<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for nightski</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/nightski/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by nightski</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/nightski/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:36:54 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:36:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Covariance/Contravariance in .NET Generics [Covariance/Contravariance in .NET Generics]</title><description>Does anybody know of any official response from MS on why this feature wasn't supported in C#?&amp;nbsp; The CLI itself supports it but for some reason it has been left out of C#.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/261637-CovarianceContravariance-in-NET-Generics/'&gt;Covariance/Contravariance in .NET Generics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/261637/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/261637-CovarianceContravariance-in-NET-Generics/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/261637-CovarianceContravariance-in-NET-Generics/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:36:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/261637-CovarianceContravariance-in-NET-Generics/</guid><evnet:views>750</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/261637/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Does anybody know of any official response from MS on why this feature wasn't supported in C#?&amp;nbsp; The CLI itself supports it but for some reason it has been left out of C#.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/261637-CovarianceContravariance-in-NET-Generics/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/261637/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Optimization question [Optimization question]</title><description>For a pixel shader - it wouldn't be too difficult.&amp;nbsp; I would highly recommend using Nvidia's FX Composer 2&amp;nbsp;- its a great IDE for shaders.&amp;nbsp; Or if you want to use ATI stuff there is Rendermonkey.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/261573-Optimization-question/'&gt;Optimization question&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/340519/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments></comments><link></link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:19:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false"></guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/340519/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>For a pixel shader - it wouldn't be too difficult.&amp;nbsp; I would highly recommend using Nvidia's FX Composer 2&amp;nbsp;- its a great IDE for shaders.&amp;nbsp; Or if you want to use ATI stuff there is Rendermonkey.in reply to Optimization question</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/340519/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Massive Silverlight Deployment [Massive Silverlight Deployment]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;This has been showing up in the news lately -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/01/Silverlight-Olympic;jsessionid=8000A88C59A11F2E88554F03E62FA4BF"&gt;http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/01/Silverlight-Olympic;jsessionid=8000A88C59A11F2E88554F03E62FA4BF&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It is great news for the Silverlight platform.&amp;nbsp; What do you think - risky move for NBC?&amp;nbsp; 2.0 isn't even out in beta form yet.&amp;nbsp; I gotta say though, I am really looking forward to the 2.0 beta.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260254-Massive-Silverlight-Deployment/'&gt;Massive Silverlight Deployment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260254/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260254-Massive-Silverlight-Deployment/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260254-Massive-Silverlight-Deployment/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:51:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260254-Massive-Silverlight-Deployment/</guid><evnet:views>4139</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260254/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;This has been showing up in the news lately -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/01/Silverlight-Olympic;jsessionid=8000A88C59A11F2E88554F03E62FA4BF"&gt;http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/01/Silverlight-Olympic;jsessionid=8000A88C59A11F2E88554F03E62FA4BF&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It is great news for the Silverlight platform.&amp;nbsp; What do you think - risky move for NBC?&amp;nbsp; 2.0 isn't even out in beta form yet.&amp;nbsp; I gotta say though, I am really looking forward to the 2.0 beta.&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>17</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260254-Massive-Silverlight-Deployment/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260254/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Flex vs. Silverlight [Flex vs. Silverlight]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I have been diving pretty heavily into WPF lately, and I do really enjoy it.&amp;nbsp; With Silverlight 2.0 on the horizon, its even more compelling.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However I am not ignorant to what is happening with Flex/Air and the other platforms coming out.&amp;nbsp; In fact, searches on dice.com return results in the thousands for flex/air, but only low hundreds for silverlight/wpf.&amp;nbsp; Are there any Flex developers here?&amp;nbsp; How do the platforms compare?&amp;nbsp; Is Flex a joy to work with - or the opposite?&amp;nbsp; Just looking for some opinions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260165-Flex-vs-Silverlight/'&gt;Flex vs. Silverlight&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260165/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260165-Flex-vs-Silverlight/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260165-Flex-vs-Silverlight/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:39:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260165-Flex-vs-Silverlight/</guid><evnet:views>7772</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260165/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;I have been diving pretty heavily into WPF lately, and I do really enjoy it.&amp;nbsp; With Silverlight 2.0 on the horizon, its even more compelling.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However I am not ignorant to what is happening with Flex/Air and the other platforms coming out.&amp;nbsp; In fact, searches on dice.com return results in the thousands for flex/air, but only low hundreds for silverlight/wpf.&amp;nbsp; Are there any Flex developers here?&amp;nbsp; How do the platforms compare?&amp;nbsp; Is Flex a joy to work with - or the opposite?&amp;nbsp; Just looking for some opinions.&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>14</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260165-Flex-vs-Silverlight/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260165/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>WPF in Finance Contest [WPF in Finance Contest]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="http://wpfcontest.lab49.com/index.aspx"&gt;http://wpfcontest.lab49.com/index.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Anyone else going to enter?&amp;nbsp; When I first started learning WPF I created some simple visualizations on top of Yahoo finance data to help learn the technology.&amp;nbsp; This will be a very fun project to work on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259486-WPF-in-Finance-Contest/'&gt;WPF in Finance Contest&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/259486/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259486-WPF-in-Finance-Contest/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259486-WPF-in-Finance-Contest/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:38:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259486-WPF-in-Finance-Contest/</guid><evnet:views>1160</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/259486/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="http://wpfcontest.lab49.com/index.aspx"&gt;http://wpfcontest.lab49.com/index.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Anyone else going to enter?&amp;nbsp; When I first started learning WPF I created some simple visualizations on top of Yahoo finance data to help learn the technology.&amp;nbsp; This will be a very fun project to work on.&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/259486-WPF-in-Finance-Contest/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/259486/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>F# Site Unavailable? [F# Site Unavailable?]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;The F# site at&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;http://research.microsoft.com/fsharp/&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;has been unavailable all day (at least for me - does it work for anyone else?).&amp;nbsp; Just curious if this was normal downtime or if there have been any announcements about it moving to a new location?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258876-F-Site-Unavailable/'&gt;F# Site Unavailable?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/258876/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258876-F-Site-Unavailable/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258876-F-Site-Unavailable/</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:24:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258876-F-Site-Unavailable/</guid><evnet:views>1820</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/258876/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;The F# site at&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;http://research.microsoft.com/fsharp/&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;has been unavailable all day (at least for me - does it work for anyone else?).&amp;nbsp; Just curious if this was normal downtime or if there have been any announcements about it moving to a new location?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258876-F-Site-Unavailable/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/258876/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Microsoft.Scripting [Microsoft.Scripting]</title><description>I have been studying the code for both the IronPython alpha implementation and the new Microsoft.Scripting code, and find it very fascinating.&amp;nbsp; The project I am undertaking is to implement the Lua language on top of .NET using the DLR.&amp;nbsp; At this point in time I am just learning the DLR, and determining if it would even be feasible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My ultimate desire is to do a project that involves dealing with concurrent programming in .NET on top of the DLR.&amp;nbsp; Working with and building upon implementations such as Stackless Python, CCR, and various other technologies.&amp;nbsp; But I figure implementing a language on top of the DLR is a good first step so I can become very familiar with the platform.&amp;nbsp; I also have a decent amount of free time until the holiday season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, this leads to my question.&amp;nbsp; Is Microsoft's goal with the DLR for it to be *the* scripting solution for .NET?&amp;nbsp; In other words, if you want to embed a scripting engine into your application, would the DLR be for this scenerio?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I only ask because I am curious if Microsoft intends to support such a scenerio in the future?&amp;nbsp; Or is the purpose of the DLR to simply serve as an enabler for scripting in Silverlight/Web type applications?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/257026-MicrosoftScripting/'&gt;Microsoft.Scripting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/257026/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/257026-MicrosoftScripting/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/257026-MicrosoftScripting/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:46:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/257026-MicrosoftScripting/</guid><evnet:views>2920</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/257026/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I have been studying the code for both the IronPython alpha implementation and the new Microsoft.Scripting code, and find it very fascinating.&amp;nbsp; The project I am undertaking is to implement the Lua language on top of .NET using the DLR.&amp;nbsp; At this point in time I am just learning the DLR, and determining if it would even be feasible.My ultimate desire is to do a project that involves dealing with concurrent programming in .NET on top of the DLR.&amp;nbsp; Working with and building upon implementations such as Stackless Python, CCR, and various other technologies.&amp;nbsp; But I figure&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/257026-MicrosoftScripting/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/257026/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Silverlight Download [Silverlight Download]</title><description>Ok so I have to admit, Silverlight looks amazing.&amp;nbsp; I want to download it and start writing a few test apps in it right away :)&amp;nbsp; However when I click on the Alpha SDK download link on the Sliverlight page it just takes me to the samples gallery?&amp;nbsp; Am I doing something wrong?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is frustrating because I am excited to get started.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254434-Silverlight-Download/'&gt;Silverlight Download&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/254434/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254434-Silverlight-Download/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254434-Silverlight-Download/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 17:48:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254434-Silverlight-Download/</guid><evnet:views>7867</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/254434/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Ok so I have to admit, Silverlight looks amazing.&amp;nbsp; I want to download it and start writing a few test apps in it right away &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /&gt;&amp;nbsp; However when I click on the Alpha SDK download link on the Sliverlight page it just takes me to the samples gallery?&amp;nbsp; Am I doing something wrong?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is frustrating because I am excited to get started.&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/254434-Silverlight-Download/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/254434/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>VS2005 SP1 for Vista [VS2005 SP1 for Vista]</title><description>I apologize if this is old news, but I saw it in a blog post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;VS2005 SP1 for Vista is officially released (non-beta)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=90E2942D-3AD1-4873-A2EE-4ACC0AACE5B6&amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252911-VS2005-SP1-for-Vista/'&gt;VS2005 SP1 for Vista&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/252911/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252911-VS2005-SP1-for-Vista/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252911-VS2005-SP1-for-Vista/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:21:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252911-VS2005-SP1-for-Vista/</guid><evnet:views>3184</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/252911/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I apologize if this is old news, but I saw it in a blog post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;VS2005 SP1 for Vista is officially released (non-beta)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=90E2942D-3AD1-4873-A2EE-4ACC0AACE5B6&amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/252911-VS2005-SP1-for-Vista/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/252911/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Vista Problem Reports &amp;amp; Solutions [Vista Problem Reports &amp;amp; Solutions]</title><description>After listening to the audio on SQM on the Channel 9 front page I was looking at the Problem Reports &amp;amp; Solutions control panel for Windows Vista.&amp;nbsp; Interestingly enough, I noticed that Vista had sent a report every time my application crashed while I was debugging it (its a native image processing app &amp;amp; I was working with some weird pointer arithmitic).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Out of curiousity, is there a way to disable the reporting for applications that you are developing?&amp;nbsp; I mean I don't really mind the information being sent to Microsoft, but isn't it kind of pointless for them to get all this misinformation?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/252899-Vista-Problem-Reports-amp-Solutions/'&gt;Vista Problem Reports &amp;amp; Solutions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/252899/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/252899-Vista-Problem-Reports-amp-Solutions/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/252899-Vista-Problem-Reports-amp-Solutions/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:41:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/252899-Vista-Problem-Reports-amp-Solutions/</guid><evnet:views>3711</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/252899/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>After listening to the audio on SQM on the Channel 9 front page I was looking at the Problem Reports &amp;amp; Solutions control panel for Windows Vista.&amp;nbsp; Interestingly enough, I noticed that Vista had sent a report every time my application crashed while I was debugging it (its a native image processing app &amp;amp; I was working with some weird pointer arithmitic).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Out of curiousity, is there a way to disable the reporting for applications that you are developing?&amp;nbsp; I mean I don't really mind the information being sent to Microsoft, but isn't it kind of pointless for them to get all this misinformation?&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/252899-Vista-Problem-Reports-amp-Solutions/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/252899/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Visual Studio Orcas [Visual Studio Orcas]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I've heard about all the wonderful new features coming in Orcas like C# 3.0, Linq, WPF Designer, etc...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However we haven't heard as much about the improvements to the editor.&amp;nbsp; VS.NET has always been my favorite environment, but I am starting to see it fall behind the Java IDEs.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Specifically, features like rich refactoring support, unit testing integration, code analysis, error analysis,&amp;nbsp;code coverage, dependency tracking, etc...&amp;nbsp; Any word on if they will be improving these areas of VS (C# specifically, but would be great for all languages)?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Also I do know that some of these features like Unit Tests, Code Coverage, etc.. are available with Team Server.&amp;nbsp; Is there any reason these features aren't offered in Professional?&amp;nbsp; They aren't really team specific features, and most programmers using the Professional version could highly benefit from them.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If anyone has seen more info on these types of features please share :)&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;PS - I still have yet to download the January 2007 CTP, I will this weekend probably.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251949-Visual-Studio-Orcas/'&gt;Visual Studio Orcas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/251949/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251949-Visual-Studio-Orcas/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251949-Visual-Studio-Orcas/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:57:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251949-Visual-Studio-Orcas/</guid><evnet:views>4838</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/251949/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;I've heard about all the wonderful new features coming in Orcas like C# 3.0, Linq, WPF Designer, etc...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However we haven't heard as much about the improvements to the editor.&amp;nbsp; VS.NET has always been my favorite environment, but I am starting to see it fall behind the Java IDEs.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Specifically, features like rich refactoring support, unit testing integration, code analysis, error analysis,&amp;nbsp;code coverage, dependency tracking, etc...&amp;nbsp; Any word on if they will be improving these areas of VS (C# specifically, but would be great for all languages)?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/251949-Visual-Studio-Orcas/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/251949/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Windows Vista &amp;amp; Gmail [Windows Vista &amp;amp; Gmail]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I&amp;nbsp;like&amp;nbsp;the new contacts &amp;amp; calendering applications in Windows Vista.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;However if&amp;nbsp;I right click a contact and hit send email it opens&amp;nbsp;windows mail (even though gmail is set to handle mailto: links).&amp;nbsp; Is there any way to modify this behavior to use gmail?&amp;nbsp; Also how does an application get listed in the "Show on Start Menu" list for "Email link: "?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250059-Windows-Vista-amp-Gmail/'&gt;Windows Vista &amp;amp; Gmail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/250059/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250059-Windows-Vista-amp-Gmail/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250059-Windows-Vista-amp-Gmail/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:54:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250059-Windows-Vista-amp-Gmail/</guid><evnet:views>8060</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/250059/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;I&amp;nbsp;like&amp;nbsp;the new contacts &amp;amp; calendering applications in Windows Vista.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;However if&amp;nbsp;I right click a contact and hit send email it opens&amp;nbsp;windows mail (even though gmail is set to handle mailto: links).&amp;nbsp; Is there any way to modify this behavior to use gmail?&amp;nbsp; Also how does an application get listed in the "Show on Start Menu" list for "Email link: "?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250059-Windows-Vista-amp-Gmail/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/250059/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Vista RTM [Vista RTM]</title><description>Hope you guys don't mind a redundant thread, but I'm posting from my first session in Windows Vista RTM!!&amp;nbsp; I haven't used Vista since the beta 2 or something phase and I just have to say this is the most positive experience I have ever had with a new operating system.&amp;nbsp; Call me a fanboy but its just freaking amazing :)&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;To all at Microsoft: outstanding work!&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250010-Vista-RTM/'&gt;Vista RTM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/250010/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250010-Vista-RTM/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250010-Vista-RTM/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:56:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250010-Vista-RTM/</guid><evnet:views>4310</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/250010/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Hope you guys don't mind a redundant thread, but I'm posting from my first session in Windows Vista RTM!!&amp;nbsp; I haven't used Vista since the beta 2 or something phase and I just have to say this is the most positive experience I have ever had with a new operating system.&amp;nbsp; Call me a fanboy but its just freaking amazing &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;To all at Microsoft: outstanding work!</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/250010-Vista-RTM/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/250010/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Video Request [Video Request]</title><description>I know that Channel 9 doesn't take video requests, but I would like to make a suggestion.&amp;nbsp; I spend a good portion of my time researching in the fields of machine learning and vision.&amp;nbsp; Microsoft has entire teams devoted to these topics within MSR.&amp;nbsp; One of the great researchers you employ (there are many!) is John Platt (&lt;a href="http://research.microsoft.com/~jplatt/"&gt;http://research.microsoft.com/~jplatt/&lt;/a&gt;).&amp;nbsp; He has some great ideas, but I am especially intruiged by his work with Support Vector Machines.&amp;nbsp; What is the chance of seeing a video with him, or any of the great researchers in these fields?&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/95360-Video-Request/'&gt;Video Request&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/95360/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/95360-Video-Request/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/95360-Video-Request/</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 17:40:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/95360-Video-Request/</guid><evnet:views>5545</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/95360/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I know that Channel 9 doesn't take video requests, but I would like to make a suggestion.&amp;nbsp; I spend a good portion of my time researching in the fields of machine learning and vision.&amp;nbsp; Microsoft has entire teams devoted to these topics within MSR.&amp;nbsp; One of the great researchers you employ (there are many!) is John Platt (&lt;a href="http://research.microsoft.com/~jplatt/"&gt;http://research.microsoft.com/~jplatt/&lt;/a&gt;).&amp;nbsp; He has some great ideas, but I am especially intruiged by his work with Support Vector Machines.&amp;nbsp; What is the chance of seeing a video with him, or any of the great researchers in these fields?</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/95360-Video-Request/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/95360/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Kudos Scoble [Kudos Scoble]</title><description>It is so funny how all the people out there are so swept off there feet
by a headline or statement that they forget the true facts.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have been reading your blog, and the recent posts regarding Longhorn names, VC stuff, etc.. has been very interesting.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So many people are out there spreading so much crap.&amp;nbsp; Especially
in the Slashdot circles - it is so funny!&amp;nbsp; So many people want
change so bad that they will switch to a new platform/language/linux
distro/application every day just to say how glad they are to be behind
it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Meanwhile, I'll just stick with .NET.&amp;nbsp; Microsoft is creating some
really cool products.&amp;nbsp; I think there are many developers that are
doing the same thing - but we are just too busy producing software to
really get involved in all the FUD :-)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Keep up the good work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87500-Kudos-Scoble/'&gt;Kudos Scoble&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/87500/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87500-Kudos-Scoble/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87500-Kudos-Scoble/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:56:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87500-Kudos-Scoble/</guid><evnet:views>8488</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/87500/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>It is so funny how all the people out there are so swept off there feet
by a headline or statement that they forget the true facts.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have been reading your blog, and the recent posts regarding Longhorn names, VC stuff, etc.. has been very interesting.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So many people are out there spreading so much crap.&amp;nbsp; Especially
in the Slashdot circles - it is so funny!&amp;nbsp; So many people want
change so bad that they will switch to a new platform/language/linux
distro/application every day just to say how glad they are to be behind
it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/87500-Kudos-Scoble/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/87500/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>BSG [BSG]</title><description>Don't forget, Battlestar Gallactica season 2 starts tonight at 10 P.M./9 Central!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I can't wait! :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/86745-BSG/'&gt;BSG&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/86745/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/86745-BSG/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/86745-BSG/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/86745-BSG/</guid><evnet:views>12623</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/86745/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Don't forget, Battlestar Gallactica season 2 starts tonight at 10 P.M./9 Central!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I can't wait! &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>22</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/86745-BSG/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/86745/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>COM Interop [COM Interop]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I am working with some machine vision components from National Instruments at work.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately, they are currently only available as COM components.&amp;nbsp; So far I have been using the "Add Reference" method to import the type libraries via Visual Studio.&amp;nbsp; This has worked ok.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, I would like to use the tlbimp method to get the type libraries.&amp;nbsp; This works fine except for the following scenerio -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In VS.NET when you import a COM library it generates a proxy assembly.&amp;nbsp; But then if you go to the Toolbox tab and add any COM ActiveX controls it generates a second assembly.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;For example -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;NIDaqControlsLib.dll&lt;BR&gt;AxNIDaqControlsLib.dll&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;These are both generated by VS.NET.&amp;nbsp; One is for access to the class library, the other for the visual components.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;So far I have only been able to generate the first one with tlbimp.&amp;nbsp; Is there any way to generate the second type - for ActiveX controls using tlbimp?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86708-COM-Interop/'&gt;COM Interop&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/86708/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86708-COM-Interop/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86708-COM-Interop/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 18:43:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86708-COM-Interop/</guid><evnet:views>2793</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/86708/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;I am working with some machine vision components from National Instruments at work.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately, they are currently only available as COM components.&amp;nbsp; So far I have been using the "Add Reference" method to import the type libraries via Visual Studio.&amp;nbsp; This has worked ok.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, I would like to use the tlbimp method to get the type libraries.&amp;nbsp; This works fine except for the following scenerio -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In VS.NET when you import a COM library it generates a proxy assembly.&amp;nbsp; But then if you go to the Toolbox tab and add any COM ActiveX controls it generates a second assembly.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;For example -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86708-COM-Interop/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/86708/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>CodeDom 2.0 [CodeDom 2.0]</title><description>I am currently working on doing some really cool optimizations in my
.NET numerical code using the automatic code generation features of
CodeDom.&amp;nbsp; However, I am using v2.0 of the .NET Framework and some
changes have been made to it since v1.1.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Does anyone know of a good place to find out details on the 2.0 version
of CodeDom?&amp;nbsp; Like what changes have been made, tips, etc...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86614-CodeDom-20/'&gt;CodeDom 2.0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/86614/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86614-CodeDom-20/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86614-CodeDom-20/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:21:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86614-CodeDom-20/</guid><evnet:views>4911</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/86614/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I am currently working on doing some really cool optimizations in my
.NET numerical code using the automatic code generation features of
CodeDom.&amp;nbsp; However, I am using v2.0 of the .NET Framework and some
changes have been made to it since v1.1.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Does anyone know of a good place to find out details on the 2.0 version
of CodeDom?&amp;nbsp; Like what changes have been made, tips, etc...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks!&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/86614-CodeDom-20/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/86614/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>.NET Numerical Processing [.NET Numerical Processing]</title><description>I have been working for over a year now on researching algorithms in the machine learning and image processing field.&amp;nbsp; I am to the point where I have some really solid ideas for implementation.&amp;nbsp; They involve additions and modifications to Support Vector Machines and the Condensation Filter if you are curious.&amp;nbsp; The Condensation Filter (a replacement for the Kalman filter)&amp;nbsp;is a uni-modal filter which assumes no prior distribution (whereas the Kalman filter assumes Gaussian).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Anyways, I have been working on this project in C++ because of the really cool stuff you can do with templates such as metaprograms and expression templates.&amp;nbsp; It allows some really good performance enhancements at compile time.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Now I would be real interested in moving this to .NET.&amp;nbsp; Performance&amp;nbsp;is really important, but I know that .NET can provide good results if used correctly.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;To my question - is there any way I could use the facilities in C#, possibly attributes or generics to accomplish things similar to the expression templates technique in C++?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks!&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/85873-NET-Numerical-Processing/'&gt;.NET Numerical Processing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/85873/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/85873-NET-Numerical-Processing/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/85873-NET-Numerical-Processing/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:30:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/85873-NET-Numerical-Processing/</guid><evnet:views>2549</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/85873/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I have been working for over a year now on researching algorithms in the machine learning and image processing field.&amp;nbsp; I am to the point where I have some really solid ideas for implementation.&amp;nbsp; They involve additions and modifications to Support Vector Machines and the Condensation Filter if you are curious.&amp;nbsp; The Condensation Filter (a replacement for the Kalman filter)&amp;nbsp;is a uni-modal filter which assumes no prior distribution (whereas the Kalman filter assumes Gaussian).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/85873-NET-Numerical-Processing/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/85873/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>The advantage to being Microsoft... [The advantage to being Microsoft...]</title><description>This might be old news, but I thought it was extremely cool.&amp;nbsp; In
Windows Longhorn Microsoft is leading up an effort for RAW image
support in Windows.&amp;nbsp; Apple announced the same thing with OS X,
however there is a huge difference.&amp;nbsp; Since all the camera
manufactuerers release a slightly different RAW format, Apple decided
to attempt to reverse engineer this format for all the cameras (Adobe
tried this too).&amp;nbsp; However, since Panther there have been little to
no updates to the effort.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, in Longhorn Microsoft has rounded up support from not only Adobe,
but many of the camera manufacturers to agree on a standard devised by
everyone.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is one area where having Microsoft is a huge advantage - getting
all the big corps to agree.&amp;nbsp; One thing the Linux movement couldn't accomplish with its ad-hoc model.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/longhorn_raw_images.asp&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Interesting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78973-The-advantage-to-being-Microsoft/'&gt;The advantage to being Microsoft...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/78973/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78973-The-advantage-to-being-Microsoft/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78973-The-advantage-to-being-Microsoft/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:22:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78973-The-advantage-to-being-Microsoft/</guid><evnet:views>1655</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/78973/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>This might be old news, but I thought it was extremely cool.&amp;nbsp; In
Windows Longhorn Microsoft is leading up an effort for RAW image
support in Windows.&amp;nbsp; Apple announced the same thing with OS X,
however there is a huge difference.&amp;nbsp; Since all the camera
manufactuerers release a slightly different RAW format, Apple decided
to attempt to reverse engineer this format for all the cameras (Adobe
tried this too).&amp;nbsp; However, since Panther there have been little to
no updates to the effort.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78973-The-advantage-to-being-Microsoft/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/78973/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Team Blogs [Team Blogs]</title><description>I have a question about all the Microsoft Blogs on MSDN.&amp;nbsp; I am
currently looking at the Visual Studio Team System blog page.&amp;nbsp;
There are like 50 bloggers all working on VSTS.&amp;nbsp; However, many of
the blogs are out of date, etc..&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Why have so many blogs and make the customer go through each one to determine who is blogging and who is not?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Maybe make a single team blog for each product?&amp;nbsp; Or just put the active blogs up on the site?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just a suggestion.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for all the great info on the blogs!&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78312-Team-Blogs/'&gt;Team Blogs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/78312/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78312-Team-Blogs/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78312-Team-Blogs/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:52:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78312-Team-Blogs/</guid><evnet:views>3768</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/78312/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I have a question about all the Microsoft Blogs on MSDN.&amp;nbsp; I am
currently looking at the Visual Studio Team System blog page.&amp;nbsp;
There are like 50 bloggers all working on VSTS.&amp;nbsp; However, many of
the blogs are out of date, etc..&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Why have so many blogs and make the customer go through each one to determine who is blogging and who is not?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Maybe make a single team blog for each product?&amp;nbsp; Or just put the active blogs up on the site?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just a suggestion.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for all the great info on the blogs!&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/78312-Team-Blogs/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/78312/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>I think you will like this [I think you will like this]</title><description>Hey,&lt;br&gt;
I found this on the internet a while ago, and thought I would post
it.&amp;nbsp; It is a new movie starring, well, I think you know who :-)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
http://www.nata2.info/humor/flash/switchlinux3.swf&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CAUTION: Do not go to this link at work with your sound turned way up, unless that sort of thing is ok at your workplace :-)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Enjoy!&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/75229-I-think-you-will-like-this/'&gt;I think you will like this&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/75229/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/75229-I-think-you-will-like-this/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/75229-I-think-you-will-like-this/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:03:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/75229-I-think-you-will-like-this/</guid><evnet:views>8729</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/75229/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Hey,&lt;br&gt;
I found this on the internet a while ago, and thought I would post
it.&amp;nbsp; It is a new movie starring, well, I think you know who &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
http://www.nata2.info/humor/flash/switchlinux3.swf&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CAUTION: Do not go to this link at work with your sound turned way up, unless that sort of thing is ok at your workplace &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Enjoy!&lt;br&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>19</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/75229-I-think-you-will-like-this/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/75229/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Linux Question relating to VS.NET 2005 Alternatives (Beer28?) [Linux Question relating to VS.NET 2005 Alternatives (Beer28?)]</title><description>I have always been intrigued by Linux, and have become much more familiar with it over the years.&amp;nbsp; It is a nice operating system, and I would like to give it a go.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, my biggest beef with it is the lack of a VS.NET 2005 type tool.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Given I can probably scrounge around for 100 different tools that perform the various functions VS.NEt 2005 does - but is there any kind of integrated environment for this?&amp;nbsp; Here would be my requirements -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;*Doesn't have to do .NET - I love C++ too&lt;BR&gt;*I hate Java :-)&lt;BR&gt;*Enterprise type development features&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Full subversion/cvs integrated support&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Document management (requirements, design, SOPs, etc..)&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Performance testing &amp;amp; memory profiling (instrumentation &amp;amp; sampling)&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Static code analysis (such as the FxCop integrated in VS.NET 2005)&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Debugger Visualizers (Sweet, but not as vital)&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Full item tracking back to requirements along with bug tracking features&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Unit testing integration&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Refactoring&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Some sort of team collaboration such as a Sharepoint integration (not with sharepoint - could be some PHP community site or something)&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If there is anthing that comes close please let me know.&amp;nbsp; I am willing to pay for it.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Anyways, I love VS.NET 2005 so much it will be very hard to make a switch, but if you can give me a link to a good Linux IDE I would be very greatful.&amp;nbsp; The hack in vim &amp;amp; compile method just doesn't work for me.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks!&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/73295-Linux-Question-relating-to-VSNET-2005-Alternatives-Beer28/'&gt;Linux Question relating to VS.NET 2005 Alternatives (Beer28?)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/73295/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/73295-Linux-Question-relating-to-VSNET-2005-Alternatives-Beer28/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/73295-Linux-Question-relating-to-VSNET-2005-Alternatives-Beer28/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 16:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/73295-Linux-Question-relating-to-VSNET-2005-Alternatives-Beer28/</guid><evnet:views>6951</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/73295/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I have always been intrigued by Linux, and have become much more familiar with it over the years.&amp;nbsp; It is a nice operating system, and I would like to give it a go.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, my biggest beef with it is the lack of a VS.NET 2005 type tool.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Given I can probably scrounge around for 100 different tools that perform the various functions VS.NEt 2005 does - but is there any kind of integrated environment for this?&amp;nbsp; Here would be my requirements -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;*Doesn't have to do .NET - I love C++ too&lt;BR&gt;*I hate Java &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /&gt;&lt;BR&gt;*Enterprise type development features&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;*Full subversion/cvs integrated support&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/73295-Linux-Question-relating-to-VSNET-2005-Alternatives-Beer28/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/73295/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>C++ Design Question [C++ Design Question]</title><description>Hello all.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I am writing a class library in C++ (port from C#).&amp;nbsp; I haven't used C++ in many years (C# convert), and need some guidance on the following.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In c# I have implemented a matrix class that stores a matrix of numbers in a single dimension double array. (double[] matrix = new double[rows * columns]).&amp;nbsp; I have also implemented a sparse matrix class that is very similar (a sparse matrix being one where only a few elements are stored - those that are not close to zero for those who ask).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Now, in C++ I am doing the same thing.&amp;nbsp; However, does C++ have any sort of indexer facility?&amp;nbsp; I want to give my C++ class indexers (you know, the [] on your own class).&amp;nbsp; This would be similar to C# - public double this[int row, int column] {}).&amp;nbsp; So is there any way to do this in C++?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If C++ doesn't support indexers, ok that is fine.&amp;nbsp; But what facility would you recommend?&amp;nbsp; I *can't* simply return a pointer to the array.&amp;nbsp; Why?&amp;nbsp; Because the matrix is in a sparse format (which doesn't store every element of the matrix, hence requesting row 2 column 3 might return an element in&amp;nbsp;the array, or zero - not necessarily row 2 column 3 of the array).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I thought about using a function GetElement(int row, int column), but this seems like a high overhead operation?&amp;nbsp; Of course it could be inline, but is there any better solution?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/61622-C-Design-Question/'&gt;C++ Design Question&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/61622/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/61622-C-Design-Question/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/61622-C-Design-Question/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:45:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/61622-C-Design-Question/</guid><evnet:views>5450</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/61622/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Hello all.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I am writing a class library in C++ (port from C#).&amp;nbsp; I haven't used C++ in many years (C# convert), and need some guidance on the following.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In c# I have implemented a matrix class that stores a matrix of numbers in a single dimension double array. (double[] matrix = new double[rows * columns]).&amp;nbsp; I have also implemented a sparse matrix class that is very similar (a sparse matrix being one where only a few elements are stored - those that are not close to zero for those who ask).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nightski</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/61622-C-Design-Question/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/61622/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>