Mike Flasko and Anthony Jones: Winsock and .NET Protocol Agnostic Development
- Posted: Dec 12, 2006 at 12:52 PM
- 22,806 Views
- 6 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
In the agnostic C code example, where the Winsock "service" is IPV4 only, but the PC on which it is running has IPv6 as well, surely there is going to be a performance/user experience issue related to timeouts, unless I'm misinterpreting what was said. eg If getaddrinfo() returns multiple IP Addresses, IPv6 and v4, the IPv6 ones are listed first, right ?
EDIT: Removed detracting (grumpy old man) postscript.
What was the postscript?
C
It wasn't about you, Charles.
Good Interview, BTW.
Thanks.
Channel 9 and the interviews I do are never about me. Never have been. Never will be. Think of me as just a voice behind a camera that communicates with people in front of the camera (most important, always) talking about stuff they truly understand.
At any rate, I am more interested in what the postscript contained from a developer feedback point of view, assuming you were venting about networking or C or something that the interviewees (most important, always) could engage....
C
Ah, that's why said it was detracting.
I bitched about about the use of the word "pound" for the "#" symbol (hash or hatch). Then went on to question why it was cool to say "whack" instead of slash... grumpy old man stuff... there, I said it...
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close