Looks feasible. Not tried it though.
That is an absolute pain to use if you need to change the appointment system to something different from the standard Outlook and incorporate additional functionality.phreaks said:jonathansampson said:*snip*
It's not free, but it gives you all the tools you need to easily create your own...
I have tried others like componentone and infragistics (which are more authentic looking) and they too are unnecessarily complex. The mistake these guys make is in getting an Outlook mimic, but don't have a simple object model to modify the structure. I would advise against using any of the third party vendor suites (especially if it is a small office with limited funds) as it will take far too long to create something to suite their needs. Invariably you'll end up needing a database for the custom calendar, and then choosing which machine has it etc.
The key decision is in realising that an exchange server is not available and impracticable at present. I would try to find a solution via the Office team, if not, resort to saving the calendar .ics file into a shared location on their peer to peer network and have a system where by each week/month a new .ics file is cretaed to this shared location. Not perfect, or ideal but it is workable.
Anyone remember this guy?Minh said:Bas said:*snip*
Contrast that w/ the guy who makes awful UI (like leaving subject line out of a post), and thinks it's a good UI. Who's worse?
This is not such a disaster. In WPF your are either a designer or a developer - both if you are lucky. The most important thing is that he gets the application working correctly and the code stable.Bas said:BlackTiger said:*snip*
Good thing jh71283 isn't blaming the tool, then.
Here's a nice screenshot of that app:
Awful. Just awful. As much as I like those examples of curved scrollbars and textboxes on 3D cloth simulations, I cannot for the life of me imagine a scenario where stuff like that is useful beyond a "look what you can do with this stuff!" demo video.
Maybe that's a nice C9 competition for PDC tickets: make a WPF-based UI that a) is whymsical and impossible (or very hard) to do with Winforms and b) doesn't suck. Could turn up some interesting results.
jh71283 and Bas should be all acquainted with resource dictionaries. All the chap that developed this app needs to do is go here and choose a theme (or two). Within a flick of a switch the whole application will be looking respectable. Trying to do this with pre-WPF technologies is a lot of hard work. If you are a very good developer and lack WPF design skills the system makes it easy for you to still be effective.
I've been thinking about making a reflection based application. If you look at reflector at the moment, I hate the way you navigate. Look at this traditional tree view
Now look at it after some WPF goodness
This simple article by Josh Smith shows the power of WPF and how you can re-order traditional controls like the treeview and come up with something different.
I will probably do the reflection application in WPF because the door has opened up insofar as possibilities, and just the fact that you can buy or get resource dictionaries developed that can affect the whole application makes it something Redgate the new owners of reflector are unlikely to do. I also think that there is a "new breed" of developer that expects to be able to navigate hierarchy based applications much easier.
Yggdrasil said:vesuvius said:*snip*
And I don't think Google is keeping track of your browsing history in case National Security needs it.That's an even more difficult question to answer that ought to be put to the IE team. It is an invisible factor included in buying and using Windows technology.
I watched the GNU/Video and that has some resonance, as the arguments against IE and Windows "sandboxing" or "blackboxing" segments of the OS simply are not there with GNU. All you need is an open source non recording web search facility.
Yesterday my heart sank when a priest was found guilty of child porn. The notable point was the offences were carried out between 1991 and 1997. I'm certain that this "blackboxing" of IE and the Kernel had a big part to do with his conviction, as well as his ISP.
This really begs the question, whether one can ever be truly autonomous on the internet, and whether it is Microsoft's obligation to ensure that a "record of activity" is maintained. The typical Government response is "if you have nothing to hide, there is nothing to worry about".
How do you strike a balance between ensuring communities are kept safe, and allowing people freedom with their data? The internet is an extension of self for most people now, and is open to good and mal-practice.
I can see where you're going here, and it is a perfectly apt question that I hope Charles, Dan and so forth should make representations to the IE team. No doubt some brilliant niner will ascertain sufficient information that proves or disproves whether private mode actually truely exists.
My feelings are that any company whether it be Microsoft or Apple is under obligation via the law institutions of the Nation, to ensure some level of control is put into place. I think the result will be "we will keep you private from everyone, except ourselves". With the Google Chrome browser, they will be following suit, and any other company (ISP providers being next in queue) that can get you to use their product.
http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95464&hl=en-GBDCMonkey said:Charles said:*snip*
I'm afraid this has been posted already here
It appears you were right about gNewSense. The only problem I have with the video, is that Stephen Fry is a millionaire and that he didn't make his money by writing free books, selling free films or DVDs. The things that allowed him to buy all those computers in the first place.
I have tried installing gNewSense to virtual PC2007 but it crashes, I'm not quite ready to create a dual boot OS yet, can this be installed on a virtual machine?
I keep going back to the notion of Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner.
There are times when cornflakes are like no other thing in the world (Linux), and other times when cornflakes seem inappropriate after a hard day at the Office and you go to a restaurant (Windows)
I like software i.e. computer programming, and what language an OS uses is an irrelevance. As it is Windows can make me an honest living, but if Linux could then I'd use that instead. I am absolutely disgusted by people who flagrantly ignore the difficulty of writing a Windows/Mac/Linux application. In truth software development is so hard, it is a wonder anything ever gets shipped.
If your needs necessitate debian, then use debian. If you require the supreme visual studio, then use that. If OS x floats you boat, enjoy that.
I like breakfast, lunch and dinner. I aslo like going into a sweet shop/candy store and having lots of choice. What is it with just having just the one OS. Sweet shops with one type of sweet are in a word boring, same applies to operating systems.