Comment Feed for Channel 9 - GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman http://media.ch9.ms/ch9/9c32/721b7705-7d1b-4a0e-a64d-1d4a14009c32/C9GoingNative9CppLINQRxC_220.jpg Channel 9 - GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman LINQ is one of those modern technologies missing from the C++ toolbox. By extension, so is Rx (Reactive Extensions), which of course is LINQ at its core... Well, today we're happy to announce that this is no longer the case. Erik Meijer's team is delivering on their promise of a native Rx. It's not available for download yet, but the work is being done and great progress has been made! Rock and roll. Aaron Lahman is the newest member of Erik Meijer's gang of stellar developers. Erik and team are cranking away at pushing LINQ everywhere. Here, we meet Aaron and geek out about C++ LINQ (it's a modern library... Aaron's not extending the language....) and RxC (that's C as in C (not C++)—why C? Why not RxC++? Does it really matter?...) Here's a trivial example employing C++ LINQ: vector<int> some_primes(size_t howMany) { auto xs = from(int_range(0, INT_MAX)) .where(is_prime) .take(howMany); return xs.to_vector(); // or: vector<int>(begin(xs), end(xs)); } Table of Contents: [00:00] GoingNative(); //Charles flies solo for this episode. Make sure you check out the sessions from Developing Windows 8 Metro style apps with C++ event. This is the only place to learn (deeply) about WRL and C++ + XAML + DX, for example. Herb Sutter's keynote is excellent, of course. [03:00] Charles interviews software developer Aaron Lahman. Aaron explains (whiteboard and demo included) the work he's doing building a LINQ library for C++ and Reactive Extensions for C. Aaron is great at explaining what he's doing (and why he's doing it). Thank you, Aaron! Go Rx!! [39:58] ~GoingNative(); en Sun, 19 May 2013 23:05:18 GMT Sun, 19 May 2013 23:05:18 GMT Rev9 Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman Now you're talkin'!  This sounds really interesting!

 

posted by ryanb

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744417767994734 Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:22:56 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744417767994734 ryanb Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman I have to watch the full video, but will this library be able to be used outside of Windows development?  It will be great to have to develop Windows apps, but would be insanely powerful for other types of software development.  Either way, keep up the great work.  I'll update this comment after watching the vid this weekend Smiley

posted by JamWils

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744477674413096 Mon, 04 Jun 2012 23:02:47 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744477674413096 JamWils Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman Hey guys,

Very excited to see this. I had been working on my own implementation (http://sourceforge.net/projects/qlang/?source=directory) and I'll be happy to have a correction of my work by a "stellar" developer Wink

posted by JulienNitard

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744548582064421 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 01:00:58 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744548582064421 JulienNitard Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman Oh, heard about that almost 3 years ago IIRC ......

posted by felix9

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744648435912481 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:47:23 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744648435912481 felix9 Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman @felix9: Did you watch this?
C

posted by Charles

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744652510073627 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:54:11 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744652510073627 Charles Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman posted by Anonymous

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744659441420867 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:05:44 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744659441420867 Anonymous Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman You know about two years ago I got so disillusioned with Microsoft's attitude towards their native code stack and associated tool chain that I went and bought a MacBook, paid up to join the iOS developer program and well... have grown to respect Clang and UIKit etc. Then about a year ago, after a decade of managed code 'tyranny' Wink I find Microsoft is pouring more love into their native offering than I can member in almost 2 decades of programming with their C++ implementation. It's looking more and more like OS X might end up mostly being a glorified boot loader for Windows 8 and VS2012 for me Smiley

Having LINQ and Rx onside is going to be damn useful when it comes to luring managed folks out of their comfort zone. A little surprised to see this coming from Erik's crew, thought he was all about the .NET - but I'm not complaining. This. rocks. More please. 

I've love to see Microsoft provide a native code, Standard Library friendly, XML library that didn't take a dependency on System.Xml plumbing, WinRT and if possible the IE XML DLLs. In other words source code.

Very pleased to see a new episode of Going Native, really hope you keep this going beyond the official launch of Visual Studio 2012 and Windows 8. You're going to have to hold down the 'Undo' key for a little while longer until at the very least we get some parity in library functionality.

posted by tomkirbygreen

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744667581280936 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:19:18 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744667581280936 tomkirbygreen Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman posted by Ivan Cukic

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744800752078512 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:01:15 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744800752078512 Ivan Cukic Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman @Ivan Cukic: but that's not open for us to see in anyway ?

posted by JulienNitard

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744863731105612 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:46:13 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744863731105612 JulienNitard Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman posted by web optimization

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744882268864698 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:17:06 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634744882268864698 web optimization Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman Fantastic ... will watch later....

posted by Richard.Hein

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745085899572815 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:56:29 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745085899572815 Richard.Hein Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman

, Charles wrote

@felix9: Did you watch this?
C

Well, I had not yet when I wrote the comment above, and I have watched it now, why ?

You said its been talked about in PDC10, but I thought someone had talked about a possible port of Rx to C++ in early 2010 or even 2009, could be false memory though. Tongue Out

 

posted by felix9

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745117954258687 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:49:55 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745117954258687 felix9 Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman @felix9: You seemed sure it had been done (I misinterpreted your statement...). As mentioned in the preamble and beginning of the video, RxC was first discussed at PDC10 on C9 Live with Erik Meijer...

C

posted by Charles

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745139144333354 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:25:14 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745139144333354 Charles Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman Oh boy! oh boy! oh boy! This makes me SOOOO happy!

I have had LINQ envy for my C++ code so much that I had rolled my own C++ "LINQ" like code a couple years ago. But having something from MS is so much better.  Big Smile

 

Denzil

posted by Denzil

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745144216773027 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:33:41 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745144216773027 Denzil Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman Looking forward to this.  Hope MS follows the pro-standardization direction that Herb Sutter has been trying to set.

@dot_tom: I agree - a standard, source-format, portable XML library is very much needed.  (And a JSON library, a TCP/IP library, and an HTTP library.  Likely all built on an async task/futures-based runtime.)

Who knows?  If this keeps up, maybe I can switch from C# to C++ a few years sooner than I planned!  (I'm not going to get my hopes up just yet, though.)

posted by Lars Kemmann

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745255101529703 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:38:30 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745255101529703 Lars Kemmann Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman @Lars Kemmann: Casablanca, though not a standard (it's an incubation project at this point), is a move in the right direction re modern client-server (HTTP, REST, JSON, etc) libraries for C++. It also employs an Actor-based concurrency model.

Have you checked it out? You mentioned JSON, HTTP... Worth a look-see. And some developer feedback, too Smiley

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/devlabs/hh974325

C

posted by Charles

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745262262173780 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:50:26 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745262262173780 Charles Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman posted by Lenny

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745267548855183 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:59:14 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745267548855183 Lenny Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman If VisualC++ team can push more libraries out then I guess C++ from Microsoft is going in the right direction.

I am VERY VERY HAPPY WITH THE NEW "VISUAL STUDIO C++ IDE"... I have to say that you guys did a very good job with the C++ IDE.

posted by freefly

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745316004649869 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:20:00 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745316004649869 freefly Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman posted by poss taridli

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745660539287726 Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:54:13 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745660539287726 poss taridli Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman

Did Microsoft change cmd so that it works like bash now?

It think it's power shell.

LINQ in C++ looks a lot like boost::range on steroids. This is very promising and I can't wait to try it. I am tired of wrting code with the STL algorithms which do not compose as nicely as LINQ and it is one of the things that I miss most when programming in C++ and not in C#.

What I do not get though, is why using C for Rx. Is it because the library that was wrapped was in C or is this a general decision? I doubt that people programming in C are really interested in Rx and using Rx in C seems to be very complicated. Why not doing all this in C++?

An Rx interface to the async stuff in WinRT might be an interesting showcase.

Bernd

posted by rab36

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745691520886731 Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:45:52 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634745691520886731 rab36 Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman Very intrigued who the people they're working with are who are looking for C ... Devil

posted by contextfree`

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634746320901720771 Thu, 07 Jun 2012 02:14:50 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634746320901720771 contextfree` Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman
But I've got to ask. The biggest things that the STL has that I miss in in Linq.Net are well defined complexity guarantees and exception guarantees.

If I call Count on a pseudo container that wraps a random access container will it perform better than one based on a fwd container? And will it be able to make that optimisation at compile time?

posted by Indranil

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747063508174765 Thu, 07 Jun 2012 22:52:30 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747063508174765 Indranil Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman Definitely something I'm looking forward to testing! In the meanwhile I'll give this a try:

http://code.google.com/p/boolinq/

posted by BFotland

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747478285642082 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:23:48 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747478285642082 BFotland Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman This is great news!!!

posted by AceHack

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747628631869611 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:34:23 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747628631869611 AceHack Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman This looks excellent! A couple of simple questions:

1. Will the generated collections (ex. powers) work with rage-based for?

2. Will the generated collections work with the function form of begin and end? ex. for (auto i = begin(powers); i != end(powers); i++)

It seems that I'll need to to_vector() if I want to use those but just wanted to confirm.

posted by schroedl

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747998330046733 Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:50:33 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747998330046733 schroedl Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman I see the trivial example above mentions begin() and end() so the ans. to my Q #2 is probably Yes. cool.

posted by schroedl

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747999455513027 Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:52:25 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634747999455513027 schroedl Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman There was a bug in VS editor in 32:04, the collapse [-] sign was next to line 24 but should be next to line 18 or 19

posted by DiryBoy

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634749126251707889 Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:10:25 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634749126251707889 DiryBoy Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman @schroedl: Yes, function-form begin/end and the range-based for-loop are designed to automatically pick up anything that has begin/end members, so they should just work out of the box with this library. No idea why the example didn't use range-based for.

 

posted by CornedBee

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634750160190987169 Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:53:39 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634750160190987169 CornedBee Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman @rab36:

Did Microsoft change cmd so that it works like bash now?

Actually, that's just cmd.exe, with a custom prompt (try "prompt /?") and a few aliases (try "doskey /?"). It's just a muscle memory thing for me.

 

posted by AaronLa

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634763420135755498 Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:13:33 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634763420135755498 AaronLa Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman @Indranil:

Looks really promising!

But I've got to ask. The biggest things that the STL has that I miss in in Linq.Net are well defined complexity guarantees and exception guarantees.

If I call Count on a pseudo container that wraps a random access container will it perform better than one based on a fwd container? And will it be able to make that optimisation at compile time?

Good question! Complexity guarantees have always been a bit messy for lazy evaluation. I'm not offering an excuse for Linq to objects, just general information. Everything just creates a wrapper, and the behavior of that wrapper depends on what's inside it and so forth.

For instance, consider "r = Range(1, n); r.SelectMany(x=>r.Take(1<<x)).Where(x=>x==1)" -- no Linq operator takes exponential time, but each element of this composition takes exponential steps to compute (1, 2, 4, 8, ...).

That said, I'll do what I can to make sure that the performance characteristics are, at least, predictable.

~

As for optimizations, I looking at how much we can preserve. Generally, aggregations are always O(N), but we can optimize special cases, such as zero-argument count. Filtering is amenable to bidirectional traversal only, as we need to skip an indeterminate number of elements.

posted by AaronLa

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634763439007903444 Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:45:00 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634763439007903444 AaronLa Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman posted by Johnathon

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634783092799477021 Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:41:19 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634783092799477021 Johnathon Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman posted by Andrew

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634828989354768101 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:35:35 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634828989354768101 Andrew Re: GoingNative 9: LINQ for C/C++, Native Rx, Meet Aaron Lahman posted by Damien

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634837931212090143 Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:58:41 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-9-LINQ-for-C-Native-Rx-RxC-Meet-Aaron-Lahman#c634837931212090143 Damien