Project JSMeter: JavaScript Performance Analysis in the Real World
- Posted: Mar 28, 2010 at 5:03 PM
- 60,802 Views
- 6 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
I watched this two weeks ago and skimmed the paper. Now I have this question: Have you studied the number of (simultaneous) XmlHttpRequests most web apps make?
I just FW'd it to the two Bens.
C
Thanks for the question. We did not measure the number of simultaneous XmlHttpRequests in our current study, although that's an interesting question. There are a number of additional measures like that including the ways the typical WebApps interact with the DOM that we are also interesting in knowing. While we do not have concrete plans right now for collecting such data, if we do get it, we'll make it available from our project website.
Thank you for your time answering my question.
My question arose when I was reading this proposal to add a priority property to XmlHttpRequests, but I had my doubts whether it would be a useful addition.
There's a blog post about the report: www.belshe.com/2010/03/31/how-to-tune-a-porsche/
I wonder how the authors would respond to that.
Thanks for your question. We are aware of the related blog post and disagree with the conclusions the author reaches. Specifically, the analogy with the elephant, while quite visually provacative, is inaccurate. The implication is that browser users want to drive their browsers on a racetrack all day (e.g., the benchmarks). Browser users want high performance, but not for small benchmarks that don't correspond to their daily experience. A better analogy would be to consider driving your browser down a city street in traffic. In that case, which we argue is the common case, the fact that your browser performs like a Porsche on a racetrack isn't as meaningful. What the user cares about is how it handles in traffic. We are presenting this research at the WebApps 2010 conference in Boston, on June 23, 2010 (http://www.usenix.org/events/webapps10/).
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close