Microsoft ever looked at anti-Open Source business model, but didn’t compete coincidentally with that different software licensing business model. Today's Open Source projects may meet Microsoft solutions with Open Source at Microsoft. With regarding to software marketplace withstanding solicited marketing conditions of MIXture between Open Source and anti-Open Source. Since Open Source classified software business solutions in which Microsoft may have the title of Express products, marketing psychology stopped looking up differentiated business position of Open Source where opposed Microsoft software business licensing model.

How much Open Source business?

From IT financial viewpoints, software assets became part of hardware equipments and services. For instance in Japan industry 2005, 601 companies expensed $1.22bi for hardware equipments while 560 companies did $0.57bi for software assets in telecommunication business category. A statistical analyst of Japan government services issued that software assets could earn only ~2%, and particularly more by selling as part of hardware equipments and services in major computer companies. Under short volume of investment to magnifying software business looked down, beside industrial behavior chose services including software atop SOA Interoperability. Unlike big software company Microsoft, the world leaders even denied sustainable software business without hardware services.

Creating Business Partnership outside Developers Partnership?

Conservative consideration of business creators might direct to shrink business opportunities of consumer model licensing software companies where Microsoft marketing occupies. Most of world business leaders might mislead and downturned industrial value of software business in advance to services centric government and industrial business relationships underneath major IT companies. It appeared for surpass Microsoft business practices to survive along marketing conception of software plus services virtual business development and programs management beside relatively weak IT industrial growth. Microsoft consequently did upturn sales performance in 2007, in reverse majority of Open Source software business did turndown under less revenue generating business management method of Open Source control for hardware assets.

The fact is value of whole product solution is cheep in Microsoft partnering business, and Open Source industry leaders may choose services value with open connectivity involving Microsoft lobbying acts.

posted by ymasuda_

Given functional paradigm to picturesque data synchronization business appears to stack another layer for data replication manager through Windows Live connection. For connected Live user experiences in difference capacity of computing devices, such data centric consumption may be worth where Windows Live version of data replication manager takes care of. That functions make certain of another developing live business scene of intelligent data transfer services which Windows Server has proposed by expanding typical use of HTTP download applications, and most of educated users may feel like to find what's different from synchronization interfaces of today's mobility has.

How could you enable Windows connected data consumption atop services blocks of Windows Live, but offline? Device solutions have supplied rich data synchronization functions around carrier business drivers. Generally consuming Web Services means to make forward or rollback transactions on workflows on network identified resources. 2008/Q2 industry has invested leading telecommunication companies to adopt such SOA enabling solution, and it should ease of data consumption on Internet.

posted by ymasuda_

Let's liquidate Microsoft cultural talks about virtualization from viewpoint of enterprise marketplace to SMB. Not all of commercial talks for virtualization bring nearly equals to what mainframe scale computing has demonstration of "thousands of instant L series system elements in Z massive computing set" for some 2 partnership years. IBM PR introduced a mainframe project which bought "management cost become lower". Windows Virtualization is enterprise, but actually in different performance scale from mainframe products.

Windows enterprise server marketplace may ask for how system management could be different. Are there easier way to optimize resources allocation in server administration with Hyper-V? For example, typical deployment of enterprise search products estimates numerous server boxes and disk spaces for each of document feeding, indexing and querying. Today’s virtual PC solutions compose such machine deployment resources in single desktop environment for product solutions development and testing purpose. However that virtualization doesn’t mean virtualization-enabled business management and cost saving of virtual systems at all, and enterprise system may still stay in enterprise deployment scenarios.

Even uprising SMB marketplace may want Windows Virtualization under strong pressure of financial cost control. An easy answer to SMB business forces is value of richer computing power beyond instant boxes management, lower power consumption, and smaller management efforts. Evangelists may tell "Buy 1 box and supply 4 times cost efficiency S+S with Hyper-V blueprint".

I'd like to overstate that Windows Virtualization doesn't have true business value without virtualization-enabling Windows Management behind enterprise IT industrial scenes.

posted by ymasuda_

Microsoft has server specific core parallel computing. In other words, Microsoft is developing high scale computing area of mainframe computer architecture, with Intel. Mainframe computers have value differentiation of multi-processors management, and Microsoft has multi-cores management. System buyers may guess past long decade of large scale mainframe versus small scale personal computing.
Innovative processors development is in different side of hardware business, and given development point is how intelligent software solution may add generic values to multi-processor units under Windows resource management. Let's evaluate how Windows became bigger beside mainframe computers.

posted by ymasuda_

For Microsoft Game development partners, advancing security solution of SQL Server 2008 must make Game developers business safe and stable because of its nature of "security by design". Theory behind relational database management has common context of developers knowledge, and advancing storage management takes implicit security solution of storage managers. Don't find logical advantages of database product, and get rid of business development practices of database in gaming industry.

Feed to Gaming Industory from what Microsoft learned from SQL Server Database Business

A question may pinpoint lengthy of "SQL Server database applications development cost, performance, security with comparison of other database platforms." Game developers industry may take risks with advancing development platform upon SQL Server 2008 security solutions. Let's support gaming industry with proper training investment of securing SQL Server product design.

posted by ymasuda_

posted by ymasuda_

Is it possible for Africa to manage such ISP centers? Sun has introduced wagon style containers of computer equipments; and African drivers may catch business opportunities of ISP business suppliers to world. Low cost dependency of ISP in Africa brand might be the best development practices to raise awareness of ISP business capabilities to global from region.

posted by ymasuda_

Could you mind to surpass Live ID authentication services under Phishing controls with care of customer education for rest of Internet people? Your advancing developers say benefits Microsoft Live Web services consumers, and moreover industrial security training for rest of billions Internet business developers. Microsoft is a consumer of OpenID, and being wise with given subject of Live ID authentication.

posted by ymasuda_

Set business domain to compete

Only the security solution supplier for the Database System

posted by ymasuda_

With flexible SQL Server synchronization interfaces, storage location and scale matters might be resolved by database administration and deployment scenarios. Today's system analysts should hope for administrative import/ restore and export/ backup of data independently from scale of storage services. Valued business system has total product solution of secure and procedural storage management beside Windows system interfaces.

How could Microsoft cloud services replace today's data transfer solution along virtual business on Internet? Is only unique pricing value of SDSS?

posted by ymasuda_

• Ideally sales volume and business interfaces of removable media lead conception of lifeline in consumer segment, in which personal and collaboration computing live. SQL Server mobile has scale infinity in a scenario, so what about mobility on removable media?
• Ironical S+S implementation may supply vary software controls without virtual business development in marketplace, and the software architects of Microsoft should have to come at value added S+S which means SQL Server and Windows differentiation of technical marketing survival.

Mobile device may have connected functions for Data Services, what so? Being not innovative part of Data access, but business performer may demand cheap and intelligent device software.

posted by ymasuda_

Even Microsoft has 4,000 of MVPs worldwide, position of organization might be misled in term of community and business performance. Q is amount of community values in real business networks, M is controlled variable of Microsoft own direct channel, and P is uncontrolled variable of Partnering channel. p means efficiency of communication in real business marketplace.

Q = M + P
p = P / M

Sean, how much do partnering channels rally partner's community resources? Wherever Microsoft worldwide business meat business partners, partnering sub-networks under Microsoft networks development should be worth index community price and position.
p means weight of Microsoft networking empowerment.

HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW introduced such global business networks management, when I stepped in global business management programs in a multi-national security company in practice. For references, I cited in a way of mathematical expression which appears in context of dynamics.

posted by ymasuda_

On the one hand ideas of Windows platform development has any .NET languages which accommodate forms, communication and business rules. On the other hand advancing behavior of .NET languages may alter language expressions.
As Microsoft Developer Network delivers blueprints to build set of development practices, Architects should probe truly categorized computing topics, which mean to avoid kind of “development practice for development practices”.

posted by ymasuda_

That Python language speaking spreadsheet acquires static automation codes for complex work stacks, and dynamic language codes looks after simple work areas. May application having dynamic language nature meet needs of spreadsheet functions less costly? How much and where does dynamic language application benefit in subject of financial application development in the case of Resolver One? Whereas developers prefer Python, Resolver One solution providers may purchase more function points than simple construction of Python functions.

For instance, XForm has influenced XML conformant application designs and it has more productive module development nature based on XForm submit controls. XForm clients may act as SOAP originators and communicate with flexible SOAP actors. That solution comparison means to tell that business practice led by present dynamic language nature might be costly, and more competitive networking spreadsheet solutions of standards should be extensible.

What could be expected application designs truly for dynamic language runtime? Composition is major architectural subject in Office business application development. Is combining nature capable to meet composition for today's Office System solutions? Interestingly, is this project trying to evangelize partners with such architectural blueprints for .NET developers expectedly without loosing development business?

posted by ymasuda_

• Energy output based random number generation (TOSHIBA)
• Advancing long distance communication of fiber channel development (NTT)
• Position energy analysis of atom level movement (IBM)
• Consumer business vision of computing "inside" fly (Intel)

Quantum computing would have to be new area unlike traditional computing category of software and hardware, since it means more business controls than today's electric devices. For example, flying birds may supply less moving energy and scale independent real-time characteristic communication with databases in broader satellite stations to analyze weather and warming conditions. For advancing medical computing areas, sensor equipments might be replaced by the smallest scale of quantum computing controls. Not all of mobility systems carry sets of human interfaces, but consumer segment may see what Windows Mobile enables as total solution. Do investors yet feel bid to future ICT centric economics in references to future mobility systems and more applications? Try to meet Microsoft quantum computing making differences, not tons of computer physics.

posted by ymasuda_

CNET users learned how even amateur video loggers are able to make most of advancing video editing functions in simple manners. As that software possibility customary introducing, hundreds of home computing developers may feel where MSDN channels live with fun of video publicity. Challenging CNET TV educated how to uncover possibilities of video logging from viewpoint of home consumers.

An instance of symbolic inquiries might call custom attention of "MSDN Channel 9 periodical censorship seems old fashioned device communications which invested methods of analogue recording likewise TV box sounds beside living space. Media engineers prefer to make use of highly invested digital editing to produce spaces and sounds. Windows is responsible for media business frontend runners to support, and endeavors Internet media communication including IPTV. How does MSDN Channel 9 produce MSDN developers with today's video making?"

Video publishing sites in TV stations demonstrate to meet Internet virtual business, and then new media business takes proactively hugely invested business opportunities in the subject of digital media communication. TV development business stepped in Internet development business relationships. From viewpoint of developers and Microsoft media business intelligence, MSDN should become the experimental location to fulfill gap of media business interfaces from today's publishing culture. Check how Microsoft media partners communicates in long running industry, and think about difficulty of business dynamics from MSDN Channel 9 end points. That prepared small station of MSNBC Video should be what Microsoft demonstrated under differentiated media partnerships.

posted by ymasuda_

Technology Interfaces
Not all of game developers are technical innovator; however that developer's interview may compile pattern of data consumers in higher performance gaming industry. Logical Data services centered real-time data analysis is demanding area, and computing dynamics might be realized by gaming industry when commercial vision of the 1^st XNA release asked for academic approach in the subject of real-world analysis.

Hopefully Microsoft needs to meet cost reasonable development environment where developer's business demands, and business value of data management services. Expectedly gaming industry is not going to accuse XNA platform to provision what data services provide as benefits. More business classes may unfold Internet connected data services to accelerate gaming business performance, which means mostly cut of development resources, beyond comprehension of today’s gaming industry.

posted by ymasuda_

"Most costry Internet developing nation has an assumption of spam mail to Japan companies impacts 0.7bi USD/year, ISP investment 0.3bi USD/year and business and government investment 0.5bi USD/year"

posted by ymasuda_

What to do for better project management with VS Server capability? Century of industrial engineering tells demanding business management solution is yet to meet management factor of engineering business. More work activity tracking, time to resource management and auditing check method are implicit requirements of major industrial portions. What about workflow management as part of team management with Server?

posted by ymasuda_

posted by ymasuda_

Windows industry have presumably invested the first decade of Windows application runtimes which proved further language neutral and object oriented system. Long history of OLE software asset has following characteristics.

• Extensibility of data types in type library
• Dynamic method dispatching through v-table

Web Services architecture and unfolding W3C XML activity related standards might propose such flexible runtime design. Also given subject of runtime invocation system is somewhat neural network and fuzzy software method to solve, but not seeing outright answers and industrial references.

posted by ymasuda_

posted by ymasuda_