<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Channel 9 - Discussions by sjsmith</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/sjsmith/Discussions/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.</description>
	<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/sjsmith/Discussions</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:36:02 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:36:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<c9:totalResults>0</c9:totalResults>
	<c9:pageCount>0</c9:pageCount>
	<c9:pageSize>0</c9:pageSize>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - Anti-virus Software</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts are you should just tune the security center with alerts that let people know they are not protected and then link them to a page that any of then vendors can add their content too which provide places where end users can click and download
 the software to their computer.<br>
<br>
Nice, quick and anoying, the perfect security compromise.<br>
<br>
S.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/4728-Anti-virus-Software/3ffac46abe754384a6449dea0117f757#3ffac46abe754384a6449dea0117f757</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 04:16:20 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/4728-Anti-virus-Software/3ffac46abe754384a6449dea0117f757#3ffac46abe754384a6449dea0117f757</guid>
		<dc:creator>sjsmith</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/sjsmith/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - MSN Messenger, MS Office Spell-Checker?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>How about having some of those nice red squigly lines under badly spelled words just like Office and MSN Mail?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/4039-MSN-Messenger-MS-Office-Spell-Checker/47371d44f2d7453daf9e9dea01170dcf#47371d44f2d7453daf9e9dea01170dcf</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 05:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/4039-MSN-Messenger-MS-Office-Spell-Checker/47371d44f2d7453daf9e9dea01170dcf#47371d44f2d7453daf9e9dea01170dcf</guid>
		<dc:creator>sjsmith</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/sjsmith/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - SQL Server 2000 is losing ground -- Where the H**L is Yukon?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I want a good stable product.&nbsp; I suspose I just want a good stable product more offten then 5 years apart.&nbsp; At the enterprise level we are being forced to squeeze every last ounce of productivity out of the tools we own today.&nbsp; If tools are driving
 down development cost or delivering lots of end user satisfaction then there is a problem, period.&nbsp; From my point of view Analysis Services looked like a sure thing bet for the future.&nbsp; The reasonably quick iterations beteen 7.0 and 2000 provided lots of good
 enhancements.&nbsp; At this point my disapointment comes from these facts:<br>
<br>
1) We are still struggling to bring OLAP to the masses.&nbsp; However the design experience in SQL 2000 was nice back in 2000 but 5 years?!<br>
2) The integration between Analysis services and Excel in the XP timeframe got lots better.&nbsp; Then 2003 shipped and we got nothing....<br>
3) SQL reporting services was a great add-on.&nbsp; Don't get me wrong I was in the launch video, but we still need an end user power query tool. (Don't even get me started about MS Query in Excel).<br>
4) Partitioning...&nbsp; yikes.<br>
<br>
I think at this point I would have been happy with the 2000 product with some productivity enhancements.&nbsp; A more incremental approach where functionalty improved ever 2 years would have bee welcomed.&nbsp; (Yet, again don't get me started about the SA value we have
 received from SQL 2000.&nbsp; I agree reporting services came out but how many people run the web gui on SQL server?? without extra licenses.)<br>
<br>
Shawn</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/2483-SQL-Server-2000-is-losing-ground-Where-the-HL-is-Yukon/41077d7cdeb94447b1ff9dea01145e6d#41077d7cdeb94447b1ff9dea01145e6d</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2004 05:52:32 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/2483-SQL-Server-2000-is-losing-ground-Where-the-HL-is-Yukon/41077d7cdeb94447b1ff9dea01145e6d#41077d7cdeb94447b1ff9dea01145e6d</guid>
		<dc:creator>sjsmith</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/sjsmith/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - SQL Server 2000 is losing ground -- Where the H**L is Yukon?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Don't get me wrong we can get the job done with SQL 2000 in most areas. I think what I am looking for is the big bump in productivity other tools have come out with in the same time period. The one feature I really want is an expanded Analysis Services experience.
 It was a very nice version 2.0 release when it came out in SQL 2000. Now it is 2004 and we have not realized any productivity gain in this area for 4 years! This is becoming unacceptable, I could not imagine other vendors not shipping a new version of product
 in the BI space for 5 years when it is all said and done with Yukon. I expect more from Micrsoft, they have been the big productivity booster in the past, now we are looking at buying other tools in the near term to do more with less people. The reality of
 2004. </p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/2483-SQL-Server-2000-is-losing-ground-Where-the-HL-is-Yukon/99f78a49e15f42799ce79dea01145daa#99f78a49e15f42799ce79dea01145daa</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/2483-SQL-Server-2000-is-losing-ground-Where-the-HL-is-Yukon/99f78a49e15f42799ce79dea01145daa#99f78a49e15f42799ce79dea01145daa</guid>
		<dc:creator>sjsmith</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/sjsmith/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coffeehouse - SQL Server 2000 is losing ground -- Where the H**L is Yukon?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, with the recent news Yukon is going to be delayed (again!) until 2005 I really have to ask what the SQL server team is thinking delaying this product this long?&nbsp; I have seen demos and quite frankly it looks amazing, but, it is now due early 2005.&nbsp; Some
 of the things in SQL 2000 which looked really good when it was released are starting to look quite frankly pretty clunky by todays standards.&nbsp; These things include the Analysis services UI, Partitioning Support and&nbsp;DTS.&nbsp; Quite frankly some of the other vedors
 are starting to get it right and the ease of use of some the new tools just blows&nbsp;the&nbsp;SQL 2000 design environment out of the water.&nbsp;
</p>
<p>Microsoft, get this thing out the door.&nbsp; I don't even care&nbsp;about CLR functionality at this point, I just want a more usable&nbsp;product for delivering&nbsp;business intelligence functionality.&nbsp; You can give me the CLR&nbsp;bits later.&nbsp; Management is&nbsp;starting to ask if
 SQL was the right decsion?&nbsp;<br>
<br>
<a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/sjsmith/archive/2004/04/13/112845.aspx">http://weblogs.asp.net/sjsmith/archive/2004/04/13/112845.aspx</a><br>
<a href="http://weblogs.asp.net"></a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/2483-SQL-Server-2000-is-losing-ground-Where-the-HL-is-Yukon/2483#2483</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/2483-SQL-Server-2000-is-losing-ground-Where-the-HL-is-Yukon/2483#2483</guid>
		<dc:creator>sjsmith</dc:creator>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/sjsmith/Discussions/RSS</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>