Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Mike Flasko and Anthony Jones: Winsock and .NET Protocol Agnostic Development http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/previewImages/100/249229_100x75.jpg Channel 9 - Mike Flasko and Anthony Jones: Winsock and .NET Protocol Agnostic Development Mike Flasko, Program Manager, and Anthony Jones, Software Development Engineer, dig into Winsock and .NET protocol agnostic network development and elaborate on some of the new APIs in the re-written Windows Vista networking stack. Tune in and meet some of the people behind the APIs you rely on when programming network apps on Windows and learn how to build the next generation of network applications by leveraging IPv6. Resources: Winsock IPv6 Porting GuideIPv6 WebsiteBlogThink you have found a bug or have a feature ask/suggestion? Report it here. en Sat, 25 May 2013 19:16:24 GMT Sat, 25 May 2013 19:16:24 GMT Rev9 Re: Mike Flasko and Anthony Jones: Winsock and .NET Protocol Agnostic Development
In the agnostic C code example, where the Winsock "service" is IPV4 only, but the PC on which it is running has IPv6 as well, surely there is going to be a performance/user experience issue related to timeouts, unless I'm misinterpreting what was said. eg If getaddrinfo() returns multiple IP Addresses, IPv6 and v4, the IPv6 ones are listed first, right ?


EDIT: Removed detracting (grumpy old man) postscript.

posted by RichardRudek

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016144400000000 Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:47:20 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016144400000000 RichardRudek Re: Mike Flasko and Anthony Jones: Winsock and .NET Protocol Agnostic Development
RichardRudek wrote:
Hmm.

EDIT: Removed detracting (grumpy old man) postscript.


What was the postscript?
C

posted by Charles

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016281700000000 Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:36:10 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016281700000000 Charles Re: Mike Flasko and Anthony Jones: Winsock and .NET Protocol Agnostic Development
Charles wrote:

What was the postscript?
C


It wasn't about you, Charles.

Good Interview, BTW.

posted by RichardRudek

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016530670000000 Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:31:07 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016530670000000 RichardRudek Re: Mike Flasko and Anthony Jones: Winsock and .NET Protocol Agnostic Development
RichardRudek wrote:

Charles wrote: 
What was the postscript?
C


It wasn't about you, Charles.

Good Interview, BTW.



Thanks.

Channel 9 and the interviews I do are never about me. Never have been. Never will be. Think of me as just a voice behind a camera that communicates with people in front of the camera (most important, always) talking about stuff they truly understand.

At any rate, I am more interested in what the postscript contained from a developer feedback point of view, assuming you were venting about networking or C or something that the interviewees (most important, always) could engage....

C

posted by Charles

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016534110000000 Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:36:51 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016534110000000 Charles Re: Mike Flasko and Anthony Jones: Winsock and .NET Protocol Agnostic Development
Charles wrote:

[snip]

At any rate, I am more interested in what the postscript contained from a developer feedback point of view, assuming you were venting about networking or C or something that the interviewees (most important, always) could engage....
C


Ah, that's why said it was detracting.

I bitched about about the use of the word "pound" for the "#" symbol (hash or hatch). Then went on to question why it was cool to say "whack" instead of slash... grumpy old man stuff... there, I said it... Smiley

posted by RichardRudek

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016539890000000 Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:46:29 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633016539890000000 RichardRudek Re: Mike Flasko and Anthony Jones: Winsock and .NET Protocol Agnostic Development posted by brianleahy

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633021913130000000 Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:01:53 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mike-Flasko-and-Anthony-Jones-Winsock-and-NET-Protocol-Agnostic-Development#c633021913130000000 brianleahy