A Look Behind Mouse 2.0 ver. 2.0
- Posted: May 21, 2010 at 3:46 PM
- 55,180 Views
- 5 Comments
Download
How do I download the videos?
- To download, right click the file type you would like and pick “Save target as…” or “Save link as…”
Why should I download videos from Channel9?
- It's an easy way to save the videos you like locally.
- You can save the videos in order to watch them offline.
- If all you want is to hear the audio, you can download the MP3!
Which version should I choose?
- If you want to view the video on your PC, Xbox or Media Center, download the High Quality WMV file (this is the highest quality version we have available).
- If you'd like a lower bitrate version, to reduce the download time or cost, then choose the Medium Quality WMV file.
- If you have a Zune, WP7, iPhone, iPad, or iPod device, choose the low or medium MP4 file.
- If you just want to hear the audio of the video, choose the MP3 file.
Right click “Save as…”
- High Quality WMV (PC, Xbox, MCE)
- MP3 (Audio only)
- MP4 (iPod, Zune HD)
- Mid Quality WMV (Lo-band, Mobile)
Back in December,
I talked to Dan Rosenfeld about the capacitive version of the Mouse 2.0 project (we also went by the Fab Lab where mice are born).
Hrvoje Benko is a researcher in the Adaptive Systems and Interaction group at
Microsoft Research and is also working on the project. I recently stopped by
Benko's office to get more info and a detailed look at how some of the optical versions of Mouse 2.0 may work.
In this video, Benko walks us through a deconstruction of the Orb mouse prototype and the FTIR (Frustrated Total Internal Reflection) mouse prototype.
In this video, Benko walks us through a deconstruction of the Orb mouse prototype and the FTIR (Frustrated Total Internal Reflection) mouse prototype.
Comments Closed
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Very cool mouse.....
This research is interesting and I'm curious what lessons were learned. I imagine this research delved into new UI concepts. For example, the Orb mouse may feel very much at home if contextual menus were circular instead of up/down. Up/down menus require either a finger swipe (mouse 2.0) or wrist movement (mouse 1.0). Carefully crafted circular menus might only require a tap by the corresponding finger. Whether that would be advantageous or notm who knows.
That's what I was getting at with my question at 4:57. It seemed with these two mouses the focus was on hardware and function more than use planning.
that's awsome
so is the name "fab lab" by the way, just... super..
am guessing that they are also other team is
working on extending .net framework
to adapt with this new clicks and new gestures and so on
thats true ,right?
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close