TWC9: Roborazzi, Building Metro, Mango resources, .NET 4.5 Poster, 100 VS/TFS Tools
- Posted: Nov 05, 2011 at 5:45 AM
- 42,615 Views
- 8 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
This week on Channel 9, Dan and Brian discuss the week's top developer news, including:
Picks of the Week!
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
Sound isn't syncronized
But great show 
Edit: Oh never mind, looks like it was just my computer
You have the stereo mic with the wrong inputs, the left sound comes from right and vice versa, its confusing. And it is not of my computer, I checked the headphones!!
Ha, true, they are reversed.
IPv5 there is a thread about it here: http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2003/06/what_ever_happened_to_ipv5.html
Basically the header for the connection has a place where it says what version of the protocol you are using. "5" was already assigned to another protocol (ST streaming IP protocol) so they had to go to v6 for the headers to work out. The proposal for "IPv5" supposedly happened in 1994 and was supposed to be implemented by 1996. Not sure how close it is to IPv6 but it seems like it had a lot of the same features, 16bit addresses vs 4 etc. I guess there wasn't a clear need for it so "5" got assigned to something else, and now we are finally getting to the point where the larger addresses are necessary and they have to skip a version.
@madscientist: Nice! Thanks
Thanks for linking to my .NET Framework 4.5 poster. Not sure about your C# 5 naming, but Anders called it that in his Build talk, so that was good enough for me
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/BUILD/BUILD2011/TOOL-816T
@Jouni Heikniemi:Oh very interesting - well I'm certainly not one to disagree with Anders! Thanks for clarifying.
Thanks for talking about the PowerShell Get-RoslynInfo piece I wrote. I liked the ideas for ways to extend it. I will be adding that.
Thanks again
Doug
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close