Welcome to the latest video in the weekly WF/WCF Screencast series. This week, we switch back to a series of WF screencasts.
In this short video, CSD MVP
Matt Milner
from
PluralSight guides the viewer through how to use the ReceiveActivity within Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) to allow WCF clients to invoke the WF 3.5 workflow.
Matt starts with an existing WF sequential workflow (for more info, see
Creating your First Sequential Workflow), and adds a WF 3.5 ReceiveActivity to the beginning of the workflow, and setup the activity to process the incoming work. To configure the activity, we add a service contract and a child activities to the ReceiveActivity
that will process the request and return a result to the calling client and continue doing additional work after the workflow responds.
Along the way, Matt configures the workflow to create new instances of the workflow when a WCF call is received, and sets up the workflow in the WorkflowServiceHost that was added in 3.5. We will configure the host with an initial endpoint, add a MEX behavior,
and then opens up the host. Matt then uses the WCF Test Client (discussed in
Creating your First WCF Service) to interface with the hosted WCF workflow service to step through the workflow in the debugger.
For additional information on WF, please check out the
WF Dev Center on MSDN and the
.NET Endpoint team blog. For more information on classes offered by Aaron and the PluralSight folks, check out their catalog of
instructor led courses and
new online courses that cover a variety of Microsoft technologies, ranging from .NET v3.5 to WSS to BizTalk server.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
The downsides are: no embeddable player by default (which would be great for blogging) and the video links aren't attached to the feeds. I believe the accepted assumption is that most people use screencasts when needed, as opposed to subscribing to them like a typical 'show'.
That being said, I'll follow up with the Channel9 folks to get a more complete answer. Would there be a preference for video feeds for the screencast videos (and having them show up in the same format/player as the podcasts) over the current posting format?
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close