<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Entries for xgamer</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/niners/xgamer/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Entries, comments and threads posted by xgamer</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/xgamer/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:09:49 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:09:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Chrome is Version 4 ... Where are you IE ? [Chrome is Version 4 ... Where are you IE ?]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday Google released Beta version 4 of their Chrome browser with claims of increasing speed of browsing ... 400% from the initial version 1 ( which itself claimed few times faster than IE ) .. So within a year and few months they have 4 versions of their browser.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics can say that having so many versions within so short time is not good .. i can agree to that .. they also can say that within each version the features are not much different ... but all have to agree that within a short period of time, they have introduced a lot of features, speedy browsing .. (apart from the fact that they are working on multiple platform and IE is only on windows )&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I distinctly remember the same type of dynamism that IE brought with it when it started against Netscape .. by introducing 1-4 version of IE within a short period of 2+ years with a lot of feature additions &amp;nbsp;[anybody remember Favorite icon, IE page transitions ... :) ] ... this was in the era when Internet was still evolving and majority of information still passed thru magazines, word of mouth etc... where as now news spreads more quickly with blogs,twitter,online news etc...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One can say that IE was able to capture market because of Windows OS .. but now google in its arsenal similar things like Google.Com, Youtube, Gmail etc ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So unless MS wants to see another one of its products go down ... it has to up the ante (for goodness sake it still does not have a proper download manager, Spell check, Still uses a decade old rendering engine) &amp;nbsp;... &amp;nbsp;and become the same dynamic team for which it earlier came to be known ... &amp;nbsp;What do you think ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/504402-Chrome-is-Version-4--Where-are-you-IE-/'&gt;Chrome is Version 4 ... Where are you IE ?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/504402/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/504402-Chrome-is-Version-4--Where-are-you-IE-/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/504402-Chrome-is-Version-4--Where-are-you-IE-/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:06:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/504402-Chrome-is-Version-4--Where-are-you-IE-/</guid><evnet:views>671</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/504402/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Yesterday Google released Beta version 4 of their Chrome browser with claims of increasing speed of browsing ... 400% from the initial version 1 ( which itself claimed few times faster than IE ) .. So within a year and few months they have 4 versions of their browser.
&amp;nbsp;
Critics can say that&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>24</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/504402-Chrome-is-Version-4--Where-are-you-IE-/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/504402/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Mozilla backs Web Open Font Format [Mozilla backs Web Open Font Format]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/11/web-open-font-format-backed-by-mozilla-type-foundries.ars"&gt;http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/11/web-open-font-format-backed-by-mozilla-type-foundries.ars&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So another one of the ideas/technologies introduced long back by MS finds place in other browsers but in a format different that used by MS ... eOT become ZOT / WOFF ...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When news like these appears I feel MS is like Xerox, not able to&amp;nbsp;recognize&amp;nbsp;and properly leverage technologies it creates (think AJAX, SOAP, .. so on )&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bill Hill one of the proponents of Web Font Embedding will be surely missed in Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/503984-Mozilla-backs-Web-Open-Font-Format/'&gt;Mozilla backs Web Open Font Format&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/503984/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/503984-Mozilla-backs-Web-Open-Font-Format/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/503984-Mozilla-backs-Web-Open-Font-Format/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:48:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/503984-Mozilla-backs-Web-Open-Font-Format/</guid><evnet:views>377</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/503984/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/11/web-open-font-format-backed-by-mozilla-type-foundries.ars
&amp;nbsp;
So another one of the ideas/technologies introduced long back by MS finds place in other browsers but in a format different that used by MS ... eOT become ZOT / WOFF ...&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
When news&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/503984-Mozilla-backs-Web-Open-Font-Format/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/503984/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Now that is ridiculous even for struggling Music Industry People [Now that is ridiculous even for struggling Music Industry People]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/8317952.stm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can try to understand need for DRM/Restricted Licensing(WGA) etc especially with the digital products like Music, Computer programs which can be easily duplicated / transferable  unlike Physical products. Software and Music industry is trying to still trying find a perfect balance between control and freedom for user.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the above incident is really  ridiculous where UK PRS ( Perfromance Rights Society - similar institution exists in each country which collect payments on behalf of copyright holders for public performance of their members content) threatened to fine a lady for singing in her shop &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thought matter has been resolved now (may be due to public outcry) ... it shows the ridiculous lengths these soft-media products companies going to control their content...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/501532-Now-that-is-ridiculous-for-even-struggling-Music-Industry-People/'&gt;Now that is ridiculous even for struggling Music Industry People&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/501532/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/501532-Now-that-is-ridiculous-for-even-struggling-Music-Industry-People/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/501532-Now-that-is-ridiculous-for-even-struggling-Music-Industry-People/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:28:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/501532-Now-that-is-ridiculous-for-even-struggling-Music-Industry-People/</guid><evnet:views>337</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/501532/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/8317952.stm I can try to understand need for DRM/Restricted Licensing(WGA) etc especially with the digital products like Music, Computer programs which can be easily duplicated / transferable  unlike Physical products. Software and&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/501532-Now-that-is-ridiculous-for-even-struggling-Music-Industry-People/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/501532/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Apple the New Microsoft - Atleast in Cash in Hand Terms [Apple the New Microsoft - Atleast in Cash in Hand Terms]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;For long we all have been hearing about MS being on of the few tech companies with large war(cash) chest on 35-45 Billon USD.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now with large investments MS is making the same seems to be reducing. Even Google did not manage to come close to this amount.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, as the per yesterdays Q4 result now Cash in Hands of Apple is 34 Billion Dollars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apples growth in these terms in last 4 years is amazing ... Now like MS Steve the other Steve also can buy Yahoo .. or many other companies .. :))&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/500217-Apple-the-New-Microsoft-Atleast-in-Cash-in-Hand-Terms/'&gt;Apple the New Microsoft - Atleast in Cash in Hand Terms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/500217/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/500217-Apple-the-New-Microsoft-Atleast-in-Cash-in-Hand-Terms/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/500217-Apple-the-New-Microsoft-Atleast-in-Cash-in-Hand-Terms/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:40:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/500217-Apple-the-New-Microsoft-Atleast-in-Cash-in-Hand-Terms/</guid><evnet:views>744</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/500217/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>For long we all have been hearing about MS being on of the few tech companies with large war(cash) chest on 35-45 Billon USD.
&amp;nbsp;
Now with large investments MS is making the same seems to be reducing. Even Google did not manage to come close to this amount.
&amp;nbsp;
However, as the per yesterdays&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/500217-Apple-the-New-Microsoft-Atleast-in-Cash-in-Hand-Terms/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/500217/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Really Cool Water Feature ..Deskjet Printer on a Larger scale [Really Cool Water Feature ..Deskjet Printer on a Larger scale]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="355"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2KoCzUI0eyg&amp;hl=en"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2KoCzUI0eyg&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Really Cool water feature created by a Japanese Company Koei (&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.koeiaquatec.co.jp/"&gt;http://www.koeiaquatec.co.jp/&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For me Fonts look like Windows Fonts .... &amp;nbsp; May be deskjet/Laerjet printing like &amp;nbsp;technology on a large scale ... &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Created with Windows Printer/Device Driver ...??&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/498318-Really-Cool-Water-Feature-Deskjet-Printer-on-a-Larger-scale/'&gt;Really Cool Water Feature ..Deskjet Printer on a Larger scale&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/498318/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/498318-Really-Cool-Water-Feature-Deskjet-Printer-on-a-Larger-scale/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/498318-Really-Cool-Water-Feature-Deskjet-Printer-on-a-Larger-scale/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:01:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/498318-Really-Cool-Water-Feature-Deskjet-Printer-on-a-Larger-scale/</guid><evnet:views>690</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/498318/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&amp;nbsp;
Really Cool water feature created by a Japanese Company Koei (&amp;nbsp;http://www.koeiaquatec.co.jp/&amp;nbsp;).
&amp;nbsp;
For me Fonts look like Windows Fonts .... &amp;nbsp; May be deskjet/Laerjet printing like &amp;nbsp;technology on a large scale ... &amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Created with Windows Printer/Device Driver&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/498318-Really-Cool-Water-Feature-Deskjet-Printer-on-a-Larger-scale/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/498318/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Sidekick Data Loss Episode ... Can't believe it happening at MS [Sidekick Data Loss Episode ... Can't believe it happening at MS]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the major reasons for one to believe about trusting big players with your data is that the adherence to procedures and practices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But its hard to believe such a critical error can happen with a player like MS. I still can't believe MS does not have any backups for their servers ( I am not sure few days old backups would make sense .. in this scenario).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I feel this incident does not send a good signal to MS customers from MS which is trying to host everything online with sharepoint online,exchange online and azure etc ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/497836-Sidekick-Data-Loss-Episode--Cant-believe-it-happening-at-MS/'&gt;Sidekick Data Loss Episode ... Can't believe it happening at MS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/497836/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/497836-Sidekick-Data-Loss-Episode--Cant-believe-it-happening-at-MS/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/497836-Sidekick-Data-Loss-Episode--Cant-believe-it-happening-at-MS/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:04:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/497836-Sidekick-Data-Loss-Episode--Cant-believe-it-happening-at-MS/</guid><evnet:views>1229</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/497836/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>One of the major reasons for one to believe about trusting big players with your data is that the adherence to procedures and practices.
&amp;nbsp;
But its hard to believe such a critical error can happen with a player like MS. I still can't believe MS does not have any backups for their servers ( I am&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>31</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/497836-Sidekick-Data-Loss-Episode--Cant-believe-it-happening-at-MS/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/497836/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Pheonix Bios UEFI Implementation - Boot in Seconds [Pheonix Bios UEFI Implementation - Boot in Seconds]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-phoenix-instant-boot-bios-starts-loading-windows-in-under/"&gt;http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-phoenix-instant-boot-bios-starts-loading-windows-in-under/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-phoenix-instant-boot-bios-starts-loading-windows-in-under/"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's very interesting from Windows Boot Speed and Green Tech point of view ... now only if MS and its partners get these things in the PCs especially netbooks ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494166-Pheonix-Bios-UEFI-Implementation-Boot-in-Seconds/'&gt;Pheonix Bios UEFI Implementation - Boot in Seconds&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/494166/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494166-Pheonix-Bios-UEFI-Implementation-Boot-in-Seconds/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494166-Pheonix-Bios-UEFI-Implementation-Boot-in-Seconds/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:21:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494166-Pheonix-Bios-UEFI-Implementation-Boot-in-Seconds/</guid><evnet:views>867</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/494166/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/video-phoenix-instant-boot-bios-starts-loading-windows-in-under/

&amp;nbsp;
That's very interesting from Windows Boot Speed and Green Tech point of view ... now only if MS and its partners get these things in the PCs especially netbooks ...in reply to Pheonix Bios&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/494166-Pheonix-Bios-UEFI-Implementation-Boot-in-Seconds/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/494166/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Does Microsofties Understand Internet ?? [Does Microsofties Understand Internet ??]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;May be this is the last time i harp the same old tune (&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/257083-Microsoft-Too-US-Centric-/"&gt;http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/257083-Microsoft-Too-US-Centric-/&lt;/a&gt;)..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday two companies MS and Google released their visual search products for testing ..&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.bing.com/visualsearch"&gt;Bing Visual Search&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://fastflip.googlelabs.com/"&gt;Google Fast flip&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google Fast Flip is available everywhere in the world (though I should say that the content is predominantly US/European), whereas Bing Visual Search is not even accessible outside US ( unless you change your region to US on bing ).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though not logical I can still understand some reasons for limiting availability of things like Zune HD to a country/region but what about a webbased product ... its beyond me...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From my perspective MS decision makers still fails to understand the ubiquity of internet ... :(&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/491781-Does-Microsofties-Understand-Internet-/'&gt;Does Microsofties Understand Internet ??&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/491781/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/491781-Does-Microsofties-Understand-Internet-/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/491781-Does-Microsofties-Understand-Internet-/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:28:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/491781-Does-Microsofties-Understand-Internet-/</guid><evnet:views>1000</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/491781/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>May be this is the last time i harp the same old tune (&amp;nbsp;http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/257083-Microsoft-Too-US-Centric-/)..
&amp;nbsp;
Yesterday two companies MS and Google released their visual search products for testing ..&amp;nbsp;Bing Visual Search&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;Google Fast&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/491781-Does-Microsofties-Understand-Internet-/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/491781/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Cross Platform Mobile Web Framework [Cross Platform Mobile Web Framework]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I was exploring options&amp;nbsp;for developing a basic&amp;nbsp;web-mobile&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;based&amp;nbsp;interface for a application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are quite a few frameworks for like &lt;a href="http://www.webapp-net.com"&gt;www.webapp-net.com&lt;/a&gt; or iphone.css/.js which are specifically targeted towrards iphone ( mainly may be because of its standardization).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was wondering if there is any framework or css/js scripts, which will make the same webapp work in WinMo and other browsers.?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Frameworks like webapp-net.com&amp;nbsp;seem to work&amp;nbsp;(though not perfectly)on Symbian Webkit browsers. However fail in other browsers viz., Opera and IE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the same topic , I was wondering whether IE on Win Mobile 6.5 or 7 will support all the additional css behaviour added by appple in webkit ?. IF Microsoft makes it compatible it will be better for them as they will be able to use existing webapps without requiring developers to re-code it again. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/485474-Cross-Platform-Mobile-Web-Framework/'&gt;Cross Platform Mobile Web Framework&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/485474/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/485474-Cross-Platform-Mobile-Web-Framework/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/485474-Cross-Platform-Mobile-Web-Framework/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:12:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/485474-Cross-Platform-Mobile-Web-Framework/</guid><evnet:views>983</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/485474/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Recently I was exploring options&amp;nbsp;for developing a basic&amp;nbsp;web-mobile&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;based&amp;nbsp;interface for a application.
&amp;nbsp;
There are quite a few frameworks for like www.webapp-net.com or iphone.css/.js which are specifically targeted towrards iphone ( mainly may be because of its&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/485474-Cross-Platform-Mobile-Web-Framework/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/485474/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Mono Webhosting [Mono Webhosting]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my&amp;nbsp;colleague&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;looking for a Mono Shared Webhost for hosting a application provided to customers on ASP format. Their .net web-service application is compatible to Mono 2 and above and mysql.&amp;nbsp; But currently being a small sized provider they would like to go for a shared hosting. The guy would like to have quite a bit space and bandwidth with multiple subdomains if possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found some references on &lt;a href="http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_ASP.NET"&gt;http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_ASP.NET&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;about some hosting providers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has anyone used these&amp;nbsp;providers&amp;nbsp;?&amp;nbsp; How was your experience ? Any other suggestions ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/476751-Mono-Webhosting/'&gt;Mono Webhosting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/476751/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/476751-Mono-Webhosting/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/476751-Mono-Webhosting/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:40:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/476751-Mono-Webhosting/</guid><evnet:views>694</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/476751/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>One of my&amp;nbsp;colleague&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;looking for a Mono Shared Webhost for hosting a application provided to customers on ASP format. Their .net web-service application is compatible to Mono 2 and above and mysql.&amp;nbsp; But currently being a small sized provider they would like to go for a shared&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/476751-Mono-Webhosting/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/476751/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Distributed Version Control for Visual Studio - Suggestion [Distributed Version Control for Visual Studio - Suggestion]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Me and My friend are developing some application in Visual Studio (.net) . I have used Visual Source Safe and on smaller scale Subversion for Version control on my PC. However, as we both are working on the same applications and are going to travel around during this period, was thinking of using some kind of distributed VCS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I checked Git and&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/p/msysgit/"&gt;msysgit&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;which looks interesting. Has somebody used these tools or is there any other suggestions for Version Control in such situation ? How is the integration with VS&amp;nbsp; or it needs to be done manually ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As its a project currently on smaller scale I would like to go for free&amp;nbsp; or opensource or less expensive solution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/475970-Distributed-Version-Control-for-Visual-Studio-Suggestion/'&gt;Distributed Version Control for Visual Studio - Suggestion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/475970/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/475970-Distributed-Version-Control-for-Visual-Studio-Suggestion/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/475970-Distributed-Version-Control-for-Visual-Studio-Suggestion/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:27:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/475970-Distributed-Version-Control-for-Visual-Studio-Suggestion/</guid><evnet:views>738</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/475970/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Me and My friend are developing some application in Visual Studio (.net) . I have used Visual Source Safe and on smaller scale Subversion for Version control on my PC. However, as we both are working on the same applications and are going to travel around during this period, was thinking of using&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>18</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/475970-Distributed-Version-Control-for-Visual-Studio-Suggestion/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/475970/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>May be one of the Reasons Live Search Sucks  [May be one of the Reasons Live Search Sucks ]</title><description>&lt;A href="http://3krfqw.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pmGOc9-28JL9Yrb4kKPEBRD9a2UFbNfddwYcZ9UuyYyEWFwuME30VoDrgs-mnD9enAjNItiXPjNnKPpodlhV0kcVfv4aJ5lZT/WhyLiveSearchSucks.jpg" rel=lightbox&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://3krfqw.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pmGOc9-28JL9Yrb4kKPEBRD9a2UFbNfddwYcZ9UuyYyEWFwuME30VoDrgs-mnD9enAjNItiXPjNnKPpodlhV0kcVfv4aJ5lZT/WhyLiveSearchSucks.jpg"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Its about crawling and crawling frequently ... :(&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/463125-May-be-one-of-the-Reasons-Live-Search-Sucks/'&gt;May be one of the Reasons Live Search Sucks &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/463125/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/463125-May-be-one-of-the-Reasons-Live-Search-Sucks/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/463125-May-be-one-of-the-Reasons-Live-Search-Sucks/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:27:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/463125-May-be-one-of-the-Reasons-Live-Search-Sucks/</guid><evnet:views>681</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/463125/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Its about crawling and crawling frequently ... :(in reply to May be one of the Reasons Live Search Sucks </evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/463125-May-be-one-of-the-Reasons-Live-Search-Sucks/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/463125/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Gigapan and Silverlight [Gigapan and Silverlight]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;Just saw this image, aswesome .. But the default viewer which is Flash and Javascript based, does not have very smooth transition.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://gigapan.org/viewGigapan.php?id=15374" rel=nofollow target=_blank&gt;&lt;B&gt;http://gigapan. org/viewGigapan. php?id=15374&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I felt that silverlight with Deepzoom technology based viewer is&amp;nbsp;perfect for this. Is any one from silverlight evangelism team working on it ? I found one reference of Seadragon version it works. But its still seems to be work in progress.&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="http://www.odyex.com/gigadragon"&gt;http://www.odyex.com/gigadragon&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It would be cool to have a silverlight based viewer for gigapn.org images. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;On the same note does anybody have idea whether deepzoom is available in current moonlight version ? or is it planned to be included in next versions ?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/458529-Gigapan-and-Silverlight/'&gt;Gigapan and Silverlight&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/458529/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/458529-Gigapan-and-Silverlight/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/458529-Gigapan-and-Silverlight/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:50:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/458529-Gigapan-and-Silverlight/</guid><evnet:views>945</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/458529/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Just saw this image, aswesome .. But the default viewer which is Flash and Javascript based, does not have very smooth transition.http://gigapan. org/viewGigapan. php?id=15374I felt that silverlight with Deepzoom technology based viewer is&amp;nbsp;perfect for this. Is any one from silverlight&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/458529-Gigapan-and-Silverlight/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/458529/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Webservice Operation Timed out  [Webservice Operation Timed out ]</title><description>I am currently developing a front end for a webservice. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I require quite a bit of inital data, which I am getting by using multiple Webservice Async methods calls from within a Backgroundworker, so that I can do all my UI initialization.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Certain webservice calls are done in Sync mode such as Login to service, while the Async webservices may be running.&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, I noticed that sometimes, the webservices return&amp;nbsp;"Request timed out" mainly for Sync webservices ( and sometimes for async webservices).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I tried setting&amp;nbsp;ConnectionManagement maxconnection to 20 in .Net machine.config at the client and server.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I am using IIS 6&amp;nbsp; (Windows server 2003) &amp;nbsp;with SQL Server. Using NHibernate as data access layer. I also use a custom SessionManager&amp;nbsp; Webservice for differentiating between multiple clients.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Still intemittently I am receiving "Request Timed out" on random webservice calls.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;What else should I check&amp;nbsp;? any IIS confiugration to be done ? Did you&amp;nbsp;have any similar experiences ?&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/448205-Webservice-Operation-Timed-out/'&gt;Webservice Operation Timed out &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/448205/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/448205-Webservice-Operation-Timed-out/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/448205-Webservice-Operation-Timed-out/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:57:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/448205-Webservice-Operation-Timed-out/</guid><evnet:views>1270</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/448205/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I am currently developing a front end for a webservice. I require quite a bit of inital data, which I am getting by using multiple Webservice Async methods calls from within a Backgroundworker, so that I can do all my UI initialization.Certain webservice calls are done in Sync mode such as Login to&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/448205-Webservice-Operation-Timed-out/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/448205/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Java FX 1.0  [Java FX 1.0 ]</title><description>&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;P&gt;Java FX 1.0 was launched today&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0,39044215,62049047,00.htm"&gt;http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0,39044215,62049047,00.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Installed it properly... but strangely every time I tried running the samples .. received error message "Current version of Java on this system ( 0-unknown ) does not support JavaFX " and prompted for re-installation&amp;nbsp;.. but on cancelling the installation and clicking on the applet i could run it.&lt;BR&gt;[Update : The problem seems to be only in IE .. it works ok on Firefox]&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Anyway it looks good ... its not slow as Applets ... and comparatively quite responsive ... Just that every time I start a sample .. it asks for Permission ... may be they are giving a lot of client access rights by default to Java programs ... &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;One feature which i liked is the ability to launch&amp;nbsp;the same code as Desktop application using Java Webstart/JNLP.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I haven't tried development experience with Netbeans ... will try soon.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;How was your experience ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/447123-Java-FX-10/'&gt;Java FX 1.0 &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/447123/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/447123-Java-FX-10/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/447123-Java-FX-10/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:42:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/447123-Java-FX-10/</guid><evnet:views>1192</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/447123/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&amp;nbsp; 
Java FX 1.0 was launched today&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0,39044215,62049047,00.htmInstalled it properly... but strangely every time I tried running the samples .. received error message "Current version of Java on this system ( 0-unknown ) does not support JavaFX "&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/447123-Java-FX-10/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/447123/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Application Virtualization / Deployment ?? [Application Virtualization / Deployment ??]</title><description>I have been facing a particular problem lately.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My company develops POS and other Database applications around POS. POS systems requires working with other hardware such as printer, cash drawer, display (working thru serial/parellel port) etc thru OPOS or UPOS. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recently we need to setup quite a few demonstration sets for our partners at regular intervals on Multiple machines, which takes quite a bit of time ( install SQL Server, UPOS/OPOS, Application and configure all) etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am looking for ways to make deployment easier. These applications are installed one or sometime more than one machines which have similiar ( but may not be exactly same ) configurations. So imaging solutions seems to be out-of-questions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am trying hand at VMWare but due to external devices, seems to be facing problems. I am also concerned about speed. Is there any other solutions ? I read about altiris application virtualization or softgrid application virtualization ? Haven't tried yet ? Is these tools for the above scenario where I need to deploy applications on different machines ? What are the paid / free solutions available ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/421459-Application-Virtualization--Deployment-/'&gt;Application Virtualization / Deployment ??&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/421459/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/421459-Application-Virtualization--Deployment-/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/421459-Application-Virtualization--Deployment-/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:10:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/421459-Application-Virtualization--Deployment-/</guid><evnet:views>921</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/421459/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I have been facing a particular problem lately.My company develops POS and other Database applications around POS. POS systems requires working with other hardware such as printer, cash drawer, display (working thru serial/parellel port) etc thru OPOS or UPOS. Recently we need to setup quite a few&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/421459-Application-Virtualization--Deployment-/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/421459/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>SQL Server CAL Licensing. [SQL Server CAL Licensing.]</title><description>I am having a bit difficulty in understanding SQL Server CAL Licensing scheme.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The&amp;nbsp;scenario is as follows :&lt;BR&gt;Company "X" is buying a business application software which uses the SQL Server database.&amp;nbsp; The software uses SQL TCP/IP Connection to connect to the SQL Server.&amp;nbsp; Company "X" has brought SQL Server license&amp;nbsp; to be installed on Windows 2003 server and&amp;nbsp;business application software to be installed on 10 XP Clients. Though all the 10 people will be running Business application software, they will not be installing any part of the SQL Server database components (&amp;nbsp;apart from ODBC / MDAC which is part of XP ).&amp;nbsp; The Business application software will use ODBC / MDAC to access data on SQL Server. The Business application software uses the same SQL Server user to connect to SQL Server ( it does not use Windows Authentication but instead uses SQL Server authentication ) .&amp;nbsp; All the 10 people may not be using the&amp;nbsp;using the Business application software all the time and at the same time . Connection is&amp;nbsp;over TCP/IP.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;My Question is :&lt;BR&gt;1. How many Client CALs are required to be purchased ? Is it 10 CALs ? &lt;BR&gt;2. How the SQL&amp;nbsp; CAL's are calculated - For example instead of one Business application on each PC, there are two Business applications from different vendors ( both use same SQL Server but may be different SQL Server user ) . Does the CALs need to be doubled&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; though it is same PC ?&lt;BR&gt;3. What if normally all the PC's are not running Business application at the same time, but only very very rarely (theoritical situtation ) all of them are accessing SQL Data using Business application - does this scenario change the SQL CAL Calculation ?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Its really confusing .... especially w.r.t SQL Server ( may be bcos when I think of SQL Server with TCP/IP connection, &amp;nbsp;i think it like a webserver which can serve many users requests without licensing issues ).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/410352-SQL-Server-CAL-Licensing/'&gt;SQL Server CAL Licensing.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/410352/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/410352-SQL-Server-CAL-Licensing/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/410352-SQL-Server-CAL-Licensing/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:14:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/410352-SQL-Server-CAL-Licensing/</guid><evnet:views>1690</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/410352/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I am having a bit difficulty in understanding SQL Server CAL Licensing scheme.The&amp;nbsp;scenario is as follows :Company "X" is buying a business application software which uses the SQL Server database.&amp;nbsp; The software uses SQL TCP/IP Connection to connect to the SQL Server.&amp;nbsp; Company "X" has&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/410352-SQL-Server-CAL-Licensing/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/410352/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Microsoft Buy This Company .... [Microsoft Buy This Company ....]</title><description>Just came across a very nice piece of technology&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Checkout &lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/11/camspace-creates-a-wii-for-everyone-minus-the-nintendo-console/"&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/11/camspace-creates-a-wii-for-everyone-minus-the-nintendo-console/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0srY37kkMw"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0srY37kkMw&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The fully software based technology&amp;nbsp;turns any&amp;nbsp;item&amp;nbsp;into controller for a PC&amp;nbsp;with standard web-cam.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;From my perspective it has huge potential for making interactions with computer easier especially in developed countries.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/409162-Microsoft-Buy-This-Company-/'&gt;Microsoft Buy This Company ....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/409162/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/409162-Microsoft-Buy-This-Company-/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/409162-Microsoft-Buy-This-Company-/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:21:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/409162-Microsoft-Buy-This-Company-/</guid><evnet:views>625</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/409162/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Just came across a very nice piece of technology&amp;nbsp;Checkout http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/11/camspace-creates-a-wii-for-everyone-minus-the-nintendo-console/and&amp;nbsp;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0srY37kkMwThe fully software based technology&amp;nbsp;turns any&amp;nbsp;item&amp;nbsp;into controller for&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/409162-Microsoft-Buy-This-Company-/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/409162/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Is it really this easy to Hack Windows Vista ? [Is it really this easy to Hack Windows Vista ?]</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.offensive-security.com/movies/vistahack/vistahack.html"&gt;http://www.offensive-security.com/movies/vistahack/vistahack.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The guy renames the cmd.exe to Utilman.exe using a Linux Live CD boot and Windows File system access. Then he can access Windows as System Admin even without logging into Vista :s&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Did MS testers forgot to include this in their security plan ??&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405565-Is-it-really-this-easy-to-Hack-Windows-Vista-/'&gt;Is it really this easy to Hack Windows Vista ?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/405565/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405565-Is-it-really-this-easy-to-Hack-Windows-Vista-/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405565-Is-it-really-this-easy-to-Hack-Windows-Vista-/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:19:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405565-Is-it-really-this-easy-to-Hack-Windows-Vista-/</guid><evnet:views>2603</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/405565/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;a href="http://www.offensive-security.com/movies/vistahack/vistahack.html"&gt;http://www.offensive-security.com/movies/vistahack/vistahack.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The guy renames the cmd.exe to Utilman.exe using a Linux Live CD boot and Windows File system access. Then he can access Windows as System Admin even without logging into Vista &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-7.gif' alt='Perplexed' /&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Did MS testers forgot to include this in their security plan ??&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>23</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405565-Is-it-really-this-easy-to-Hack-Windows-Vista-/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/405565/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Direct Image Manipulation Viewer [Direct Image Manipulation Viewer]</title><description>A very interesting idea for video viewer which alllows&amp;nbsp;user to drag&amp;nbsp;objects in the video to move the time line. The video they created is very cool. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;May be very useful in Video editing packages.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcIy9O344bI"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcIy9O344bI&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/22/dimp-a-direct-manipulation-video-player/"&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/22/dimp-a-direct-manipulation-video-player/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/615949/Video-Browsing-by-Direct-Manipulation"&gt;http://www.docstoc.com/docs/615949/Video-Browsing-by-Direct-Manipulation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405260-Direct-Image-Manipulation-Viewer/'&gt;Direct Image Manipulation Viewer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/405260/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405260-Direct-Image-Manipulation-Viewer/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405260-Direct-Image-Manipulation-Viewer/</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 08:06:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405260-Direct-Image-Manipulation-Viewer/</guid><evnet:views>380</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/405260/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>A very interesting idea for video viewer which alllows&amp;nbsp;user to drag&amp;nbsp;objects in the video to move the time line. The video they created is very cool. May be very useful in Video editing packages.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcIy9O344bIhttp://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/22/dimp-a-direct-manipulation-video-player/http://www.docstoc.com/docs/615949/Video-Browsing-by-Direct-Manipulation</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/405260-Direct-Image-Manipulation-Viewer/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/405260/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>New FolderShare Website is slow [New FolderShare Website is slow]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I have been using Foldershare for last 1 1/2 years and think it to be one of the&amp;nbsp;great tools MS has been providing.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I normally do not need to visit the website as I do not create / modify frequently. However, the earlier version of the website was quite fast and was easy to use.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, last two days I have been trying to use the new Foldershare website,&amp;nbsp;it seems to be&amp;nbsp;so slow.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It take very long just to sign in into the website. Even matter of adding another computer to the library seems to be taking few minutes.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I am accessing the service currently from Malaysia. How is your experience ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/403750-New-FolderShare-Website-is-slow/'&gt;New FolderShare Website is slow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/403750/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/403750-New-FolderShare-Website-is-slow/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/403750-New-FolderShare-Website-is-slow/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 06:50:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/403750-New-FolderShare-Website-is-slow/</guid><evnet:views>487</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/403750/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;I have been using Foldershare for last 1 1/2 years and think it to be one of the&amp;nbsp;great tools MS has been providing.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I normally do not need to visit the website as I do not create / modify frequently. However, the earlier version of the website was quite fast and was easy to use.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, last two days I have been trying to use the new Foldershare website,&amp;nbsp;it seems to be&amp;nbsp;so slow.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It take very long just to sign in into the website. Even matter of adding another computer to the library seems to be taking few minutes.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I am accessing the service currently from Malaysia. How is your experience ?&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/403750-New-FolderShare-Website-is-slow/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/403750/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Simple ( VB/,net) Free Attendance System [Simple ( VB/,net) Free Attendance System]</title><description>&lt;P&gt;My friend who is running a small restaurant is looking for a very basic attendance system.&amp;nbsp; He is looking for a very simple system with employee clock-in / clockout time recording and on the basis of that simple attendnace report.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I could develop the system for him, but was wondering if already any free simple system already exists. Only&amp;nbsp;complexity may be he has multiple shifts for kitchen staff, waiters&amp;nbsp;and also&amp;nbsp;restaurant closes in the afternoon.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I have already googled it, but the solutions&amp;nbsp;dont have shift &amp;nbsp;or too are advanced.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262268-Simple--VBnet-Free-Attendance-System/'&gt;Simple ( VB/,net) Free Attendance System&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/262268/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262268-Simple--VBnet-Free-Attendance-System/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262268-Simple--VBnet-Free-Attendance-System/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:11:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262268-Simple--VBnet-Free-Attendance-System/</guid><evnet:views>2275</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/262268/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>&lt;P&gt;My friend who is running a small restaurant is looking for a very basic attendance system.&amp;nbsp; He is looking for a very simple system with employee clock-in / clockout time recording and on the basis of that simple attendnace report.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I could develop the system for him, but was wondering if already any free simple system already exists. Only&amp;nbsp;complexity may be he has multiple shifts for kitchen staff, waiters&amp;nbsp;and also&amp;nbsp;restaurant closes in the afternoon.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I have already googled it, but the solutions&amp;nbsp;dont have shift &amp;nbsp;or too are advanced.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/262268-Simple--VBnet-Free-Attendance-System/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/262268/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Standard RFID SDK [Standard RFID SDK]</title><description>Hi All,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I am looking around for standard RFID SDK mainly with anticollision features and ability to reader a large number&amp;nbsp;of tags in a short time.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;So far I have seen skyetek and&amp;nbsp;few china based SDKs. They all seem to be very low level mainly around C and strangely delphi :(&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Have you ever come across a standard SDK preferably around .Net&amp;nbsp;so that&amp;nbsp;low level detail can be ignored and we can concentrate on higher level application?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Satish&lt;BR&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260266-Standard-RFID-SDK/'&gt;Standard RFID SDK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/260266/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260266-Standard-RFID-SDK/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260266-Standard-RFID-SDK/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:54:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260266-Standard-RFID-SDK/</guid><evnet:views>1283</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/260266/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Hi All,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I am looking around for standard RFID SDK mainly with anticollision features and ability to reader a large number&amp;nbsp;of tags in a short time.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;So far I have seen skyetek and&amp;nbsp;few china based SDKs. They all seem to be very low level mainly around C and strangely delphi &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-6.gif' alt='Sad' /&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Have you ever come across a standard SDK preferably around .Net&amp;nbsp;so that&amp;nbsp;low level detail can be ignored and we can concentrate on higher level application?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Satish&lt;BR&gt;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/260266-Standard-RFID-SDK/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/260266/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Google .. still the Ultimate search [Google .. still the Ultimate search]</title><description>After the recent search update I have been using live search for practically all purpose and has been quite satisifed with its results and speed. However, at certain times, either due to its indexing speed or may be due to deficient algorithm it does not give correct result.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For eg. I searched "blame halo3" on all major ( &lt;a href="http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=blame+halo3&amp;amp;sourceid=Mozilla-search&amp;amp;form=CHROME"&gt;live&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.google.com.my/search?q=blame+halo3&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a"&gt;google&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=blame+halo3&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;fr=moz2"&gt;yahoo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.ask.com/web?q=blame+halo3&amp;amp;search=search&amp;amp;qsrc=0&amp;amp;o=0&amp;amp;l=dir"&gt;ask&lt;/a&gt; ) search engines. Only google returned the correct result for the video link ( &lt;span class="a"&gt;www.break.com/index/&lt;b&gt;blame&lt;/b&gt;-halo-3.html). It even listed the channel9 discussion which has been posted few hours ago. :). See the &lt;a href="http://tkfiles.storage.live.com/y1p_ONgnKloc5uT9WR_JdtteEbhcnwT-I5a8O1-Xsf1fVpoQDIRYyyy2d7ndKpcD0-7VLbDVmq6ORY"&gt;screenshot &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will still use live search .. but i think live search team should index content more often especially for dynamic sites like channle9 or microsoft sites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What u say ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258638-Google--still-the-Ultimate-search/'&gt;Google .. still the Ultimate search&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/258638/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258638-Google--still-the-Ultimate-search/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258638-Google--still-the-Ultimate-search/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:09:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258638-Google--still-the-Ultimate-search/</guid><evnet:views>1583</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/258638/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>After the recent search update I have been using live search for practically all purpose and has been quite satisifed with its results and speed. However, at certain times, either due to its indexing speed or may be due to deficient algorithm it does not give correct result.For eg. I searched "blame halo3" on all major ( live, google, yahoo, ask ) search engines. Only google returned the correct result for the video link ( www.break.com/index/blame-halo-3.html). It even listed the channel9 discussion which has been posted few hours ago. &lt;img src='/emoticons/C9/emotion-1.gif' alt='Smiley' /&gt;. See the screenshot I will still use live search ..&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/258638-Google--still-the-Ultimate-search/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/258638/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Microsoft Too US-Centric ? [Microsoft Too US-Centric ?]</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I feel that Microsoft and its offerings
are too US-Centric. Currently I reside in Malaysia and  Travel
extensively in China, India and South Asia. I am not against giving
priority to the country of origin at initial phase and not a
US-hater, but feel that there is too much US-Centric
development.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Examples :&lt;br&gt;Recently it was published that live
Maps did a massive update to their data. I like the new updates and
their interface. However, even now it does not allow full Zoom view
of many of the important places (major / capital cities ) in the
region, whereas Google even provides street searches.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Office
Live was launched a 1 1/2 years ago. However, it is still not
available in this region. Google apps for domains is available here.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is also the case with many betas released by MS which
are only restricted to US.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Live search even after 2 years does
not offer localised search, whereas google offers country specific
searches.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The list can go on like this. I think Europe and 
Australian region based niners also feel that same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This MS
strategy is alienating the non-US customers. I can understand that
internationalization being a separate exercise for a product, however
fail to understand reasons for restricting the English version
geographically.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the light of studies, which points the
rapid increase of Internet / computer / mobile phone users in non-US
regions, I feel MS will lose the market to local players or companies
like Google which can quickly offer products internationally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What
do you feel ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in reply to &lt;a href='http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/257083-Microsoft-Too-US-Centric-/'&gt;Microsoft Too US-Centric ?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/257083/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0" height="1" width="1" alt="" /&gt;</description><comments>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/257083-Microsoft-Too-US-Centric-/</comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/257083-Microsoft-Too-US-Centric-/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 08:11:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/257083-Microsoft-Too-US-Centric-/</guid><evnet:views>5825</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/257083/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I feel that Microsoft and its offerings
are too US-Centric. Currently I reside in Malaysia and  Travel
extensively in China, India and South Asia. I am not against giving
priority to the country of origin at initial phase and not a
US-hater, but feel that there is too much US-Centric
development.Examples :Recently it was published that live
Maps did a massive update to their data. I like the new updates and
their interface. However, even now it does not allow full Zoom view
of many of the important places (major / capital cities ) in the
region, whereas Google even provides street&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>xgamer</dc:creator><slash:comments>40</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/257083-Microsoft-Too-US-Centric-/RSS/</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/257083/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>