Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Dave Campbell: Inside SQL Services http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/previewImages/100/435118_100x75.jpg Channel 9 - Dave Campbell: Inside SQL Services Technical Fellow Dave Campbell digs into the "fabric" of Azure's SQL Services. What are the current capabilities of SQL Services and how will they evolve? Can you upload stored procedures to the cloud and expect them to run? What does extending a shrink-wrapped application to the world of distributed cloud services really mean? Listen in. Learn. en Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:49:13 GMT Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:49:13 GMT Rev9 Re: Dave Campbell: Inside SQL Services goldust by the most venerable Technical Fellows.

I feel like a kid in a sweet shop at the moment, completely hysterical!

posted by vesuvius

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633607296150000000 Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:40:15 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633607296150000000 vesuvius Re: Dave Campbell: Inside SQL Services Much more to come (but I can't tell what it's about or who's being interviewed).

Keep on watching and listening. Of course, please talk back. We need you feedback. So, what do think of Azure? How will you innovate on it?
C

posted by Charles

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633607301460000000 Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:49:06 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633607301460000000 Charles Re: Dave Campbell: Inside SQL Services
(just minus the metadata stuff)

posted by Atachi

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633607949590000000 Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:49:19 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633607949590000000 Atachi Re: Dave Campbell: Inside SQL Services Too bad it's called SQL Services.
If it's not a SQL Server (which is presumably a good thing), it would make sense to drop the SQL moniker all together and name it something like Cloud Database Services. If it does offer a SQL query interface, that's fine, but it doesn't mean that SQL should be part of the name.
If it offered a solid relational calculus DSL and no SQL support, no one would complain.

As soon as you guys are building a new database service, why don't you take it a bit further and allow defining entities and relations between them as predicates in a semi-natural language? Relvars are predicates, according to the relational database theory. Why not to preserve the relvar's original meaning in the database metadata? That would be a competitive advantage.

PS: What's that S-LINK thing, anyways? Is it a subset of LINK or a superset of thereof?

posted by sokhaty

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633607967470000000 Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:19:07 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633607967470000000 sokhaty Re: Dave Campbell: Inside SQL Services
Kudos to the SDS team for releasing Ruby implementations for SQL Services. For the rest of us!Smiley
http://www.azurejournal.com/2008/10/ruby-and-sql-data-services-sdk/" target="_self">http://www.azurejournal.com/2008/10/ruby-and-sql-data-services-sdk

-PT.

posted by Peter Thomas

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633616087350000000 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:52:15 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Dave-Campbell-Inside-SQL-Services#c633616087350000000 Peter Thomas