TWC9: Visual Studio 2012 Update 1, Windows Phone 8, Hilo and more...
- Posted: Nov 30, 2012 at 7:32 PM
- 58,294 Views
- 5 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
This week on Channel 9, Dan and Brian discuss the week's top developer news, including;
Picks of the Week!
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
we all know what happens when I'm allowed out of my office
I like today
Have to say, the HyperV requirement is (so far) the most annoying part of Windows Phone development. My laptop (which runs VirtualBox virtual machines without any issue) apparently doesn't have support for "SLAT", one of the requirements of HyperV. As such, I cannot run the Windows Phone emulator, which is a huge stumbling block to development. "Fixing" this means buying a phone and paying for the developer account, or buying a machine that supports SLAT for HyperV on Windows 8 (which I don't think I've ever seen in specification lists on computers)? Expensive.
@Yakko Warner: i5 or i7 should do it. verify the processor can do virtualization. In my opinion, if you are doing mobile development, you should have a physical device on top of using the emulator. I have seen apps work amazing if you use a mouse and then when they are deployed on a physic device, the hit areas are so tiny the app is near useless.
True, if and when I get to the point that I want to actually deploy an app, testing on a real device would be a requirement. But first, I want to be able to try it out, dip my toe in the water, before I commit. Having to buy a new computer or a development license for my new phone is a big barrier to just see if I can do it. I've never done XAML or Silverlight (except to follow walkthroughs that just say "do this, now change this tag to read this" where I don't feel like I've learned anything), so in many ways I feel like I'm starting from scratch. Saying I have to go out and buy new hardware if I want to try it out just doesn't work for me.
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close