<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for sodapop</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/sodapop/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by sodapop</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/sodapop/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:50:05 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:50:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>WHS won't be on MSDN [WHS won't be on MSDN]</title><description>&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The post does say 'at this time', but come on. :(&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/msdnsubscriptions/archive/2008/01/14/windows-home-server-a-follow-up.aspx&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I wish I hadn't bought my home server now.&amp;nbsp; I've been anxious to start developing an add-in for it, but I refuse to do it on my actual home server.&amp;nbsp; I've got too many important files and backups on it.&amp;nbsp; It is sitting there taunting me to screw it up.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'm very disappointed by this decision.&amp;nbsp; I think the limited number of add-ins for it is due to the lack of availability on MSDN.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'm a huge MS advocate and I convinced my mgmt team to buy MSDN licenses for all of our developers, but I keep having to explain to&amp;nbsp;mgmt that not all developer/development related products are on MSDN after I told them they were.&amp;nbsp; The last big mess was the Expression Suite.&amp;nbsp; At least they don't care about WHS, but the development team all bought a WHS and they are all ticked too.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260338-WHS-wont-be-on-MSDN/'&gt;WHS won't be on MSDN&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260338/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260338-WHS-wont-be-on-MSDN/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260338-WHS-wont-be-on-MSDN/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:50:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260338-WHS-wont-be-on-MSDN/</guid><evnet:views>1105</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260338/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>The post does say 'at this time', but come on. :(http://blogs.msdn.com/msdnsubscriptions/archive/2008/01/14/windows-home-server-a-follow-up.aspxI wish I hadn't bought my home server now.&amp;nbsp; I've been anxious to start developing an add-in for it, but I refuse to do it on my actual home server.&amp;nbsp; I've got too many important files and backups on it.&amp;nbsp; It is sitting there taunting me to screw it up.I'm very disappointed by this decision.&amp;nbsp; I think the limited number of add-ins for it is due to the lack of availability on MSDN.I'm a huge MS advocate and I convinced my mgmt team to&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>sodapop</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260338-WHS-wont-be-on-MSDN/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260338/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Vista to Vista rdp not working [Vista to Vista rdp not working]</title><description>&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Basically I have two instances of Vista running in two separate locations.&amp;nbsp; If I try connecting from Vista to Vista, I will get a black screen and Remote Desktop will just sit there all day until I close it.&amp;nbsp; If I move my mouse over the window I get the new 'waiting' pointer.&amp;nbsp; When I attempt to close Remote Desktop, it takes a few minutes for it to close.&amp;nbsp; Normal RDP sessions close immediately.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;At both locations port 3389 is&amp;nbsp;setup to forward to the&amp;nbsp;machines (they are behind firewalls and both are being nat'd).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Network wise, nothing has changed since these were XP machines and RDP worked fine.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I can be on an XP machine in the same subnet as either computer and connect to the remote Vista machine and it will connect fine.&amp;nbsp; So xp to vista is ok, vista to vista gets black window in Remote Desktop.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I have a similar problem connecting to Server 2003 file shares in our DMZ.&amp;nbsp; Explorer will hang and the system will run poorly until I reboot.&amp;nbsp; It seems that something in the WorkStation service gets stuck in a loop..&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;the service can't be&amp;nbsp;restarted&amp;nbsp;once this starts happening.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I can HTTP or telnet to systems in the DMZ all day, but RDP is super slow (it at least&amp;nbsp;works)&amp;nbsp;and file share access hangs explorer.&amp;nbsp; I can step over to an XP machine on the same subnet and it can access the shares in the DMZ reliably all day long.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Has anyone else seen these types of problems?&amp;nbsp; Are there additional ports that need to be opened for Vista to Vista rdp or in the case of file shares, Vista to Server 2003 to work correctly?&amp;nbsp; Suggestions?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;This is the only problem I haven't been able to get fixed in Vista.. everything else has been poor 3rd party drivers.&amp;nbsp; This is just killing my productivity.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Oh.. and for the rdp problem, if I setup a VPN connection between the two locations I can rdp from vista to vista just fine.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately, this isn't a viable long term solution for me.&amp;nbsp; You would think a straight connection to port 3389 would be more reliable than tunneling through vpn, but that is what has me thinking I need another port open.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/251450-Vista-to-Vista-rdp-not-working/'&gt;Vista to Vista rdp not working&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/251450/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/251450-Vista-to-Vista-rdp-not-working/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/251450-Vista-to-Vista-rdp-not-working/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:23:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/251450-Vista-to-Vista-rdp-not-working/</guid><evnet:views>7816</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/251450/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Basically I have two instances of Vista running in two separate locations.&amp;nbsp; If I try connecting from Vista to Vista, I will get a black screen and Remote Desktop will just sit there all day until I close it.&amp;nbsp; If I move my mouse over the window I get the new 'waiting' pointer.&amp;nbsp; When I attempt to close Remote Desktop, it takes a few minutes for it to close.&amp;nbsp; Normal RDP sessions close immediately.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>sodapop</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/251450-Vista-to-Vista-rdp-not-working/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/251450/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Vista &amp;amp; Line-In &amp;amp; explorer hang [Vista &amp;amp; Line-In &amp;amp; explorer hang]</title><description>So I listen to sirius at work and my receiver is connected to the line-in on my sound card.&amp;nbsp; I just recently installed vista (complete reinstall) and I can't figure out how to have the line-in be anything but an input source for recording.&amp;nbsp; I just want to do pass-through so I can use my speakers for windows and for the sirius.&amp;nbsp; Anyone know how to do this in Vista?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I know the line-in is working as I can record from the port.&amp;nbsp; I just can't figure out how to get the line-in audio to pass through.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Also..&amp;nbsp; anyone had problems with Explorer hanging in vista when connecting to a network share?&amp;nbsp; I have one server on my network that will hang explorer every time I connect to it.&amp;nbsp; I can connect to other servers without issues.&amp;nbsp; The only difference is the server that causes the hang is in our DMZ.&amp;nbsp; My xp box can connect to the server all day without problem.&amp;nbsp; I thought the problem started when I turned on the network discovery service, but I have since turned the service off and the problem continues.&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250593-Vista-amp-Line-In-amp-explorer-hang/'&gt;Vista &amp;amp; Line-In &amp;amp; explorer hang&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/250593/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250593-Vista-amp-Line-In-amp-explorer-hang/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250593-Vista-amp-Line-In-amp-explorer-hang/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:18:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250593-Vista-amp-Line-In-amp-explorer-hang/</guid><evnet:views>8739</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/250593/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>So I listen to sirius at work and my receiver is connected to the line-in on my sound card.&amp;nbsp; I just recently installed vista (complete reinstall) and I can't figure out how to have the line-in be anything but an input source for recording.&amp;nbsp; I just want to do pass-through so I can use my speakers for windows and for the sirius.&amp;nbsp; Anyone know how to do this in Vista?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I know the line-in is working as I can record from the port.&amp;nbsp; I just can't figure out how to get the line-in audio to pass through.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>sodapop</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/250593-Vista-amp-Line-In-amp-explorer-hang/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/250593/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 [Re: IE 7]</title><description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div class="quoteAuthor"&gt;shooby wrote:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="quoteBody"&gt;But, my furry friend, you say your application needs a browser for some things, and its bound and determined to use IE not Firefox&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; Does Firefox expose a COM component so other apps can use it?&amp;nbsp; It's so easy to use IE in your app I can see why so many apps use it.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div class="quoteAuthor"&gt;shooby wrote:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="quoteBody"&gt;After cramming the 'File Edit View.... Help' thing down our throats they have decided we just dont need that stuff.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; I don't get the complaints about this..&amp;nbsp; File, Edit View, etc.. are all there, just hidden.&amp;nbsp; Hit your ALT key and there's the menu.&amp;nbsp; I wish there was a way to turn this on for all apps.&amp;nbsp; I'd rather have the screen&amp;nbsp;space that the stupid menu showing up when I don't need it.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div class="quoteAuthor"&gt;shooby wrote:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="quoteBody"&gt;&lt;BR&gt;And besides that, it just plain sucks compared to Firefox 2.0.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&amp;nbsp; yeah, memory leaks ROCK!&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href=''&gt;Re: IE 7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/344508/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments></comments><link></link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:45:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false"></guid><evnet:views>6</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/344508/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>shooby wrote:But, my furry friend, you say your application needs a browser for some things, and its bound and determined to use IE not Firefox Does Firefox expose a COM component so other apps can use it?&amp;nbsp; It's so easy to use IE in your app I can see why so many apps use it.shooby wrote:After&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>sodapop</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/344508/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>