C&B 2011 Panel: Herb Sutter, Andrei Alexandrescu and Scott Meyers - Concurrency and Parallelism
- Posted: Nov 15, 2011 at 6:00 AM
- 49,934 Views
- 3 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
I was able to attend C++ and Beyond 2011 and it was a tremendous experience. The technical depth and C++ goodness was profound and lasted for 3 whole days (and two evenings). Thanks Andrei Alexandrescu, Scott Meyers and Herb Sutter for allowing me to crash your affair with my camera - which was perhaps too big and too advanced for the likes of me - still, I was abe to capture some great content like this interactive panel on Concurrency and Parallelism with Scott, Andrei and Herb. Great questions from attendees. Note that this is the second in a series of three panels from C++ and Beyond 2011 that will appear on C9 over the coming months.
Make sure to check out all the C&B 2011 content we're lucky enough to have stored on C9 ![]()
Enjoy! Learn!
Table of contents (click on the time code link to move the player to that point in time...):
[00:00] Using multiple cores for useful work...
[01:56] Does C++AMP build on PPL?
[02:48] What about operating system scheduling for GPU operations?
[03:49] Transition from platform-specific memory models to a standard(ized) C++ memory model (C++11's MM, to be specific...).
[06:41] Is there a performance penalty associated with a standard C++ memory model?
[09:18] What about functional languages/techniques (with respect to parallel and concurrent programming)?
[15:44] Which performance pitfalls we may pitfall into?
[16:13] What about the work on ranges and wouldn't they help parallelism?
[20:34] Fortran arrays have things like slices and strides. What about C++AMP?
[22:42] Parallel debugging...
[23:30] How baked is C++AMP?
[25:26] On SIMD and MIMD...
[34:20] Computation-following-data versus data-following-computation...
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
Awesome that there will be a C++ and Beyond 2012! You definitely want to be there.
C
No comments on a C++ video? This is quite rare indeed.
Good talk, thanks for making it available.
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close