Ping: Episode 6
- Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 2:05 PM
- 33,425 Views
- 27 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
The thing about OnLive is that.. even if it works, it'll only work for the people where they've been able to put datacenters in the vincinity of. So that'd be a small part of the US, for starters. Unless they can cater to the whole of the US and parts of Asia or something within the next two years, I don't see it picking up steam. And that's all assuming that it actually works as well as they advertise, which I still doubt. I mean, how can the input lag possibly be bearable? I can't even turn on all the bells and whistles on my TV, because the tv's processing alone will cause too much lag between button presses and a resulting image onscreen.
I'd like to know what the "Games for Windows" division at Microsoft has to say about the future of Hardcore PC gaming.
GO SLUGS!
as for onlive.. well.. as laura said, there was the phantom.. it worked so poorly it was never released
sure onlive is diffrent as it does all its rendering on the back end, but thats ALOT of computing power.. considering the massive datacenters that run WoW, i find it hard to belive that such a system a) could scale, b) be competitive price wise, c) provide a good experience for the user..
just from a visual standpoint, we're used to completly uncompressed, artifact free, super crisp graphics at 60+ fps.. no way they can maintain that fidelity and still compress enough to have low latency. and thats just the graphics, then theres the game logic and the sound processing.. their servers are going to fry
every year this happens.. idiot journalists claim the death of the pc as a gameing platform.. this year they extended that to all the consoles
also, yay for proper live login at channel9
Pick me randomnly.
I also have the same problem as Laura that most stuff is just too big for me. They're either in women's (more like little girl size) or big bearded Linux geek size.
What about a guest one week?
I like what you are doing so far (and I too love Twitter) What's the internal buzz about Azure?
I had to share this Polar Bear Video!
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close