Entries:
Comments:
Posts:

Loading User Information from Channel 9

Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9

Latest Achievement:

Loading User Information from MSDN

Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN

Visual Studio Achievements

Latest Achievement:

Loading Visual Studio Achievements

Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements

Comments

sokhaty sokhaty
  • Joe Duffy and Igor Ostrovsky: Parallel LINQ under the hood

    Good video. Too short apparently to cover the subject deep enough Smiley
    General suggestion to the PLINQ team - please do provide programmers with extra knobs and switches to fine tune parallel execution flow. 
    Based on personal experience with SQL optimizers including the parallel ones, out of five more or less complex queries one would need a hint to run correctly.
    I wouldn't expect PLINQ be any different in this regard, especially considering that it will work on data that won't have any statistics associated with them.
  • This Week on Channel 9: March 21st episode

    Mighty cool. For extra-coolness [z-E-E-ma] should be pronounced [z-ee-m-A-A-h](which means wintEr in quite a few Slavic languages)Tongue Out
  • Christian Kleinerman: SQL Server 2008 for Developers

    Hierarchies are exciting only when you are watching a demo.
    I mean the idea of a dedicated type to store node's materialized path seems sound (though nothing prevents one from using varchar for the same purposes).
    But the implementation is weak at best.

    In fact, as soon as you try to write anything with more than a single user modifying hierarchyID columns you quickly realize that all concurrency control is your personal responsibility.

    Without proper locking of ancestry nodes hierarchyID  is a recipe for disaster. And built-in hierarchyID methods are in essence just substring equivalents.

    Ironically, there is nothing in SQL Server to manage concurrency explicitly, which in this case means ability to place explicit row locks in a non-blocking manner.

    Ideally, it should be possible to place shared read or exclusive locks on rows using T-SQL. For starter only exclusive locking would suffice (though it has some serious performance implications). But they did provide even that.

    IMO this feature should have not been included at all. People will try to use it in real life and get burned. Microsoft should have added means to ensure proper use of hierarchyID first and  produced clear guidelines on how to do that.

    Re: table types in T-SQL, compare this to complex type support in Oracle PL/SQL. T-SQL is still 10 years away from where PL/SQL was 10 years ago.
  • Inside MultiTouch: Team, Demo, Lab Tour

    Oggelito wrote:
    I wonder if the customers are ready for this technique.

    And please someone tell mr butler to cut his nails 


    Are you suggesting he should switch to nailless classic guitar playing technique?

    Long nails might provide some additional benefits like tweezers substitute.
  • Greg Leake: Stocktrader - Overview

    Nice video, too bad Greg avoided the subject of horizontal scaling of the "RDBMS" layer. As the "RDBMS" here is actually an integral and a very critical part of any more or less decent application these days, it would be nice to know how guys at Microsoft are planning to address that.
    Oracle at least claims that their RAC (real application cluster) scales horizontally.
    MS SQL Server does not even seem to have a similar concept neither in 2005, nor 2008 incarnation.

  • Peter Spiro: The power of having fun, building great databases, and leadership

    Damn, if Peter worked on record versioning/snapshot isolation in RDB at DEC, why SQL Server got this feature only in 2005 release?

    I guess it would explain why WinFS failed. Even in the planned 2008 release SQL Server still lacks a bunch of key features that are absolutely required for WinFS to function.

    Well, may be in the next 10 years or so, it would get there.

    Otherwise very interesting to watch.
  • Rick Rashid: Leading Microsoft into the Future with Research

    Hakime, you might want to edit Mach-related article on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_kernel), so it would be consistent with your point of view. As of 5 minutes ago it read '..The lead developer on the Mach project, Richard Rashid, [ship]... Another of the original Mach developers, Avie Tevanian, ...'.

    Also, are you positive that you are not looking at the name of person who made code merge into the branch that was used to build OSX?