<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/styles/xslt/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:c9="http://channel9.msdn.com">
<channel>
	<title>Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Dan Johansson - Industrial &amp;amp; Financial Systems (IFS)</title>
	<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Inside+Out/Dan-Johansson-Industrial-amp-Financial-Systems-IFS/RSS"></atom:link>
	
	<description>
Here, we talk to Dan Johansson, CIO of the Swedish company Industrial and Financial Systems (IFS). We have a candid conversation&amp;nbsp;about the problems his company solves and&amp;nbsp;the technologies they use. We also get some good, honest&amp;nbsp;feedback from him regarding
 our software. 

This is the first episode in the customer-oriented Channel 9 show Inside Out where we focus on the people who use some of our technologies to innovate and solve problems in the real world.
</description>
	<link></link>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:20:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>Rev9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Dan Johansson - Industrial &amp;amp; Financial Systems (IFS)</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[It’s interesting to learn that smart clients are used by enterprise applications vendors. Personally I think that smart clients and click once deployment is one of the most overlooked feature of the .Net framework. I also wonder why MS dynamics application
 does not leverage that technology. Even though MS CRM is a masterpiece in building web applications, the product would definitely benefit if the GUI was a richer smart client application!<p>posted by footloose</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Inside+Out/Dan-Johansson-Industrial-amp-Financial-Systems-IFS#c632996538050000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:10:05 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Inside+Out/Dan-Johansson-Industrial-amp-Financial-Systems-IFS#c632996538050000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>footloose</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Dan Johansson - Industrial &amp;amp; Financial Systems (IFS)</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<blockquote>
<div>footloose wrote:</div>
<div>&#65279;It’s interesting to learn that smart clients are used by enterprise applications vendors. Personally I think that smart clients and click once deployment is one of the most overlooked feature of the .Net framework. I also wonder why MS dynamics application
 does not leverage that technology. Even though MS CRM is a masterpiece in building web applications, the product would definitely benefit if the GUI was a richer smart client application!</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I agree.&nbsp; Web page is fine for browsing and such, but I don't want it as a primary app UI - no thanks.&nbsp;&nbsp;More WPF and less html imo.<p>posted by staceyw</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Inside+Out/Dan-Johansson-Industrial-amp-Financial-Systems-IFS#c632996571550000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:05:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Inside+Out/Dan-Johansson-Industrial-amp-Financial-Systems-IFS#c632996571550000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>staceyw</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: Dan Johansson - Industrial &amp;amp; Financial Systems (IFS)</title>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
<p>I had&nbsp;the chance&nbsp;to work in a customisation of the IFS applications 6 years ago, when they were using only Oracle as data and business tire. I came from a C&#43;&#43; perspective and had to adapt to the Oracle procedural-like kind of language. I found IFS development
 environment impressive. They made Oracle packages programmable as objects, they were simulating inheritance, something close to&nbsp;how XWindows (X11) was&nbsp;programmed in pure C and #DEFINE's&nbsp;. There I saw the first serialization engine which acted as the transport
 mechanism between layers (written in PL/SQL). Pure interfaces with hidden implementation, modules, asynchronous jobs, long running transactions, compensations, and so on. Hope I'm not violating any copyright laws <img src='http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/content/images/emoticons/emotion-4.gif' alt='Tongue Out' /><br>
<br>
I was impressed by the architecture they were having back then and I am sure they made big steps. Maybe Dan can share with us more of the challanges they overcome over the years. I liked his interview and want to have more. I belive that the challanges we are
 confronting now are not new, they were 6-7 years ago: modularity, decoupling, deployment, etc. Some of us made it possible without using .NET, J2EE&nbsp;or other technologies (IFS is a living example), so the solution does not lie in the technology but somewere
 else. Thanks Dan for pointing this out.<br>
<br>
Real-life examples are very important for a platform provide like Microsoft. I salute the initiaitve and hope for more.
</p>
<p>posted by bogdan.nedelcu</p>]]>
		</description>
		<link>http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Inside+Out/Dan-Johansson-Industrial-amp-Financial-Systems-IFS#c633002567740000000</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Inside+Out/Dan-Johansson-Industrial-amp-Financial-Systems-IFS#c633002567740000000</guid>
		<dc:creator>bogdan.nedelcu</dc:creator>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>