back to Basic Input Output System (BIOS) used today.</a></p><table class="content" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="right" border="0"><tbody><tr><td><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20080115221252_MSI_Plans_Transition_to_EFI_Intends_to_Drop_BIOS_Eventually.html"><br></a></td></tr></tbody></table><p><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20080115221252_MSI_Plans_Transition_to_EFI_Intends_to_Drop_BIOS_Eventually.html">The first mainboard from MSI for the channel market to use EFI will be P35 Neo3, which is powered by Intel P35 core-logic and supports Intel Core 2 Duo, Intel Core 2 Quad, Intel Core 2 Extreme as well as various other LGA775 central processing units (CPUs). According to a news-story by </a><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20080115221252_MSI_Plans_Transition_to_EFI_Intends_to_Drop_BIOS_Eventually.html">HKEPC</a><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20080115221252_MSI_Plans_Transition_to_EFI_Intends_to_Drop_BIOS_Eventually.html"> web-site, MSI P35 Neo 3’s EFI will support several languages and more precise system settings for tweaking. In order to further popularize EFI, MSI reportedly even embedded three simplistic games into EFI to allow users to play them while the operating system is loaded by the PC.</a></p><p>since the MB has been announced for february we can be pretty sure that Vista SP1 will be released soon.<br></p><p>now we just need PS/2, serial/parallel ports, analog audio jacks, VGA/DVI ports, IDE (including floppy), PCI slots, game ports and the stupid 24pin PSU connectors to disappear. I'm sick of having half the space of motherboard front panels being wasted by ports nobody uses anymore.<br></p></div></blockquote><br><br>First?&nbsp; My laptop has one <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-1.gif?v=c9' alt='Smiley' />&nbsp; Does this mean Windows supports EFI with SP1??</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260468-goodbye-BIOS-first-EFI-enabled-motherboard-soon-after-Vista-SP1/d4aad9591ca74b438a7d9e31009eaa86#d4aad9591ca74b438a7d9e31009eaa86</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:18:45 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260468-goodbye-BIOS-first-EFI-enabled-motherboard-soon-after-Vista-SP1/d4aad9591ca74b438a7d9e31009eaa86#d4aad9591ca74b438a7d9e31009eaa86</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Another nail in the .NET coffin</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So where exactly, in the switch from GPL v2 to GPL v3 does the death of .NET come in?<br><br>More specifically, QT has been available under GPL v2 for quite some time now and has not really affected .NET.&nbsp; So what is different in the GPL v3 that is going to cause this change that you are predicting?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260392-Another-nail-in-the-NET-coffin/25c84399bd7242828f4d9e31009c971f#25c84399bd7242828f4d9e31009c971f</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/260392-Another-nail-in-the-NET-coffin/25c84399bd7242828f4d9e31009c971f#25c84399bd7242828f4d9e31009c971f</guid>
		<dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>