10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010

Good stuff!

One small comment:
I noticed this in the code for the editor add-in:

[Order(Before="Selection")]

We've been doing the same thing in an in-house framework, specifying ordering constraints and letting the framework calculate a total ordering from the partial ordering. However, we concluded that a statement like:
Before="Selection"
could sometimes, depending upon the time of the day, day of the week, the mood of the programmer, the weather etc,
be interpreted as the current component being constrained to be before "Selection", other times to be interpreted as "Selection" being constrained to be before the current component. (ie, totally ambiguous)

We fond the situation to improve a lot when we added a little 'Me' at the end of 'Before' (and 'After'), like:
[Order(BeforeMe="Selection")]

Cheers,
Jarle

Visual Studio 2010 is being made with WPF?

Drew, the ever-present football logo is seriously distracting from the presentation of the video.  These videos should be 100% focused on Visual Studio, not your sports interests.  Thanks.

There's always something to complain about...right? :')

If you're not able to keep your focus on the Visual Studio part, it's not the fault of the presenter.

I agree.  It really made the video seem amateurish, like he was filming it in his dorm room.

Drew,

Well done. Really appreciate you putting these short videos together. With all the tech demands and trying to learn VSTS 2010, this is a great quick-hit. Can't wait for RTM!

Ummm, and for the record, Go Bucks!

When I heard of the 'new editor' in WPF I was a little bit shocked. because after all, it is a code editor. So there's no need for fancy things like gradients and pictures. But this video made it a lot clearer. Though it is a CTP, I hope that the editor will be as good as the plain old RichTextBox. (For example tooltips look horrible now as well as some flickering when selecting text)

But the extensibility of it is great. Especially the usage of MEF. I'm playing arround with MEF a little bit and it looks very very promising. I like the other features, like the navigation, as well!

How rude to keep these videos casual!! ha ha

Thank you, all sounds good!! Well Done!

I think I suggested already on one Microsoft's website (in 1874) to have the optional coloured editor's tabs so when you work with more projects it would be easier to recognize quickly where the opened document belongs to.. not sure if it makes sence to anybody ha ha 

http://www.vaclavelias.com/Projects/visualstudio10/VisualStudio10Editor.jpg



Cheers, Vaclav.

1.) I think its better to concentrate on the content and not on the quality of the video. If I like a professional marketing video I go to Youtube and watch Steve Ballmer (developers, developers, developers)

2.) Is there a way to change the color of the marked references, because in the current color I cant see anything.
I love huge monitors, but unfortunately you can only get them with a cheap TN Panel if you dont want to pay >1K $. So I can not really decide between white and a very light gray like in this case (tested with my 28" Hanns.G at home, but also with my cheap standard 22" Acer monitor at work), if you are looking from the wrong side and I think I am not the only one.

3.) Making the editor in WPF is a good thing. I love this new zooming function. I was searching for this the whole time (and maybe also buy larger monitors to get more resolution and more code on the screen).

I found the video very blurry.   The others were crystal clear.

I agree, the logo and the large PIP is distracting -- plus a 4th of the IDE is hidden by the PIP.   Please stop using the PIP!

The quick search feature is handy. As you probably know, IDEA does all this and more. In particular, what IDEA does is display the fully qualified name or path in parantheses, so that similarly named files in different directories may be differentiated. It would be good for Studio developers to have the same feature.

PS - I don't think there's any harm in promoting your sports team. Hey, it just happened to be on your wall.

Well it's nice, again,  to see VS2010 embracing (borrowing) the nice features from others.
If you have any experience with ReSharper from JetBrain, you will see what a huge COPY has MS made this time...
anyway, as a MS Dev, there is nothing to lose though ...

I have been using ReSharper only for 5 days and I can see some nice benefits but in my opinion most of them were supposed to be in Visual Studio anyway. Visual Studio evolves , demands increase and new features will be implemented in Visual Studio anyway if there is ReSharper or not and even the features are same or similar...

1.) Yes please stop the PIP or find a better position. You often cant read anything.

2.) I dont think its a good idea to use hundreds of external tools. The most important features should be included in VS directly. If there is a nice feature that another application used, then why not copy it. On the other side I dont see a problem if someone else copies a feature of VS like Java did with the for each loop from C#.

I think we need a more revolutionary editing ideas. It has no Xfactor! At least the extensibility will possibly make some of the following features possible.

Hi

I think we need a more revolutionary editing ideas. It has no Xfactor! At least the extensibility will possibly make some of the following features possible.

What about ?

CodeBaking http://tinyurl.com/bdfhcx

Code Snippets should have context http://tinyurl.com/aovnnl

Abstract the codefile from the language http://tinyurl.com/cs77mc

More CodeGen, and 1 reason why CodeGen does not get used as much as it should

(why is it not integrated with RTE?)  http://tinyurl.com/dle6cm

Jonathan

My thoughts:

On the unit testing features, have you considered having an "extension method" on non existent methods or classes that is called Generate. When you hit tab VS would then generate the method. Saves have to hit CTRL+. which would make it faster than you would think.

What I would love to see in Visual Studio in the future is the ability to use the editor as a "worksheet". Maybe the use of WPF to render the editing surface may allow this?

An excellent example of this is Mathematica http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/index.html. Regions of the page are code, regions are interactive, and regions are presentation output.

In Visual Studio we could use this concept to include unit test results or generated HTML documentation. Imagine if you could have an interactive grid inline in the editor that you could use to test functionality of the method you're working on.

Obviously there are plenty of times when this kind of bloat is undesirable, but I think it could be fantastic where you need code to be highly documented.

In terms of the source, it could probably be added into the existing triple-slash XML comment system. Visual Studio could optionally render these features (allow it to be switched off for performance), other editors would see comments only.

An interesting video on several counts: highlights of VS2010 code navigation improvements, an illustration of TDD style and how VS2010 will support that style, and the slick Silverlight presentation that excellently combined the presentation with the presenter video and 3D effects. Nice work and thanks.

Drew,

I think that the comment was a valid one. 

We understand that you are aiming to keep the videos casual, but at the end of the day you are representing a larger entity than yourself. I don't believe that anyone is asking you to change how you work, nor the environment that best suits your needs, my office also bears a resemblance to a dorm room, however when providing a showcase for a product on which I am working, it would look very amateurish and unprofessional if I were to bring my intended audience into "my world".

I believe the point being made was a constructive criticism, to some the college logo is obviously a distraction, and since you now work for Microsoft and not your college, perhaps a Microsoft Logo might be a little more appropriate.

With that said ... great video, thanks for the insight and keep up the good work :o)

I think the colored tabs would be pretty useful. Group them by colors. And have that match up with a project or folder or in a project, etc... I like that MS is giving us the tools to customize our development environments fairly easily. And there is no sense in MS bloating the application for everyone with all these options, when all these customizations are really based on the developer's preferences anyway. You put in what you need or what you like, while keeping Visual Studio lighter for the core application.

Very Notepad++ and JetBrains Re-Sharper.

I like the quicksearch, but one thing that I would still like to see (and haven't seen yet - or got hold of the CTP) is a function outline view for javascript files. Something like the drop down list for selecting methods in a code file and like the outline view in Aptana. Working with Javascript files in Visual Studio is still a pain.

I guess I won't be paying for the next upgrade to Resharper! Oh well, it was a good company while it lasted. I hope you guys at least offered jobs to the lead developers from JetBrains.

From what I've seen so far, my favorites are:

• Highlight references-this is intiuitive and subtle but will be a big help.
• The code navigation features-I'm always interested in easier ways to navigate projects and solutions.  Who wants to waste time clicking around.
• Code editor extensibility-This will encourage the general public to create code editor improvements that are like Wordpress plugins for the code editor.

Keep the videos coming.

New "Generate This" functionality is so cool!!  I will write article on this in VSTS2010.net which is a team blog for VSTS2010 in Korea and introduce this new cool functionality to Korean Developers. Thanks for nice job.

Where is the PianoKeys adornment sample located at?

I can't seem to find it anywhere.

Drew, maybe you'll read this and be able to help with an issue.

When you type something like if ( true ) and hit <enter> it always tabs over in case you want a single statement, but then if you do { it moves back and then you have to hit <enter> and do } then <up-arrow> then <enter> again. It would be really super duper if VS would FINALLY allow you to simply type a { and then automatically provide the } and add a new line between them tabbed over!

Guess it's little late to comment on this video, nevertheless I will try to add my $.02. Selection of scope in "Call  hierarchy" should include 4th element "All open documents", similar to Search window. This makes possible to define "custom scope" of analysis (or search) - developer just keeps open the files he is interested in.